[gnso-impl-udrp-rt] Meeting invitation: UDRP IRT call on 22 April 2014

Michele Neylon - Blacknight michele at blacknight.com
Tue Apr 15 01:24:18 UTC 2014


Matt

The only party that can apply a lock to the domain is the sponsoring registrar for the affected domain.
Or am I missing something?

Regards

Michele

--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Domains
http://www.blacknight.co/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://www.technology.ie
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

From: gnso-impl-udrp-rt-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-impl-udrp-rt-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Schneller, Matt
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 1:30 AM
To: Caitlin Tubergen; gnso-impl-udrp-rt at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-impl-udrp-rt] Meeting invitation: UDRP IRT call on 22 April 2014

Hi Catitlin and everyone on the IRT,

This looks great!  Two quick suggestions for everyone to mull over via e-mail or on the call:


*         In "Lock," should "by the registrar" should be "by the Respondent" or perhaps "by the Respondent or by the registrar"?



*         Do we need to add the bold text shown below in 4(b) to clarify that the panel must decide what to do with post-Lock modification requests?  Without "requests for" it might imply that the modification can be made (without approval) so long as the Panel retroactively decides on the correctness of the request.


o   Any requests for modification(s) of the Respondent's data following the two (2) business day period shall be addressed by the Panel.

Thanks again for coordinating the process.  Best,

Matt Schneller | Attorney | Bracewell & Giuliani LLP
701 5th Avenue, Suite 6200, Seattle, WA 98104-7043
T: 206.204.6241 | F: 800.404.3970 | C: 206.679.1895
matt.schneller at bgllp.com<mailto:matt.schneller at bgllp.com> | www.bgllp.com/schneller<http://www.bgllp.com/schneller>



From: gnso-impl-udrp-rt-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-impl-udrp-rt-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gnso-impl-udrp-rt-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Caitlin Tubergen
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 2:18 PM
To: gnso-impl-udrp-rt at icann.org<mailto:gnso-impl-udrp-rt at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-impl-udrp-rt] Meeting invitation: UDRP IRT call on 22 April 2014

Hi All,

The next Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Procedure (UDRP) Implementation Review Team meeting will be held on Tuesday 22 April 2014 at 1600 UTC.
9:00PDT, 12:00EDT, 17:00London

Adigo Conference ID: 28462745

Adigo numbers: http://adigo.com/icann/

Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/udrp

I have attached the second version of the revised UDRP Rules, which we will discuss during the call.  The most recent changes, which were the result of our last call, have been highlighted in yellow.  We will also discuss implementation timelines, and how long the IRT feels is necessary to implement these changes. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Caitlin Tubergen
Registrar Relations and Contracts Manager
ICANN



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-impl-udrp-rt/attachments/20140415/46eb94b1/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the gnso-impl-udrp-rt mailing list