<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>I am sorry but I do not see a list of members. If it is there please point it out to me.<br><br><span style="font-size: 13pt;">Paul Keating</span></div><div><br>On 16 Jul 2015, at 1:54 am, Reg Levy <<a href="mailto:reg@mindsandmachines.com">reg@mindsandmachines.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
Paul—
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">She did answer:</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">I do not have the definitive list of members of the “small group”</blockquote>
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">It may be frustrating, but I don’t know what you expect.<br class="">
<div class="">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue';"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 11px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; widows: 2; border-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; text-align: -webkit-auto; border-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; text-align: -webkit-auto; border-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; text-align: -webkit-auto; border-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; text-align: -webkit-auto; border-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; text-align: -webkit-auto; border-spacing: 0px;">
<div class=""><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
+ + +</div>
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">Reg Levy</div>
<div class="">VP Compliance + Policy</div>
<div class="">Minds + Machines</div>
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">
<div class="">m +1 310 963 7135</div>
<div class="">w +1 310 730 4104</div>
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">
<div class="" style="font-family: Helvetica;"><span class="">Current UTC offset: -7</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br class="">
<div style="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On 15 Jul 2015, at 16:47, <a href="mailto:Paul@law.es" class="">Paul@law.es</a> ZIMBRA <<a href="mailto:paul@law.es" class="">paul@law.es</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div dir="auto" class="">
<div class="">Mary,</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">I am sorry to push but I did not see an answer to my simple question. Please list the members of the small group.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Also, with reference to the "w<span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);" class="">hich is the agreed forum for the continuing dialogue between the GAC and the NGPC on IGO protections overall" exactly who has agreed to such.</span></div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Concerning "<span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);" class="">The understanding from that meeting is that conversations would continue with Petter, Phil and Mason while the NGPC and “small group” continue to discuss the broader topic"
please provide detail concerning the "broader,topic". What is it and what have they been requested to do?</span></div>
<div class=""><br class="">
<span style="font-size: 13pt;" class="">Paul Keating</span></div>
<div class=""><br class="">
On 16 Jul 2015, at 12:02 am, Mary Wong <<a href="mailto:mary.wong@icann.org" class="">mary.wong@icann.org</a>> wrote:<br class="">
<br class="">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">Hello Paul and everyone,</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">As Phil noted in an email to the group recently, a promising dialogue between our co-chairs Petter and Phil, facilitated by Mason Cole (GNSO-GAC liaison), and the GAC leadership was opened in Buenos Aires. Thomas Schneider, the GAC chair, is of
course part of the “small group”, which is the agreed forum for the continuing dialogue between the GAC and the NGPC on IGO protections overall. It was therefore helpful to have had Thomas and two of the GAC Vice Chairs meet with Petter, Phil and Mason in
Buenos Aires, given that our Working Group is deliberating one aspect of the possible protections that can be afforded to IGO acronyms, i.e. certain curative rights mechanisms. The understanding from that meeting is that conversations would continue with Petter,
Phil and Mason while the NGPC and “small group” continue to discuss the broader<font class=""> topic</font>. This gels with the GAC’s acknowledgement, in at least one Communique, of the work of our Working Group.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">While I do not have the definitive list of members of the “small group”, it may be helpful to note that the IGO coalition that participated in the original IGO-INGO PDP consisted of over 40 IGOs and 15 UN Funds and Programs (see, e.g. the IGO
coalition’s Minority Statement to that PDP’s Final Report: <a href="https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/igo-ingo-final-minority-positions-10nov13-en.pdf" class="">https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/igo-ingo-final-minority-positions-10nov13-en.pdf</a> – the statement
was filed by the OECD, WIPO and the UPU on behalf of the coalition and to the best of my knowledge these three IGOs are thus also members of the “small group”).</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">As the GNSO Council is also aware of the discussions between the “small group” and the NGPC, the additional dialogue channel opened in Buenos Aires will hopefully also be useful in assisting the GNSO, GAC and Board (NGPC) resolve the issue of
IGO protections, as appropriate to the scope of this WG and each organization.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Cheers</div>
<div class="">Mary</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
</div>
