[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan Robinson
Mary Wong
mary.wong at icann.org
Fri Jan 23 23:00:31 UTC 2015
Dear all,
The policy staff supporting the SCI thought it might be helpful to add what
we hope are clarifying comments to the ongoing discussion, which relate to
three of the four topics highlighted in the draft letter.
- On #1 (Friendly Amendment to Motions), this is actually one of the
potential topics for referral that the Council has temporarily put on hold
following its last meeting on 15 January; see
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Action+Items. It is
therefore a topic already on the Council¹s radar as a possible topic for
referral to the SCI; as such, we wonder if, for this paragraph, rather than
recommending action the SCI may wish to request that the Council inform it
(perhaps through the liaison) at the point when the Council takes up
consideration of the issue again.
- On #3 (Review of WG Consensus Levels), we note from the language of the
October 2014 GNSO Council resolution (which passed the three latest SCI
recommendations unanimously) that the Council had expressly agreed to
consider the SCI¹s request for a review of the Consensus Levels, and further
expressly noted that this exercise may be conducted as part of ³a broader
exercise in reviewing all the GNSO Operating Procedures²: see
http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201410 an exercise which the
current draft letter lists as topic #4 (Review of GNSO Operating
Procedures).
- In addition, the SCI has previously discussed (and staff had thought the
SCI had agreed) that such a broad review should not occur independently of
or without reference to the ongoing GNSO Review at a minimum, we assume
this means that any review to be initiated on the GNSO Operating Procedures
would not take place till after the type and nature of the final
recommendations from the GNSO Review are clearer.
- In light of the above points on #3, #4 and the GNSO Review, we therefore
respectfully suggest that #3 be reworded to more accurately reflect the GNSO
Council¹s intent as noted above; #4 refer expressly to the GNSO Review
rather than a ³periodic review² by the SCI, and perhaps the final paragraph
be reworked if these suggestions are adopted.
We thought we ought to offer these suggestions at this time in order to
provide further context and background for those SCI members who were not
part of the Los Angeles discussion and/or who missed the last SCI call, so
that the SCI can decide how it wishes to proceed in respect of the draft
letter. In particular, given that we were able only to issue invitations for
the next meeting at a time when Europe and Asia would have ended their work
week, we hope that these comments are helpful.
Cheers
Mary
Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong at icann.org
From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
Date: Friday, January 23, 2015 at 14:04
To: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>,
Thomas Rickert <rickert at anwaelte.de>, Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
<wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>, Lori Schulman <lori.schulman at ascd.org>,
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>, Glen de
Saint Géry <Glen at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair
Jonathan Robinson
> We may yet be able to resolve this on the list. (Perhaps a scheduled meeting
> will further inspire us to do so.)
>
> In that spirit, I attach a revised version of the letter, which is also
> available as an editable Google Doc at
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N2_MB5-K8u2SVTdTi2EnAvIuVCzPpFQb7FsM5fP3iQ
> U/edit?usp=sharing
>
> In response to Avri, I note that these 4 items were phrased as "possibilities"
> for the entire 2015 year, which leaves the question open of where in the year
> any of these items should be handled I've added language to clarify that
> items 3 and 4 should await the results of the GNSO Review. On point number 2,
> I've tried to clarify the remaining issue a bit (the language of the actual
> Operating Procedures remains ambiguous, and the language put into the motion
> to "fix" the situation is not in the actual Operating Procedures).
>
> If this meets Avri's concerns and the approval of all, we can send this out
> and give ourselves back an hour of our time.
>
> I look forward to your responses.
>
> Greg
>
> Gregory S. Shatan
>
> Partner | Abelman Frayne & Schwab
>
> 666 Third Avenue | New York, NY 10017-5621
>
> Direct 212-885-9253 | Main 212-949-9022
>
> Fax 212-949-9190 | Cell 917-816-6428
>
> gsshatan at lawabel.com
>
> ICANN-related: gregshatanipc at gmail.com
>
> www.lawabel.com <http://www.lawabel.com/>
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
> wrote:
>> Julie,
>> Although I think everyone preferred to finalize via the list, there was no
>> one expressing disagreement to the proposed changes as Avri has done. As far
>> as I know, Avri is still the primary and I do not believe that addressing her
>> issues on the list is going to result in meeting the deadline.
