<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><div>Phil,</div><div><br></div><div>I respect your opinion but disagree with it. I know that we are all tired of this project and want to see it finished. However, I do not want to do that at the risk of violating what I see are clear rules. In that regard while I support the use of polls those polls must be:</div><div><br></div><div>Restricted to voting members</div><div>Be transparent – identifying the person voting and what was voted for.</div><div>Be publicly available for all purposes as WG records.</div><div><br></div><div>Paul</div><div><br></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt"><span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp <<a href="mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces@icann.org">gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces@icann.org</a>> on behalf of "Corwin, Philip via Gnso-igo-ingo-crp" <<a href="mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org">gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Reply-To: </span> "Corwin, Philip" <<a href="mailto:pcorwin@verisign.com">pcorwin@verisign.com</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span> Tuesday, December 19, 2017 at 3:20 AM<br><span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span> "<a href="mailto:petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu">petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu</a>" <<a href="mailto:petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu">petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu</a>>, "<a href="mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org">gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org">gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org</a>><br><span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span> Re: [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] My personal comments on our time frame and continous adding of new proposals<br></div><div><br></div><blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;"><div xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Helvetica Neue";
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.font
{mso-style-name:font;}
span.size
{mso-style-name:size;}
span.colour
{mso-style-name:colour;}
span.apple-converted-space
{mso-style-name:apple-converted-space;}
span.highlight
{mso-style-name:highlight;}
span.EmailStyle24
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div class="WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal"><a name="_MailEndCompose">I appreciate the thoughtful statement from my co-chair.<o:p></o:p></a></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-bookmark:_MailEndCompose"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-bookmark:_MailEndCompose">I share his view that, whether or not any of the options before us receives consensus support, it is our duty and responsibility to deliver a conclusive final report rather than recommend that
another working group, which already has a very broad and challenging mandate, be asked to add to that burden and reconsider a matter on which we have labored for three and a half years. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-bookmark:_MailEndCompose"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-bookmark:_MailEndCompose"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Philip S. Corwin<o:p></o:p></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-bookmark:_MailEndCompose"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Policy Counsel<o:p></o:p></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-bookmark:_MailEndCompose"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">VeriSign, Inc.<o:p></o:p></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-bookmark:_MailEndCompose"><span lang="EN" style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">12061 Bluemont Way<br>
Reston, VA 20190<o:p></o:p></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-bookmark:_MailEndCompose"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">703-948-4648/Direct<o:p></o:p></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-bookmark:_MailEndCompose"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">571-342-7489/Cell<o:p></o:p></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-bookmark:_MailEndCompose"><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-bookmark:_MailEndCompose"><i><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey<o:p></o:p></span></i></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-bookmark:_MailEndCompose"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><span style="mso-bookmark:_MailEndCompose"></span><p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp [<a href="mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces@icann.org">mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Petter Rindforth<br><b>Sent:</b> Monday, December 18, 2017 6:17 PM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org">gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org</a><br><b>Subject:</b> [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] My personal comments on our time frame and continous adding of new proposals<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class="MsoNormal">Dear members of our WG,<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Just a few <i>personal comments</i>, as I can fully understand that it sometimes may be hard to remember all steps, discussions and decisions we have made together since our first meeting in August 11, 2014.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">As you all know, we have deeply discussed all possible variations during our WG calls, and also already at ICANN52 in Singapore, at February 13, 2015 had
a full day F2F meeting (from 9.30 – 17.15), including 75 minutes discussion based on George Kirikos suggestion regarding
</span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">possible “mechanics” for IGO filing.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="colour"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:black">At April 29, 2015, we received the GAC reply to a number of questions we had sent to them. As to Question 3: “</span><span style="color:black">In
opposing [amendments to the UDRP and URS] does the GAC thus advise the GNSO to preclude any possible change to its “Mutual Jurisdiction” provisions to address specific sovereign immunity concerns of IGOs? How should a curative rights process appropriately
deal with this problem while also ensuring adequate due process protections for registrants?”, GAC replied that:</span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="colour"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:black"> </span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">“The GAC notes that the IGOs, in their communication to you of 16 January 2015, have advised that they consider their claimed immunity from national jurisdiction to be fundamental
