From AAikman at lrrlaw.com Tue Jun 2 22:24:46 2015 From: AAikman at lrrlaw.com (Aikman-Scalese, Anne) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 22:24:46 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B831F15@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Dear SCI members, In our June 4 phone meeting, we will take up the Council request regarding the overlap of the Waiver and Resubmission rules related to council motions. Please review the Council request forwarded by Julie on May 22. Thank you, Anne [cid:image001.gif at 01D09D48.41F89280] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:59 PM To: Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC Dear SCI members, Please also note the requests that were sent to the Council and approved for the SCI's consideration. Best regards, Julie From: Julie Hedlund > Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:02 PM To: ">" > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC Dear SCI members, Please note that the meeting listed below will be the only SCI meeting prior to the ICANN 53 meeting in Buenos Aires. However, staff have requested a slot for an SCI working session in Buenos Aires on the morning of Saturday, 20 June. Once that slot is confirmed we'll send a notification to the SCI list. Have a nice weekend! Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: Nathalie Peregrine > Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 12:42 PM To: "Ntfy-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" > Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" >, Julie Hedlund > Subject: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC Dear All, As per the results of the Doodle poll, the preferred time and date for Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation teleconferences are Thursdays at 18:00 UTC.The next meeting is scheduled on Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC for 60 minutes. 11:00 PST , 14:00 EST, 19:00 London, 20:00 CET For other times:http://tinyurl.com/osnyhmr Adobe Connect: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/standcommdraft/ Dial-in details are below. If you require a dial-out, please email us (gnso-secs at icann.org) your preferred contact number. ____________________________________________________________________________ Participant passcode: SCI For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call. ____________________________________________________________________________ Dial in numbers: Country Toll Numbers Freephone/ Toll Free Number ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 BRAZIL 55-11-3958-0779 0800-7610651 CHILE 1230-020-2863 CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4789 10800-120-1670 COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 CROATIA 080-08-06-309 CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 ESTONIA 800-011-1093 FINLAND 358-9-5424-7162 0-800-9-14610 FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 HUNGARY 36-1-700-8856 06-800-12755 INDIA BANGALORE: 91-80-61275204 INDIA MUMBAI: 91-22-61501629 INDIA INDIA A: 000-800-852-1268 INDIA INDIA B: 000-800-001-6305 INDIA INDIA C: 1800-300-00491 INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 ITALY MILAN: 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 ITALY ROME: 39-06-8751-6018 800-986-383 ITALY TORINO: 39-011-510-0118 800-986-383 JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7878-2631 0066-33-132439 JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-6868-2631 0066-33-132439 LATVIA 8000-3185 LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 8002-9246 MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 MEXICO GUADALAJARA (JAL): 52-33-3208-7310 001-866-376-9696 MEXICO MEXICO CITY: 52-55-5062-9110 001-866-376-9696 MEXICO MONTERREY: 52-81-2482-0610 001-866-376-9696 NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 PANAMA 011-001-800-5072065 PERU 0800-53713 PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 1800-111-42453 POLAND 00-800-1212572 PORTUGAL 8008-14052 ROMANIA 40-31-630-01-79 RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 SAUDI ARABIA 800-8-110087 SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 0800-002066 SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 TURKEY 00-800-151-0516 UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 8000-35702370 UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 Thank you Kind regards, Nathalie ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 3765 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From julie.hedlund at icann.org Tue Jun 2 22:57:16 2015 From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 22:57:16 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC In-Reply-To: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B831F15@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B831F15@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Message-ID: Dear Anne and SCI members, For your reference I've attached the two requests. Best regards, Julie From: , Anne Date: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 6:24 PM To: Julie Hedlund , "" Subject: RE: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC > Dear SCI members, > In our June 4 phone meeting, we will take up the Council request regarding the > overlap of the Waiver and Resubmission rules related to council motions. > Please review the Council request forwarded by Julie on May 22. > Thank you, > Anne > > Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel > Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | > One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 > (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 > AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com > > > > > From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org > [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:59 PM > To: > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on > Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC > > > Dear SCI members, > > > > Please also note the requests that were sent to the Council and approved for > the SCI's consideration. > > > > Best regards, > > Julie > > > > From: Julie Hedlund > Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:02 PM > To: "" > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on > Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC > > >> >> Dear SCI members, >> >> >> >> Please note that the meeting listed below will be the only SCI meeting prior >> to the ICANN 53 meeting in Buenos Aires. However, staff have requested a >> slot for an SCI working session in Buenos Aires on the morning of Saturday, >> 20 June. Once that slot is confirmed we'll send a notification to the SCI >> list. >> >> >> >> Have a nice weekend! >> >> >> >> Julie >> >> >> >> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director >> >> >> >> From: Nathalie Peregrine >> Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 12:42 PM >> To: "Ntfy-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" >> >> Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" , Julie Hedlund >> >> Subject: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements >> Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC >> >> >>> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> >>> As per the results of the