[gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] FW: For your review: draft policy + implementation timing

Thu Jul 30 11:56:53 UTC 2015

I thought we agreed that changes w.r.t. Privacy services would not be considered a “material change” by the Registrar.  Has this changed?

Sorry I’m so far behind…

J.

From: <owner-gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org>> on behalf of Theo Geurts <theo.geurts at firstfind.nl<mailto:theo.geurts at firstfind.nl>>
Date: Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 2:02
To: Mike O'Connor <mike at haven2.com<mailto:mike at haven2.com>>
Cc: Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org<mailto:caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>>, "gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org<mailto:gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org>" <gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org<mailto:gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] FW: For your review: draft policy + implementation timing

It's looking pretty good,

However i got a question.

What does a Registrar do when a registrant cancels his privacy service or the privacy service is automatically terminated ?
Do I simply start displaying the underlying information (foot note 1) ?  Though the foot note states that I require confirmation from the prior registrant.

I feel it should be added to 2.3 that in such a case the change of registrant does not apply or atleast some clarification on how to deal with his.
Another thought was to add an extra section in our terms and conditions and start playing with the "designated agent" part, however that feels rather messy, but is an option.

Or we agree that when a privacy service is cancelled a change or registrant does apply, though that would open up a new can of worms.

Thank you.

Theo

________________________________
Van: "Mike O'Connor" <mike at haven2.com<mailto:mike at haven2.com>>
Aan: "Caitlin Tubergen" <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org<mailto:caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>>
Cc: "Michele Neylon - Blacknight" <michele at blacknight.com<mailto:michele at blacknight.com>>, gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org<mailto:gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org>
Verzonden: Woensdag 29 juli 2015 23:17:16
Onderwerp: Re: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] FW: For your review: draft policy + implementation timing

looks fine from here.

thanks!

m

On Jul 29, 2015, at 3:33 PM, Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org<mailto:caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>> wrote:
Thanks, Michele.

The RrSG has been given until Tuesday, 4 August, to provide feedback regarding implementation timing.

As a reminder — if anyone from the Implementation Review Team has any feedback on the latest version of the draft, please provide it by tomorrow, Thursday, 30 July.

Many thanks,

Caitlin

From: Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele at blacknight.com<mailto:michele at blacknight.com>>
Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 11:58 AM
To: Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org<mailto:caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>>
Cc: "gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org<mailto:gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org>" <gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org<mailto:gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] FW: For your review: draft policy + implementation timing

Caitlin

Having discussed this within the RrSG we need more time to provide feedback to you

Regards

Michele

Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Hosting & Domains
http://www.blacknight.host/
http://www.mneylon.social<http://www.mneylon.social/>
Sent from mobile so typos and brevity are normal

On 23 Jul 2015, at 19:34, Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org<mailto:caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>> wrote:

Hi, Team.

This is reminder to provide any final feedback on the attached draft by Thursday, 30 July.  If I do not receive any feedback on the draft, I will consider the text final.

Also, I asked the members on the call about timing for coming into compliance once the policy is announced.  The default policy cycle is six months (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gdd-policy-change-calendar-13may15-en.pdf), but the members on the call today asked for registrars’ input on if six months is enough time.  We may, for example, choose to deviate from the standard six-month cycle.

As there are no calls scheduled at this time, please provide any feedback you have over the email list.

Thank you!

Kind regards,

Caitlin

From: Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org<mailto:caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>>
Date: Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 5:21 PM
To: "gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org<mailto:gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org>" <gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org<mailto:gnso-impl-irtpc-rt at icann.org>>
Subject: For your review: draft policy + implementation timing

Hi, Team.

For those of you unable to make it to today’s call, please find a recording here: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p4maun572zp/.

I have attached the latest draft of the policy, which has a small change as a result of today’s call.  There are also a few numbering changes.

There are a few things that we are awaiting feedback on.  Specifically, please take a look at:

(1) the definition of “Designated Agent” in paragraph 1(c).

(2) the circumstances described in paragraph 2.3, specifically 2.3(iv).  (The IRT wanted to confirm that this gave registrars enough flexibility to update Whois information in the event of potential abuse).

Also, I asked the members on the call about timing for coming into compliance once the policy is announced.  The default policy cycle is six months (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gdd-policy-change-calendar-13may15-en.pdf), but the members on the call today asked for registrars input on if six months is enough time.  We may, for example, choose to deviate from the standard six month cycle.

If you have any further comments on the attached draft or on the policy cycle timing, please provide feedback by Thursday, 30 July, two weeks from today’s date.

Thank you!

Kind regards,

Caitlin Tubergen
Registrar Relations and Contracts Manager
ICANN

<Transfer Policy 16Jul.docx>
<Transfer Policy 16Jul.docx>

PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com<http://www.haven2.com>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-impl-irtpc-rt/attachments/20150730/b9becfb6/attachment.html>