From Krista.Papac at ausregistry.com Mon Mar 5 21:32:12 2012 From: Krista.Papac at ausregistry.com (Krista Papac) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 08:32:12 +1100 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: SCI activity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB6B2AE14467@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> Thanks for reengaging us Wolf-Ulrich. Apologies for the tardy response, but here's feedback on the three items you outlined: 1. In principle, a consent agenda makes sense but a definition of when and how it is used would be helpful. I like others suggestion of looking at how the Board does it, and go from there. Also a consent agenda could make things go much faster, but any "objector" should be given the chance to modify or address their concerns. Some topics could be kept in the Consent Agenda if only minor changes are made. 2. A reminder message about the SCI is a good suggestion. 3. Happy to participate in a F2F in Costa Rica, schedule permitting. Krista Papac Chief Strategy Officer AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd Email: krista.papac at ausregistry.com Web: www.ausregistry.com From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of KnobenW at telekom.de Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 3:48 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity Dear SCI members, after a phase of silent months it's now the right moment to put some items to the table which need input and recommendations from this committee. 1. Rules of procedure (http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-operating-procedures-16dec11-en.pdf) The GNSO council had a successful first run trial re a consent agenda which should be put in a formal process. One rugh suggestion for this is as follows: 1. The Chair or meeting leader calls for any opposition to said item being in the consent agenda. If any opposition is voiced, then that item is dropped from the consent agenda (and can be re-introduced at any time in the main agenda). 2. If no opposition is voiced to the item being on the consent agenda, the Chair or meeting leader calls for any opposition to the item itself. If any opposition is voiced, then no action is taken (and the item can be re-introduced at any time in the main agenda). 3. If no opposition, the consent agenda item is deemed approved by theGNSO Council. Obviously we need to discuss this in more detail, e.g. the goal of a consent agenda, which items could be included to a consent agenda and which should definitely be excluded e.a. It seems to make sense to include the text - once recommended - into chapter 3.0 of the rules "GNSO Council Meetings". 2. As discussed in Dakar, it might be worth sending out a reminder to the GNSO Council and SG/C leaders regarding the mandate of the SCI and the opportunity that exists to request review of GNSO Improvement related items. To this end, thanks to Marika the attached draft letter has been prepared for your consideration. Please feel free to comment. 3. Furthermore, in order to obtain feedback from WGs/DT on their experience with the GNSO Working Group Guidelines - as it is intended in the SCI charter - , it might be useful to develop a short survey which could facilitate data gathering and input. In order to kick off the discussion here are some bullet points: * The objective of the survey would be to determine whether there are any issues that were encountered by WG/Dts with the GNSO Working Group Guidelines, and/or identify areas for improvement * If deemed effective, such a survey could become a standard part of the self-evaluation process of WGs and provide the SCI with regular input on the status of the GNSO Working Group Guidelines Ideas for items to be included in the survey are welcome! I appreciate very much your response and hope to see most of you in Costa Rica. Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich Knoben -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From avri at acm.org Mon Mar 5 23:05:53 2012 From: avri at acm.org (Avri Doria) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 18:05:53 -0500 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8AD35C39-741E-4D75-84FC-444ADD53E17A@acm.org> Hi, A late response. And to think I am supposed to be the v-chair. Anyway. I. I am very nervous about the consent agenda idea. I would like to hear more about 1. Who gets to put it in the consent agenda. Is the chair alone enough or does it need unanimous consent of the leadership threesome 2. Does it need to be on the consent agenda when the agenda is first published? 3. is one person enough to remove it from the consent agenda? 4. How much time does someone have to remove it from the consent agenda? Can it be removed at the last minute? 5. What can and can't be put on a consent agenda: a issue report request, a pdp vote, charters, drafting team policy recommendations, canceling a comment period? I am inclined against it. And incidentally was not happy the Board started doing it either. I think too much stuff can either get swept under the rug, or passed without adequate discussion using such a mechanism. II. I think reminding people of the function and existence of the SCI is a good idea. And a letter is fine. Perhaps not this time around but next, we can arrange for each member of the group to give a std presentation to their SG?Con the goings on, or lack thereof of the group. III. Oh no, not another survey effort!!! At this point I think this might be better done by the group reps and that standard presentation I spoke of. the SCI reps should be the ones working their SG/C for problems or issues. And if there are now, we should be happy that no problems have arisen. III. Have we created our schedule yet of the periodic review processes we were going to be responsible for. Perhaps we should pick something this year for review. avri On 22 Feb 2012, at 18:48, wrote: > Dear SCI members, > > after