Doodle poll, the preferred time and date for >>> Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation teleconferences are >>> Thursdays at 18:00 UTC.The next meeting is scheduled on Thursday 4th June >>> 2015 at 18:00 UTC for 60 minutes. >>> >>> >>> 11:00 PST , 14:00 EST, 19:00 London, 20:00 CET >>> For other times:http://tinyurl.com/osnyhmr >>> >>> Adobe Connect: >>> http://icann.adobeconnect.com/standcommdraft/ >>> >>> >>> Dial-in details are below. >>> >>> If you require a dial-out, please email us (gnso-secs at icann.org >>> ) your preferred contact number. >>> >>> ____________________________________________________________________________ >>> Participant passcode: SCI >>> >>> For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call. >>> ____________________________________________________________________________ >>> >>> Dial in numbers: >>> Country Toll NumbersFreephone/ >>> Toll Free Number >>> ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 >>> AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 >>> AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 >>> AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 >>> AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 >>> AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 >>> AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 >>> AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 >>> BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 >>> BRAZIL 55-11-3958-0779 0800-7610651 >>> CHILE 1230-020-2863 >>> CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 >>> CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4789 10800-120-1670 >>> COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 >>> CROATIA 080-08-06-309 >>> CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 >>> DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 >>> ESTONIA 800-011-1093 >>> FINLAND 358-9-5424-7162 0-800-9-14610 >>> FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 >>> FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 >>> FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 >>> GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 >>> GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 >>> HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 >>> HUNGARY 36-1-700-8856 06-800-12755 >>> INDIA BANGALORE: 91-80-61275204 >>> INDIA MUMBAI: 91-22-61501629 >>> INDIA INDIA A: 000-800-852-1268 >>> INDIA INDIA B: 000-800-001-6305 >>> INDIA INDIA C: 1800-300-00491 >>> INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 >>> IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 >>> ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 >>> ITALY MILAN: 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 >>> ITALY ROME: 39-06-8751-6018 800-986-383 >>> ITALY TORINO: 39-011-510-0118 800-986-383 >>> JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7878-2631 0066-33-132439 >>> JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-6868-2631 0066-33-132439 >>> LATVIA 8000-3185 >>> LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 8002-9246 >>> MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 >>> MEXICO GUADALAJARA (JAL): 52-33-3208-7310 >>> 001-866-376-9696 >>> MEXICO MEXICO CITY: 52-55-5062-9110 001-866-376-9696 >>> MEXICO MONTERREY: 52-81-2482-0610 001-866-376-9696 >>> NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 >>> NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 >>> NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 >>> PANAMA >>> 011-001-800-5072065 >>> PERU 0800-53713 >>> PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 1800-111-42453 >>> POLAND 00-800-1212572 >>> PORTUGAL 8008-14052 >>> ROMANIA 40-31-630-01-79 >>> RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 >>> SAUDI ARABIA 800-8-110087 >>> SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 >>> SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 0800-002066 >>> SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 >>> SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 >>> SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 >>> SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 >>> SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 >>> TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 >>> THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 >>> TURKEY 00-800-151-0516 >>> UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 8000-35702370 >>> UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 >>> UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 >>> UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 >>> UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 >>> UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 >>> URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 >>> USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 >>> VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 >>> >>> >>> Thank you >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Nathalie >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the >>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this >>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or >>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended >>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or >>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you >>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by >>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any >>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and >>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the >>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. >>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 3765 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SCI Review Request - Motions - 5 Mar 2015 v2.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 30722 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SCI Review Request - Overlap of Waiver and Resubmission - 5 Mar 2015.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 138269 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5041 bytes Desc: not available URL: From AAikman at lrrlaw.com Wed Jun 3 20:42:43 2015 From: AAikman at lrrlaw.com (Aikman-Scalese, Anne) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 20:42:43 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC In-Reply-To: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B831F15@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B831F15@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Message-ID: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B833A0B@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Dear SCI Members, In order to provide a bit of background for our discussion of the first request from Council concerning the interplay between the Resubmission of a Motion rule and the 10 day waiver rule, I am pasting below in black lettering a previous comment posted to the list by Amr last year. As I understand it, the basic question is whether a properly resubmitted motion may benefit from the 10 day waiver rule or not. In this regard, please note that an explanation as to the reason for resubmission of the motion previously defeated must be supplied and the explanation would normally be due 10 days prior to the Council meeting. If the 10 day waiver rule is applied, then