[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Chair's Report to Council
Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de
Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de
Thu Feb 5 05:29:42 UTC 2015
I support the SCI considering these questions.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
-----Original-Nachricht-----
Betreff: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Chair's Report to Council
Datum: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 04:32:14 +0100
Von: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
An: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
Both 1 and 2 should be addressed. Greg
On Tuesday, February 3, 2015, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com
[1]> wrote:
Dear SCI members, please provide your informal responses to the two
questions below by 20:00 UTC on Thursday February 4.
Lori and I are finalizing the Chair’s report to Council. Staff has
prepared some draft slides for this purpose and we will be making
minor edits. For purposes of completing these edits, it would be
helpful for each member to weigh in on the two questions below.
(Please note this is an informal inquiry – not a formal Consensus
Call since these topics do not involve a formal SCI recommendation to
Council.)
1. In connection with the question of establishing a procedure
for friendly amendments in the Council Operating Procedures, should
SCI undertake this work?
2. In connection with the question of considering the
application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmission of motions in
the Operating Procedures, should SCI undertake this work?
With respect to Question 1, I have not heard any disagreement or
objection in the January 20 call or on the list, but Mary Wong is very
concerned that only three people have provided comment and feels it is
quite important for SCI to have the results of a “straw poll” on
the topic of friendly amendments.
With respect to Topic 2, I understand that both Greg and Amr believe
this topic should be addressed, but Avri does not. Again, there is
concern that comment from three SCI members is incomplete.
Regarding other topics discussed in the January call and on the list
since that time, I believe it is clear that those topics come under
the “periodic review” element in our Charter and require at a
minimum (1) Review and discussion of the Westlake Report and (2)
formulation of a proposed plan under the SCI’s “periodic review”
responsibilities as to which we will need formal consensus for the
purpose of making a recommendation to Council. I would like to
suggest that SCI work toward adopting such a “periodic review”
recommendation under its Charter in time for the Buenos Aires meeting
but realize that others may have different thoughts. This can be
explored further in future calls.
Thank you,
Anne
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com [2]
From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:07 AM
To: 'Julie Hedlund'; 'Avri Doria'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair
Jonathan Robinson
Thanks Julie. I will work with Lori on this as we hear further
thoughts on the list.
Anne
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com [3]
From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 9:17 AM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Avri Doria';
gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair
Jonathan Robinson
Anne,
I can assist by preparing a couple of slides. I can look back at
your message, but ideally the slides should just have very brief
bullet points. If you and Lori have some brief points that you would
like to send me separately in an email I can incorporate these into
slides in the template we are using for Singapore presentations.
Best regards,
Julie
From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:01 AM
To: 'Avri Doria' <avri at acm.org>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org"
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen at icann.org>
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair
Jonathan Robinson
Hi Avri,
Lori and I will schedule the SCI Chair’s Report for the first ten
minutes of the time with Council. (Lori, I will come to you off list
regarding this.) Thanks to staff for pointing out that the SCI Chair
must report at each ICANN public meeting.
Many thanks Avri for your thorough and sincere explanation of your
thinking on the best SCI working method. This deserves further
discussion as to our working process in the next SCI call. I honestly
don’t think there were any inconsistent positions taken and again
the mp3 may assist on that point. Have you had time to listen to it
or to read the transcript?
Regarding the remainder of your observations, I will come back later
today with some further thoughts for discussion on the points you have
made.
Have a great day in all respects and thank you for your active
contributions to the list.
Anne
-------------------------
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of
this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment
to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any
attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to
the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
-------------------------
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of
this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment
to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any
attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to
the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
--
Gregory S. Shatan ï Abelman Frayne & Schwab
Partner | IP | Technology | Media | Internet
666 Third Avenue | New York, NY 10017-5621
Direct 212-885-9253 | Main 212-949-9022
Fax 212-949-9190 | Cell 917-816-6428
gsshatan at lawabel.com [4]
ICANN-related: gregshatanipc at gmail.com [5]
www.lawabel.com [6]
Links:
------
[1] mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com
[2] http://www.lrrlaw.com/
[3] http://www.lrrlaw.com/
[4] mailto:gsshatan at lawabel.com
[5] mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com
[6] http://www.lawabel.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150205/1235e2f6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3765 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150205/1235e2f6/image001.gif>
More information about the Gnso-improvem-impl-sc
mailing list