[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting 06 March Re-Submitting a Motion

Wed May 29 18:50:23 UTC 2013

Thank you, Anne.  We will take this up on our call this coming Tuesday.

Kind regards,

RA

Ronald N. Andruff

RNA <http://www.rnapartners.com>  Partners, Inc.

  _____  

From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne [mailto:AAikman at lrlaw.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 2:43 PM
To: 'Ron Andruff'; 'James M. Bladel'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Cc: 'Jennifer Standiford'
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI
Meeting 06 March Re-Submitting a Motion

Ron, 

I had wanted to report to SCI that in its full meeting in Beijing, the IPC
agreed to the first two criteria listed in Item 2 of the "one or more high
level criteria" to be set for resubmitting a motion.

Anne

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP . Suite 700
One South Church Avenue . Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 . Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman at LRLaw.com . www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman 

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the 
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the
original message.

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 8:49 AM
To: 'James M. Bladel'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Cc: 'Jennifer Standiford'
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI
Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion

Thank you James and Jennifer for the quick turnaround on this matter.  As I
understand it, the request for re-submitting a motion had never happened
before the first occasion, which brought it to our table, but I agree that
it would be for the Committee to discuss the idea of frequency to make sure
we are all of like mind as to what this would mean.

By way of this mail, I am asking Julie to be sure to include this in our
next meeting.

Kind regards,

RA

Ronald N. Andruff

RNA <http://www.rnapartners.com>  Partners, Inc.

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 9:51 PM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Cc: Jennifer Standiford
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI
Meeting 06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion
Importance: High

Hello SCI Team:

Last week, Jennifer and I were able to consult with the Registrar
Stakeholder Group (RrSG) on this issue.  We can report that RrSG members
strongly favor Option #2.

Additionally, Registrars agree with the proposed criteria listed, -except-
for item #2.4, which they note could be redundant if Items #2.1-#2.3 are
followed.  Finally, RrSG members would like to see the inclusion of some
limitations (per year or minimum time frame) on how frequently a motion may
be re-introduced.

We look forward to further discussions on our next call.

Thanks--

J.

From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 15:45
To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Re: Action item from SCI Meeting
06 March -- Re-Submitting a Motion

Dear SCI members,

This is a reminder of the action item on re-submitting a motion.  The action
item is as follows:

-- Re-Submitting a Motion -- SCI members: Circulate the options to their
Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies. 

It is our understanding that we still need to hear from the Intellectual
Property Constituency and the Registrar Stakeholder Group.  All of the other
representatives on the SCI support option 2 below with all the criteria.

Best regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

Possible Options for Addressing the Re-Submission of a Motion:

1.  Leave up to discretion of the Chair

2.  Set one or more high-level criteria (in this order):

1)  Provide a reasoning to justify the resubmission of a motion. Complete no
later than the deadline for submitting a motion --  8 days prior to  the
next GNSO Council meeting.

2)  Publish the text of the re-submitted motion. Complete no later than the
deadline for submitting a motion --  8 days prior to  the next GNSO Council
meeting.

3)  Require a seconder of the motion from each house as a prerequisite for
placing the re-submission of the motion on the consent agenda.

4)  Allow a councilor to ask for the re-submission of the motion to be taken
off the consent agenda and to request a Council vote on whether to accept
the re-submission.

  _____  

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to
<http://www.lewisandroca.com/> www.lewisandroca.com.

Phoenix (602)262-5311

Reno (775)823-2900

Tucson (520)622-2090

Albuquerque (505)764-5400

Las Vegas (702)949-8200

Silicon Valley (650)391-1380

  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message
to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. 

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you
that if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended
or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the
purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20130529/a1e0ff5a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3225 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20130529/a1e0ff5a/image001.gif>