From AAikman at lrrlaw.com  Wed Jul  1 23:11:08 2015
From: AAikman at lrrlaw.com (Aikman-Scalese, Anne)
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 23:11:08 +0000
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
Message-ID: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>

Dear SCI Members,

We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of

(1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and

(2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to motions.



You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the GNSO Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding the Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.



With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri).

Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.



Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems for those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.  Personally I am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please advise your preference.



Thank you,

Anne





Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |

One South Church Avenue Suite 700

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725

AAikman at LRRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman at LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.LRRLaw.com>





________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150701/b65a63b4/attachment.html>

From angie at webgroup.com  Wed Jul  1 23:38:02 2015
From: angie at webgroup.com (Angie Graves)
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 19:38:02 -0400
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
In-Reply-To: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
Message-ID: <CAGeCciyAkS4wSg-1J1Ea5nye5eE7b83nrUOVqrpLZ52pO6ksPg@mail.gmail.com>

Thank you, Anne, for the update.

I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially
problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.

Angie



On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
wrote:

>  Dear SCI Members,
>
> We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of
>
> (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
>
> (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to
> motions.
>
>
>
> You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the
> GNSO Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding
> the Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.
>
>
>
> With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted
> motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay
> out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri).
>
> Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I
> encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.
>
>
>
> Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems
> for those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.
> Personally I am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please
> advise your preference.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Anne
>
>
>
>
>
> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>
> Of Counsel
>
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>
> One South Church Avenue Suite 700
>
> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>
> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
>
> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150701/cbe69cdf/attachment.html>

From julie.hedlund at icann.org  Thu Jul  2 13:56:47 2015
From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund)
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:56:47 +0000
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: SCI - next call
In-Reply-To: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
Message-ID: <D1BABA0F.4DDCC%julie.hedlund@icann.org>

DearSCI members,

Please note also the time of the call.  Per the Doodle poll the recurring
time is on Thursdays at 18:00 UTC for 60 minutes (11:00 PDT , 14:00 EDT,
19:00 London, 20:00 CET. For other times:http://tinyurl.com/osnyhmr).

Best regards,
Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

From:  "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
Date:  Wednesday, July 1, 2015 7:11 PM
To:  Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>,
"<gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
Cc:  Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, Nathalie Peregrine
<nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
Subject:  SCI - next call

> Dear SCI Members,
> We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of
> (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
> (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to motions.
>  
> You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the GNSO
> Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding the
> Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.
>  
> With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted
> motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay out
> their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri).
> Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I
> encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.
>  
> Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems for
> those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.  Personally I
> am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please advise your
> preference.
>  
> Thank you,
> Anne
>  
>  
> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
> Of Counsel
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
> One South Church Avenue Suite 700
> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.LRRLaw.com>
>  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying
> to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments
> may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of
> the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications
> Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150702/ffdea025/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5041 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150702/ffdea025/smime.p7s>

From wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de  Fri Jul  3 09:20:24 2015
From: wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de (WUKnoben)
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 17:20:24 +0800
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
In-Reply-To: <CAGeCciyAkS4wSg-1J1Ea5nye5eE7b83nrUOVqrpLZ52pO6ksPg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> <CAGeCciyAkS4wSg-1J1Ea5nye5eE7b83nrUOVqrpLZ52pO6ksPg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <D633858C8AA0404280E2122143FD2ABF@WUKPC>

Thanks Anne,

for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since I?m travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich



From: Angie Graves 
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne 
Cc: Julie Hedlund ; mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org ; Mary Wong ; Nathalie Peregrine 
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

Thank you, Anne, for the update. 

I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.

Angie




On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com> wrote:

  Dear SCI Members,

  We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of

  (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and

  (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to motions.



  You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the GNSO Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding the Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.



  With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri).  

  Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.



  Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems for those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.  Personally I am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please advise your preference.



  Thank you,

  Anne





  Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

  Of Counsel

  Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | 

  One South Church Avenue Suite 700

  Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

  (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725

  AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com







------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150703/a3d380a8/attachment.html>

From julie.hedlund at icann.org  Mon Jul  6 15:43:30 2015
From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund)
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 15:43:30 +0000
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
In-Reply-To: <D633858C8AA0404280E2122143FD2ABF@WUKPC>
References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
 <CAGeCciyAkS4wSg-1J1Ea5nye5eE7b83nrUOVqrpLZ52pO6ksPg@mail.gmail.com>
 <D633858C8AA0404280E2122143FD2ABF@WUKPC>
Message-ID: <D1C01499.4DEBE%julie.hedlund@icann.org>

Dear Anne and SCI members,

Would you like us to schedule a call for the 9th?  If so we'll need to get
the notice out today.

Kind regards,
Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

From:  WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
Reply-To:  WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
Date:  Friday, July 3, 2015 5:20 AM
To:  Angie Graves <angie at webgroup.com>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne"
<AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
Cc:  Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>,
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>, Mary
Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, Nathalie Peregrine
<nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

> Thanks Anne,
>  
> for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since I?m
> travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
>  
> From: Angie Graves <mailto:angie at webgroup.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
> Cc: Julie Hedlund <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>  ;
> mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org ; Mary Wong
> <mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>  ; Nathalie Peregrine
> <mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>  
> Thank you, Anne, for the update.
>  
> I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially
> problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.
>  
> Angie
>  
>  
>  
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
> wrote:
>> Dear SCI Members,
>> 
>> We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of
>> 
>> (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
>> 
>> (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to motions.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the GNSO
>> Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding the
>> Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted
>> motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay
>> out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri).
>> 
>> Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I
>> encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems for
>> those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.  Personally I
>> am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please advise your
>> preference.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> Anne
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>> 
>> Of Counsel
>> 
>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>> 
>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700
>> 
>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>> 
>> (T) 520.629.4428 <tel:520.629.4428>  | (F) 520.879.4725 <tel:520.879.4725>
>> 
>> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.LRRLaw.com>
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic
>> Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.
>  


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150706/40eb8c04/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5041 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150706/40eb8c04/smime.p7s>

From aelsadr at egyptig.org  Tue Jul  7 12:19:18 2015
From: aelsadr at egyptig.org (Amr Elsadr)
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 14:19:18 +0200
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
In-Reply-To: <D1C01499.4DEBE%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> <CAGeCciyAkS4wSg-1J1Ea5nye5eE7b83nrUOVqrpLZ52pO6ksPg@mail.gmail.com> <D633858C8AA0404280E2122143FD2ABF@WUKPC> <D1C01499.4DEBE%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
Message-ID: <D0E061B5-2962-4303-B608-45218A00C28F@egyptig.org>


Hi,

Do we have a call scheduled for tomorrow? I have another commitment on hold until this one is confirmed. Would be helpful to know as soon as possible.

Thanks.

Amr

On Jul 6, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org> wrote:

> Dear Anne and SCI members,
> 
> Would you like us to schedule a call for the 9th?  If so we'll need to get the notice out today.  
> 
> Kind regards,
> Julie
> 
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
> 
> From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
> Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 5:20 AM
> To: Angie Graves <angie at webgroup.com>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
> Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
> 
>> Thanks Anne,
>>  
>> for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since I?m travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 
>> Wolf-Ulrich
>> 
>>  
>> From: Angie Graves
>> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
>> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
>> Cc: Julie Hedlund ; mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org ; Mary Wong ; Nathalie Peregrine
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>>  
>> Thank you, Anne, for the update.
>>  
>> I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.
>>  
>> Angie
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com> wrote:
>>> Dear SCI Members,
>>> We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of
>>> (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
>>> (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to motions.
>>>  
>>> You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the GNSO Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding the Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.
>>>  
>>> With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri). 
>>> Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.
>>>  
>>> Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems for those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.  Personally I am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please advise your preference.
>>>  
>>> Thank you,
>>> Anne
>>>  
>>>  
>>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>>> Of Counsel
>>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700
>>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
>>> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com
>>>  
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. 
>>  




From kstubbs at afilias.info  Tue Jul  7 12:23:42 2015
From: kstubbs at afilias.info (Ken Stubbs)
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 08:23:42 -0400
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
In-Reply-To: <D0E061B5-2962-4303-B608-45218A00C28F@egyptig.org>
References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
 <CAGeCciyAkS4wSg-1J1Ea5nye5eE7b83nrUOVqrpLZ52pO6ksPg@mail.gmail.com>
 <D633858C8AA0404280E2122143FD2ABF@WUKPC>
 <D1C01499.4DEBE%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
 <D0E061B5-2962-4303-B608-45218A00C28F@egyptig.org>
Message-ID: <559BC4CE.6000107@afilias.info>


I am assuming that we have no call tomorrow.

I never received any timely notice of one.