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Mary Wong</font></font></div>
<div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Senior Policy Director</font></font></div>
<div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)</font></font></div>
<div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Telephone: +1 603 574 4889</font></font></div>
<div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Email:
<a href="mailto:mary.wong@icann.org" class="">mary.wong@icann.org</a></font></font></div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION" class="">
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt; text-align: left; border-width: 1pt medium medium; border-style: solid none none; padding: 3pt 0in 0in; border-top-color: rgb(181, 196, 223);" class="">
<span style="font-weight:bold" class="">From: </span>Paul Keating <<a href="mailto:paul@law.es" class="">paul@law.es</a>><br class="">
<span style="font-weight:bold" class="">Date: </span>Wednesday, July 15, 2015 at 22:38<br class="">
<span style="font-weight:bold" class="">To: </span>Mary Wong <<a href="mailto:mary.wong@icann.org" class="">mary.wong@icann.org</a>><br class="">
<span style="font-weight:bold" class="">Cc: </span>"<a href="mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org" class="">gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org" class="">gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org</a>><br class="">
<span style="font-weight:bold" class="">Subject: </span>Re: [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] GAC advice and the IGO PDP<br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;" class="">
<div class="">
<div dir="auto" class="">
<div class="">Thank you Mary</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">However we really need to know WHO exactly is in this "small group" and open a dialogue with them. Otherwise there will be a collision of proposals and it is unseemly that one group will remain unidentified with the ability to act politically. </div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
Sincerely,
<div class="">Paul Keating, Esq.</div>
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
On Jul 15, 2015, at 6:14 PM, Mary Wong <<a href="mailto:mary.wong@icann.org" class="">mary.wong@icann.org</a>> wrote:<br class="">
<br class="">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">Hello Mike and everyone,</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Some of these questions had been raised in previous WG calls, but it may be helpful to consolidate what we can in a single note, so thank you for following up on this.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">The IGO “small group” was formed as a result of discussions between the NGPC and the GAC (where the IGOs are observers) at the Los Angeles meeting, in October 2014. This grew out of NGPC-GAC discussions over the NGPC’s proposal of March 2014,
which in turn was produced in direct response to the full Board’s resolution of February 2014 (in which the Board acknowledged the GNSO’s original policy recommendations on IGO protections, which the GNSO Council had adopted in November 2013 – being the set
of consensus recommendations from the original IGO PDP that Thomas Rickert chaired).</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">The NGPC’s March 2014 proposal had been sent to the GNSO Council as well, and in September 2014 Chris Disspain (NGPC member and the Board “shepherd” for the topic of IGO protections) participated in a GNSO Council meeting, to discuss the status
of the NGPC-GAC discussions. This was viewed by the Council as particularly timely as the NGPC had asked the GNSO (in June) whether it would be amenable to amending those of its adopted policy recommendations that are inconsistent with GAC advice.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">As I understand it, the members of the IGO "small group” are basically a subset of the IGO Coalition that participated in the original GNSO IGO-INGO PDP in 2012-13, working with the GAC leadership and those GAC members that had internally been
working on the topic of IGO protections. To the extent that there seems to be a “primary” contact point for that group, I believe it is the OECD.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Sorry if all these dates and details are a bit convoluted; maybe this set of chronological bullet points will help:</div>
<ul class="">
<li class="">Feb 2014 – Board acknowledgement of GNSO original PDP recommendations and request to NGPC to develop proposal: <a href="https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2014-02-07-en#2.a" class="">https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2014-02-07-en#2.a</a></li><li class="">March 2014 – NGPC proposal: <a href="https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/chalaby-to-robinson-20mar14-en.pdf" class="">https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/chalaby-to-robinson-20mar14-en.pdf</a></li><li class="">Sept 2014 – Discussion between GNSO Council and Chris Disspain: <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/minutes-council-04sep14-en.htm" class="">http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/minutes-council-04sep14-en.htm</a></li><li class="">Oct 2014 – Letter from Jonathan Robinson to Cherine Chelaby and Chris Disspain confirming outcomes of Sept discussion: <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/robinson-to-chalaby-disspain-07oct14-en.pdf" class="">http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/robinson-to-chalaby-disspain-07oct14-en.pdf</a></li><li class="">Jan 2015 – Letter from Cherine Chelaby to Jonathan Robinson updating the GNSO on status of the discussions with the GAC: <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/chalaby-to-robinson-15jan15-en.pdf" class="">http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/chalaby-to-robinson-15jan15-en.pdf</a></li><li class="">Mar 2015 – GAC Singapore Communique: <a href="https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/27132037/GAC_SINGAPORE52_COMMUNIQUE_FINAL2.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1423724031000&api=v2" class="">
