[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures

Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu
Thu Aug 2 22:57:28 UTC 2012

I generally dislike the "+1" "reply-all" email but in this case, and for record-keeping purposes, I guess it's justified, so ... +1 (agree with Wolf-Ulrich, Avri, Ron et al).

Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong at law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> 

From: "Ron Andruff" <randruff at rnapartners.com>
To:"'Avri Doria'" <avri at acm.org>, <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
Date: 8/1/2012 6:01 PM
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures

Apologies for my ignorance, but can someone clarify which issue was out for
public comment?

As for the time frames, I agree with Avri and Wolf-Ulrich that there is no
reason to change the normal process.

Kind regards,


Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 4:54 PM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating


Since there is no reason to alter the std comment/reply process, I recommend
we just keep to the normal process with the normal dates.


On 1 Aug 2012, at 02:03, <KnobenW at telekom.de> <KnobenW at telekom.de> wrote:

> Thanks Julie.
> Since there is not any objecting comment: does anybody feel it being
necessary to extend beyond 20th of August? Otherwise the implementation
process could be as usual.
> Best regards 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 21:12
> An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
> Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating
> Dear SCI members,
> The comment period on the changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures
ended yesterday.  There was only one comment received.  It was from the
Registries Stakeholder Group in support of the changes.  See:
> The reply comment period begins today and extends to the 20th of August.
Given that many people may be on holiday, it might be useful to continue
with the reply period.  Please let me know if you would like a different
> Thank you very much.
>  Best regards,
> Julie
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20120802/e1e4482f/attachment.html>

More information about the Gnso-improvem-impl-sc mailing list