Ken Stubbs


On 7/7/2015 8:19 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do we have a call scheduled for tomorrow? I have another commitment on hold until this one is confirmed. Would be helpful to know as soon as possible.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
> On Jul 6, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear Anne and SCI members,
>>
>> Would you like us to schedule a call for the 9th?  If so we'll need to get the notice out today.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Julie
>>
>> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>>
>> From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
>> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
>> Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 5:20 AM
>> To: Angie Graves <angie at webgroup.com>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
>> Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>>
>>> Thanks Anne,
>>>   
>>> for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since I?m travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>>
>>>   
>>> From: Angie Graves
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
>>> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
>>> Cc: Julie Hedlund ; mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org ; Mary Wong ; Nathalie Peregrine
>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>>>   
>>> Thank you, Anne, for the update.
>>>   
>>> I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.
>>>   
>>> Angie
>>>   
>>>   
>>>   
>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com> wrote:
>>>> Dear SCI Members,
>>>> We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of
>>>> (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
>>>> (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to motions.
>>>>   
>>>> You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the GNSO Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding the Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.
>>>>   
>>>> With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri).
>>>> Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.
>>>>   
>>>> Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems for those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.  Personally I am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please advise your preference.
>>>>   
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Anne
>>>>   
>>>>   
>>>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>>>> Of Counsel
>>>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>>>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700
>>>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>>> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
>>>> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com
>>>>   
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.
>>>   
>
>



From lschulman at inta.org  Tue Jul  7 12:54:48 2015
From: lschulman at inta.org (Lori Schulman)
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:54:48 +0000
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
In-Reply-To: <D0E061B5-2962-4303-B608-45218A00C28F@egyptig.org>
References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
 <CAGeCciyAkS4wSg-1J1Ea5nye5eE7b83nrUOVqrpLZ52pO6ksPg@mail.gmail.com>
 <D633858C8AA0404280E2122143FD2ABF@WUKPC>
 <D1C01499.4DEBE%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
 <D0E061B5-2962-4303-B608-45218A00C28F@egyptig.org>
Message-ID: <DM3PR12MB07784381F1DC305C16A47409D3920@DM3PR12MB0778.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>


I am available tomorrow after 2 pm EDT.  I am also available on the other suggested days.

With kind regards,

Lori S. Schulman
Senior Director, Internet Policy
International Trademark Association (INTA)
+1-202-261-6588

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 8:19 AM
To: Julie Hedlund
Cc: WUKnoben; Angie Graves; Aikman-Scalese, Anne; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org; Mary Wong; Nathalie Peregrine
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call


Hi,

Do we have a call scheduled for tomorrow? I have another commitment on hold until this one is confirmed. Would be helpful to know as soon as possible.

Thanks.

Amr

On Jul 6, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org> wrote:

> Dear Anne and SCI members,
> 
> Would you like us to schedule a call for the 9th?  If so we'll need to get the notice out today.  
> 
> Kind regards,
> Julie
> 
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
> 
> From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
> Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 5:20 AM
> To: Angie Graves <angie at webgroup.com>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
> Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
> 
>> Thanks Anne,
>>  
>> for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since I'm travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 
>> Wolf-Ulrich
>> 
>>  
>> From: Angie Graves
>> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
>> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
>> Cc: Julie Hedlund ; mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org ; Mary Wong ; Nathalie Peregrine
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>>  
>> Thank you, Anne, for the update.
>>  
>> I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.
>>  
>> Angie
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com> wrote:
>>> Dear SCI Members,
>>> We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of
>>> (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
>>> (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to motions.
>>>  
>>> You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the GNSO Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding the Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.
>>>  
>>> With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri). 
>>> Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.
>>>  
>>> Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems for those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.  Personally I am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please advise your preference.
>>>  
>>> Thank you,
>>> Anne
>>>  
>>>  
>>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>>> Of Counsel
>>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700
>>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
>>> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com
>>>  
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. 
>>  





From kstubbs at afilias.info  Tue Jul  7 14:27:45 2015
From: kstubbs at afilias.info (Ken Stubbs)
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 10:27:45 -0400
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
In-Reply-To: <DM3PR12MB07784381F1DC305C16A47409D3920@DM3PR12MB0778.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
 <CAGeCciyAkS4wSg-1J1Ea5nye5eE7b83nrUOVqrpLZ52pO6ksPg@mail.gmail.com>
 <D633858C8AA0404280E2122143FD2ABF@WUKPC>
 <D1C01499.4DEBE%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
 <D0E061B5-2962-4303-B608-45218A00C28F@egyptig.org>
 <DM3PR12MB07784381F1DC305C16A47409D3920@DM3PR12MB0778.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <559BE1E1.7030203@afilias.info>


I am available on the suggested days

Ken Stubbs


On 7/7/2015 8:54 AM, Lori Schulman wrote:
> I am available tomorrow after 2 pm EDT.  I am also available on the other suggested days.
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Lori S. Schulman
> Senior Director, Internet Policy
> International Trademark Association (INTA)
> +1-202-261-6588
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr
> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 8:19 AM
> To: Julie Hedlund
> Cc: WUKnoben; Angie Graves; Aikman-Scalese, Anne; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org; Mary Wong; Nathalie Peregrine
> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Do we have a call scheduled for tomorrow? I have another commitment on hold until this one is confirmed. Would be helpful to know as soon as possible.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
> On Jul 6, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear Anne and SCI members,
>>
>> Would you like us to schedule a call for the 9th?  If so we'll need to get the notice out today.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Julie
>>
>> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>>
>> From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
>> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
>> Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 5:20 AM
>> To: Angie Graves <angie at webgroup.com>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
>> Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>>
>>> Thanks Anne,
>>>   
>>> for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since I'm travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>>
>>>   
>>> From: Angie Graves
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
>>> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
>>> Cc: Julie Hedlund ; mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org ; Mary Wong ; Nathalie Peregrine
>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>>>   
>>> Thank you, Anne, for the update.
>>>   
>>> I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.
>>>   
>>> Angie
>>>   
>>>   
>>>   
>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com> wrote:
>>>> Dear SCI Members,
>>>> We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of
>>>> (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
>>>> (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to motions.
>>>>   
>>>> You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the GNSO Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding the Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.
>>>>   
>>>> With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri).
>>>> Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.
>>>>   
>>>> Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems for those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.  Personally I am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please advise your preference.
>>>>   
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Anne
>>>>   
>>>>   
>>>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>>>> Of Counsel
>>>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>>>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700
>>>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>>> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
>>>> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com
>>>>   
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.
>>>   
>
>
>



From julie.hedlund at icann.org  Tue Jul  7 14:32:14 2015
From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund)
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 14:32:14 +0000
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
In-Reply-To: <DM3PR12MB07784381F1DC305C16A47409D3920@DM3PR12MB0778.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
 <CAGeCciyAkS4wSg-1J1Ea5nye5eE7b83nrUOVqrpLZ52pO6ksPg@mail.gmail.com>
 <D633858C8AA0404280E2122143FD2ABF@WUKPC>
 <D1C01499.4DEBE%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
 <D0E061B5-2962-4303-B608-45218A00C28F@egyptig.org>
 <DM3PR12MB07784381F1DC305C16A47409D3920@DM3PR12MB0778.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <D1C15A63.4DF82%julie.hedlund@icann.org>

Dear Amr, Lori, and Ken,

We are trying to choose a date for the next call.  As you've noted, we did
not get out a timely notice for a call Thursday, 09 July at 1800 UTC so
there will be no call on Thursday.  We also note that 16 July presents a
problem for SCI members of the CCWG who will be traveling.  Although Anne
cannot chair a call on 23 July if Rudi Vansnick as our Vice Chair can run
the call then perhaps we can shoot for that date.

Best regards,
Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

On 7/7/15 8:54 AM, "Lori Schulman" <lschulman at inta.org> wrote:

>I am available tomorrow after 2 pm EDT.  I am also available on the other
>suggested days.
>
>With kind regards,
>
>Lori S. Schulman
>Senior Director, Internet Policy
>International Trademark Association (INTA)
>+1-202-261-6588
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
>[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr
>Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 8:19 AM
>To: Julie Hedlund
>Cc: WUKnoben; Angie Graves; Aikman-Scalese, Anne;
>gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org; Mary Wong; Nathalie Peregrine
>Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>
>
>Hi,
>
>Do we have a call scheduled for tomorrow? I have another commitment on
>hold until this one is confirmed. Would be helpful to know as soon as
>possible.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Amr
>
>On Jul 6, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear Anne and SCI members,
>> 
>> Would you like us to schedule a call for the 9th?  If so we'll need to
>>get the notice out today.
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Julie
>> 
>> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>> 
>> From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
>> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
>> Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 5:20 AM
>> To: Angie Graves <angie at webgroup.com>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne"
>><AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
>> Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>,
>>"gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>,
>>Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, Nathalie Peregrine
>><nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>> 
>>> Thanks Anne,
>>>  
>>> for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since
>>>I'm travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.
>>> 
>>> Best regards
>>> 
>>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>> 
>>>  
>>> From: Angie Graves
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
>>> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
>>> Cc: Julie Hedlund ; mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org ; Mary Wong
>>>; Nathalie Peregrine
>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>>>  
>>> Thank you, Anne, for the update.
>>>  
>>> I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially
>>>problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.
>>>  
>>> Angie
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne
>>><AAikman at lrrlaw.com> wrote:
>>>> Dear SCI Members,
>>>> We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our
>>>>discussion of
>>>> (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
>>>> (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to
>>>>motions.
>>>>  
>>>> You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in
>>>>the GNSO Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion
>>>>regarding the Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.
>>>>  
>>>> With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to
>>>>resubmitted motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri
>>>>respectively to lay out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and
>>>>"Con"(Avri). 
>>>> Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA
>>>>which I encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.
>>>>  
>>>> Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose
>>>>problems for those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to
>>>>Paris.  Personally I am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to
>>>>chair.  Please advise your preference.
>>>>  
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Anne
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>>>> Of Counsel
>>>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>>>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700
>>>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>>> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
>>>> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>>>>individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of
>>>>this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the
>>>>employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment
>>>>to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
>>>>dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any
>>>>attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>>>>communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to
>>>>the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
>>>>attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
>>>>confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
>>>>Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.
>>>  
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5041 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150707/7ec5abf6/smime.p7s>