hypothetically, the explanation for resubmission of the motion could be supplied the same day of the Council meeting and the same day of any vote on the resubmitted motion, provided that the other conditions for application of the 10 day waiver rule are met. These conditions include no objection from any Council member to waiving the 10 day rule. I am also asking staff to be ready to post the text of 3.3.2 (10 day waiver rule) as actually adopted by the Council as well as 4.4.3 (Resubmitted motion) if needed. Amr?s text from last year?s discussion is here: Hi Greg and all, I know I?ve brought this up repetitively and I hate being a nag, but there?s still an inconvenient loophole in this text regarding resubmission of motions. On its meeting of March 26th, 2014, the GNSO Council approved the SCI recommendation to amend the GNSO Operating Procedures by adding sections 4.3.3 and 4.3.4 detailing the guidelines of motions being resubmitted. Section 4.3.3, claus number 1 reads as follows: ?1. Explanation: The Councilor submitting the motion must also submit an explanation for the resubmission of the motion. The explanation need not accompany the motion when it is resubmitted; however, the explanation must be submitted no later than the deadline for submitting the motion (i.e., no later than 23h59 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) on the day 10 calendar days before the Council meeting at which the motion is to be reconsidered). The explanation does not need to meet any requirements other than being submitted in a timely manner.? If the SCI determines that it would like the 10-day rule waiver to also apply to motions being resubmitted (and not exclusively to motions being submitted for the first time) in its recommendation to the Council, then there needs to be clarifying text to that effect. If the SCI does not recommend that the waiver should apply to resubmitted motions, then no further action is necessary. If the former is true, and not the latter, the the way I read it, the required clarification should either be added as a fourth bullet to 3.3.2 referencing 4.3.3, or perhaps an added numbered item to 4.3.4 (Limitations and Exceptions to Resubmission of a Motion) referring to the waiver rule in 3.3.2. Without these changes, I can?t see how the text of the operating procedures will support the waiver rule being applied to resubmitted motions in the event that the need arises. Thanks. Amr [cid:image001.gif at 01D09E01.4A1E9AE0] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Aikman-Scalese, Anne Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 3:25 PM To: 'Julie Hedlund'; Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC Dear SCI members, In our June 4 phone meeting, we will take up the Council request regarding the overlap of the Waiver and Resubmission rules related to council motions. Please review the Council request forwarded by Julie on May 22. Thank you, Anne [cid:image001.gif at 01D09E01.4A1E9AE0] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:59 PM To: > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC Dear SCI members, Please also note the requests that were sent to the Council and approved for the SCI's consideration. Best regards, Julie From: Julie Hedlund > Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:02 PM To: ">" > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC Dear SCI members, Please note that the meeting listed below will be the only SCI meeting prior to the ICANN 53 meeting in Buenos Aires. However, staff have requested a slot for an SCI working session in Buenos Aires on the morning of Saturday, 20 June. Once that slot is confirmed we'll send a notification to the SCI list. Have a nice weekend! Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: Nathalie Peregrine > Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 12:42 PM To: "Ntfy-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" > Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" >, Julie Hedlund > Subject: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC Dear All, As per the results of the Doodle poll, the preferred time and date for Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation teleconferences are Thursdays at 18:00 UTC.The next meeting is scheduled on Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC for 60 minutes. 11:00 PST , 14:00 EST, 19:00 London, 20:00 CET For other times:http://tinyurl.com/osnyhmr Adobe Connect: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/standcommdraft/ Dial-in details are below. If you require a dial-out, please email us (gnso-secs at icann.org) your preferred contact number. ____________________________________________________________________________ Participant passcode: SCI For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call. ____________________________________________________________________________ Dial in numbers: Country Toll Numbers Freephone/ Toll Free Number ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 BRAZIL 55-11-3958-0779 0800-7610651 CHILE 1230-020-2863 CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4789 10800-120-1670 COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 CROATIA 080-08-06-309 CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 ESTONIA 800-011-1093 FINLAND 358-9-5424-7162 0-800-9-14610 FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 HUNGARY 36-1-700-8856 06-800-12755 INDIA BANGALORE: 91-80-61275204 INDIA MUMBAI: 91-22-61501629 INDIA INDIA A: 000-800-852-1268 INDIA INDIA B: 000-800-001-6305 INDIA INDIA C: 1800-300-00491 INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 ITALY MILAN: 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 ITALY ROME: 39-06-8751-6018 800-986-383 ITALY TORINO: 39-011-510-0118 800-986-383 JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7878-2631 0066-33-132439 JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-6868-2631 0066-33-132439 LATVIA 8000-3185 LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 8002-9246 MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 MEXICO GUADALAJARA (JAL): 52-33-3208-7310 001-866-376-9696 MEXICO MEXICO CITY: 52-55-5062-9110 001-866-376-9696 MEXICO MONTERREY: 52-81-2482-0610 001-866-376-9696 NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 PANAMA 011-001-800-5072065 PERU 0800-53713 PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 1800-111-42453 POLAND 00-800-1212572 PORTUGAL 8008-14052 ROMANIA 40-31-630-01-79 RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 SAUDI ARABIA 800-8-110087 SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 0800-002066 SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 TURKEY 00-800-151-0516 UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 8000-35702370 UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 Thank you Kind regards, Nathalie ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 3765 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From julie.hedlund at icann.org Wed Jun 3 20:58:25 2015 From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 20:58:25 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC In-Reply-To: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B833A0B@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B831F15@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B833A0B@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Message-ID: Hi Anne and SCI members, For reference please see the attached two excerpted sections from v2.9 of the GNSO Operating Procedures as approved by the Council and dated 13 November 2014. These also will be ready for posting in the Adobe Connect Room on Thursday along with the two requests. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: , Anne Date: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 4:42 PM To: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" , Julie Hedlund , "" Subject: RE: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC > Dear SCI Members, > In order to provide a bit of background for our discussion of the first > request from Council concerning the interplay between the Resubmission of a > Motion rule and the 10 day waiver rule, I am pasting below in black lettering > a previous comment posted to the list by Amr last year. > > As I understand it, the basic question is whether a properly resubmitted > motion may benefit from the 10 day waiver rule or not. In this regard, please > note that an explanation as to the reason for resubmission of the motion > previously defeated must be supplied and the explanation would normally be due > 10 days prior to the Council meeting. If the 10 day waiver rule is applied, > then hypothetically, the explanation for resubmission of the motion could be > supplied the same day of the Council meeting and the same day of any vote on > the resubmitted motion, provided that the other conditions for application of > the 10 day waiver rule are met. These conditions include no objection from > any Council member to waiving the 10 day rule. > > I am also asking staff to be ready to post the text of 3.3.2 (10 day waiver > rule) as actually adopted by the Council as well as 4.4.3 (Resubmitted motion) > if needed. > > Amr?s text from last year?s discussion is here: > > Hi Greg and all, > > I know I?ve brought this up repetitively and I hate being a nag, but there?s > still an inconvenient loophole in this text regarding resubmission of motions. > On its meeting of March 26th, 2014, the GNSO Council approved the SCI > recommendation to amend the GNSO Operating Procedures by adding sections 4.3.3 > and 4.3.4 detailing the guidelines of motions being resubmitted. Section > 4.3.3, claus number 1 reads as follows: > > ?1. Explanation: The Councilor submitting the motion must also submit an > explanation for the resubmission of the motion. The explanation need not > accompany the motion when it is resubmitted; however, the explanation must be > submitted no later than the deadline for submitting the motion (i.e., no later > than 23h59 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) on the day 10 calendar days before > the Council meeting at which the motion is to be reconsidered). The > explanation does not need to meet any requirements other than being submitted > in a timely manner.? > > If the SCI determines that it would like the 10-day rule waiver to also apply > to motions being resubmitted (and not exclusively to motions being submitted > for the first time) in its recommendation to the Council, then there needs to > be clarifying text to that effect. If the SCI does not recommend that the > waiver should apply to resubmitted motions, then no further action is > necessary. If the former is true, and not the latter, the the way I read it, > the required clarification should either be added as a fourth bullet to 3.3.2 > referencing 4.3.3, or perhaps an added numbered item to 4.3.4 (Limitations and > Exceptions to Resubmission of a Motion) referring to the waiver rule in 3.3.2. > Without these changes, I can?t see how the text of the operating procedures > will support the waiver rule being applied to resubmitted motions in the event > that the need arises. > > Thanks. > > Amr > > > Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel > Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | > One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 > (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 > AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com > > > > > From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org > [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Aikman-Scalese, > Anne > Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 3:25 PM > To: 'Julie Hedlund'; > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on > Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC > > Dear SCI members, > In our June 4 phone meeting, we will take up the Council request regarding the > overlap of the Waiver and Resubmission rules related to council motions. > Please review the Council request forwarded by Julie on May 22. > Thank you, > Anne > > Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel > Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | > One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 > (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 > AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com > > > > > From:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org > [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:59 PM > To: > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on > Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC > > > Dear SCI members, > > > > Please also note the requests that were sent to the Council and approved for > the SCI's consideration. > > > > Best regards, > > Julie > > > > From: Julie Hedlund > Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:02 PM > To: "" > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on > Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC > > >> >> Dear SCI members, >> >> >> >> Please note that the meeting listed below will be the only SCI meeting prior >> to the ICANN 53 meeting in Buenos Aires. However, staff have requested a >> slot for an SCI working session in Buenos Aires on the morning of Saturday, >> 20 June. Once that slot is confirmed we'll send a notification to the SCI >> list. >> >> >> >> Have a nice weekend! >> >> >> >> Julie >> >> >> >> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director >> >> >> >> From: Nathalie Peregrine >> Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 12:42 PM >> To: "Ntfy-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" >> >> Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" , Julie Hedlund >> >> Subject: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements >> Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC >> >> >>> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> >>> As per the results of the Doodle poll, the preferred time and date for >>> Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation teleconferences are >>> Thursdays at 18:00 UTC.The next meeting is scheduled on Thursday 4th June >>> 2015 at 18:00 UTC for 60 minutes. >>> >>> >>> 11:00 PST , 14:00 EST, 19:00 London, 20:00 CET >>> For other times:http://tinyurl.com/osnyhmr >>> >>> Adobe Connect: >>> http://icann.adobeconnect.com/standcommdraft/ >>> >>> >>> Dial-in details are below. >>> >>> If you require a dial-out, please email us (gnso-secs at icann.org >>> ) your preferred contact number. >>> >>> ____________________________________________________________________________ >>> Participant passcode: SCI >>> >>> For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call. >>> ____________________________________________________________________________ >>> >>> Dial in numbers: >>> Country Toll NumbersFreephone/ >>> Toll Free Number >>> ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 >>> AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 >>> AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 >>> AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 >>> AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 >>> AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 >>> AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 >>> AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 >>> BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 >>> BRAZIL 55-11-3958-0779 0800-7610651 >>> CHILE 1230-020-2863 >>> CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 >>> CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4789 10800-120-1670 >>> COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 >>> CROATIA 080-08-06-309 >>> CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 >>> DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 >>> ESTONIA 800-011-1093 >>> FINLAND 358-9-5424-7162 0-800-9-14610 >>> FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 >>> FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 >>> FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 >>> GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 >>> GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 >>> HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 >>> HUNGARY 36-1-700-8856 06-800-12755 >>> INDIA BANGALORE: 91-80-61275204 >>> INDIA MUMBAI: 91-22-61501629 >>> INDIA INDIA A: 000-800-852-1268 >>> INDIA INDIA B: 000-800-001-6305 >>> INDIA INDIA C: 1800-300-00491 >>> INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 >>> IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 >>> ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 >>> ITALY MILAN: 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 >>> ITALY ROME: 39-06-8751-6018 800-986-383 >>> ITALY TORINO: 39-011-510-0118 800-986-383 >>> JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7878-2631 0066-33-132439 >>> JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-6868-2631 0066-33-132439 >>> LATVIA 8000-3185 >>> LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 8002-9246 >>> MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 >>> MEXICO GUADALAJARA (JAL): 52-33-3208-7310 >>> 001-866-376-9696 >>> MEXICO MEXICO CITY: 52-55-5062-9110 001-866-376-9696 >>> MEXICO MONTERREY: 52-81-2482-0610 001-866-376-9696 >>> NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 >>> NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 >>> NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 >>> PANAMA >>> 011-001-800-5072065 >>> PERU 0800-53713 >>> PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 1800-111-42453 >>> POLAND 00-800-1212572 >>> PORTUGAL 8008-14052 >>> ROMANIA 40-31-630-01-79 >>> RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 >>> SAUDI ARABIA 800-8-110087 >>> SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 >>> SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 0800-002066 >>> SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 >>> SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 >>> SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 >>> SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 >>> SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 >>> TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 >>> THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 >>> TURKEY 00-800-151-0516 >>> UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 8000-35702370 >>> UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 >>> UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 >>> UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 >>> UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 >>> UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 >>> URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 >>> USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 >>> VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 >>> >>> >>> Thank you >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Nathalie >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the >>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this >>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or >>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended >>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or >>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you >>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by >>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any >>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and >>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the >>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. >>> >>> >>> >>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the >>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this >>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or >>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended >>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or >>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you >>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by >>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any >>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and >>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the >>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. >>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 3765 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 3.3.2 Submission of Reports and Motions.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 82851 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 4.3.3 Resubmission of a Motion.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 130638 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5041 bytes Desc: not available URL: From AAikman at lrrlaw.com Thu Jun 4 17:43:53 2015 From: AAikman at lrrlaw.com (Aikman-Scalese, Anne) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 17:43:53 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC In-Reply-To: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B833A0B@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> References: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B831F15@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B833A0B@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Message-ID: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B833D3F@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Dear all, I do need to correct my text below in that I said that if the 10-day waiver rule is applied to resubmitted motions, then a resubmitted motion could be considered the same day as the Council meeting. This is not the case because the resubmission rule requires that the resubmitted motion be provided at least 24 hours in advance of the Council meeting. I apologize for this error in my summary. I look forward to speaking with all who are able to attend in a few minutes. Anne [cid:image001.gif at 01D09EB3.57E78670] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 1:43 PM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Julie