[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan Robinson

Aikman-Scalese, Anne AAikman at lrrlaw.com
Wed Jan 28 02:18:27 UTC 2015

Thanks Avri.  I think SCI has 15 minutes in the agenda so how shall we split the time for our respective reports?  (Lori and I can work out who will give the SCI Chair (or Vice Chair) report based on time zones etc.)  I am copying Glen with respect to your recommendation that both the Chair (or Vice Chair) and the Council Liaison provide a report to Council.

Let us know if you have further thoughts after review of the January 20 mp3 and/or transcript.  I was not previously aware of a protocol to “never make a decision in one meeting”.  We can certainly discuss this within SCI on our next call.

[cid:image001.gif at 01D03A64.92D99CE0]

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel

Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |

One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725

AAikman at LRRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman at LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/>

From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 3:44 PM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan Robinson


I have no idea what letter people are referring to at this time.
I do not, however, feel at all comfortable with the way the process is being run.
And the only letter I have approved is the one that Mary provided.

SCI has always been a deliberative body.  We discuss things more that once and allow time to ask questions, especially of those who cannot attend a meeting.  Several groups have adopted a practice of never making a decsion in one meeting.  This seems like a excellent practices.  And while in the past that has never been a problem, we seem to be adopting a new pace that may make such a practice necessary.

As for consensus, we tried to achieve that with discussion.

As for the report, having thought about it a bit more, I think you should be able to make you own report remotely Anne, as required by the charter.  Or perhaps Lori as vice chair can do it. I will give a brief liaison report.


On 27-Jan-15 16:22, Angie Graves wrote:
Dear Anne,

I agree with your revised letter to Jonathan.

Thank you for your time on this.


On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Lori Schulman <lori.schulman at ascd.org<mailto:lori.schulman at ascd.org>> wrote:
Dear Anne,

Thank you for the concise run down of events and positions.  I agree with your proposal on how to proceed with the report and the request for direction.



This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150128/ebfde557/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3765 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150128/ebfde557/image001.gif>

More information about the Gnso-improvem-impl-sc mailing list