a phase of silent months it's now the right moment to put some items to the table which need input and recommendations from this committee. > > 1. Rules of procedure (http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-operating-procedures-16dec11-en.pdf) > The GNSO council had a successful first run trial re a consent agenda which should be put in a formal process. One rugh suggestion for this is as follows: > 1. The Chair or meeting leader calls for any opposition to said item being in the consent agenda. If any opposition is voiced, then that item is dropped from the consent agenda (and can be re-introduced at any time in the main agenda). > > 2. If no opposition is voiced to the item being on the consent agenda, the Chair or meeting leader calls for any opposition to the item itself. If any opposition is voiced, then no action is taken (and the item can be re-introduced at any time in the main agenda). > > 3. If no opposition, the consent agenda item is deemed approved by theGNSO Council. > > Obviously we need to discuss this in more detail, e.g. the goal of a consent agenda, which items could be included to a consent agenda and which should definitely be excluded e.a. It seems to make sense to include the text - once recommended - into chapter 3.0 of the rules "GNSO Council Meetings". > > 2. As discussed in Dakar, it might be worth sending out a reminder to the GNSO Council and SG/C leaders regarding the mandate of the SCI and the opportunity that exists to request review of GNSO Improvement related items. To this end, thanks to Marika the attached draft letter has been prepared for your consideration. Please feel free to comment. > > 3. Furthermore, in order to obtain feedback from WGs/DT on their experience with the GNSO Working Group Guidelines - as it is intended in the SCI charter - , it might be useful to develop a short survey which could facilitate data gathering and input. In order to kick off the discussion here are some bullet points: > > ? The objective of the survey would be to determine whether there are any issues that were encountered by WG/Dts with the GNSO Working Group Guidelines, and/or identify areas for improvement > ? If deemed effective, such a survey could become a standard part of the self-evaluation process of WGs and provide the SCI with regular input on the status of the GNSO Working Group Guidelines > > Ideas for items to be included in the survey are welcome! > > > I appreciate very much your response and hope to see most of you in Costa Rica. > Kind regards > > Wolf-Ulrich Knoben > > From AAikman at lrlaw.com Mon Mar 5 23:13:37 2012 From: AAikman at lrlaw.com (Aikman-Scalese, Anne) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 23:13:37 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity In-Reply-To: <8AD35C39-741E-4D75-84FC-444ADD53E17A@acm.org> References: <8AD35C39-741E-4D75-84FC-444ADD53E17A@acm.org> Message-ID: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD94496FB2B@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> I should think review of the revised PDP guidelines over the next year might be appropriate. Not sure to what extent we want to survey as to WG issues that arose before that. Some of the issues encountered there may well be addressed by the new PDP guidelines. Could someone please educate me as to the top GNSO improvements (other than new PDP) over the past couple of years? As J. Scott's alternate, very happy to meet in Costa Rica per schedule to be proposed by Wolf-Ulrich. Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP ? Suite 700 One South Church Avenue ? Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 ? Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman at LRLaw.com ? www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. ________________________________ For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com. Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From avri at acm.org Mon Mar 5 23:22:43 2012 From: avri at acm.org (Avri Doria) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 18:22:43 -0500 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity In-Reply-To: References: <104A2680A0F7435EA8C948F042B02898@ron> Message-ID: On 23 Feb 2012, at 11:54, wrote: > What do others think about an F2F meeting in CR? This seems to be relatively difficult to manage since we're already close to the CR meeting. The only timeslot I could see would be on Saturday morning before 10:00 a.m. But this should be confirmed by Glen - in case more people opt for this. > Assuming we can find a time that works for most, seems like an ok idea. i think i can handle before 10am Saturday. avri From AAikman at lrlaw.com Mon Mar 5 23:29:24 2012 From: AAikman at lrlaw.com (Aikman-Scalese, Anne) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 23:29:24 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity In-Reply-To: References: <104A2680A0F7435EA8C948F042B02898@ron> Message-ID: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD94496FB7F@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> When does the GNSO start its Saturday work session? Shouldn't we meet before that or during one of their breaks? Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP * Suite 700 One South Church Avenue * Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 * Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman at LRLaw.com * www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 4:23 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity On 23 Feb 2012, at 11:54, wrote: > What do others think about an F2F meeting in CR? This seems to be relatively difficult to manage since we're already close to the CR meeting. The only timeslot I could see would be on Saturday morning before 10:00 a.m. But this should be confirmed by Glen - in case more people opt for this. > Assuming we can find a time that works for most, seems like an ok idea. i think i can handle before 10am Saturday. avri ---------------------- For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com. Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer From Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu Mon Mar 5 23:35:03 2012 From: Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu (Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu) Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:35:03 -0500 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity In-Reply-To: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD94496FB7F@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> References: <104A2680A0F7435EA8C948F042B02898@ron> <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD94496FB7F@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Message-ID: <4F5507570200005B000867C2@smtp.law.unh.edu> The GNSO sessions start at 10 a.m. Armed with some good, strong Costa Rican coffee, I think I can handle meeting F2F before that ... :) I wonder if anyone will ask the SCI to look at the "improved" bicameral House and Stakeholder Group/Constituency structure and see if it's working .... (yikes!) Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301USAEmail: mary.wong at law.unh.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" To:"'Avri Doria'" , "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" Date: 3/5/2012 6:31 PM Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity When does the GNSO start its Saturday work session? Shouldn't we meet before that or during one of their breaks? Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP * Suite 700 One South Church Avenue * Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 * Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman at LRLaw.com * www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 4:23 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity On 23 Feb 2012, at 11:54, wrote: > What do others think about an F2F meeting in CR? This seems to be relatively difficult to manage since we're already close to the CR meeting. The only timeslot I could see would be on Saturday morning before 10:00 a.m. But this should be confirmed by Glen - in case more people opt for this. > Assuming we can find a time that works for most, seems like an ok idea. i think i can handle before 10am Saturday. avri ---------------------- For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com. Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From avri at acm.org Mon Mar 5 23:38:36 2012 From: avri at acm.org (Avri Doria) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 18:38:36 -0500 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity In-Reply-To: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD94496FB7F@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> References: <104A2680A0F7435EA8C948F042B02898@ron> <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD94496FB7F@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Message-ID: Hi, I think that was the point at about Saturday before 10am Meeting during breaks gets harder because people tend to go huddle amongst their own kind during those breaks (except for the few who flit from group to group). And before you know it, the break is done. avri On 5 Mar 2012, at 18:29, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote: > > When does the GNSO start its Saturday work session? Shouldn't we meet before that or during one of their breaks? > Anne > > > Anne E. Aikman-Scalese > Of Counsel > Lewis and Roca LLP * Suite 700 > One South Church Avenue * Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 > Tel (520) 629-4428 * Fax (520) 879-4725 > AAikman at LRLaw.com * www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman > P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. > This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information > intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. > If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the > agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication > was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 4:23 PM > To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org > Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity > > > > On 23 Feb 2012, at 11:54, wrote: > >> What do others think about an F2F meeting in CR? This seems to be relatively difficult to manage since we're already close to the CR meeting. The only timeslot I could see would be on Saturday morning before 10:00 a.m. But this should be confirmed by Glen - in case more people opt for this. >> > > > Assuming we can find a time that works for most, seems like an ok idea. > i think i can handle before 10am Saturday. > > avri > > > > > ---------------------- > For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com. > > Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 > Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 > Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 > > This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. > In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer > > From KnobenW at telekom.de Tue Mar 6 07:15:58 2012 From: KnobenW at telekom.de (KnobenW at telekom.de) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 08:15:58 +0100 Subject: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity In-Reply-To: References: <104A2680A0F7435EA8C948F042B02898@ron> <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD94496FB7F@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Message-ID: Thanks for all responses. Let's try to hold a meeting on Saturday 9:00 am. I know its a challenge for Glen and Marika but if we get a room at least that would be fine. Marika, Glen could you help plsease? I'll send out a short agenda later this week. Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] Im Auftrag von Avri Doria Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. M?rz 2012 00:39 An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Betreff: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity Hi, I think that was the point at about Saturday before 10am Meeting during breaks gets harder because people tend to go huddle amongst their own kind during those breaks (except for the few who flit from group to group). And before you know it, the break is done. avri On 5 Mar 2012, at 18:29, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote: > > When does the GNSO start its Saturday work session? Shouldn't we meet before that or during one of their breaks? > Anne > > > Anne E. Aikman-Scalese > Of Counsel > Lewis and Roca LLP * Suite 700 > One South Church Avenue * Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 > Tel (520) 629-4428 * Fax (520) 879-4725 > AAikman at LRLaw.com * www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman > P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. > This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information > intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. > If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the > agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication > was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 4:23 PM > To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org > Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity > > > > On 23 Feb 2012, at 11:54, wrote: > >> What do others think about an F2F meeting in CR? This seems to be relatively difficult to manage since we're already close to the CR meeting. The only timeslot I could see would be on Saturday morning before 10:00 a.m. But this should be confirmed by Glen - in case more people opt for this. >> > > > Assuming we can find a time that works for most, seems like an ok idea. > i think i can handle before 10am Saturday. > > avri > > > > > ---------------------- > For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com. > > Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 > Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 > Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 > > This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. > In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer > > From Glen at icann.org Tue Mar 6 08:00:28 2012 From: Glen at icann.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Glen_de_Saint_G=E9ry?=) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:00:28 -0800 Subject: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <41F6C547EA49EC46B4EE1EB2BC2F34184ABD30E10F@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> OK will do! Glen ----- Message d'origine ----- De : KnobenW at telekom.de [mailto:KnobenW at telekom.de] Envoy? : Monday, March 05, 2012 11:15 PM ? : avri at acm.org ; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Cc : Glen de Saint G?ry Objet : AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity Thanks for all responses. Let's try to hold a meeting on Saturday 9:00 am. I know its a challenge for Glen and Marika but if we get a room at least that would be fine. Marika, Glen could you help plsease? I'll send out a short agenda later this week. Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] Im Auftrag von Avri Doria Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. M?rz 2012 00:39 An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Betreff: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity Hi, I think that was the point at about Saturday before 10am Meeting during breaks gets harder because people tend to go huddle amongst their own kind during those breaks (except for the few who flit from group to group). And before you know it, the break is done. avri On 5 Mar 2012, at 18:29, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote: > > When does the GNSO start its Saturday work session? Shouldn't we meet before that or during one of their breaks? > Anne > > > Anne E. Aikman-Scalese > Of Counsel > Lewis and Roca LLP * Suite 700 > One South Church Avenue * Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 > Tel (520) 629-4428 * Fax (520) 879-4725 > AAikman at LRLaw.com * www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman > P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. > This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information > intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. > If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the > agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication > was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 4:23 PM > To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org > Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity > > > > On 23 Feb 2012, at 11:54, wrote: > >> What do others think about an F2F meeting in CR? This seems to be relatively difficult to manage since we're already close to the CR meeting. The only timeslot I could see would be on Saturday morning before 10:00 a.m. But this should be confirmed by Glen - in case more people opt for this. >> > > > Assuming we can find a time that works for most, seems like an ok idea. > i think i can handle before 10am Saturday. > > avri > > > > > ---------------------- > For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com. > > Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 > Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 > Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 > > This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. > In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer > > From marika.konings at icann.org Tue Mar 6 08:35:35 2012 From: marika.konings at icann.org (Marika Konings) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:35:35 -0800 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity In-Reply-To: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD94496FB2B@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Message-ID: Hi Anne, I'm not sure whether you are referring to the GNSO WG Guidelines or the revised GNSO