[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording SCI meeting - Thursday 6 December 2012

[Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu]

Ugh, that will be 3 a.m. in the morning for me as I will be in
Singapore, but I'll try to make it ... :) Thanks everyone!


Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong at law.unh.edu
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
(SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584  


>>> 


From:  
Julia Charvolen <julia.charvolen at icann.org> 

To: 
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org> 

CC: 
"gnso-secs at icann.org" <gnso-secs at icann.org> 

Date:  
12/6/2012 7:20 PM 

Subject:  
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording SCI meeting - Thursday 6 December
2012 

Dear All,   

 
The next call for the Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation
meeting is scheduled on Thursday 20 December 2012 at 20:00 UTC 

  
Please find the MP3 rerecording and transcript of the Standing
Committee on Improvements Implementation meeting held on Thursday 6
December 2012 at 20:00UTC.  

   
http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-20121206-en.mp3

On page: 
http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#dec

(transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page) 


 

Attendees: 
Ray Fassett – RySG 
Ronald Andruff – Commercial and Business Users Constituency - Primary 
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben – ISPCP – Primary 
J. Scott Evans – IPC Primary 
Avri Doria – Non Commercial SG – Primary 
Anne Aikman-Scalese – IPC Alternate 

 
Apologies :  
Angie Graves – Commercial and Business Users Constituency – Alternate 
Mary Wong -NCUC 
James Bladel – Registrar Stakeholder Group - Alternate 
Jennifer Standiford 

 
ICANN Staff: 
Marika Konings
Julia Charvolen 


 

** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** 

  

Let me know if you have any questions. 

Thank you. 

 
Kind regards, 
Julia Charvolen 
For GNSO Secretariat 

 
Adobe Connect chat transcript: 

 Julie Hedlund:Welcome Avri 

  Julie Hedlund:Hi Anne 

  Ron A:Just fell off the call, but was not suggesting you would loss
;o) 

  avri:Ron, it is quite alreaight.  It is midnight here  and it sounded
that way to me, but it amused me.  no worries.  you have to realie i
have been doing ITU and diplomatic double talk to 2.5 weeks now. 

  avri:... for 2.5 weeks now 

  avri:Really good question 

  Ron A:@ Avri - I feel your pain... 

  Ron A:@ Anne: That is my issue 

  avri:Yes, it could be easy to just add a line that says a suspeiton
must be for a fixed length of time. 

  avri:but who give notice.  and what is the vote thershold of that
motion. 

  Ron A:For those who have served on the Council, this may not be an
issue, but from the outside looking in, it looks like an open loop. 

  Ron A:Or better said: loophole 

  Marika Konings:No new vote would be required - the motion would
contain the 'timeinterval' for suspension as noted in the footnote at
which point the PDP would resume 

  J. Scott:I think Marika has made a very valid point 

  Marika Konings:with the previous instance ('thick' Whois) the PDP was
restarted (without a vote) before the actual end date of the original
suspension 

  Marika Konings:as there was Council agreement 

  J. Scott:Yes, Wolf-Ulrich.  I was saying "simple majority" 

  Ron A:IF the time suspension is included in the motion, THEN I am
okay with this. 

  J. Scott:What if we insert the term "stated" before the wording "time
interval" 

  avri:i need to drop off now. 

  Marika Konings:I think that would be a useful clarification 

  avri:will stay on adobe 

  Ron A:I support J Scott's proposal 

  Ray Fassett:agree with J Scott.  Appears to me the issue is making
clear that a time interval to resume is inherent with the suspension 

  Marika Konings:Exactly - no other vote required if timeframe is
included in the motion 

  Marika Konings:it would automatically restart, unless the Council
would take another vote 

  Ray Fassett:I think the time interval should be case by case vs. hard
scripting 

  Marika
Konings:http://gnso.icann.org/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-08apr11-en.pdf


  Marika Konings:There is also a summary:
http://gnso.icann.org/council/summary-gnso-wg-guidelines-06apr11-en.pdf


  Ron A:Thank you, Marika. 

  Wolf Knoben:Thanks to all 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20121206/69ecbf2d/attachment.html>