Hedlund'; Subject: RE: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC Dear SCI Members, In order to provide a bit of background for our discussion of the first request from Council concerning the interplay between the Resubmission of a Motion rule and the 10 day waiver rule, I am pasting below in black lettering a previous comment posted to the list by Amr last year. As I understand it, the basic question is whether a properly resubmitted motion may benefit from the 10 day waiver rule or not. In this regard, please note that an explanation as to the reason for resubmission of the motion previously defeated must be supplied and the explanation would normally be due 10 days prior to the Council meeting. If the 10 day waiver rule is applied, then hypothetically, the explanation for resubmission of the motion could be supplied the same day of the Council meeting and the same day of any vote on the resubmitted motion, provided that the other conditions for application of the 10 day waiver rule are met. These conditions include no objection from any Council member to waiving the 10 day rule. I am also asking staff to be ready to post the text of 3.3.2 (10 day waiver rule) as actually adopted by the Council as well as 4.4.3 (Resubmitted motion) if needed. Amr?s text from last year?s discussion is here: Hi Greg and all, I know I?ve brought this up repetitively and I hate being a nag, but there?s still an inconvenient loophole in this text regarding resubmission of motions. On its meeting of March 26th, 2014, the GNSO Council approved the SCI recommendation to amend the GNSO Operating Procedures by adding sections 4.3.3 and 4.3.4 detailing the guidelines of motions being resubmitted. Section 4.3.3, claus number 1 reads as follows: ?1. Explanation: The Councilor submitting the motion must also submit an explanation for the resubmission of the motion. The explanation need not accompany the motion when it is resubmitted; however, the explanation must be submitted no later than the deadline for submitting the motion (i.e., no later than 23h59 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) on the day 10 calendar days before the Council meeting at which the motion is to be reconsidered). The explanation does not need to meet any requirements other than being submitted in a timely manner.? If the SCI determines that it would like the 10-day rule waiver to also apply to motions being resubmitted (and not exclusively to motions being submitted for the first time) in its recommendation to the Council, then there needs to be clarifying text to that effect. If the SCI does not recommend that the waiver should apply to resubmitted motions, then no further action is necessary. If the former is true, and not the latter, the the way I read it, the required clarification should either be added as a fourth bullet to 3.3.2 referencing 4.3.3, or perhaps an added numbered item to 4.3.4 (Limitations and Exceptions to Resubmission of a Motion) referring to the waiver rule in 3.3.2. Without these changes, I can?t see how the text of the operating procedures will support the waiver rule being applied to resubmitted motions in the event that the need arises. Thanks. Amr [cid:image001.gif at 01D09EB3.57E78670] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Aikman-Scalese, Anne Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 3:25 PM To: 'Julie Hedlund'; > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC Dear SCI members, In our June 4 phone meeting, we will take up the Council request regarding the overlap of the Waiver and Resubmission rules related to council motions. Please review the Council request forwarded by Julie on May 22. Thank you, Anne [cid:image001.gif at 01D09EB3.57E78670] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:59 PM To: > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC Dear SCI members, Please also note the requests that were sent to the Council and approved for the SCI's consideration. Best regards, Julie From: Julie Hedlund > Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:02 PM To: ">" > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC Dear SCI members, Please note that the meeting listed below will be the only SCI meeting prior to the ICANN 53 meeting in Buenos Aires. However, staff have requested a slot for an SCI working session in Buenos Aires on the morning of Saturday, 20 June. Once that slot is confirmed we'll send a notification to the SCI list. Have a nice weekend! Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: Nathalie Peregrine > Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 12:42 PM To: "Ntfy-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" > Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" >, Julie Hedlund > Subject: Meeting Invitation: Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation - Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC Dear All, As per the results of the Doodle poll, the preferred time and date for Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation teleconferences are Thursdays at 18:00 UTC.The next meeting is scheduled on Thursday 4th June 2015 at 18:00 UTC for 60 minutes. 11:00 PST , 14:00 EST, 19:00 London, 20:00 CET For other times:http://tinyurl.com/osnyhmr Adobe Connect: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/standcommdraft/ Dial-in details are below. If you require a dial-out, please email us (gnso-secs at icann.org) your preferred contact number. ____________________________________________________________________________ Participant passcode: SCI For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call. ____________________________________________________________________________ Dial in numbers: Country Toll Numbers Freephone/ Toll Free Number ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 BRAZIL 55-11-3958-0779 0800-7610651 CHILE 1230-020-2863 CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4789 10800-120-1670 COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 CROATIA 080-08-06-309 CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 ESTONIA 800-011-1093 FINLAND 358-9-5424-7162 0-800-9-14610 FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 HUNGARY 36-1-700-8856 06-800-12755 INDIA BANGALORE: 91-80-61275204 INDIA MUMBAI: 91-22-61501629 INDIA INDIA A: 000-800-852-1268 INDIA INDIA B: 000-800-001-6305 INDIA INDIA C: 1800-300-00491 INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 ITALY MILAN: 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 ITALY ROME: 39-06-8751-6018 800-986-383 ITALY TORINO: 39-011-510-0118 800-986-383 JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7878-2631 0066-33-132439 JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-6868-2631 0066-33-132439 LATVIA 8000-3185 LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 8002-9246 MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 MEXICO GUADALAJARA (JAL): 52-33-3208-7310 001-866-376-9696 MEXICO MEXICO CITY: 52-55-5062-9110 001-866-376-9696 MEXICO MONTERREY: 52-81-2482-0610 001-866-376-9696 NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 PANAMA 011-001-800-5072065 PERU 0800-53713 PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 1800-111-42453 POLAND 00-800-1212572 PORTUGAL 8008-14052 ROMANIA 40-31-630-01-79 RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 SAUDI ARABIA 800-8-110087 SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 0800-002066 SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 TURKEY 00-800-151-0516 UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 8000-35702370 UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 Thank you Kind regards, Nathalie ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 3765 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From terri.agnew at icann.org Fri Jun 5 01:04:41 2015 From: terri.agnew at icann.org (Terri Agnew) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 01:04:41 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 Message-ID: Dear All, Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation meeting held on Thursday, 04 June 2015: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-04jun15-en.mp3 On page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#jun (transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page) Attendees: Anne Aikman Scalese - IPC - Primary - Chair Wolf-Ulrich Knoben - ISPCP - Primary Rudi Vansnick - NPOC - Primary Amr Elsadr - NCUC - Primary Avri Doria - NCSG - Primary Lori Schulman - IPC - Alternate Apologies: None ICANN Staff: Julie Hedlund Mary Wong Terri Agnew ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew Adobe Chat Transcript 04 June 2015 Terri Agnew:Dear all, welcome to the SCI call on the 4th June 2015 Lori Schulman:Where is the mute symbol? Terri Agnew:Lori your mic isn't active Lori Schulman:good. I have a bad habit of not muting. Amr Elsadr:I can hear you Anne. Terri Agnew:Lost audio, one moment rejoining Lori Schulman:Am I still disqualified? Are there ever exceptions? Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:is it the wish of anybody (eg council) that the resubmitted motion should benefit from the rule? Rudi Vansnick:quid if motion content/context is changed ? Amr Elsadr:http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg01201.html Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:sorry Anne, I overread it. It's now clear, thanks Amr Elsadr:This is the language Mary suggested adding to 3.3.2: "Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements in addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible for consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2." Rudi Vansnick:what's the feeling of the councils in this ? in favor ? Avri Doria:i think clarity was the issue. and the fact that some SCI members were unhappy with the way our last recommendation had left it. most were ok with it. Avri Doria:put after it haad been poked at enough and after the SCI asked the council to please make this an issue we could work on, we did. Mary Wong:Yes, per what Amr is saying - first question is whether 10-day waiver rule can/should apply to resubmitted motions Rudi Vansnick:if the 10-day waiver is applied, a resubmitted motion could indefinitely be resubmitted ? Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:@Mary, I thought that is the wish, so it should happen?? Rudi Vansnick:thanks Mary Mary Wong:@Anne, that works too - Chair's call :) Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: I don't think the 10-day waiver rule affects how many times a motion may be resubmitted. Julie Hedlund:@Amr and Rudi: I think whether a motion can be resubmitted is governed by the rules in 4.3.3. Amr Elsadr:@Anne: Correct. Amr Elsadr:Thanks Julie. Mary Wong:Yes, a fresh start Amr Elsadr:For some reason, I seem to be the only one who thinks we did actually talk a great deal about this. :) Avri Doria:Amr, you did talk about it a lot. But there weren't any great discussions. Rudi Vansnick:@Mary: +1 Avri Doria:thee were one or two people who kept bringing it up , but the discussion never stuck. Amr Elsadr:Greg engaged in this discussion quite a bit. Discussions took place both on-list and on calls, if I recall correctly. Mary Wong:@Amr, that's right - there was discussion but people seemed to have different ideas about what the agreed conclusion was. Amr Elsadr:@Anne: I'm sorry, could you clarify your concern again. Not sure I got it. Rudi Vansnick:perhaps we are now in a state where we need to finalize the direction Avri Doria:i'm ambivalent on this issue. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:staff should draft Avri Doria:i dont mind allowing them to draft, i am not sure about asking them to draft. Lori Schulman:There is no harm in starting drafting. We are not approving anything. Julie Hedlund:@Anne: That is correct. The next meeting is in Buenos Aires. Lori Schulman:I agree with Mary's point that a draft would be a starting point only and a good thing to react o. Lori Schulman:yes. agree. Julie Hedlund:@Anne: It is the 20th early in the morning. Mary Wong:The usual "happy" hour :) Rudi Vansnick:at 7am ? ;-) Amr Elsadr:@Mary: Happy hour isn't supposed to be all about coffee!! Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Saturday 7:45 Julie Hedlund:@Wolf-Ulright I think that's correct. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:GNSO starts at 9:00 Amr Elsadr:Am I not getting through? Terri Agnew:@Amr your audio is cutting out Amr Elsadr:The way I see it, both the request and the explanation should be provided. Mary Wong:@Amr, staff will send you something to review before sending to the list Amr Elsadr:@Mary: I'll dig up what I came up with and fwd it to you as well. Mary Wong:Gerat, thanks! Amr Elsadr:BTW..., I won't be in BA, but will participate in the SCI meeting remotely. Mary Wong:@Amr, so it's confirmed you can't come? :( Amr Elsadr:Have personal stuff I need to sort out at that time. Sorry I won't be there. Rudi Vansnick:thanks Anne for chairing this meeting Mary Wong:Sorry we won't see you Julie Hedlund:@Anne: Mary and I are drafting some slides. Julie Hedlund:We will send them to you to review. Amr Elsadr:Thanks Anne and all. Bye. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Thanks Anne and bye to all Anne Aikman-Scalese - IPC member:Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From julie.hedlund at icann.org Wed Jun 10 23:11:03 2015 From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 23:11:03 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Meeting in Buenos Aires Message-ID: Dear SCI members, Please see the following information from Glen de Saint G?ry concerning the schedule for the face-to-face meeting of the SCI in Buenos Aires. The teleconference information will be sent separately. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director The GNSO Standing Committee for Improvements Implementation (SCI) meeting is 07:45-08:45 on Saturday 20 June 2015 in Retiro B. Coffee and pastries will be served. Details of the meeting can be found at: http://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/sat-sci Please find the link to add your agenda: Agenda Details: https://community.icann.org/x/RIM0Aw The GNSO working sessions will follow in the same room at 9:00 and the first agenda item is 09:0009:15Standing Committee on GNSO Improvements Implementation update What it's about: Update from the SCI on its 2015 potential activities. Background Information: Home Policy Staff responsible: Julie Hedlund and Mary WongJonathan RobinsonAnne Aikman-Scelese, Avri Doria Kind regards, Glen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5041 bytes Desc: not available URL: From julie.hedlund at icann.org Thu Jun 11 15:08:25 2015 From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:08:25 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Report to the Council Message-ID: Dear SCI members, Please see the attached report and the email below from Anne. Note that I have sent the meeting information to the list. The meeting will be from 0745-0845 local Buenos Aires time on Saturday, 20 June. See: http://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/sat-sci. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director ----------------------------------------- Dear all, Attached please find the SCI Report for BA. Let me know if you have comments. I have not said anything about our positive straw poll in connection with the possible application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions - too early. Julie, can we send out a time and place meeting notice to SCI members for the BA meeting no later than this Friday, June 12? I don?t know whether our start time will be 7:30 or 8:00 am but I assume Glen knows. Thank you, Anne -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SCI Report to the GNSO Buenos Aires June 2015 PowerPoint.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 1291491 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5041 bytes Desc: not available URL: From AAikman at lrrlaw.com Tue Jun 16 18:14:20 2015 From: AAikman at lrrlaw.com (Aikman-Scalese, Anne) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:14:20 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B84945D@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Hi everyone. I had understood that Amr and staff would be working together to put out a general e-mail asking whether there is a generally favorable view toward the issue of giving resubmitted motions the benefit of the 10 day waiver rule and that this general e-mail might include at least some old language drafted previously by Mary to spark our discussion for this Saturday morning?s meeting at 7:45 am in the GNSO Council meeting room. Could staff please advise as to status of this effort? Thank you, Anne [cid:image001.gif at 01D0A825.97861EB0] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Terri Agnew Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:05 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 Dear All, Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation meeting held on Thursday, 04 June 2015: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-04jun15-en.mp3 On page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#jun (transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page) Attendees: Anne Aikman Scalese ? IPC ? Primary - Chair Wolf-Ulrich Knoben ? ISPCP - Primary Rudi Vansnick ? NPOC - Primary Amr Elsadr ? NCUC - Primary Avri Doria ? NCSG ? Primary Lori Schulman ? IPC - Alternate Apologies: None ICANN Staff: Julie Hedlund Mary Wong Terri Agnew ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew Adobe Chat Transcript 04 June 2015 Terri Agnew:Dear all, welcome to the SCI call on the 4th June 2015 Lori Schulman:Where is the mute symbol? Terri Agnew:Lori your mic isn't active Lori Schulman:good. I have a bad habit of not muting. Amr Elsadr:I can hear you Anne. Terri Agnew:Lost audio, one moment rejoining Lori Schulman:Am I still disqualified? Are there ever exceptions? Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:is it the wish of anybody (eg council) that the resubmitted motion should benefit from the rule? Rudi Vansnick:quid if motion content/context is changed ? Amr Elsadr:http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg01201.html Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:sorry Anne, I overread it. It's now clear, thanks Amr Elsadr:This is the language Mary suggested adding to 3.3.2: "Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements in addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible for consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2." Rudi Vansnick:what's the feeling of the councils in this ? in favor ? Avri Doria:i think clarity was the issue. and the fact that some SCI members were unhappy with the way our last recommendation had left it. most were ok with it. Avri Doria:put after it haad been poked at enough and after the SCI asked the council to please make this an issue we could work on, we did. Mary Wong:Yes, per what Amr is saying - first question is whether 10-day waiver rule can/should apply to resubmitted motions Rudi Vansnick:if the 10-day waiver is applied, a resubmitted motion could indefinitely be resubmitted ? Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:@Mary, I thought that is the wish, so it should happen?? Rudi Vansnick:thanks Mary Mary Wong:@Anne, that works too - Chair's call :) Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: I don't think the 10-day waiver rule affects how many times a motion may be resubmitted. Julie Hedlund:@Amr and Rudi: I think whether a motion can be resubmitted is governed by the rules in 4.3.3. Amr Elsadr:@Anne: Correct. Amr Elsadr:Thanks Julie. Mary Wong:Yes, a fresh start Amr Elsadr:For some reason, I seem to be the only one who thinks we did actually talk a great deal about this. :) Avri Doria:Amr, you did talk about it a lot. But there weren't any great discussions. Rudi Vansnick:@Mary: +1 Avri Doria:thee were one or two people who kept bringing it up , but the discussion never stuck. Amr Elsadr:Greg engaged in this discussion quite a bit. Discussions took place both on-list and on calls, if I recall correctly. Mary Wong:@Amr, that's right - there was discussion but people seemed to have different ideas about what the agreed conclusion was. Amr Elsadr:@Anne: I'm sorry, could you clarify your concern again. Not sure I got it. Rudi Vansnick:perhaps we are now in a state where we need to finalize the direction Avri Doria:i'm ambivalent on this issue. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:staff should draft Avri Doria:i dont mind allowing them to draft, i am not sure about asking them to draft. Lori Schulman:There is no harm in starting drafting. We are not approving anything. Julie Hedlund:@Anne: That is correct. The next meeting is in Buenos Aires. Lori Schulman:I agree with Mary's point that a draft would be a starting point only and a good thing to react o. Lori Schulman:yes. agree. Julie Hedlund:@Anne: It is the 20th early in the morning. Mary Wong:The usual "happy" hour :) Rudi Vansnick:at 7am ? ;-) Amr Elsadr:@Mary: Happy hour isn't supposed to be all about coffee!! Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Saturday 7:45 Julie Hedlund:@Wolf-Ulright I think that's correct. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:GNSO starts at 9:00 Amr Elsadr:Am I not getting through? Terri Agnew:@Amr your audio is cutting out Amr Elsadr:The way I see it, both the request and the explanation should be provided. Mary Wong:@Amr, staff will send you something to review before sending to the list Amr Elsadr:@Mary: I'll dig up what I came up with and fwd it to you as well. Mary Wong:Gerat, thanks! Amr Elsadr:BTW..., I won't be in BA, but will participate in the SCI meeting remotely. Mary Wong:@Amr, so it's confirmed you can't come? :( Amr Elsadr:