[Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] PLEASE READ: IGO-INGO Curative Rights session at ICANN61

Paul Keating Paul at law.es
Tue Mar 13 21:22:04 UTC 2018 

Mary,

I would lie to speak with Susan.  I am available on BCN time 11am ­ 7pm.

My personal preference is for Option #1 *disregard the UDRP finding PENDING
the determination fo the PDS via Option 4.  In other words I would prefer
the that THIS WG confirm that Option ! Is the recommendation of this WG but
that the matter be formally referred and that the proffered suggestion be
implemented in the interim.

Sincerely,

Paul Raynor Keating, Esq.

Law.es <http://law.es/>

Tel. +34 93 368 0247 (Spain)

Tel. +44.7531.400.177 (UK)
Tel. +1.415.937.0846 (US)

Fax. (Europe) +34 93 396 0810

Fax. (US)(415) 358.4450

Skype: Prk-Spain

email:  Paul at law.es

 

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MAY CONTAIN
INFORMATION SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY/CLIENT OR WORK-PRODUCT PRIVILEGE.  THE
INFORMATION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHOM
IT IS ADDRESSED.  IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, NO WAIVER OF
PRIVILEGE IS MADE OR INTENDED AND YOU ARE REQUESTED TO  PLEASE DELETE THE
EMAIL AND ANY ATTACHMENTS.

 

Circular 230 Disclosure: To assure compliance with Treasury Department rules
governing tax practice, we hereby inform you that any advice contained
herein (including in any attachment) (1) was not written or intended to be
used, and cannot be used, by you or any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding
any penalties that may be imposed on you or any taxpayer and (2) may not be
used or referred to by you or any other person in connection with promoting,
marketing or recommending to another person any transaction or matter
addressed herein.

 

NOTHING CONTAINED IN THIS EMAIL SHALL CONSTITUTE THE FORMATION OF AN
ATTORNEY/CLIENT RELATIONSHIP; SUCH A RELATIONSHIP MAY BE FORMED WITH THIS
FIRM AND ATTORNEY ONLY BY SEPARATE FORMAL WRITTEN ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT,
WHICH THIS IS NOT.  IN THE ABSENCE OF SUCH AN AGREEMENT, NOTHING CONTAINED
HEREIN SHALL CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE
 

From:  Gnso-igo-ingo-crp <gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of
Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>
Date:  Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 9:32 PM
To:  "gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org" <gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org>
Cc:  Heather Forrest <haforrestesq at gmail.com>
Subject:  [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] PLEASE READ: IGO-INGO Curative Rights session
at ICANN61

> Dear Working Group members,
>  
> Following on Susan¹s email (below), please note that the ICANN61 session for
> our Working Group ­ scheduled for Wednesday 14 March from 1700-1830 Puerto
> Rico time ­ will be repurposed as office hours, for any Working Group member
> (either present on site in San Juan or remotely) to meet with Susan, to
> discuss your views on the IGO jurisdictional immunity issue (including the six
> options currently under consideration).
>  
> To facilitate the office hours, and if you are interested in meeting with
> Susan, please be so kind as to fill out this Doodle poll to indicate which
> 10-minute slot you prefer: https://doodle.com/poll/ikwa9hp8cd7sar4h. If you
> will not be physically here but nevertheless wish to meet with Susan, please
> email me or Steve privately to provide us with a phone number that Susan can
> reach you at, for your preferred 10-minute slot.
>  
> As Susan has noted, additional office hours can be scheduled after ICANN61 to
> accommodate those Working Group members who are not available during the
> Wednesday time frame.
>  
> Thank you.
>  
> Cheers
> Mary & Steve
>  
> 
> From: Susan Kawaguchi <susankpolicy at gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, March 9, 2018 at 14:37
> To: "gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org" <gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org>
> Cc: Heather Forrest <haforrestesq at gmail.com>, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>,
> Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org>, "gnso-chairs at icann.org"
> <gnso-chairs at icann.org>
> Subject: [Ext] IGO-INGO Curative Rights PDP WG
> 
>  
> 
> Dear IGO-INGO Curative Rights Policy Development Process Working Group
> members,
>  
> I write as the GNSO Council Liaison to this Working Group, to circulate a
> recommendation from Dr. Heather Forrest, GNSO Chair, which I endorse and
> support. She and I both hope that the proposed approach can be a useful path
> forward in assisting the group to ascertain and develop consensus (if any) on
> the six options under consideration relating to the handling of IGO
> jurisdictional immunity issues where a registrant who has lost a UDRP or URS
> proceeding against an IGO proceeds to file a court claim against that IGO.
>  
> You will find details of the recommended approach in the attached Straw Man
> Paper (prepared by ICANN staff at Heather¹s request) and accompanying Annex. I
> will be very grateful if everyone can take a moment to provide feedback as to
> whether you support the suggested approach or not, since this will allow us
> all to see if the approach may be workable.
>  
> As the Working Group has a session coming up next week at ICANN61 (on
> Wednesday 14 March from 1700-1830 Puerto Rico time), the recommended approach
> also includes a suggestion for how to organize that session. In brief, the
> recommendation is:
>  
> ·      Instead of a regular Working Group meeting or open community session,
> as has been the Working Group¹s practice in recent ICANN meetings, the ICANN61
> session will be run as a form of ³open office hours², where any and all
> Working Group members are invited to discuss their views and questions on the
> topic of IGO jurisdictional immunity with me, including (and especially) the
> six options.
> 
> ·      ICANN policy staff will be on hand, to provide background information
> and process advice, and to assist me with taking accurate notes of the
> session.
> 
> ·      The session will not be recorded, to encourage frank sharing of views
> (note: this is the model that was adopted for a different group relatively
> recently to try to break an impasse in that group).
> 
> ·      Since not everyone will be able to attend the ICANN61 open office hours
> and, more importantly, because some Working Group members may prefer to
> provide their views in private, I will (with ICANN staff assistance) hold
> additional 1:1 or small group conversations (as you may prefer) after ICANN61
> ­ this will most likely be done through Adobe Connect and/or a conference
> phone bridge.
> 
> ·      Following these office hour sessions, I will (with ICANN staff
> assistance) prepare a report for the Working Group on the discussions that
> took place. That report should form the basis for an initial designation of
> consensus levels for each of the six options by Phil and Petter.
> 
> ·      While a non-anonymous poll may be useful at some later stage in this
> iterative process of finding consensus (consistent with the requirements in
> the GNSO Working Group Guidelines), it is not necessary at this present time.
> 
>  
> Thank you ­ and on behalf of Heather, thank you also for taking the time to
> provide me with any and all feedback you may have in light of the procedural
> path forward noted in this message.
>  
> Susan Kawaguchi 
> Councilor for the Business Constituency
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________ Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/attachments/20180313/ed36d89c/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list