[gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off

[Mike Zupke]

Thanks, James. 

The schedule/project plan is indeed topic #1.  But I think the bigger
question - how does this fit into all of the rest of the work underway? - is
probably outside this group's remit.  My team (on staff) is currently
mapping out all of the implementation items we see on the horizon and trying
to figure out a way to manage those in a responsible way.  I think,
ultimately, it might require a discussion with the GNSO council, but that's
as far as my thinking has progressed to date...  Happy to discuss on the
call if you and others like.

Best,

 

Mike Zupke

Director, Registrar Programs

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

 

From: James M. Bladel [mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 6:01 PM
To: Mike Zupke; gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off

 

Mike and Team:

 

What is ICANN's plan w.r.t. scheduling this implementation?  We are still
working on Rec 9 of IRTP-B, ERRP, TMCH, and soon New gTLDs and the 2013 RAA.
I'm concerned that these changes are starting to work against each other,
and are definitely contending for the same development resources.  

 

Recommend we make this Agenda Topic #1 during our first call.

 

Thanks--

 

J.

 

From: Mike Zupke <Mike.Zupke at icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 16:39
To: "gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org" <gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off

 

Greetings!

Welcome to the Transfer Policy Working Group C Implementation Review Team
("IRTPWGCIRT").  I will be leading ICANN's implementation of the GNSO's IRTP
C recommendations, and it is my pleasure to have the opportunity to work
with you on this effort.

 

As a refresher, the GNSO made 3 recommendations that were adopted by the
ICANN Board:

1. Modify the IRTP / Create a consensus policy that would apply to
inter-registrant transfers.

2. Revise the existing Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy related to the
expiration of the Form of Authorization used by registrars during transfers.

3. Require registries to include registrars' GURIDs (aka IANA IDs) in Whois
output. 

 

Recommendation 3 is currently being implemented by Staff, so that leaves
recs 1 & 2 for us.  There is quite a bit of work to be done on these, so
I've created a project plan that I'd like to share with you for feedback on
a kick-off call.  If you're interested in attending, would you kindly enter
your availability in this doodle poll?: http://doodle.com/7uq5vaiyu7n8fpu8 

 

Thanks in advance.  I look forward to working with you.  

 

Sincerely,

 

Mike Zupke

Director, Registrar Programs

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-impl-irtpc-rt/attachments/20130606/7fb50ce0/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5501 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-impl-irtpc-rt/attachments/20130606/7fb50ce0/smime.p7s>