PDP. With regard to the latter, the revised GNSO PDP only entered into force on 8 December of last year and even though all ongoing PDPs have now converted to the revised GNSO PDP, there has not been a PDP that has been conducted from start to finish under these new rules yet. It also might be worth pointing out that the WT responsible for developing this revised PDP recommended that 'periodic assessment of the overall PDP process is important, noting that a certain threshold of completed PDPs should be met before an overall review is carried out'. As a reminder, I've attached the overview of the GNSO Improvement documents relevant to the SCI. I hope this is helpful. With best regards, Marika From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" > Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:13:37 -0800 To: Avri Doria >, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" > Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity I should think review of the revised PDP guidelines over the next year might be appropriate. Not sure to what extent we want to survey as to WG issues that arose before that. Some of the issues encountered there may well be addressed by the new PDP guidelines. Could someone please educate me as to the top GNSO improvements (other than new PDP) over the past couple of years? As J. Scott's alternate, very happy to meet in Costa Rica per schedule to be proposed by Wolf-Ulrich. Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP ? Suite 700 One South Church Avenue ? Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 ? Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman at LRLaw.com ? www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. ________________________________ For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com. Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jscottevans at yahoo.com Tue Mar 6 11:38:12 2012 From: jscottevans at yahoo.com (J. Scott Evans) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 03:38:12 -0800 (PST) Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity Message-ID: <1331033892.7315.YahooMailMobile@web160403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Happy to meet before 10 AM Saturday. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com Tue Mar 6 13:06:19 2012 From: carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com (carlos dionisio aguirre) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 13:06:19 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity In-Reply-To: <1331033892.7315.YahooMailMobile@web160403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <1331033892.7315.YahooMailMobile@web160403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Saturday before 10 am sounds good for me. Carlos Dionisio Aguirre NCA GNSO Council - ICANN former ALAC member by LACRALO Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 03:38:12 -0800 From: jscottevans at yahoo.com Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity To: Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Happy to meet before 10 AM Saturday. From: Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu ; To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org ; Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity Sent: Mon, Mar 5, 2012 11:35:03 PM The GNSO sessions start at 10 a.m. Armed with some good, strong Costa Rican coffee, I think I can handle meeting F2F before that ... :) I wonder if anyone will ask the SCI to look at the "improved" bicameral House and Stakeholder Group/Constituency structure and see if it's working .... (yikes!) Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law Chair, Graduate IP Programs Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW Two White Street Concord, NH 03301 USA Email: mary.wong at law.unh.edu Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" To: "'Avri Doria'" , "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" Date: 3/5/2012 6:31 PM Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity When does the GNSO start its Saturday work session? Shouldn't we meet before that or during one of their breaks? Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP * Suite 700 One South Church Avenue * Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 * Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman at LRLaw.com * www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 4:23 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity On 23 Feb 2012, at 11:54, wrote: > What do others think about an F2F meeting in CR? This seems to be relatively difficult to manage since we're already close to the CR meeting. The only timeslot I could see would be on Saturday morning before 10:00 a.m. But this should be confirmed by Glen - in case more people opt for this. > Assuming we can find a time that works for most, seems like an ok idea. i think i can handle before 10am Saturday. avri ---------------------- For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com. Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From marika.konings at icann.org Tue Mar 6 15:27:14 2012 From: marika.konings at icann.org (Marika Konings) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 07:27:14 -0800 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity In-Reply-To: Message-ID: And now with the attachment. Apologies for that. Marika From: Marika Konings > Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:35:35 -0800 To: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" >, Avri Doria >, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" > Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity Hi Anne, I'm not sure whether you are referring to the GNSO WG Guidelines or the revised GNSO PDP. With regard to the latter, the revised GNSO PDP only entered into force on 8 December of last year and even though all ongoing PDPs have now converted to the revised GNSO PDP, there has not been a PDP that has been conducted from