to their role as international bodies. There are non-judicial means to ensure due process, such as arbitration, which the GAC believes should be considered in more detail.”<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">At February 20, 2016, we still had the goal to present our Initial Report prior to ICANN55 in Marrakech (March 5 – 10, 2016…)<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">The Timeline was discussed and updated at our August 4, 2016 meeting:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Month of August 2016</span></u></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#333333"> </span></span>(after
4 August WG call) – straw poll of members on elements to be addressed in a draft Initial Report; staff preparation of outline of report with those elements<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">1 & 8 September</span></u></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#333333"> </span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">–
discuss outline and elements; staff to begin filling out draft Initial Report<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">15 & 22 September</span></u></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#333333"> </span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">–
discuss preliminary conclusions<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">30 September</span></u></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#333333"> </span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">–
staff to prepare and circulate draft Initial Report<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">6, 13, 20 October</span></u></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#333333"> </span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">–
discuss Initial Report<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">24 October</span></u></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#333333"> </span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">–
publish Initial Report for public comment<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Early November (ICANN57)</span></u></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#333333"> </span></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">–
present conclusions in Initial Report for community discussion</span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Mid-end November</span></u></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span></span>– begin discussion
of community feedback and public comments received <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">3 December</span></u></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span></span>– public comment forum closes;
staff to prepare summary and Public Comment Review Tool<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">8 & 15 December</span></u></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span></span>– continue discussions
of public comments received (no meeting on 22 or 29 December)<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">5 & 12 January 2017</span></u></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span></span>– continue discussion
of public comments received; determine if preliminary conclusions and any open questions need to be updated; staff to prepare draft Final Report<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">19 & 26 January</span></u></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span></span>– discuss final recommendations;
staff to circulate draft Final Report by end-January<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">2 February</span></u></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span></span>– discuss Final Report<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">6 February</span></u></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span></span>- commence formal consensus
call<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">9 & 16 February</span></u></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span></span>(only if needed) –
WG meeting<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">20 February</span></u></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span></span>– conclude formal consensus
call<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">27 February 2017</span></u></span><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> </span></span>– sign off on Final
Report; chairs to submit Final Report to GNSO Council<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">On our meetings in December 2016 – January 2017, we deeply discussed our Initial Report, and fully agreed to ask for comments on
<b><i>2</i></b> options:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Where an IGO succeeds in asserting its claim of jurisdictional immunity in a court of mutual jurisdiction, the Working Group recommends that in that case:
<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><i><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Option 1</span></u></i></span><span class="size"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> - the decision rendered against
the registrant in the predecessor UDRP or URS shall be vitiated; or</span></i></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><i><u><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Option 2 </span></u></i></span>– the decision rendered against the registrant in the predecessor UDRP or URS may be brought before the [name of arbitration
entity] for de novo review and determination.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Among the comments received, apart from IGO’s, there were also comments from Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies, as well as from individuals (members of our WG), meaning
that everyone had the possibility to comment and adding new proposals, for further discussion in our WG.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">We discussed the public comments received on our meetings at March 30, April 6, April 13, April 20, April 27, May 4, May 11, 2017<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">At the May 4 meeting it was noticed a comment from some IGO.s (OECD, UN, UPU, WHO & WIPO), on the time frame, based on a discussion of it was need to have
another external legal advice on Article 6ter: </span></span><span class="colour"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:black">“</span><span style="color:black">IGO colleagues share the OECD’s concern that such an exercise will
significantly prolong what has already been an extensive and resource-intensive process”, meaning that also IGO representatives wanted to have a result/decision of our work without further delays.</span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">At July 13, 2017, we still discussed the