From AAikman at lrrlaw.com  Tue Jul  7 15:19:12 2015
From: AAikman at lrrlaw.com (Aikman-Scalese, Anne)
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 15:19:12 +0000
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
In-Reply-To: <D1C01499.4DEBE%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
 <CAGeCciyAkS4wSg-1J1Ea5nye5eE7b83nrUOVqrpLZ52pO6ksPg@mail.gmail.com>
 <D633858C8AA0404280E2122143FD2ABF@WUKPC>
 <D1C01499.4DEBE%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
Message-ID: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8561AB@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>

Sorry Julie but I was in all day meetings on site with a client yesterday and did not realize you needed to be advised by Monday to schedule a Thursday call.   If you get in a deadline situation like this again, please call either Cynthia Cover at 520-629-4402 or Denise Moryoqui at 520-629-4435.  They can always find me.

If Rudi can chair the call on July 23, then I think the call should proceed on that date.  (I will be on a plane.)
Thank you,
Anne

[cid:image001.gif at 01D0B88C.3A9686A0]

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel

Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |

One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725

AAikman at LRRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman at LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/>







From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org]
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 8:43 AM
To: WUKnoben; Angie Graves; Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>; Mary Wong; Nathalie Peregrine
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

Dear Anne and SCI members,

Would you like us to schedule a call for the 9th?  If so we'll need to get the notice out today.

Kind regards,
Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>
Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>
Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 5:20 AM
To: Angie Graves <angie at webgroup.com<mailto:angie at webgroup.com>>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrlaw.com<mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com>>
Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>>, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>>, Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org<mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

Thanks Anne,

for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since I'm travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

From: Angie Graves<mailto:angie at webgroup.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne<mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
Cc: Julie Hedlund<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org> ; mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org ; Mary Wong<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org> ; Nathalie Peregrine<mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

Thank you, Anne, for the update.

I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.

Angie




On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com<mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com>> wrote:

Dear SCI Members,

We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of

(1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and

(2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to motions.



You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the GNSO Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding the Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.



With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri).

Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.



Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems for those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.  Personally I am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please advise your preference.



Thank you,

Anne





Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |

One South Church Avenue Suite 700

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

(T) 520.629.4428<tel:520.629.4428> | (F) 520.879.4725<tel:520.879.4725>

AAikman at LRRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman at LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.LRRLaw.com>





________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.


________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150707/deecd16d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3765 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150707/deecd16d/image001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 95 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150707/deecd16d/image002.png>

From julie.hedlund at icann.org  Tue Jul  7 15:23:39 2015
From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund)
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 15:23:39 +0000
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
In-Reply-To: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8561AB@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
 <CAGeCciyAkS4wSg-1J1Ea5nye5eE7b83nrUOVqrpLZ52pO6ksPg@mail.gmail.com>
 <D633858C8AA0404280E2122143FD2ABF@WUKPC>
 <D1C01499.4DEBE%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
 <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8561AB@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
Message-ID: <D1C166E4.4DF9C%julie.hedlund@icann.org>

Thanks Anne, will do!

Rudi,

See my and Anne's message below ? might you be able to Chair an SCI call on
23 July?

Thanks for your consideration.

Kind regards,
Julie

From:  "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
Date:  Tuesday, July 7, 2015 11:19 AM
To:  Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, WUKnoben
<wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>, Angie Graves <angie at webgroup.com>
Cc:  "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>,
Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, Nathalie Peregrine
<nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
Subject:  RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

> Sorry Julie but I was in all day meetings on site with a client yesterday and
> did not realize you needed to be advised by Monday to schedule a Thursday
> call.   If you get in a deadline situation like this again, please call either
> Cynthia Cover at 520-629-4402 or Denise Moryoqui at 520-629-4435.  They can
> always find me.
>  
> If Rudi can chair the call on July 23, then I think the call should proceed on
> that date.  (I will be on a plane.)
> Thank you,
> Anne
>  
> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
> AAikman at LRRLaw.com <mailto:AAikman at LRRLaw.com>  | www.LRRLaw.com
> <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>
>  
>  
> 
> From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org]
> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 8:43 AM
> To: WUKnoben; Angie Graves; Aikman-Scalese, Anne
> Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org; Mary Wong; Nathalie Peregrine
> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>  
> 
> Dear Anne and SCI members,
> 
>  
> 
> Would you like us to schedule a call for the 9th?  If so we'll need to get the
> notice out today.
> 
>  
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Julie
> 
>  
> 
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
> 
>  
> 
> From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
> <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de> >
> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
> <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de> >
> Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 5:20 AM
> To: Angie Graves <angie at webgroup.com <mailto:angie at webgroup.com> >,
> "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrlaw.com <mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com> >
> Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org> >,
> "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org> "
> <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org> >,
> Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org <mailto:mary.wong at icann.org> >, Nathalie
> Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org <mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
> >
> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
> 
>  
>> 
>> Thanks Anne,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since I?m
>> travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 
>> Wolf-Ulrich
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From:Angie Graves <mailto:angie at webgroup.com>
>> 
>> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
>> 
>> To:Aikman-Scalese, Anne <mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
>> 
>> Cc:Julie Hedlund <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>  ;
>> mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>  ; Mary Wong
>> <mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>  ; Nathalie Peregrine
>> <mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
>> 
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thank you, Anne, for the update.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially
>> problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Angie
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com
>> <mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com> > wrote:
>> 
>> Dear SCI Members,
>> 
>> We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of
>> 
>> (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
>> 
>> (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to motions.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the GNSO
>> Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding the
>> Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted
>> motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay
>> out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri).
>> 
>> Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I
>> encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems for
>> those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.  Personally I
>> am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please advise your
>> preference.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> Anne
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>> 
>> Of Counsel
>> 
>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>> 
>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700
>> 
>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>> 
>> (T) 520.629.4428 <tel:520.629.4428>  | (F) 520.879.4725 <tel:520.879.4725>
>> 
>> AAikman at LRRLaw.com <mailto:AAikman at LRRLaw.com>  | www.LRRLaw.com
>> <http://www.LRRLaw.com>
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic
>> Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.
>> 
>>  
> 
> 
> 
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying
> to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments
> may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of
> the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications
> Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150707/cea0be43/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3765 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150707/cea0be43/image001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 95 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150707/cea0be43/image002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5052 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150707/cea0be43/smime.p7s>

From aelsadr at egyptig.org  Tue Jul  7 15:28:25 2015
From: aelsadr at egyptig.org (Amr Elsadr)
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:28:25 +0200
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
In-Reply-To: <D1C15A63.4DF82%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> <CAGeCciyAkS4wSg-1J1Ea5nye5eE7b83nrUOVqrpLZ52pO6ksPg@mail.gmail.com> <D633858C8AA0404280E2122143FD2ABF@WUKPC> <D1C01499.4DEBE%julie.hedlund@icann.org> <D0E061B5-2962-4303-B608-45218A00C28F@egyptig.org> <DM3PR12MB07784381F1DC305C16A47409D3920@DM3PR12MB0778.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> <D1C15A63.4DF82%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
Message-ID: <302242BC-4DC7-43C9-BB8C-73D128BAF929@egyptig.org>


Thanks Julie. That's really helpful. 

Thanks again. 