https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/27132037/GAC_SINGAPORE52_COMMUNIQUE_FINAL2.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1423724031000&api=v2</a></li><li class="">Jun 2015 – GAC Buenos Aires Communique: <a href="https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/27132037/GAC%20Buenos%20Aires%2053%20Communique.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1435188375963&api=v2" class="">
https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/27132037/GAC%20Buenos%20Aires%2053%20Communique.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1435188375963&api=v2</a></li></ul>
<div class="">
<div class="">I hope this helps provide the background to the formation of the “small group” and to the GAC’s latest Communique.</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</div>
<div class="">Cheers</div>
<div class="">Mary</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Mary Wong</font></font></div>
<div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Senior Policy Director</font></font></div>
<div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)</font></font></div>
<div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Telephone: +1 603 574 4889</font></font></div>
<div class=""><font class="Apple-style-span"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Email:
<a href="mailto:mary.wong@icann.org" class="">mary.wong@icann.org</a></font></font></div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION" class="">
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 11pt; text-align: left; border-width: 1pt medium medium; border-style: solid none none; padding: 3pt 0in 0in; border-top-color: rgb(181, 196, 223);" class="">
<span style="font-weight:bold" class="">From: </span><<a href="mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces@icann.org" class="">gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces@icann.org</a>> on behalf of Mike Rodenbaugh <<a href="mailto:mike@rodenbaugh.com" class="">mike@rodenbaugh.com</a>><br class="">
<span style="font-weight:bold" class="">Date: </span>Wednesday, July 15, 2015 at 03:47<br class="">
<span style="font-weight:bold" class="">To: </span>"<a href="mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org" class="">gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org" class="">gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org</a>><br class="">
<span style="font-weight:bold" class="">Subject: </span>Re: [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] GAC advice and the IGO PDP<br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;" class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div dir="ltr" class="">Thanks George, I am in general agreement.
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Along these lines, is anyone aware, or can Staff please inform us, as to the who is in the "informal small group" referenced in the GAC Communique as having made "progress" on the topic of IGO names, what are they discussing exactly, where is
the transparency around that effort, and when is it supposed to conclude?</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">There are quite a few IGO names issues up in the air, where there is a difference of opinion between GAC and GNSO, and the Board is trying to reconcile. This WG covers just one aspect -- IGO names at the second level. The remaining issues (i.e.
proposed protections at the top level) must also be dragged out into the light, and then a compromise reached to resolve all issues -- not just the one this WG is considering.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">This "informal small group" does not appear to have any official charter or public presence, yet the GAC is citing their progress and goal to develop a "concrete proposal" before Dublin. The community, and particularly this WG, ought to be informed
and involved in the work of that group.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all" class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div dir="ltr" class="">
<div style="font-family:arial;font-size:small" class="">Mike Rodenbaugh</div>
<div style="font-family:arial;font-size:small" class="">RODENBAUGH LAW</div>
<div style="font-family:arial;font-size:small" class="">tel/fax: <a href="tel:%2B1.415.738.8087" value="+14157388087" target="_blank" class="">+1.415.738.8087</a></div>
<div style="font-family:arial;font-size:small" class=""><a href="http://rodenbaugh.com/" target="_blank" class="">http://rodenbaugh.com</a> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br class="">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 6:29 AM, George Kirikos <span dir="ltr" class="">
<<a href="mailto:icann@leap.com" target="_blank" class="fullcontact-active-email">icann@leap.com</a>></span> wrote:<br class="">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi folks,<br class="">
<br class="">
I hope everyone is enjoying the start of the weekend. Late last night,<br class="">
ICANN released a decision in the Independent Review of the .africa<br class="">
matter. See:<br class="">
<br class="">
<a href="https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2015-07-10-en" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2015-07-10-en</a><br class="">
<a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-declaration-09jul15-en.pdf" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-declaration-09jul15-en.pdf</a><br class="">
