[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Chair's Report to Council

[Amr Elsadr]

Hi,

I think 1 and 2 would be good recommendations to include in the letter. Like I said before though, I would appreciate it if the context on why we want to now raise the issue of 10-day rule waivers’ applicability to resubmitted motions be presented as clearly as possible. I’d be glad to help with that, if needed.

Thanks.

Amr

On Feb 3, 2015, at 1:19 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com> wrote:

> Dear SCI members, please provide your informal responses to the two questions below by 20:00 UTC on Thursday February 4.
>  
> Lori and I are finalizing the Chair’s report to Council.  Staff has prepared some draft slides for this purpose and we will be making minor edits.  For purposes of completing these edits, it would be helpful for each member to weigh in on the two questions below.  (Please note this is an informal inquiry  – not a formal Consensus Call since these topics do not involve a formal SCI recommendation to Council.)
>  
> 1.       In connection with the question of establishing a procedure for friendly amendments in the Council Operating Procedures, should SCI undertake this work?
>  
> 2.       In connection with the question of considering the application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmission of motions in the Operating Procedures, should SCI undertake this work?
>  
>  
> With respect to Question 1, I have not heard any disagreement or objection in the January 20 call or on the list, but Mary Wong is very concerned that only three people have provided comment and feels it is quite important for SCI to have the results of a “straw poll” on the topic of friendly amendments.
>  
> With respect to Topic 2, I understand that both Greg and Amr believe this topic should be addressed, but Avri does not.  Again, there is concern that comment from three SCI members is incomplete.  
>  
> Regarding other topics discussed in the January call and on the list since that time, I believe it is clear that those topics come under the “periodic review” element in our Charter and require at a minimum (1) Review and discussion of the Westlake Report and (2) formulation of a proposed plan under the SCI’s “periodic review” responsibilities as to which we will need formal consensus for the purpose of making a recommendation to Council.  I would like to suggest that SCI work toward adopting such a “periodic review” recommendation under its Charter in time for the Buenos Aires meeting but realize that others may have different thoughts.   This can be explored further  in future calls.
>  
> Thank you,
> Anne
>  
> <image001.gif>
> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com
>  
>  
> From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:07 AM
> To: 'Julie Hedlund'; 'Avri Doria'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
> Cc: Glen de Saint Géry
> Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan Robinson
>  
> Thanks Julie.  I will work with Lori on this as we hear further thoughts on the list.
> Anne
>  
> <image001.gif>
> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com
>  
>  
> From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 9:17 AM
> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Avri Doria'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
> Cc: Glen de Saint Géry
> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan Robinson
>  
> Anne,
>  
> I can assist by preparing a couple of slides.  I can look back at your message, but ideally the slides should just have very brief bullet points.  If you and Lori have some brief points that you would like to send me separately in an email I can incorporate these into slides in the template we are using for Singapore presentations.
>  
> Best regards,
> Julie
>  
> From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
> Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:01 AM
> To: 'Avri Doria' <avri at acm.org>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
> Cc: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen at icann.org>
> Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan Robinson
>  
> Hi Avri,
> Lori and I will schedule the SCI Chair’s Report for the first ten minutes of the time with Council.  (Lori, I will come to you off list regarding this.)  Thanks to staff for pointing out that the SCI Chair must report at each ICANN public meeting.
>  
> Many thanks Avri for your thorough and sincere explanation of your thinking on the best SCI working method.  This  deserves further discussion as to our working process in the next SCI call.  I honestly don’t think there were any inconsistent positions taken and again the mp3 may assist on that point.  Have you had time to listen to it or to read the transcript? 
>  
> Regarding the remainder of your observations, I will come back later today with some further thoughts for discussion on the points you have made.
>  
> Have a great day in all respects and thank you for your active contributions to the list.
> Anne
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
> 
> 
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150203/1311e342/attachment.html>