Amr

Sent from mobile

> On Jul 7, 2015, at 4:32 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear Amr, Lori, and Ken,
> 
> We are trying to choose a date for the next call.  As you've noted, we did
> not get out a timely notice for a call Thursday, 09 July at 1800 UTC so
> there will be no call on Thursday.  We also note that 16 July presents a
> problem for SCI members of the CCWG who will be traveling.  Although Anne
> cannot chair a call on 23 July if Rudi Vansnick as our Vice Chair can run
> the call then perhaps we can shoot for that date.
> 
> Best regards,
> Julie
> 
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
> 
>> On 7/7/15 8:54 AM, "Lori Schulman" <lschulman at inta.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I am available tomorrow after 2 pm EDT.  I am also available on the other
>> suggested days.
>> 
>> With kind regards,
>> 
>> Lori S. Schulman
>> Senior Director, Internet Policy
>> International Trademark Association (INTA)
>> +1-202-261-6588
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 8:19 AM
>> To: Julie Hedlund
>> Cc: WUKnoben; Angie Graves; Aikman-Scalese, Anne;
>> gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org; Mary Wong; Nathalie Peregrine
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Do we have a call scheduled for tomorrow? I have another commitment on
>> hold until this one is confirmed. Would be helpful to know as soon as
>> possible.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Amr
>> 
>>> On Jul 6, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear Anne and SCI members,
>>> 
>>> Would you like us to schedule a call for the 9th?  If so we'll need to
>>> get the notice out today.
>>> 
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Julie
>>> 
>>> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>>> 
>>> From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
>>> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
>>> Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 5:20 AM
>>> To: Angie Graves <angie at webgroup.com>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne"
>>> <AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
>>> Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>,
>>> "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>,
>>> Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, Nathalie Peregrine
>>> <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>>> 
>>>> Thanks Anne,
>>>> 
>>>> for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since
>>>> I'm travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards
>>>> 
>>>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> From: Angie Graves
>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
>>>> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
>>>> Cc: Julie Hedlund ; mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org ; Mary Wong
>>>> ; Nathalie Peregrine
>>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you, Anne, for the update.
>>>> 
>>>> I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially
>>>> problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.
>>>> 
>>>> Angie
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne
>>>> <AAikman at lrrlaw.com> wrote:
>>>>> Dear SCI Members,
>>>>> We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our
>>>>> discussion of
>>>>> (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
>>>>> (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to
>>>>> motions.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in
>>>>> the GNSO Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion
>>>>> regarding the Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.
>>>>> 
>>>>> With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to
>>>>> resubmitted motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri
>>>>> respectively to lay out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and
>>>>> "Con"(Avri). 
>>>>> Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA
>>>>> which I encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose
>>>>> problems for those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to
>>>>> Paris.  Personally I am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to
>>>>> chair.  Please advise your preference.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Anne
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>>>>> Of Counsel
>>>>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>>>>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700
>>>>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>>>> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
>>>>> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>>>>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of
>>>>> this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the
>>>>> employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment
>>>>> to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
>>>>> dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any
>>>>> attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>>>>> communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to
>>>>> the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
>>>>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
>>>>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
>>>>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.
>> 
>> 



From rudi.vansnick at isoc.be  Tue Jul  7 15:39:29 2015
From: rudi.vansnick at isoc.be (Rudi Vansnick)
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:39:29 +0200
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
In-Reply-To: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8561AB@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> <CAGeCciyAkS4wSg-1J1Ea5nye5eE7b83nrUOVqrpLZ52pO6ksPg@mail.gmail.com> <D633858C8AA0404280E2122143FD2ABF@WUKPC> <D1C01499.4DEBE%julie.hedlund@icann.org> <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8561AB@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
Message-ID: <A10A477B-A566-4F37-BD6F-AF3703779169@isoc.be>

I?m available on the 23rd so if needed we can schedule the call on that day.

Rudi Vansnick
Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)
www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>

rudi.vansnick at npoc.org
Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32



> Op 7-jul.-2015, om 17:19 heeft Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> Sorry Julie but I was in all day meetings on site with a client yesterday and did not realize you needed to be advised by Monday to schedule a Thursday call.   If you get in a deadline situation like this again, please call either Cynthia Cover at 520-629-4402 or Denise Moryoqui at 520-629-4435.  They can always find me.
>  
> If Rudi can chair the call on July 23, then I think the call should proceed on that date.  (I will be on a plane.)
> Thank you,
> Anne
>  
> <image001.gif>
> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
> AAikman at LRRLaw.com <mailto:AAikman at LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>
>  
> From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>] 
> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 8:43 AM
> To: WUKnoben; Angie Graves; Aikman-Scalese, Anne
> Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>; Mary Wong; Nathalie Peregrine
> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>  
> Dear Anne and SCI members,
>  
> Would you like us to schedule a call for the 9th?  If so we'll need to get the notice out today.  
>  
> Kind regards,
> Julie
>  
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>  
> From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>
> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>
> Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 5:20 AM
> To: Angie Graves <angie at webgroup.com <mailto:angie at webgroup.com>>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrlaw.com <mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com>>
> Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>>, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org <mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>>, Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org <mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>  
> Thanks Anne,
>  
> for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since I?m travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
>  
> From: Angie Graves <mailto:angie at webgroup.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
> Cc: Julie Hedlund <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org> ; mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org> ; Mary Wong <mailto:mary.wong at icann.org> ; Nathalie Peregrine <mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>  
> Thank you, Anne, for the update.
>  
> I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.
>  
> Angie
>  
>  
> <image002.png>
>  
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com <mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com>> wrote:
> Dear SCI Members,
> 
> We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of
> 
> (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
> 
> (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to motions.
> 
>  
> 
> You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the GNSO Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding the Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.
> 
>  
> 
> With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri). 
> 
> Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.
> 
>  
> 
> Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems for those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.  Personally I am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please advise your preference.
> 
>  
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Anne
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
> 
> Of Counsel
> 
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
> 
> One South Church Avenue Suite 700
> 
> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
> 
> (T) 520.629.4428 <tel:520.629.4428> | (F) 520.879.4725 <tel:520.879.4725>
> AAikman at LRRLaw.com <mailto:AAikman at LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.
>  
> 
> 
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150707/cb4d57f3/attachment.html>

From julie.hedlund at icann.org  Tue Jul  7 17:15:05 2015
From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund)
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:15:05 +0000
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
In-Reply-To: <A10A477B-A566-4F37-BD6F-AF3703779169@isoc.be>
References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
 <CAGeCciyAkS4wSg-1J1Ea5nye5eE7b83nrUOVqrpLZ52pO6ksPg@mail.gmail.com>
 <D633858C8AA0404280E2122143FD2ABF@WUKPC>
 <D1C01499.4DEBE%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
 <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8561AB@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
 <A10A477B-A566-4F37-BD6F-AF3703779169@isoc.be>
Message-ID: <D1C18143.4DFA9%julie.hedlund@icann.org>

Thanks so much Rudi, we'll schedule the call for the 23rd.

Kind regards,
Julie

From:  Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>
Date:  Tuesday, July 7, 2015 11:39 AM
To:  "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
Cc:  Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, WUKnoben
<wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>, Angie Graves <angie at webgroup.com>,
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>, Mary
Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, Nathalie Peregrine
<nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

> I?m available on the 23rd so if needed we can schedule the call on that day.
> 
> Rudi Vansnick
> Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)
> www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org>
> 
> rudi.vansnick at npoc.org
> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
> Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
> 
> 
> 
>> Op 7-jul.-2015, om 17:19 heeft Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com> het
>> volgende geschreven:
>> 
>> Sorry Julie but I was in all day meetings on site with a client yesterday and
>> did not realize you needed to be advised by Monday to schedule a Thursday
>> call.   If you get in a deadline situation like this again, please call
>> either Cynthia Cover at 520-629-4402 or Denise Moryoqui at 520-629-4435.
>> They can always find me.
>>  
>> If Rudi can chair the call on July 23, then I think the call should proceed
>> on that date.  (I will be on a plane.)
>> Thank you,
>> Anne
>>  
>> <image001.gif>Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
>> AAikman at LRRLaw.com <mailto:AAikman at LRRLaw.com>  | www.LRRLaw.com
>> <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org]
>> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 8:43 AM
>> To: WUKnoben; Angie Graves; Aikman-Scalese, Anne
>> Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org; Mary Wong; Nathalie Peregrine
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>>  
>> 
>> Dear Anne and SCI members,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Would you like us to schedule a call for the 9th?  If so we'll need to get
>> the notice out today.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> 
>> Julie
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
>> <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de> >
>> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
>> <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de> >
>> Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 5:20 AM
>> To: Angie Graves <angie at webgroup.com <mailto:angie at webgroup.com> >,
>> "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrlaw.com <mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com> >
>> Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>
>> >, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
>> " <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
>> >, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org <mailto:mary.wong at icann.org> >, Nathalie
>> Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org <mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
>> >
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>> 
>>  
>>> 
>>> Thanks Anne,
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since I?m
>>> travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.
>>> 
>>> Best regards
>>> 
>>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From:Angie Graves <mailto:angie at webgroup.com>
>>> 
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
>>> 
>>> To:Aikman-Scalese, Anne <mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
>>> 
>>> Cc:Julie Hedlund <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>  ;
>>> mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org
>>> <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>  ; Mary Wong
>>> <mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>  ; Nathalie Peregrine
>>> <mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
>>> 
>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Thank you, Anne, for the update.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially
>>> problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Angie
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> <image002.png>
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com
>>> <mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear SCI Members,
>>> 
>>> We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of
>>> 
>>> (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
>>> 
>>> (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to
>>> motions.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the GNSO
>>> Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding the
>>> Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted
>>> motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay
>>> out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri).
>>> 
>>> Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I
>>> encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems for
>>> those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.  Personally I
>>> am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please advise your
>>> preference.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> 
>>> Anne
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>>> 
>>> Of Counsel
>>> 
>>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>>> 
>>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700
>>> 
>>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>> 
>>> (T) 520.629.4428 <tel:520.629.4428>  | (F) 520.879.4725 <tel:520.879.4725>
>>> 
>>> AAikman at LRRLaw.com <mailto:AAikman at LRRLaw.com>  | www.LRRLaw.com
>>> <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
>>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
>>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
>>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
>>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
>>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
>>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
>>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
>>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.
>>> 
>>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic
>> Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.
>> 
>> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150707/561c00cb/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5052 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150707/561c00cb/smime.p7s>