<a href="http://domainincite.com/18944-new-gtld-program-thrown-into-chaos-as-icann-loses-africa-case" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">http://domainincite.com/18944-new-gtld-program-thrown-into-chaos-as-icann-loses-africa-case</a><br class="">
<br class="">
Parts of the decision are redacted, which raises questions of its own<br class="">
regarding ICANN transparency.<br class="">
<br class="">
However, the panel had much to say about GAC advice.<br class="">
<br class="">
1. It ruled that GAC is a constituent body of ICANN (paragraph 101, page 43).<br class="">
<br class="">
2. ICANN's own witness, Heather Dryden (former GAC chair), according<br class="">
to the panel, testified that the "GAC did not act with transparency or<br class="">
in a manner designed to insure fairness" (paragraph 102, pages 43-44).<br class="">
Rather, Ms. Dryden testified that "we talk about creative ambiguity.<br class="">
We leave things unclear so we don't have conflict" (paragraph 102,<br class="">
page 44)<br class="">
<br class="">
3. Most damningly, the panel said in paragraph 104 (pages 44-45) that<br class="">
"Ms. Dryden also stated that the GAC made its decision without<br class="">
providing any rationale and primarily based on politics and not on<br class="">
potential violations of national laws and sensitivities." This appears<br class="">
to be quite similar to the "advice" that the GAC has provided to ICANN<br class="">
and to this very PDP (via its "answers")<br class="">
<br class="">
4. In paragraph 110 (pages 46-47), Ms. Dryden admitted that the GAC<br class="">
isn't using sound and reasoned technical or legal analysis to come up<br class="">
with its advice, but is instead influenced by politics "And that's the<br class="">
nature of -- of the political process." (with much redacted after that<br class="">
answer)<br class="">
<br class="">
5. Ms. Dryden also testified (still in paragraph 110, page 52) that<br class="">
GAC advice is issued with no rationale:<br class="">
<br class="">
"THE WITNESS:<br class="">
Problematic, violate national law -- there are a lot of laws -- and<br class="">
sensitivities does strike me as being quite broad.<br class="">
[...]<br class="">
ARBITRATOR KESSEDJIAN:<br class="">
Okay. So we are left with what? No rules?<br class="">
THE WITNESS:<br class="">
No rationale with the consensus objections. That's the -- the effect."<br class="">
<br class="">
6. This was not consistent with ICANN's bylaws, e.g. paragraph 113<br class="">
(page 53), "In light of the clear “Transparency” obligation provisions<br class="">
found in ICANN’s Bylaws, the Panel would have expected the ICANN Board<br class="">
to, at a minimum, investigate the matter further before rejecting DCA<br class="">
Trust’s application."<br class="">
<br class="">
How does the IRP decision affect this PDP? I believe no deference<br class="">
should be given to any of the answers or positions provided by the<br class="">
GAC, unless accompanied by clear and convincing facts and rationale,<br class="">
along with evidence that there's been substantive deliberations to<br class="">
arrive at a position. The GAC has not been transparent with how it<br class="">
reaches its positions, nor has it elaborated on its reasoning to<br class="">
assist this PDP.<br class="">
<br class="">
In particular, its 2 page letter of April 29, 2015 does not come close<br class="">
to the standard that is demanded by ICANN bylaws, and thus should be<br class="">
given no deference.<br class="">
<br class="">
In my opinion, the IGOs have (to date) hesitated to participate in<br class="">
this PDP, perhaps in the misguided belief that they could rely instead<br class="">
on their ability to influence the GAC behind closed doors. This IRP<br class="">
decision should be considered a harsh rebuke to that approach. If the<br class="">
IGOs really want to affect the outcome of this PDP, they should<br class="">
actively engage with us by providing facts and analysis, rather than<br class="">
using a "political" approach.<br class="">
<br class="">
In conclusion, this PDP should not be influenced by politics (points<br class="">
#3 and #4 above), but should instead be built on a foundation of a<br class="">
careful analysis of facts and laws.<br class="">
<br class="">
Sincerely,<br class="">
<br class="">
George Kirikos<br class="">
<a href="tel:416-588-0269" value="+14165880269" target="_blank" class="">416-588-0269</a><br class="">
<a href="http://www.leap.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">http://www.leap.com/</a><br class="">
_______________________________________________<br class="">
Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org" target="_blank" class="">Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org</a><br class="">
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp</a></blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</span></div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class=""><span class="">_______________________________________________</span><br class="">
<span class="">Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list</span><br class="">
<span class=""><a href="mailto:Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org" class="">Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org</a></span><br class="">
<span class=""><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp" class="">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp</a></span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</span></blockquote>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">
Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org" class="">Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org</a><br class="">
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp</a></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>