[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: CONCENSUS on Revised Suspension - Termination of a PDP

[Ron Andruff]

Thank you, Wolf. ISPs are duly noted as having approved this draft.

 

Thank you also for volunteering to participate in the sub-group to review
the Charter.  You will be hearing from Julie shortly to set up a call(s) for
that work.

 

Kind regards,

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

RNA <http://www.rnapartners.com>  Partners, Inc.

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of WUKnoben
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 7:52 AM
To: Julie Hedlund; Ron Andruff; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: CONCENSUS on Revised Suspension -
Termination of a PDP

 

Anyway - my support as ISPCP primary rep.


Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 

From: Julie <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>  Hedlund 

Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 7:24 PM

To: Ron <mailto:randruff at rnapartners.com>  Andruff ;
gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org 

Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: CONCENSUS on Revised Suspension -
Termination of a PDP

 

Ron,

 

Just a reminder that before this can go to the Council it will need to go
out for public comment because the revisions are substantial.  It is helpful
to know whether all agree that this version is the one we want to send out
for comment, and then the next steps are as follows:

 

1.  30-day comment period in the public forum

2.  Reply period (only if necessary)

3.  Analysis and consideration of comments (if any)

4.  Revisions resulting from comments (if necessary)

5.  Final version to Council for approval

 

Best regards,

 

Julie

 

From: Ron Andruff <randruff at rnapartners.com>
Organization: RNA Partners
Date: Thursday, February 21, 2013 12:14 PM
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>,
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
Subject: RE: CONCENSUS on Revised Suspension - Termination of a PDP

 

Dear Committee Members,

 

Julie sent out the revised language on the Termination and Suspension with
attachments this morning and the link to the doc (on our wiki) is noted
below for easy reference.  

 

It appears that we have this matter ready to go back to the GNSO Council,
but before sending it over we need the other constituencies (primary or
secondary member) to confirm your agreement so that we have consensus.  At
this point it has IPC and BC support.

 

Thank you all for your prompt attention to this matter.

 

Kind regards,

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

RNA <http://www.rnapartners.com>  Partners, Inc.

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 10:12 AM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Revised Suspension - Termination of a PDP

 

Dear SCI members,

 

Per our discussion on yesterday's call, attached for your review (in Word
and PDF) is the revised text of the section on termination and suspension of
a PDP with all previous edits accepted.  I have included, as the only
redline, the one change suggested by Anne in the meeting.  The revised
document is attached and also posted on the 06 March meeting page under the
heading "For Review" at
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosci/06+March+2013. 

 

Best regards,

 

Julie

 

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20130225/0763e84d/attachment.html>