>>
>> PLEASE ISSUE THE INVITATION FOR THE CALL NEXT TUESDAY AS REQUESTED. I would
>> appreciate your doing this today.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Anne
>>
>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>> (T) 520.629.4428 <tel:520.629.4428> | (F) 520.879.4725 <tel:520.879.4725>
>> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 2:52 PM
>> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Avri Doria'; 'Thomas Rickert'; Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
>> Cc: Lori Schulman; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org; Glen de Saint Géry
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair
>> Jonathan Robinson
>> Importance: High
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Anne,
>>
>>
>>
>> If I recall correctly I think some people raised concerns on the call that
>> they would not be available next week and also that it was a very busy time
>> for various constituencies as they prepare for Singapore. I would
>> respectfully suggest that perhaps you could encourage people to provide their
>> thoughts on the list. In particular, it would be helpful if each primary
>> member could indicate whether he or she supports the letter as is, or if not,
>> suggest changes that would enable them to support it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Julie
>>
>>
>>
>> From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
>> Date: Thursday, January 22, 2015 4:01 PM
>> To: 'Avri Doria' <avri at acm.org>, 'Thomas Rickert' <rickert at anwaelte.de>,
>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
>> Cc: Lori Schulman <lori.schulman at ascd.org>, Julie Hedlund
>> <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org"
>> <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen at icann.org>
>> Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair
>> Jonathan Robinson
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Avri. Shall we schedule a call on January 27 to discuss? As per the
>>> mp3, we did not have any disagreement on these points during the call, but
>>> we can certainly set up a call January 27 to discuss. Sounds like we need
>>> to do that. Will staff please proceed accordingly?
>>> Thank you,
>>> Anne
>>>
>>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
>>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>> (T) 520.629.4428 <tel:520.629.4428> | (F) 520.879.4725 <tel:520.879.4725>
>>> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri at acm.org]
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 1:11 PM
>>> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Thomas Rickert'; Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
>>> Cc: Lori Schulman; Julie Hedlund; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org; Glen de
>>> Saint Géry
>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair
>>> Jonathan Robinson
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Belated apologies for missing the meeting.
>>>
>>> Was there a consensus call on the four issues that are being included? I
>>> know we have not done one on the list and was wondering if one had been
>>> taken during the call.
>>>
>>> A council liaison I would like to know that for my report. I will of course
>>> faithfully faithfully any letter the SCI wishes sent.
>>>
>>> As a primary member I have doubts on whether I would have participated in a
>>> positive consensus on these four items, though I might have allowed them to
>>> pass without comment. Specifically on #3, I have been explicit in not
>>> supporting a review of consensus levels while the GNSO review was ongoing.
>>> I also do not see the point of #2, as we could have done this before but
>>> opted not to. So while I would understand the council requesting such a
>>> comment, I do not understand the SCI asking to redo work it already did and
>>> has had accepted. Yes we had a difference of opinion on whether to include
>>> resubmitted notions and that may have been a good reason to withhold our
>>> recommendation. But since we went ahead, I do not understand the SCI asking
>>> to reopen this issue.
>>>
>>> I can not support the letter as it stands.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> avri
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have always been against, number 3, for example until such time as we knew
>>> the results of any reorganizational review.
>>>
>>> On 22-Jan-15 14:07, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>> Please see attached the revised letter to GNSO Council based on Tuesday¹s
>>>> SCI conference call. If you have any comments, please supply them to the
>>>> list prior to 1300 UTC Monday, January 26.