From AAikman at lrrlaw.com  Thu Jul  9 17:20:54 2015
From: AAikman at lrrlaw.com (Aikman-Scalese, Anne)
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 17:20:54 +0000
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
In-Reply-To: <D1C18143.4DFA9%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8535FD@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
 <CAGeCciyAkS4wSg-1J1Ea5nye5eE7b83nrUOVqrpLZ52pO6ksPg@mail.gmail.com>
 <D633858C8AA0404280E2122143FD2ABF@WUKPC>
 <D1C01499.4DEBE%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
 <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8561AB@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>
 <A10A477B-A566-4F37-BD6F-AF3703779169@isoc.be>
 <D1C18143.4DFA9%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
Message-ID: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8573F6@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>

Thanks Rudi!

[cid:image001.gif at 01D0BA30.EF74CC30]

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel

Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |

One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725

AAikman at LRRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman at LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/>








From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:15 AM
To: Rudi Vansnick; Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Cc: WUKnoben; Angie Graves; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org; Mary Wong; Nathalie Peregrine
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

Thanks so much Rudi, we'll schedule the call for the 23rd.

Kind regards,
Julie

From: Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick at isoc.be<mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be>>
Date: Tuesday, July 7, 2015 11:39 AM
To: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrlaw.com<mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com>>
Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>, WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>, Angie Graves <angie at webgroup.com<mailto:angie at webgroup.com>>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>>, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>>, Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org<mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

I'm available on the 23rd so if needed we can schedule the call on that day.

Rudi Vansnick
Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)
www.npoc.org<http://www.npoc.org>

rudi.vansnick at npoc.org<mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32



Op 7-jul.-2015, om 17:19 heeft Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com<mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com>> het volgende geschreven:

Sorry Julie but I was in all day meetings on site with a client yesterday and did not realize you needed to be advised by Monday to schedule a Thursday call.   If you get in a deadline situation like this again, please call either Cynthia Cover at 520-629-4402 or Denise Moryoqui at 520-629-4435.  They can always find me.

If Rudi can chair the call on July 23, then I think the call should proceed on that date.  (I will be on a plane.)
Thank you,
Anne

<image001.gif>

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel

Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |

One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725

AAikman at LRRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman at LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/>






From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org]
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 8:43 AM
To: WUKnoben; Angie Graves; Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>; Mary Wong; Nathalie Peregrine
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

Dear Anne and SCI members,

Would you like us to schedule a call for the 9th?  If so we'll need to get the notice out today.

Kind regards,
Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>
Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>>
Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 5:20 AM
To: Angie Graves <angie at webgroup.com<mailto:angie at webgroup.com>>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrlaw.com<mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com>>
Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>>, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>>, Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org<mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

Thanks Anne,

for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since I'm travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

From:Angie Graves<mailto:angie at webgroup.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
To:Aikman-Scalese, Anne<mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com>
Cc:Julie Hedlund<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org> ; mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org ; Mary Wong<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org> ; Nathalie Peregrine<mailto:nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

Thank you, Anne, for the update.

I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.

Angie


<image002.png>

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrlaw.com<mailto:AAikman at lrrlaw.com>> wrote:
Dear SCI Members,
We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of
(1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
(2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to motions.

You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the GNSO Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding the Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.

With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri).
Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.

Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems for those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.  Personally I am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please advise your preference.

Thank you,
Anne


Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
One South Church Avenue Suite 700
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
(T) 520.629.4428<tel:520.629.4428> | (F) 520.879.4725<tel:520.879.4725>
AAikman at LRRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman at LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/>



________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.


________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.


________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150709/cb71c4f0/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3765 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150709/cb71c4f0/image001.gif>

From rudi.vansnick at isoc.be  Wed Jul 22 11:48:31 2015
From: rudi.vansnick at isoc.be (Rudi Vansnick)
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:48:31 +0200
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda Thursday 23 July 18:00 UTC
References: <72F4751B-0CE2-4C36-855D-B9F74CA9CAA4@npoc.org>
Message-ID: <EA952AE5-B759-49EF-9231-3B44D2D11AC1@isoc.be>

Dear SCI members,

Our next call scheduled for Thursday 23 July at 18:00 UTC would focus on 2 items based on the discussions we already had in Buenos Aires :

1. application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted motions;
2. GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to motions.

When reading through transcripts of previous calls (and especially the one from our BA meeting), the language we need to validate is the one between the brackets as is shown below. If we consider this is not the case, I would like to get clearance on this during our call tomorrow.
"If these requirements are not met, the motion shall not be considered submitted for the next Council meeting. For the avoidance of doubt, if the motion is proposed again for a subsequent Council meeting, it shall not be considered a resubmitted motion under the rules for Resubmission of a Motion in these Operating Procedures. [Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements in addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible for consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2.]"

If I?m not wrong we had two proposals : waiving the 10 day rule or NOT waiving the 10 day rule. Maybe this is a bit to simple, but as far as I could distinct from the discussions in BA this is the point we had not reached consensus. So perhaps we could start the discussion tomorrow on this level.

Of course, open to any other proposal, and looking forward to our meeting tomorrow.
 
Adobe Connect: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/standcommdraft/ <http://icann.adobeconnect.com/standcommdraft/>
Kind regards,

Rudi Vansnick
Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)
www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>

rudi.vansnick at npoc.org <mailto:rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>
Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150722/094859ae/attachment.html>

From wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de  Wed Jul 22 16:30:25 2015
From: wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de (WUKnoben)
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:30:25 +0800
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda Thursday 23 July 18:00 UTC
In-Reply-To: <EA952AE5-B759-49EF-9231-3B44D2D11AC1@isoc.be>
References: <72F4751B-0CE2-4C36-855D-B9F74CA9CAA4@npoc.org> <EA952AE5-B759-49EF-9231-3B44D2D11AC1@isoc.be>
Message-ID: <8CCB493A0FF64F35A4FF7A459019BAE9@WUKPC>

Some thoughts re the waiver rule since I?ll be not participating the call:

1. I think the 1st sentence of the last para in 3.3.2 is confusing with the wording ?...for the next Council meeting...?. Here the meeting is meant where the vote under 3.3.2 c is taken. So I feel more comfortable to remove the word ?next?.

2. The text proposed in brackets theoretically opens a circle to repeatedly resubmit a motion the first time since according to the conditions under 4.3.3 only the explanation is to be submitted 10 days in advance. If this is achieved any late (re)submission of the motion is not to be considered as resubmission. This doesn?t make sense to me.

3. I?m not against waivering the 10 day rule. But I wonder whether it?s really needed to be formalized in the case of resubmission. Since in every case a former motion shall be tha basis for a resubmission I really can?t see it happen that the 10 day rule can?t be met. So my suggestion is to recommend:
a) not to amend the rules (besides removing the ?next?, see above)
b) for the first ever contentious case on council to grant the waiver
c) if b) happens put it on the SCI agenda again to find a final solution 

Nice meeting and best regards

Wolf-Ulrich 



From: Rudi Vansnick 
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 7:48 PM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org 
Cc: GNSO Secretariat ; Julie Hedlund 
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda Thursday 23 July 18:00 UTC

Dear SCI members,


Our next call scheduled for Thursday 23 July at 18:00 UTC would focus on 2 items based on the discussions we already had in Buenos Aires :

1. application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted motions;
2. GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to motions.

When reading through transcripts of previous calls (and especially the one from our BA meeting), the language we need to validate is the one between the brackets as is shown below. If we consider this is not the case, I would like to get clearance on this during our call tomorrow.
"If these requirements are not met, the motion shall not be considered submitted for the next Council meeting. For the avoidance of doubt, if the motion is proposed again for a subsequent Council meeting, it shall not be considered a resubmitted motion under the rules for Resubmission of a Motion in these Operating Procedures. [Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements in addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible for consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2.]"
If I?m not wrong we had two proposals : waiving the 10 day rule or NOT waiving the 10 day rule. Maybe this is a bit to simple, but as far as I could distinct from the discussions in BA this is the point we had not reached consensus. So perhaps we could start the discussion tomorrow on this level.

