[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan Robinson
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Thu Jan 22 23:52:18 UTC 2015
Hi,
> In particular, it would be helpful if each primary member could
> indicate whether he or she supports the letter as is,
As NCSG Primary, I do not support as is.
> or if not, suggest changes that would enable them to support it.
For the reasons stated.
Dropping #3 would be a necessary for me - this is not time to go messing
with vote thresholds.
Dropping #2 would be a nice to have but I would abstain. I understand
the urge to go back and fix a suspected bug that got away.
avri
On 22-Jan-15 16:52, Julie Hedlund wrote:
> Hi Anne,
>
> If I recall correctly I think some people raised concerns on the call
> that they would not be available next week and also that it was a very
> busy time for various constituencies as they prepare for Singapore. I
> would respectfully suggest that perhaps you could encourage people to
> provide their thoughts on the list. In particular, it would be
> helpful if each primary member could indicate whether he or she
> supports the letter as is, or if not, suggest changes that would
> enable them to support it.
>
> Best regards,
> Julie
>
> From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com
> <mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com>>
> Date: Thursday, January 22, 2015 4:01 PM
> To: 'Avri Doria' <avri at acm.org <mailto:avri at acm.org>>, 'Thomas
> Rickert' <rickert at anwaelte.de <mailto:rickert at anwaelte.de>>,
> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
> <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>
> Cc: Lori Schulman <lori.schulman at ascd.org
> <mailto:lori.schulman at ascd.org>>, Julie Hedlund
> <julie.hedlund at icann.org <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>,
> "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>"
> <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>>, Glen de Saint Géry
> <Glen at icann.org <mailto:Glen at icann.org>>
> Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair
> Jonathan Robinson
>
> Thanks Avri. Shall we schedule a call on January 27 to discuss?
> As per the mp3, we did not have any disagreement on these points
> during the call, but we can certainly set up a call January 27 to
> discuss. Sounds like we need to do that. Will staff please
> proceed accordingly?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Anne
>
>
>
> **
>
>
>
> *Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel*
>
> *Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | *
>
> *One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611*
>
> *(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725*
>
> *_AAikman at LRRLaw.com <mailto:AAikman at LRRLaw.com>_**|
> www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>*
>
>
>
>
>
> **
>
>
>
>
> * *
>
>
>
> *From:*Avri Doria [mailto:avri at acm.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 22, 2015 1:11 PM
> *To:* Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Thomas Rickert'; Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
> *Cc:* Lori Schulman; Julie Hedlund;
> gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>; Glen de Saint Géry
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council
> Chair Jonathan Robinson
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Belated apologies for missing the meeting.
>
> Was there a consensus call on the four issues that are being
> included? I know we have not done one on the list and was
> wondering if one had been taken during the call.
>
> A council liaison I would like to know that for my report. I will
> of course faithfully faithfully any letter the SCI wishes sent.
>
> As a primary member I have doubts on whether I would have
> participated in a positive consensus on these four items, though I
> might have allowed them to pass without comment. Specifically on
> #3, I have been explicit in not supporting a review of consensus
> levels while the GNSO review was ongoing. I also do not see the
> point of #2, as we could have done this before but opted not to.
> So while I would understand the council requesting such a comment,
> I do not understand the SCI asking to redo work it already did and
> has had accepted. Yes we had a difference of opinion on whether to
> include resubmitted notions and that may have been a good reason
> to withhold our recommendation. But since we went ahead, I do not
> understand the SCI asking to reopen this issue.
>
> I can not support the letter as it stands.
>
> thanks
>
> avri
>
>
>
> I have always been against, number 3, for example until such time
> as we knew the results of any reorganizational review.
>
> On 22-Jan-15 14:07, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Please see attached the revised letter to GNSO Council based
> on Tuesday’s SCI conference call. If you have any comments,
> please supply them to the list prior to 1300 UTC Monday,
> January 26.
>
>
>
> *Avri*, again, as Council liaison for SCI, we are requesting
> 15 minutes on the schedule for Working Sessions in Singapore
> for you to present this letter to Council. (I am unable to
> attend and SCI will not be meeting separately there.)
