[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: Actions re: Deferral of Motions & Raising an Issue

[KnobenW at telekom.de]

Thanks for your assistance, Julie, very helpful.


Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich

________________________________
Von: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2012 23:29
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Betreff: Actions re: Deferral of Motions & Raising an Issue

Dear Wolf-Ulrich,

As noted today, you have the action to notify the GNSO Council of the results of the discussions by the SCI on Deferral of Motions and Raising an Issue.  To assist you with this action, I've included below the language that was agreed to by the SCI for responses to the Council.

With best regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

Deferral of Motions:  (Response language that was accepted by the SCI, including J. Scott's proposed changes.)

The SCI was asked to consider the current GNSO Council informal practice whereby a party may request the deferral of a motion to a later date in those situations where a formal process for a deferral is not specifically provided (for example, certain deferrals are foreseen as part of the GNSO PDP, see http://gnso.icann.org/council/annex-2-pdp-manual-16dec11-en.pdf). The SCI discussed this practice and whether there was a need to create a procedure to formalize this informal practice. After much debate, the SCI concluded that the current practice of allowing for the deferral of motions was done as a matter of courtesy at the discretion of the Chair of the GNSO Council.  For this reason, the SCI concluded that there was no need to create a formal procedure at this time.  However, the SCI felt that it was necessary to explicitly state that there is no rule that the Chair must always exercise his or her discretion in the affirmative or the negative. Given that the current informal practice is at the discretion of the Chair, the Chair can exercise that same discretion in considering whether to grant or deny any request and can also exercise his or her discretion when determining how to handle any specific situation that may occur with regard to this informal practice.

Raising an Issue: (Incorporates response language from the SCI.)

The SCI was asked to consider who can raise an issue for SCI consideration. After deliberating on this matter, the SCI agreed to maintain the status quo according to the Charter of the SCI.  This means only the GNSO Council or a group  chartered by the GNSO Council can request an item to be reviewed by the SCI.  However, the GNSO Council could possibly consider communicating to other SO/ACs / individuals, that if there are issues they would like to see reviewed by the SCI they will need to channel these via the GNSO Council and/or a group chartered by the GNSO Council.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20121207/6dd905bd/attachment.html>