>>>>
>>>> Avri, again, as Council liaison for SCI, we are requesting 15 minutes on
>>>> the schedule for Working Sessions in Singapore for you to present this
>>>> letter to Council. (I am unable to attend and SCI will not be meeting
>>>> separately there.)
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Anne
>>>>
>>>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
>>>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>>>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>>> (T) 520.629.4428 <tel:520.629.4428> | (F) 520.879.4725 <tel:520.879.4725>
>>>> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Thomas Rickert [mailto:rickert at anwaelte.de]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 2:32 AM
>>>> To: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
>>>> Cc: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; Lori Schulman; Julie Hedlund;
>>>> gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org; Glen de Saint Géry
>>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] NCPH Intersessional 2015 Recordings &
>>>> Transcripts
>>>>
>>>> Same here. Sorry!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>>
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 21.01.2015 um 09:44 schrieb WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry all that I missed the call! I came back late after the Frankfurt
>>>>> meeting.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 10:16 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> To: 'Lori Schulman' <mailto:lori.schulman at ascd.org> ; Julie Hedlund
>>>>> <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org> ; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: 'Glen de Saint Géry' <mailto:Glen at icann.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: NCPH Intersessional 2015 Recordings &
>>>>> Transcripts
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Many thanks Lori. We will revise the draft letter to GNSO Council in
>>>>> accordance with comments received during today¹s meeting.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Separately, and specifically directed at Avri as Council liaison, staff
>>>>> advised today that certain SCI matters were put ³on hold² last week by
>>>>> Council. (Thanks Mary for this info.) Staff also advised that it is part
>>>>> of the function of Council liaison to provide SCI with information as to
>>>>> action taken by Council affecting its work.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Amr mentioned that GNSO Council meeting minutes are not available until
>>>>> the next GNSO Council meeting and as such, may not be timely.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks everyone who participated in today¹s call. We will be circulating
>>>>> the redraft of the letter soon. We want to be sure our letter and request
>>>>> for time on the Council¹s work schedule for Singapore reaches Council in a
>>>>> timely fashion and preferably well before February 1.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anne
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <image002.gif>
>>>>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
>>>>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>>>>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>>>> (T) 520.629.4428 <tel:520.629.4428> | (F) 520.879.4725 <tel:520.879.4725>
>>>>> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
>>>>> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lori Schulman
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:11 PM
>>>>> To: Julie Hedlund; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
>>>>> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] NCPH Intersessional 2015 Recordings &
>>>>> Transcripts
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear All,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Below is the link for last week¹s intersessional. I didn¹t find the
>>>>> joint letter re GNSO review posted separately.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=51416553
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Lori
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Lori S. Schulman · General Counsel
>>>>> 1703 North Beauregard StreetAlexandria, VA 22311-1714P 703-575-5678
>>>>> <tel:703-575-5678> · Lori.Schulman at ascd.org
>>>>> <image003.jpg>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of
>>>>>
>>>>> the person(s) to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that
>>>>> is
>>>>>
>>>>> confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient
>>>>> or
>>>>>
>>>>> have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy,
>>>>> distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please
>>>>> notify the
>>>>> sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message
>>>>> and any
>>>>>
>>>>> attachments. ASCD makes no guarantee that this e-mail is error or virus
>>>>> free.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>>>>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
>>>>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
>>>>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
>>>>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
>>>>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
>>>>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>>>>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and
>>>>> any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
>>>>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
>>>>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>>>>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
>>>>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
>>>>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
>>>>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
>>>>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
>>>>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>>>>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and
>>>>> any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
>>>>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
>>>>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>>>>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
>>>>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
>>>>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
>>>>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
>>>>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
>>>>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>>>>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and
>>>>> any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
>>>>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
>>>>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>>>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
>>>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
>>>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
>>>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
>>>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
>>>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>>>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
>>>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
>>>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
>>>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>>>>
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150123/61ad6942/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3765 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150123/61ad6942/image001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5044 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150123/61ad6942/smime.p7s>
More information about the Gnso-improvem-impl-sc
mailing list