start to finish under these new rules yet. It also might be worth pointing out that the WT responsible for developing this revised PDP recommended that 'periodic assessment of the overall PDP process is important, noting that a certain threshold of completed PDPs should be met before an overall review is carried out'. As a reminder, I've attached the overview of the GNSO Improvement documents relevant to the SCI. I hope this is helpful. With best regards, Marika From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" > Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:13:37 -0800 To: Avri Doria >, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" > Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity I should think review of the revised PDP guidelines over the next year might be appropriate. Not sure to what extent we want to survey as to WG issues that arose before that. Some of the issues encountered there may well be addressed by the new PDP guidelines. Could someone please educate me as to the top GNSO improvements (other than new PDP) over the past couple of years? As J. Scott's alternate, very happy to meet in Costa Rica per schedule to be proposed by Wolf-Ulrich. Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca LLP ? Suite 700 One South Church Avenue ? Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) 629-4428 ? Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman at LRLaw.com ? www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. ________________________________ For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com. Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: List of documents relevant to the SCI - Updated 6 March 2012.doc Type: application/x-msword Size: 34304 bytes Desc: List of documents relevant to the SCI - Updated 6 March 2012.doc URL: From KnobenW at telekom.de Thu Mar 8 17:59:18 2012 From: KnobenW at telekom.de (KnobenW at telekom.de) Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 18:59:18 +0100 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity In-Reply-To: References: <104A2680A0F7435EA8C948F042B02898@ron> <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD94496FB7F@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Message-ID: All, the SCI meeting is scheduled for Sat, 10 Mar, 09:00-10:00 am, in Room La Paz B. Attached is a draft agenda. Looking forward to seeing you and Save travels Wolf-Ulrich -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Agenda100312.doc Type: application/msword Size: 22528 bytes Desc: Agenda100312.doc URL: From Glen at icann.org Thu Mar 8 18:05:01 2012 From: Glen at icann.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Glen_de_Saint_G=E9ry?=) Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:05:01 -0800 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity In-Reply-To: References: <104A2680A0F7435EA8C948F042B02898@ron> <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD94496FB7F@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Message-ID: <41F6C547EA49EC46B4EE1EB2BC2F34184ABD176DEC@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Dear Avri and wolf-Ulrich, We have a room, La Paz B, for the SCI meeting on Saturday 10 March however, there will be no telephone connection, Adobe Connect, audio streaming or transcription for the meeting due to the lateness of the request because all the requests had to be in by 3 February in order to have all the facilities. Our apologies for this inconvenience. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint G?ry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org -----Message d'origine----- De?: KnobenW at telekom.de [mailto:KnobenW at telekom.de] Envoy??: mardi 6 mars 2012 08:16 ??: avri at acm.org; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Cc?: Glen de Saint G?ry Objet?: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity Thanks for all responses. Let's try to hold a meeting on Saturday 9:00 am. I know its a challenge for Glen and Marika but if we get a room at least that would be fine. Marika, Glen could you help plsease? I'll send out a short agenda later this week. Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] Im Auftrag von Avri Doria Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. M?rz 2012 00:39 An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Betreff: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity Hi, I think that was the point at about Saturday before 10am Meeting during breaks gets harder because people tend to go huddle amongst their own kind during those breaks (except for the few who flit from group to group). And before you know it, the break is done. avri On 5 Mar 2012, at 18:29, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote: > > When does the GNSO start its Saturday work session? Shouldn't we meet before that or during one of their breaks? > Anne > > > Anne E. Aikman-Scalese > Of Counsel > Lewis and Roca LLP * Suite 700 > One South Church Avenue * Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 Tel (520) > 629-4428 * Fax (520) 879-4725 AAikman at LRLaw.com * > www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman P Please consider the environment before > printing this e-mail. > This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information > intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. > If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the > agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication > was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org > [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 4:23 PM > To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org > Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI activity > > > > On 23 Feb 2012, at 11:54, wrote: > >> What do others think about an F2F meeting in CR? This seems to be relatively difficult to manage since we're already close to the CR meeting. The only timeslot I could see would be on Saturday