<b>2</b> options (</span></span>Options 1 & 2 for Recommendation #4)<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;background:white"> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">On our July 20, call, we discussed three new options:<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">OPTION 3 TO RECOMMENDATION #4<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Suggested by Paul Keating on the Working Group call of 15 June 2017):<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#0563C2"><a href="https://community.icann.org/x/SEfwAw">https://community.icann.org/x/SEfwAw</a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#0563C2"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:black">OPTION 4 TO RECOMMENDATION #4<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:black">Suggested by George Kirikos via email to the mailing list on 27 June 2017):<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#0563C2"><a href="http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2017-June/000769.html"><span lang="EN-GB">http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2017-June/000769.html</span></a></span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:black">ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:black">From Paul Keating, via email to the mailing list, 14 July 2017:
<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#0563C2"><a href="http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igoingo-crp/2017-July/000784.html">http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igoingo-crp/2017-July/000784.html</a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:#0563C2"><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">These were further discussed on July 27, August 3 (Options 3, 4, 5, 6), and September 7 (Options 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">It is also noted that on July 26, we discussed and agreed upon a new draft timeline for completion of our WG, with December 7, 2017 for our WG to Finalize Report, and noting that December 11, 2017 was a Document deadline for GNSO Council
December meeting (either submit Final Report here, or if more time is needed, aim to submit for GNSO Council meeting in January 2018).<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">On our September 26, 2017 meeting, we agreed on Option A, B and C, which was further discussed on October 5, in preparation for a Survey<span class="colour"><b><span style="color:#333333"></span></b></span>to detect consensus on Options A, B or C.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">At our December 7, 2017 call, we discussed Options A, B, C and George Kirikos Option 6.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">At our December 14 call we had three additional proposals (as well as A, B, C): from Zak Muscovitch, George Kirikos and Paul Tattersfield respectively, that
were discussed.</span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b>To summarize:</b><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">I think it is clear to all of us, that we have discussed our topic/s deeply for a long time. I also think it is clear that some WG members support A, where other WG members support C (including myself). Continuously adding new proposals
at the last minute, and thereby arguing that our topics have not already been fully discussed, will not change that fact.
<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="size"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:black">I deeply respect the knowledge and experience of all my fellow WG members, and that is why I also hope that all of you agrees that the reason
why we actively join a WG is to find a solution and recommendation on specific topic/s (and keeping the time frame), rather than conclude that we shall refrain from
</span></span>taking our responsibility and instead transfer the subject to another working group.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif"> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">All the best,<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal">Petter<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="font"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",serif;color:#333333;background:white">-- </span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="font"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",serif;color:#333333;background:white">Petter Rindforth, LL M </span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><img border="0" width="150" height="41" style="width:1.5625in;height:.427in" id="_x0000_i1025" src="cid:image001.jpg@01D37846.0F2E9030"><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="font"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",serif;color:#333333;background:white">Fenix Legal KB </span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="font"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",serif;color:#333333;background:white">Stureplan 4c, 4tr </span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="font"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",serif;color:#333333;background:white">114 35 Stockholm </span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="font"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",serif;color:#333333;background:white">Sweden </span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="font"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",serif;color:#333333;background:white">Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 </span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="font"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",serif;color:#333333;background:white">Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 </span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="font"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",serif;color:#333333;background:white">E-mail:
<a href="mailto:petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu">petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu</a> </span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="font"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",serif;color:#333333;background:white"><a href="http://www.fenixlegal.eu">www.fenixlegal.eu</a> </span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="font"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",serif;color:#333333;background:white">NOTICE </span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="font"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",serif;color:#333333;background:white">This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client
privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return
e-mail. </span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="font"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",serif;color:#333333;background:white">Fenix Legal KB, Sweden,
<a href="http://www.fenixlegal.eu">www.fenixlegal.eu</a> </span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="font"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",serif;color:#333333;background:white">Thank you</span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></div>
_______________________________________________
Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
<a href="mailto:Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org">Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org</a>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp</a></blockquote></span></body></html>