[Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] Open Item 7b - Coordination/Incentive for Registrars Migration to Thick

[Rob Golding]

On 2016-08-11 15:34, Metalitz, Steven wrote:
> Roger, that data would be useful, of course, and should be published,
> but by itself it would provide no incentive to registrars to
> accelerate compliance.

You're confusing *compliance* and *progress*

Compliance is having it all done by the deadline.

Progress is how much (if any you have done so far) and is no valid 
concern to anyone but the registry and registrar concerned

> Percentages of transitioned domains by
> registrar would be needed.

Why ?

If a-Registrar has a plan to do a "big bang" of 100% of domains on date 
X what possible valid concern of anyone else could it be outside of that 
registrar and their registrants ?

If a-n-other registrars' software supplier wants to do it in a different 
fashion, that's down to their requirements and implementation, and 
simliarly is not of any valid concern of random 3rd  parties

I am *VERY* opposed to the ideas of making commercially sensitive data 
and plans public.

Rob