Of course, open to any other proposal, and looking forward to our meeting tomorrow.
 
Adobe Connect: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/standcommdraft/

Kind regards, 

Rudi Vansnick
Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)
www.npoc.org

rudi.vansnick at npoc.org
Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150723/36050f2e/attachment.html>

From julie.hedlund at icann.org  Thu Jul 23 19:21:03 2015
From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund)
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 19:21:03 +0000
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Next SCI Call: Schedule for 03 September
Message-ID: <D1D6B451.4E6CB%julie.hedlund@icann.org>

Dear SCI members,

At the end of today's SCI call there was discussion concerning when the next
call should be scheduled.  Several members pointed out that since August is
typically the month for holidays/vacations, if we keep to our usual schedule
of a meeting every two weeks (which would be 06 and 20 August) we may end up
canceling calls if there are few attendees.  Thus, members suggested that it
was preferable to schedule the call on Thursday, 03 September and to
continue discussion of the issues on the list (for which I'll start two
discussion threads).

If there are no objections the GNSO Secretariat will make arrangements to
place the next call on the calendar for Thursday, 03 September at the usual
time of 1800 UTC.

Best regards,
Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150723/ddf49475/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5052 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150723/ddf49475/smime.p7s>

From angie at webgroup.com  Thu Jul 23 19:47:26 2015
From: angie at webgroup.com (Angie Graves)
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:47:26 -0400
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Next SCI Call: Schedule for 03 September
In-Reply-To: <D1D6B451.4E6CB%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
References: <D1D6B451.4E6CB%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
Message-ID: <CAGeCcizTjNq1WNNxvJchhtEntebSsYV_iYpjrStmmNWzQvn1Xg@mail.gmail.com>

Thank you, Julie.  I personally am available and have no objections, but if
holiday/vacation times are being avoided, please note that a popular US
holiday, Labor Day, is September 7, for which many people take a holiday
week or long weekend leading up to that Monday.

Best regards,

Angie

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
wrote:

> Dear SCI members,
>
> At the end of today's SCI call there was discussion concerning when the
> next call should be scheduled.  Several members pointed out that since
> August is typically the month for holidays/vacations, if we keep to our
> usual schedule of a meeting every two weeks (which would be 06 and 20
> August) we may end up canceling calls if there are few attendees.  Thus,
> members suggested that it was preferable to schedule the call on Thursday,
> 03 September and to continue discussion of the issues on the list (for
> which I'll start two discussion threads).
>
> If there are no objections the GNSO Secretariat will make arrangements to
> place the next call on the calendar for Thursday, 03 September at the usual
> time of 1800 UTC.
>
> Best regards,
> Julie
>
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150723/03bba709/attachment.html>

From julie.hedlund at icann.org  Thu Jul 23 20:11:09 2015
From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund)
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:11:09 +0000
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] For Review: Waiver of 10-Day Motion Deadline and Resubmission of
 Motions
Message-ID: <D1D6C247.4E6DC%julie.hedlund@icann.org>

Dear SCI members,

The SCI members on the call on 23 July (Avri Doria, Amr Elsadr, Angie
Graves, Lori Schulman, Ken Stubbs, and Rudi Vansnick (Vice Chair)) discussed
the issue of whether the waiver of the 10-day deadline for submitting
motions should apply to resubmitted motions.  After some discussion there
was consensus of the members on the call with the suggestion from
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben on the list that the SCI should not recommend a change to
the GNSO Operating Procedures at this time with respect to this issue.
However, they agreed that the SCI should send a response to the Council
emphasizing that after a review of the GNSO Operating Procedures it is clear
that the waiver of the 10-day deadline for submission of motions does not
apply to resubmitted motions.  The SCI also could note in its response that
although changes are not recommended at this time, the SCI could revisit the
issue if requested by the Council and, specifically, if there is a
contentious issue that warrants it.

The SCI members on the call also agreed that it would be better not to send
the response to the GNSO Council until the SCI has decided how to address
the second issue, which concerns the current informal customs relating to
amendments to motions.  This would enable the SCI to send its
recommendations concerning both issues to the Council at the same time.

Please indicate on the list whether you agree with this approach,
particularly those SCI members who were not on the call on 23 July.

Thank you very much for your assistance.

Best regards,
Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150723/784accd3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5052 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150723/784accd3/smime.p7s>

From julie.hedlund at icann.org  Thu Jul 23 20:26:05 2015
From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund)
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:26:05 +0000
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] For Discussion: Amendments to Motions
Message-ID: <D1D6BE88.4E6D4%julie.hedlund@icann.org>

Dear SCI members,

On today's call the SCI began a discussion concerning whether the informal
GNSO Council customs relating to amendments to motions should be
incorporated in the GNSO Operating Procedures and, if so, in what form.  For
background on the issue, please see the attached Review Request. Here is a
brief summary of the points raised in the discussion.  I've included the
relevant discussion from the Chat Room below and the transcript will be
circulated separately.  I would be grateful to those who were in the meeting
to let me know whether there were any points I missed and whether there is
additional information to inform this discussion.

Key Points:
* The GNSO Operating Procedures do not contain any guidance concerning
amendments of any sort, or define "friendly" and "unfriendly".  There also
is no guidance on seconding motions.
* The current informal custom is that the person who proposes a motion
decides whether an amendment is friendly or not. (See the attached Review
Request for a full description of the current practice.)
* Roberts Rules of Order treat amendments as neutral (neither friendly or
unfriendly).
* The current informal custom in the Council is that if an amendment is
deemed unfriendly then a vote is held on the motion (threshold: simply
majority).
* Voting on amendments is standard outside of the GNSO/ICANN community.
* Timing of the submission of amendments has been problematic, sometimes not
allowing time for consultation with constituencies and stakeholder groups.
The SCI members on the call today decided that discussion on this issue
should continue on the list and at the next meeting.  In particular, members
should consider whether the GNSO Operating Procedures should be revised to
include specific procedures on amendments.  Possible procedures to include
could be:
> * Timing of submission of amendments;
> * Defining "friendly" and "unfriendly";
> * When and how votes on amendments are conducted; and
> * When and how amendments are seconded.
Please send any comments in response to this message as the start of the
discussion thread.

Best regards,
Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

Chat Room:

Lori Schulman:Are "friendly" and "unfriendly" defined in the GNSO
procedures.
  Julie Hedlund:@Lori: No, there is nothing in the Procedures addressing
amendments of either kind.
  Lori Schulman:Without a definition, how do we delineate a procdure?
  Julie Hedlund:@Lori: We would have to consider whether to incorporate a
definition in the addition to the procedures.  We could probably use Roberts
Rules of Order as a guide.
  ken stubbs - afilias:15 years ago for me (joined council)
  ken stubbs - afilias:+1 avri
  Amr Elsadr:@Avri: In BA, council also voted on whether to accept the
amended language before voting on the motion.
  Avri Doria:under the tradion on the maker of the motion and seconder get
to decide if it is friendly.  rudi issue is the crix of the issue on
friendly motions. who owns changing it?
  Lori Schulman:I tend to agree with Roberts.  Amendments should be
agnostic.
  Lori Schulman:neither friendly nor unfriendly.
  Mary Wong:The consequence of characterizing a proposed amendment as
friendly or not is whether or not the Council will then first need to vote
on the proposed amendment (whether to accept it)
  Mary Wong:Again, it's Council custom - first vote on amendment if
considered unfriendly
  Mary Wong:Needs majority to add the amendment to the original motion
  Avri Doria:voting on amendments is the standard even in the real world.
  Lori Schulman:yup
  Julie Hedlund:@Avri: You mean we aren't in the real world ;-)
  Mary Wong:Yup just pointing out the consequence
  Lori Schulman:+1 to Avri's comment about the "real" world.
  Avri Doria:Julie, you tell me.  I can't ever tell for sure.
  Julie Hedlund:@Avri: Then we are both lost since I'm not sure either :-)
  Rudi Vansnick:"friendly" is to me a personal (human) perception not
procedural
  Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: Yes..., which is why it is highly subjective.
  Avri Doria:i have to chair a IGF type meeting on the hour so will drop off
at around  xx58
  Angie Graves:I agree with Amr.  Are we working against an agreed-upon
definition of "friendly"?
  Avri Doria:for a bit of history, when i first becasme GNSO chair in
antiquity, i tried to get rid of the whole friendly ammendment thing.  at
that time i was told to leave it alone.  now, after all these years i have
grown accustomed to it.
  Amr Elsadr:I wouldn't try to define friendly here.
  Amr Elsadr:Seems unnecessary to me.
  Angie Graves:Me neither.  Just wondering if one exists.
  ken stubbs:sorry.. wifi wnt down for a few min
  Amr Elsadr:@Angie: I think you're friendly. Does that count? ;-)
  Angie Graves:hehe
  Angie Graves:me too you!
  Avri Doria:continue to discuss on list?
  Lori Schulman:I think that if you want to codify rules around friendly
amendments then you need to define them
  Amr Elsadr:@Avri: +1
  Angie Graves:Thanks, Avri
  ken stubbs:awareness needs to be made at council level before we move much
further
  Avri Doria:some mornig i wake up and know i am not going to be all that
friendly that day.
  Amr Elsadr:@Lori: I only meant that if we work out and suggest codified
rules, those will determine how friendly amendments may be submitted and
accepted without us having to define it now. That's all.
  Lori Schulman:Amr: got it.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150723/f7ee1036/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SCI Review Request - Motions - 5 Mar 2015 v2.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 29640 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150723/f7ee1036/SCIReviewRequest-Motions-5Mar2015v2.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5052 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150723/f7ee1036/smime.p7s>

