[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: For final review - consent agenda

[KnobenW at telekom.de]

Thanks Marika,

Second phrase in the draft says: "All items that are not subject to a simple majority vote (see ICANN Bylaws, Article X, section 3-9) or are subject to absentee voting (see section 4.4. of the GNSO Operating Procedures) are not eligible for inclusion in the consent agenda."
Two questions: 1. Why don't we refer to the GNSO concil votings results table (which make reference to the bylaws, too)? 2. Excluding items from the consent agenda I understand we're here referring to items only which need a council vote. In other words: it should be clear that items not needing a council vote are not excluded.



Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich



________________________________
Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] Im Auftrag von Marika Konings
Gesendet: Montag, 4. Juni 2012 15:59
An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] For final review - consent agenda

Dear All,

As discussed during the SCI meeting last week, please find attached for final review the latest version of the proposed language for the consent agenda.

As a reminder, this issue was discussed extensively at the SCI meeting of 3 May (see notes of the meeting here: https://community.icann.org/x/JMTbAQ) and the language as originally proposed by J. Scott was updated accordingly (see http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg00172.html).

The SCI intends to finalize this language at its next meeting, so if you have any objections and/or suggestions, please share those with the mailing list as soon as possible.

With best regards,

Marika
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20120607/9f0c8c84/attachment.html>