[Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] Agenda and documents for next WG call

[Paul Keating]

I do not believe #4 Is correct. The Options are not LIMITED to amending or creating a new system. It also includes issuing a report confirming that no changes are warranted. 

As I have said previously I am not in favor of either amending the current UDRP or creating a new system. I have remained open to any reasoning supporting either but have seen no evidence supporting the desirability or need for a change. I have found it particularly telling that no NGO or INGO has come forward to date although the WG has certainly been pro active in reaching out.  

Sincerely,
Paul Keating, Esq.

> On Apr 28, 2015, at 8:12 PM, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear WG members,
> 
> With apologies for the slight delay, here is the proposed agenda for our next WG call, scheduled for Wednesday 29 April 2015 at 1600 UTC:
> Roll call/updates to SOI
> Summary of GAC advice to ICANN Board concerning protections for IGO names and acronyms (see attached)
> Review status of GNSO work concerning preventative and curative rights protections for IGO names and acronyms (staff to update)
> Discuss merits and disadvantages of amending existing dispute resolution processes compared to developing a new and separate procedure (based on WG discussions from prior meetings)
> Next steps/next meeting
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary
> 
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
> 
> 
> 
> <Compilation of GAC Advice on IGO Protections.docx>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/attachments/20150428/2504af76/attachment.html>