From terri.agnew at icann.org  Thu Jul 23 21:27:19 2015
From: terri.agnew at icann.org (Terri Agnew)
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:27:19 +0000
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 23 July 2015
Message-ID: <b9dba3eccec0443c986b87c6d442ec7f@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG>

Dear All,
Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation meeting held on Thursday, 23 July 2015:  http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-23jul15-en.mp3

On page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#jul

(transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page)



Attendees:

Rudi Vansnick - NPOC - Primary

Amr Elsadr - NCUC - Primary

Avri Doria - NCSG - Primary

Lori Schulman - IPC - Alternate

Angie Graves - BC - Primary

Ken Stubbs - RySG - Primary



Apologies:

Wolf-Ulrich Knoben - ISPCP - Primary

Jennifer Standiford - RrSG - Primary

Anne Aikman Scalese - IPC - Primary - Chair



ICANN Staff:

Julie Hedlund

Mary Wong

Terri Agnew
 ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **

Let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Terri Agnew
Adobe Chat Transcript 23 July 2015

  Terri Agnew:Dear all, welcome to the SCI call on the 23rd July 2015

  Lori Schulman:Hello.

  Rudi Vansnick:hi Lori

  Amr Elsadr:May the document on the screen please by desynched?

  Amr Elsadr:Thanks.

  Julie Hedlund:@Amr -- Done!

  ken stubbs - afilias:thank you !

  Amr Elsadr:It looks like the chat window may be covering the window showing participants. Can this please be fixed?

  Julie Hedlund:@Amr, it isn't showing that way for me.  I will try to change it thought.

  Julie Hedlund:I tried moving the chat window down a bit.

  Amr Elsadr:Thanks. Looks like it's fixed on my end. Maybe I was just imagining it.

  Amr Elsadr::)

  Julie Hedlund:Well, it is Adobe Connect, so who knows ;-)

  Lori Schulman:can you hear me?

  Julie Hedlund:We can't hear you Lori.

  Terri Agnew:@Lori, no, you need to active your mic

  Julie Hedlund:Loud and clear Lori!

  Julie Hedlund:@Lori, I don't think that there was consensus.

  Avri Doria:right in the past we had consensu on creating the rule in the first place.

  Avri Doria:but as Amr is explain this is a theoretical emergent edge case.

  Avri Doria:the reason i gave for not doing so is tha reason for the 10 day rule - emergencies.  on a resubmission i do not see what the emergency might be.

  Amr Elsadr:@Julie: That's fine by me.

  Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: Yes, of course. Didn't mean anything by it. Just wanted to point it out.

  Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: I'm sorry..., could you clarify what you want us to agree on?

  Amr Elsadr:@Julie: Sure. Thanks.

  Amr Elsadr:Thanks Julie. Sounds fine by me.

  Avri Doria:Rudi, are you just on AC, if so, it has been bouncing up and own for days now.

  Avri Doria:.. up and down ...

  Rudi Vansnick:@Avri yes Avri i was on AC only

  Lori Schulman:Are "friendly" and "unfriendly" defined in the GNSO procedures.

  Julie Hedlund:@Lori: No, there is nothing in the Procedures addressing amendments of either kind.

  Lori Schulman:Without a definition, how do we delineate a procdure?

  Julie Hedlund:@Lori: We would have to consider whether to incorporate a definition in the addition to the procedures.  We could probably use Roberts Rules of Order as a guide.

  ken stubbs - afilias:15 years ago for me (joined council)

  ken stubbs - afilias:+1 avri

  Amr Elsadr:@Avri: In BA, council also voted on whether to accept the amended language before voting on the motion.

  Avri Doria:under the tradion on the maker of the motion and seconder get to decide if it is friendly.  rudi issue is the crix of the issue on friendly motions. who owns changing it?

  Lori Schulman:I tend to agree with Roberts.  Amendments should be agnostic.

  Lori Schulman:neither friendly nor unfriendly.

  Mary Wong:The consequence of characterizing a proposed amendment as friendly or not is whether or not the Council will then first need to vote on the proposed amendment (whether to accept it)

  Mary Wong:Again, it's Council custom - first vote on amendment if considered unfriendly

  Mary Wong:Needs majority to add the amendment to the original motion

  Avri Doria:voting on amendments is the standard even in the real world.

  Lori Schulman:yup

  Julie Hedlund:@Avri: You mean we aren't in the real world ;-)

  Mary Wong:Yup just pointing out the consequence

  Lori Schulman:+1 to Avri's comment about the "real" world.

  Avri Doria:Julie, you tell me.  I can't ever tell for sure.

  Julie Hedlund:@Avri: Then we are both lost since I'm not sure either :-)

  Rudi Vansnick:"friendly" is to me a personal (human) perception not procedural

  Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: Yes..., which is why it is highly subjective.

  Avri Doria:i have to chair a IGF type meeting on the hour so will drop off at around  xx58

  Angie Graves:I agree with Amr.  Are we working against an agreed-upon definition of "friendly"?

  Avri Doria:for a bit of history, when i first becasme GNSO chair in antiquity, i tried to get rid of the whole friendly ammendment thing.  at that time i was told to leave it alone.  now, after all these years i have grown accustomed to it.

  Amr Elsadr:I wouldn't try to define friendly here.

  Amr Elsadr:Seems unnecessary to me.

  Angie Graves:Me neither.  Just wondering if one exists.

  ken stubbs:sorry.. wifi wnt down for a few min

  Amr Elsadr:@Angie: I think you're friendly. Does that count? ;-)

  Angie Graves:hehe

  Angie Graves:me too you!

  Avri Doria:continue to discuss on list?

  Lori Schulman:I think that if you want to codify rules around friendly amendments then you need to define them

  Amr Elsadr:@Avri: +1

  Angie Graves:Thanks, Avri

  ken stubbs:awareness needs to be made at council level before we move much further

  Avri Doria:some mornig i wake up and know i am not going to be all that friendly that day.

  ken stubbs:vacatiuons coming up

  Lori Schulman:I vote September

  Lori Schulman:Too many vacations

  ken stubbs:+1 september

  Avri Doria:September is good.

  Amr Elsadr:@Lori: I only meant that if we work out and suggest codified rules, those will determine how friendly amendments may be submitted and accepted without us having to define it now. That's all.

  Lori Schulman:Amr: got it.

  Avri Doria:can we include Spetember as one of the doodle choices?

  Mary Wong:Just schedule for the 6th and cancel if you have too many apolgies?

  ken stubbs:1st wk in sept is best

  Lori Schulman:I like Mary's approach.

  ken stubbs:pass on the 6th

  Lori Schulman:Top down but practical

  Avri Doria:bye all.

  Amr Elsadr:I would also prefer to wait until September.

  ken stubbs:majority have suggested september

  Amr Elsadr:#September

  ken stubbs:serious trending .. majority of parties on the call favor sept

  Lori Schulman:LOL

  ken stubbs:good bye folks

  Julie Hedlund:Bye everyone and thanks!

  Amr Elsadr:Thanks all. Bye.

  Lori Schulman:Bye.  Happy Summer!

  Mary Wong:Thanks all

  Angie Graves:Thanks!

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150723/4b4cb5ff/attachment.html>

From Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de  Fri Jul 24 01:13:23 2015
From: Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de (Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de)
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:13:23 +0800
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] For Review: Waiver of 10-Day Motion Deadline and Resubmission of Motions
In-Reply-To: <D1D6C247.4E6DC%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
References: <D1D6C247.4E6DC%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
Message-ID: <F18D83E5-EBFC-49E9-97E9-87962085A30C@t-online.de>

Thanks to all who participated. I'm glad with having contributed to a step forward. I agree to the approach suggested.

