[gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off

[Mike O'Connor]

hi Mike,

i think "how we fit" is in our remit, because we will have a unique perspective on dependencies.   but i agree that creating the larger structure that we fit *into* isn't.  do a search on "program management" for tips on how to put together and manage a portfolio of inter-connected projects.  i think we be a project, within a larger program.  

mikey


On Jun 6, 2013, at 8:56 AM, James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com> wrote:

> Right.  And this IRT must be aware of all these new changes, particularly those that could affect its own items.
> 
> For example, the new 2013 RAA will have validation/verification requirements.  The IRT must consider how this (not yet adopted) verification process will affect the Change of Registrant procedure.  There are probably a bunch of unknown dependencies like that….
> 
> J.
> 
> 
> From: Mike Zupke <Mike.Zupke at icann.org>
> Date: Thursday, June 6, 2013 08:50
> To: James Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com>, "gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org" <gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org>
> Subject: RE: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off
> 
> Thanks, James.
> The schedule/project plan is indeed topic #1.  But I think the bigger question - how does this fit into all of the rest of the work underway? - is probably outside this group’s remit.  My team (on staff) is currently mapping out all of the implementation items we see on the horizon and trying to figure out a way to manage those in a responsible way.  I think, ultimately, it might require a discussion with the GNSO council, but that’s as far as my thinking has progressed to date...  Happy to discuss on the call if you and others like.
> Best,
>  
> Mike Zupke
> Director, Registrar Programs
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
>  
> From: James M. Bladel [mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 6:01 PM
> To: Mike Zupke; gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off
>  
> Mike and Team:
>  
> What is ICANN's plan w.r.t. scheduling this implementation?  We are still working on Rec 9 of IRTP-B, ERRP, TMCH, and soon New gTLDs and the 2013 RAA. I'm concerned that these changes are starting to work against each other, and are definitely contending for the same development resources.  
>  
> Recommend we make this Agenda Topic #1 during our first call.
>  
> Thanks--
>  
> J.
>  
> From: Mike Zupke <Mike.Zupke at icann.org>
> Date: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 16:39
> To: "gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org" <gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org>
> Subject: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off
>  
> Greetings!
> Welcome to the Transfer Policy Working Group C Implementation Review Team (“IRTPWGCIRT”).  I will be leading ICANN’s implementation of the GNSO’s IRTP C recommendations, and it is my pleasure to have the opportunity to work with you on this effort.
>  
> As a refresher, the GNSO made 3 recommendations that were adopted by the ICANN Board:
> 1. Modify the IRTP / Create a consensus policy that would apply to inter-registrant transfers.
> 2. Revise the existing Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy related to the expiration of the Form of Authorization used by registrars during transfers.
> 3. Require registries to include registrars’ GURIDs (aka IANA IDs) in Whois output.
>  
> Recommendation 3 is currently being implemented by Staff, so that leaves recs 1 & 2 for us.  There is quite a bit of work to be done on these, so I’ve created a project plan that I’d like to share with you for feedback on a kick-off call.  If you’re interested in attending, would you kindly enter your availability in this doodle poll?: http://doodle.com/7uq5vaiyu7n8fpu8
>  
> Thanks in advance.  I look forward to working with you. 
>  
> Sincerely,
>  
> Mike Zupke
> Director, Registrar Programs
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
>  


PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-impl-irtpc-rt/attachments/20130606/0287af7b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-impl-irtpc-rt/attachments/20130606/0287af7b/smime.p7s>