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Anne
>
>
>
> *mailbox:///C:/Users/Avri/AppData/Roaming/Thunderbird/Profiles/6ebmyl35.default/Mail/Local%20Folders/0-Responsibiities.sbd/SCI?number=16975542&header=quotebody&part=1.1.2&filename=image001.gif*
>
>
>
> *Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel*
>
> *Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | *
>
> *One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611*
>
> *(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725*
>
> *_AAikman at LRRLaw.com <mailto:AAikman at LRRLaw.com>_ |
> www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> * *
>
>
>
> *From:* Thomas Rickert [mailto:rickert at anwaelte.de]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 21, 2015 2:32 AM
> *To:* Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
> *Cc:* Aikman-Scalese, Anne; Lori Schulman; Julie Hedlund;
> gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>; Glen de Saint Géry
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] NCPH Intersessional
> 2015 Recordings & Transcripts
>
>
>
> Same here. Sorry!
>
>
>
> Best
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Am 21.01.2015 um 09:44 schrieb WUKnoben
> <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
> <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>:
>
>
>
> Sorry all that I missed the call! I came back late after
> the Frankfurt meeting.
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
>
> *From:* Aikman-Scalese, Anne <mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 10:16 PM
>
> *To:* 'Lori Schulman'
> <mailto:lori.schulman at ascd.org> ; Julie Hedlund
> <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org> ; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
>
> *Cc:* 'Glen de Saint Géry' <mailto:Glen at icann.org>
>
> *Subject:* [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: NCPH Intersessional
> 2015 Recordings & Transcripts
>
>
>
> Many thanks Lori. We will revise the draft letter to GNSO
> Council in accordance with comments received during
> today’s meeting.
>
>
>
> Separately, *and specifically directed at Avri as Council
> liaison*, staff advised today that certain SCI matters
> were put “on hold” last week by Council. (Thanks Mary for
> this info.) Staff also advised that it is part of the
> function of Council liaison to provide SCI with
> information as to action taken by Council affecting its work.
>
>
>
> Amr mentioned that GNSO Council meeting minutes are not
> available until the next GNSO Council meeting and as such,
> may not be timely.
>
>
>
> Thanks everyone who participated in today’s call. We will
> be circulating the redraft of the letter soon. We want to
> be sure our letter and request for time on the Council’s
> work schedule for Singapore reaches Council in a timely
> fashion and preferably well before February 1.
>
> Anne
>
>
>
> *<image002.gif>*
>
>
>
> *Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel*
>
> *Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | *
>
> *One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona
> 85701-1611*
>
> *(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725*
>
> *_AAikman at LRRLaw.com
> <mailto:AAikman at LRRLaw.com>_ | www.LRRLaw.com
> <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> * *
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
> <mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Lori Schulman
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:11 PM
> *To:* Julie Hedlund; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
> *Subject:* [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] NCPH Intersessional
> 2015 Recordings & Transcripts
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Below is the link for last week’s intersessional. I
> didn’t find the joint letter re GNSO review posted separately.
>
>
>
>
>
> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=51416553
>
>
>
> Lori
>
>
>
> *Lori S. Schulman* · General Counsel
> 1703 North Beauregard Street
>
> Alexandria, VA 22311-1714
>
> P 703-575-5678 · Lori.Schulman at ascd.org
> <mailto:Lori.Schulman at ascd.org>
> <image003.jpg>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of
>
>
>
> the person(s) to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that is
>
>
>
> confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient or
>
>
>
> have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy,
>
> distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please notify the
>
> sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message and any
>
>
>
> attachments. ASCD makes no guarantee that this e-mail is error or virus free.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the
> use of the individual or entity to which they are
> addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment
> is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
> responsible for delivering the message or attachment to
> the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or
> any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us
> immediately by replying to the sender. The information
> transmitted in this message and any attachments may be
> privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is
> covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18
> U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use
> of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If
> the reader of this message or an attachment is not the
> intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
> delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
> or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
> please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The
> information transmitted in this message and any attachments
> may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by
> the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of
> the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the
> reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended
> recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the
> message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
> by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this
> message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only
> for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients,
> and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18
> U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150122/0da04ee5/attachment.html>
More information about the Gnso-improvem-impl-sc
mailing list