morning before 10:00 a.m. But this should be confirmed by Glen - in case more people opt for this. >> > > > Assuming we can find a time that works for most, seems like an ok idea. > i think i can handle before 10am Saturday. > > avri > > > > > ---------------------- > For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to www.lewisandroca.com. > > Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900 > Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400 > Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380 > > This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. > In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise > you that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was > not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any > taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on > the taxpayer > > From KnobenW at telekom.de Mon Mar 12 13:46:22 2012 From: KnobenW at telekom.de (KnobenW at telekom.de) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:46:22 +0100 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting Message-ID: All, attached is a short summary of the SCI meeting held in San Jos?, Costa Rica. Glen, would you be so kind to post it to the Wiki? Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Summary_SCI meeting_100312.doc Type: application/msword Size: 25600 bytes Desc: Summary_SCI meeting_100312.doc URL: From KnobenW at telekom.de Thu Mar 15 23:58:42 2012 From: KnobenW at telekom.de (KnobenW at telekom.de) Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:58:42 +0100 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting Message-ID: All, In addition to the tasks we took at our meeting the SCI is asked by the GNSO council to look at the issue of GNSO Council deferral requests for motions. As we agreed to reconvene after mid of April it would be helpful to prepare a little in specifying the problem in more detail. Looking into how in the past the council handled deferrals would be useful. I'd therefore like to ask Marika whether staff would take over this survey. >From my point of view the following criteria could apply for this survey: - starting with council meetings under the new house structure - type, name and date of motion deferred - deferral requested by which SG/constituency - rationale given for the request - repeated request for deferral if applicable? Please add any criteria which may be useful. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From avri at acm.org Fri Mar 16 06:43:38 2012 From: avri at acm.org (Avri Doria) Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:43:38 -0600 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Sounds like a good task for the group. We also need to include as a base the new PDP requirements that include a individual councilor based right of deferral on PDP votes. Or perhaps we even need to discuss if this is a good reason given the requirements these days for posting of motions and reports weeks in advance of any meeting. The deferral made/makes a lot of sense when the information is still raw, or perhaps incomplete. But whether it makes sense in those cases where a SG/C has had the information in a stable format for weeks, is indeed debatable - in the days when the practice started, often a report was made available a few days before a vote. Should be an interesting discussion. I am glad the council called for the intial research. avri On 15 Mar 2012, at 17:58, wrote: > All, > > In addition to the tasks we took at our meeting the SCI is asked by the GNSO council to look at the issue of GNSO Council deferral requests for motions. > As we agreed to reconvene after mid of April it would be helpful to prepare a little in specifying the problem in more detail. Looking into how in the past the council handled deferrals would be useful. > > I'd therefore like to ask Marika whether staff would take over this survey. > > From my point of view the following criteria could apply for this survey: > - starting with council meetings under the new house structure > - type, name and date of motion deferred > - deferral requested by which SG/constituency > - rationale given for the request > - repeated request for deferral if applicable? > > Please add any criteria which may be useful. > > > Best regards > Wolf-Ulrich From randruff at rnapartners.com Mon Mar 19 15:34:57 2012 From: randruff at rnapartners.com (Ron Andruff) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:34:57 -0400 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Dear Wolf-Ulrich, For those of us who were unable to attend the SCI meeting in San Jose, will there be a summary email sent out to advise what was discussed and what decisions were taken there? Please advise. Kind regards, RA Ronald N. Andruff President RNA Partners, Inc. 220 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10001 + 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11 _____ From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of KnobenW at telekom.de Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 7:59 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting All, In addition to the tasks we took at our meeting the SCI is asked by the GNSO council to look at the issue of GNSO Council deferral requests for motions. As we agreed to reconvene after mid of April it would be helpful to prepare a little in specifying the problem in more detail. Looking into how in the past the council handled deferrals would be useful. I'd therefore like to ask Marika whether staff would take over this survey. >From my point of view the following criteria could apply for this survey: - starting with council meetings under the new house structure - type, name and date of motion deferred - deferral requested by which SG/constituency - rationale given for the request - repeated request for deferral if applicable? Please add any criteria which may be useful. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: