[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR DISCUSSION: Re-Submission of a Motion
Julie Hedlund
julie.hedlund at icann.org
Mon Jul 1 17:51:13 UTC 2013
Dear SCI members,
As discussed on our 04 June call, we will continue discussion on
re-submission of a motion at our meeting tomorrow, 02 July. There was
agreement on option 2 (see below), but not on which criteria to include (see
comments from Anne and James in their emails below).
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
Procedure for Re-Submission of a Motion:
Option 2 -- Set one or more high-level criteria (in this order):
1) Provide a reasoning to justify the resubmission of a motion. Complete no
later than the deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the
next GNSO Council meeting.
2) Publish the text of the re-submitted motion. Complete no later than the
deadline for submitting a motion -- 8 days prior to the next GNSO Council
meeting.
3) Require a seconder of the motion from each house as a prerequisite for
placing the re-submission of the motion on the consent agenda.
4) Allow a councilor to ask for the re-submission of the motion to be taken
off the consent agenda and to request a Council vote on whether to accept
the re-submission.
---------------------------------------------------------------
From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman at lrlaw.com <mailto:AAikman at lrlaw.com> >
Date: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 2:42 PM
To: Ron Andruff <randruff at rnapartners.com <mailto:randruff at rnapartners.com>
>, James Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com <mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com> >,
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org> "
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org> >
Cc: 'Jennifer Standiford' <JStandiford at web.com <mailto:JStandiford at web.com>
>
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI
Meeting 06 March Re-Submitting a Motion
Ron,
I had wanted to report to SCI that in its full meeting in Beijing, the IPC
agreed to the first two criteria listed in Item 2 of the "one or more high
level criteria" to be set for resubmitting a motion.
Anne
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org> ] On Behalf Of James M.
Bladel?Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 9:51 PM?To:
gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
?Cc: Jennifer Standiford?Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re:
Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion?Importance:
High
Hello SCI Team:
Last week, Jennifer and I were able to consult with the Registrar
Stakeholder Group (RrSG) on this issue. We can report that RrSG members
strongly favor Option #2.
Additionally, Registrars agree with the proposed criteria listed, -except-
for item #2.4, which they note could be redundant if Items #2.1-#2.3 are
followed. Finally, RrSG members would like to see the inclusion of some
limitations (per year or minimum time frame) on how frequently a motion may
be re-introduced.
We look forward to further discussions on our next call.
Thanks--
J.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20130701/003843cb/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5041 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20130701/003843cb/smime.p7s>
More information about the Gnso-improvem-impl-sc
mailing list