[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Wed Aug 1 20:54:02 UTC 2012


Hi,

Since there is no reason to alter the std comment/reply process, I recommend we just keep to the normal process with the normal dates.

avri

On 1 Aug 2012, at 02:03, <KnobenW at telekom.de> <KnobenW at telekom.de> wrote:

> Thanks Julie.
>  
> Since there is not any objecting comment: does anybody feel it being necessary to extend beyond 20th of August? Otherwise the implementation process could be as usual.
>  
> 
> Best regards 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
>  
> 
> Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 21:12
> An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
> Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures
> 
> Dear SCI members,
> 
> The comment period on the changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures ended yesterday.  There was only one comment received.  It was from the Registries Stakeholder Group in support of the changes.  See: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-operating-procedures-2012/.
> 
> The reply comment period begins today and extends to the 20th of August.  Given that many people may be on holiday, it might be useful to continue with the reply period.  Please let me know if you would like a different approach.
> 
> Thank you very much.
> 
>  Best regards,
> 
> Julie
> 
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director





More information about the Gnso-improvem-impl-sc mailing list