[Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] The origins of how INGOs got into this process (as opposed to IGO)

[Jim Bikoff]

We strongly agree with Osvaldo.

Jim Bikoff

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 15, 2014, at 4:33 PM, Paul Keating <paul at law.es> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I know I have been absent from the last several calls (family issues), however, I feel that we should address both IGOs and INGOs.  If we don't we run the risk of inconsistency and future conflict.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Paul Keating
> 
>> On 15 Oct 2014, at 9:03 pm, Novoa, Osvaldo <onovoa at antel.com.uy> wrote:
>> 
>> I think that the INGOs were sufficiently considered in the first policy and hat is now been revised.  The revision arises from a request by the GAC, through the NGPC, to modify the decisions with regards to the IGOs acronyms and some on the Red Cross.
>> It is my opinion that we should focus on the IGOs and consider that the measures approved by the GNSO Council regarding the INGOs are sufficient.
>> Best regards,
>> Osvaldo Novoa
>> 
>> 
>>> El 15/10/2014, a las 11:33, George Kirikos <icann at leap.com> escribió:
>>> 
>>> Hi folks,
>>> 
>>> During today's conference call, the topic of how INGOs got into this
>>> process was raised. Researching the mailing list of the prior working
>>> group, I believe the origin was the message at:
>>> 
>>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-igo-ingo/msg00885.html
>>> 
>>> where one of the participants put forward the idea that:
>>> 
>>> "Accreditation by ECOSOC is equivalent to the IGO treaty requirements
>>> and stands in fair stead to business oriented trademarks"
>>> 
>>> which, as Kristine noted in the chatroom during the call (I don't
>>> think the transcript is available yet, but will be) is probably not
>>> correct. i.e. her exact words were "I rather suspect it's much harder
>>> to get included in a treaty than to get on the ECOSOC list..."
>>> 
>>> I agree with Kristine.
>>> 
>>> Anyhow, I thought it would be good to capture this "history", in case
>>> we want to revisit this so-called "rationale" for adding INGOs.
>>> 
>>> Sincerely,
>>> 
>>> George Kirikos
>>> 416-588-0269
>>> http://www.leap.com/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
>>> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp
>> 
>> El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información
>> 
>> 
>> This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
>> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp