[gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] Current draft is creating overhead compared to published comment version.

Theo Geurts theo.geurts at firstfind.nl
Tue Jun 16 09:13:08 UTC 2015


Hi Guys, 

In 3.2(a) Registars are required to to get explicit consent from all parties in involved for a change or Registrant. Most registrars will go for an FOA type of method to obtain consent (assumption). 

After the registrars got the consent and preform the change of ownership 3.2 (b) and (i) kick in and Registrars must send the confirmation to the prior and new registrant and get approval again from the old one and new one ? 

This will get messy for the Registrants and cause alot of overhead at the Registrars support desks, not to mention it is confusing when you just agreed to a change of ownership and get a confirmation that requires approval also. 

Note, i like the removal of 3.2 (i) through (iii) alot. 

Best regards, 

Theo Geurts 

Realtime Register B.V. 

Ceintuurbaan 32A 
8024 AA - ZWOLLE - The Netherlands 

T: +31.384530759 
F: +31.384524734 
U: www.realtimeregister.com 
E: support at realtimeregister.com 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-impl-irtpc-rt/attachments/20150616/4d1d91e1/attachment.html>


More information about the Gnso-impl-irtpc-rt mailing list