Regards from China
Wolf-Ulrich

Sent from my personal phone

> Am 24.07.2015 um 04:11 schrieb Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>:
> 
> Dear SCI members,
> 
> The SCI members on the call on 23 July (Avri Doria, Amr Elsadr, Angie Graves, Lori Schulman, Ken Stubbs, and Rudi Vansnick (Vice Chair)) discussed the issue of whether the waiver of the 10-day deadline for submitting motions should apply to resubmitted motions.  After some discussion there was consensus of the members on the call with the suggestion from Wolf-Ulrich Knoben on the list that the SCI should not recommend a change to the GNSO Operating Procedures at this time with respect to this issue.  However, they agreed that the SCI should send a response to the Council emphasizing that after a review of the GNSO Operating Procedures it is clear that the waiver of the 10-day deadline for submission of motions does not apply to resubmitted motions.  The SCI also could note in its response that although changes are not recommended at this time, the SCI could revisit the issue if requested by the Council and, specifically, if there is a contentious issue that warrants it.
> 
> The SCI members on the call also agreed that it would be better not to send the response to the GNSO Council until the SCI has decided how to address the second issue, which concerns the current informal customs relating to amendments to motions.  This would enable the SCI to send its recommendations concerning both issues to the Council at the same time.
> 
> Please indicate on the list whether you agree with this approach, particularly those SCI members who were not on the call on 23 July.
> 
> Thank you very much for your assistance.
> 
> Best regards,
> Julie
> 
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150724/743a824c/attachment.html>

From sbockey at godaddy.com  Fri Jul 24 18:02:21 2015
From: sbockey at godaddy.com (Sara Bockey)
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:02:21 +0000
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Next SCI Call: Schedule for 03 September
In-Reply-To: <CAGeCcizTjNq1WNNxvJchhtEntebSsYV_iYpjrStmmNWzQvn1Xg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <D1D6B451.4E6CB%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
 <CAGeCcizTjNq1WNNxvJchhtEntebSsYV_iYpjrStmmNWzQvn1Xg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <F41DAC0D-F871-4D35-B879-5FCE76E038C5@godaddy.com>

I would also be available in August ? presuming I was needed as the alternate.

Sara

From: <owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>> on behalf of Angie Graves
Date: Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 12:47 PM
To: Julie Hedlund
Cc: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>", GNSO Secretariat
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Next SCI Call: Schedule for 03 September

Thank you, Julie.  I personally am available and have no objections, but if holiday/vacation times are being avoided, please note that a popular US holiday, Labor Day, is September 7, for which many people take a holiday week or long weekend leading up to that Monday.

Best regards,

Angie


On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>> wrote:
Dear SCI members,

At the end of today's SCI call there was discussion concerning when the next call should be scheduled.  Several members pointed out that since August is typically the month for holidays/vacations, if we keep to our usual schedule of a meeting every two weeks (which would be 06 and 20 August) we may end up canceling calls if there are few attendees.  Thus, members suggested that it was preferable to schedule the call on Thursday, 03 September and to continue discussion of the issues on the list (for which I'll start two discussion threads).

If there are no objections the GNSO Secretariat will make arrangements to place the next call on the calendar for Thursday, 03 September at the usual time of 1800 UTC.

Best regards,
Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150724/86e45b53/attachment.html>

From Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de  Sat Jul 25 01:13:33 2015
From: Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de (Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de)
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 03:13:33 +0200
Subject: No subject
In-Reply-To: <F41DAC0D-F871-4D35-B879-5FCE76E038C5@godaddy.com>
References: <D1D6B451.4E6CB%julie.hedlund@icann.org> <CAGeCcizTjNq1WNNxvJchhtEntebSsYV_iYpjrStmmNWzQvn1Xg@mail.gmail.com> <F41DAC0D-F871-4D35-B879-5FCE76E038C5@godaddy.com>
Message-ID: <6390D9A0-8DDD-4AF1-A711-3E1A0066457F@t-online.de>

I would be available in August.

Wolf-Ulrich

Sent from my personal phone

> Am 25.07.2015 um 02:02 schrieb Sara Bockey <sbockey at godaddy.com>:
> 
> I would also be available in August ? presuming I was needed as the alternate.
> 
> Sara 
> 
> From: <owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org> on behalf of Angie Graves
> Date: Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 12:47 PM
> To: Julie Hedlund
> Cc: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org", GNSO Secretariat
> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Next SCI Call: Schedule for 03 September
> 
> Thank you, Julie.  I personally am available and have no objections, but if holiday/vacation times are being avoided, please note that a popular US holiday, Labor Day, is September 7, for which many people take a holiday week or long weekend leading up to that Monday.  
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Angie
> 
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org> wrote:
>> Dear SCI members,
>> 
>> At the end of today's SCI call there was discussion concerning when the next call should be scheduled.  Several members pointed out that since August is typically the month for holidays/vacations, if we keep to our usual schedule of a meeting every two weeks (which would be 06 and 20 August) we may end up canceling calls if there are few attendees.  Thus, members suggested that it was preferable to schedule the call on Thursday, 03 September and to continue discussion of the issues on the list (for which I'll start two discussion threads).
>> 
>> If there are no objections the GNSO Secretariat will make arrangements to place the next call on the calendar for Thursday, 03 September at the usual time of 1800 UTC.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Julie
>> 
>> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150725/2abea4e8/attachment.html>

From AAikman at lrrlaw.com  Mon Jul 27 18:48:47 2015
From: AAikman at lrrlaw.com (Aikman-Scalese, Anne)
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 18:48:47 +0000
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE:
In-Reply-To: <6390D9A0-8DDD-4AF1-A711-3E1A0066457F@t-online.de>
References: <D1D6B451.4E6CB%julie.hedlund@icann.org>
 <CAGeCcizTjNq1WNNxvJchhtEntebSsYV_iYpjrStmmNWzQvn1Xg@mail.gmail.com>
 <F41DAC0D-F871-4D35-B879-5FCE76E038C5@godaddy.com>
 <6390D9A0-8DDD-4AF1-A711-3E1A0066457F@t-online.de>
Message-ID: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B889D51@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com>

Thanks all.  I have no objections to September 3 and will be listening to the mp3 from the July 23 call soon, today being my first day back in the office.
Anne

[cid:image001.gif at 01D0C862.324B4BD0]

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel

Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |

One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725

AAikman at LRRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman at LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/>








From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 6:14 PM
Cc: Angie Graves; Julie Hedlund; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org; GNSO at pechora1.lax.icann.org
Subject:

I would be available in August.

Wolf-Ulrich

Sent from my personal phone

Am 25.07.2015 um 02:02 schrieb Sara Bockey <sbockey at godaddy.com<mailto:sbockey at godaddy.com>>:
I would also be available in August ? presuming I was needed as the alternate.

Sara

From: <owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>> on behalf of Angie Graves
Date: Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 12:47 PM
To: Julie Hedlund
Cc: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>", GNSO Secretariat
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Next SCI Call: Schedule for 03 September

Thank you, Julie.  I personally am available and have no objections, but if holiday/vacation times are being avoided, please note that a popular US holiday, Labor Day, is September 7, for which many people take a holiday week or long weekend leading up to that Monday.

Best regards,

Angie


On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>> wrote:
Dear SCI members,

At the end of today's SCI call there was discussion concerning when the next call should be scheduled.  Several members pointed out that since August is typically the month for holidays/vacations, if we keep to our usual schedule of a meeting every two weeks (which would be 06 and 20 August) we may end up canceling calls if there are few attendees.  Thus, members suggested that it was preferable to schedule the call on Thursday, 03 September and to continue discussion of the issues on the list (for which I'll start two discussion threads).

If there are no objections the GNSO Secretariat will make arrangements to place the next call on the calendar for Thursday, 03 September at the usual time of 1800 UTC.

Best regards,
Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director



________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150727/9c2e880f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3765 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150727/9c2e880f/image001.gif>

From julie.hedlund at icann.org  Wed Jul 29 13:25:04 2015
From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:25:04 +0000
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Next SCI Call: Schedule for 03 September
Message-ID: <D1DE4C25.4E8E2%julie.hedlund@icann.org>

Dear SCI members,

I have seen no objections to scheduling the next call for Thursday 03
September, although a couple of members said they would be available in
August if necessary.  Thus, the GNSO Secretariat will go ahead and put the
call on the schedule for 03 September.

Thank you very much for your assistance.

Best regards,
Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

From:  <owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund
<julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Date:  Thursday, July 23, 2015 3:21 PM
To:  "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org>
Cc:  GNSO Secretariat <gnso-secs at icann.org>
Subject:  [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Next SCI Call: Schedule for 03 September

> Dear SCI members,
> 
> At the end of today's SCI call there was discussion concerning when the next
> call should be scheduled.  Several members pointed out that since August is
> typically the month for holidays/vacations, if we keep to our usual schedule
> of a meeting every two weeks (which would be 06 and 20 August) we may end up
> canceling calls if there are few attendees.  Thus, members suggested that it
> was preferable to schedule the call on Thursday, 03 September and to continue
> discussion of the issues on the list (for which I'll start two discussion
> threads).
> 
> If there are no objections the GNSO Secretariat will make arrangements to
> place the next call on the calendar for Thursday, 03 September at the usual
> time of 1800 UTC.
> 
> Best regards,
> Julie
> 
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150729/925526b2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5052 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/attachments/20150729/925526b2/smime.p7s>