<div dir="ltr"><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial">Dear WG Members,</div><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"><br></div><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial">I'll include a personal comment that our work here has been hampered by the lack of participation from the IGOs, on whose behalf this WG was formed.  Despite all the work, time and effort that this WG has devoted over many years, we do not know whether any of the proposed options would actually address the root concerns of the IGOs.  Indeed even if we adopted option 3, which would lead the WG down a long, tortured path to try to develop an arbitration system, if the IGOs maintain their resistance to participating, we would still be left not knowing whether the final recommendations would be deemed acceptable by the IGOs.  It seems better to refer the core issues of jurisdiction and legal process to the RPM WG which enjoys more robust representation from a variety of stakeholders and will need to address these same issues as part of its work.</div><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"><br></div><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">I support Option 4, and would also support continued exploration of Options 1, 2, 5, or 6, if one of those options attracted consensus support of the WG.</span><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"><br></div><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial">Regards,</div><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"><br></div><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial">Nat Cohen</div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Zak Muscovitch <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:zak@muscovitch.com" target="_blank">zak@muscovitch.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear WG members, I confirm that I support Option 4, which I had earlier<br>
proposed to the WG, and would also support Options 1, 2, 5, and 6.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Zak Muscovitch<br>
</font></span><span class="im HOEnZb"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Gnso-igo-ingo-crp [mailto:<a href="mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces@icann.org">gnso-igo-ingo-crp-<wbr>bounces@icann.org</a>] On<br>
Behalf Of George Kirikos<br>
Sent: May-07-18 2:43 PM<br>
To: gnso-igo-ingo-.<br>
Subject: [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] Public Display of Possible Consensus<br>
<br>
</span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">Hi folks,<br>
<br>
Since there's been no response to the call for the true numbers to be<br>
posted:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2018-May/001140.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/<wbr>pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/<wbr>2018-May/001140.html</a><br>
<br>
let's attempt to do this transparently. I believe we might already have a<br>
consensus.<br>
<br>
The 6 options (not mutually exclusive!) were at:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2018-March/001093.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/<wbr>pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/<wbr>2018-March/001093.html</a><br>
<br>
Briefly:<br>
<br>
Option 1: set aside the UDRP/URS decision, to put both sides back in the<br>
same position<br>
<br>
Option 2: use Option 1 for existing domain names, and Option 3 for newly<br>
created domains<br>
<br>
Option 3: arbitration<br>
<br>
Option 4: refer it to the RPM PDP<br>
<br>
Option 5: lock the domains in the event of an "in rem" lawsuit (not just<br>
"in personam")<br>
<br>
Option 6: mediation as a step, and then back to Option 1 if need be<br>
<br>
If you'd like to post your position/thoughts in an open and transparent<br>
manner, please do so in this thread, using the following template<br>
<br>
------------------------------<wbr>----<br>
<br>
Name:<br>
Option 1:<br>
Option 2:<br>
Option 3:<br>
Option 4:<br>
Option 5:<br>
Option 6:<br>
<br>
------------------------------<wbr>----<br>
<br>
For myself:<br>
<br>
Option 1: yes, I support this (ultimately my first choice)<br>
<br>
Option 2: yes, I can support this as a compromise<br>
<br>
Option 3: no, I can't support this<br>
<br>
Option 4: yes, I can support this; Paul Keating's prior suggestion of<br>
having Option 1 be the interim solution if Option 4 is<br>
<br>
Option 5: yes, I support this, and it works in parallel to all other<br>
options<br>
<br>
Option 6: yes, I support mediation<br>
<br>
Sincerely,<br>
<br>
George Kirikos<br>
416-588-0269<br>
<a href="http://www.leap.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.leap.com/</a><br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org">Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp</a><br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org">Gnso-igo-ingo-crp@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>