[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Invite re: Survey on Working Group Guidelines

[Ron Andruff]

Julie, 

 

As noted below, Avri and James have confirmed their agreement for the survey
to be sent over,  Can you prepare the communication as we have discussed.

 

Thank you to all of the committee members for your good work on this matter.

 

Kind regards,

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

RNA <http://www.rnapartners.com>  Partners, Inc.

  _____  

From: James M. Bladel [mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 8:13 PM
To: Ron Andruff; 'Avri Doria'
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Invite re: Survey on
Working Group Guidelines

 

Hi Ron & Avri.  Ok by me.


Thanks--

 

J.

 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Invite re: Survey on
Working Group Guidelines
From: "Ron Andruff" <randruff at rnapartners.com>
Date: Thu, March 07, 2013 4:49 pm
To: "'Avri Doria'" <avri at acm.org>
Cc: "'James M. Bladel'" <jbladel at godaddy.com>

Thank you, Avri.

James? Are you good to go with this approach? Please advise.

Kind regards,

RA

Ronald N. Andruff

RNA Partners, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 4:53 PM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Invite re: Survey on
Working Group Guidelines


Hi,

I am only a lowly member of the IRTP-D group.
While James is again Chair.

I see no problem with this approach.

One thing to note is the group is mostly composed of people who were on
IRTP-[a-d], though there are some newcomers each time. I think I joined the
train at IRTP-B.

avri

On 7 Mar 2013, at 15:08, Julie Hedlund wrote:

> Dear Ron and SCI members,
> 
> Below for your review is a draft email to go from Ron Andruff to the IRTP
Part C Working Group. As the SCI agreed, it would be helpful for a Working
Group that recently completed its work to take the survey. The IRTP-C
Working Group was suggested as an option. James Bladel and Avri Doria were
the Co-Chairs of the IRTP-C Working Group. Perhaps James and Avri could
indicate on this list whether they agree with this approach. If so, below
is a draft message to go from Ron to the Working Group list for your
consideration.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Julie
> 
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Subject: Invite to Participate in Survey on Working Group Guidelines
> 
> Dear IRTP-C Working Group members,
> 
> As some of you may know, the GNSO Standing Committee on Implementation
Improvements (SCI) has developed a survey for GNSO Working Groups, as
requested by the GNSO Council, to solicit feedback on the GNSO Working Group
Guidelines. As Chair of the SCI, I am contacting your Working Group to
invite you to take the survey because you have recently completed your work
and, thus, may have valuable insight on the usefulness of the Working Group
Guidelines and suggestions for improvements. If you would like to take the
survey you may wish to review the Working Group Guidelines and Summary
first. Please see the following links to the documents and the survey:
> 
> Link to the Working Group Guidelines:
http://gnso.icann.org/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-08apr11-en.pdf
> Link to the Guidelines Summary:
http://gnso.icann.org/council/summary-gnso-wg-guidelines-06apr11-en.pdf 
> Link to Draft Survey for GNSO Working Groups:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/FFTCJPT
> 
> The SCI appreciates your consideration of this request and we ask that if
you wish to complete the survey please do so by **Monday, 25 March 2013.**
> 
> Thank you for your consideration.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Ron Andruff
> Chair, GNSO Standing Committee on Implementation Improvements



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20130307/abe03671/attachment.html>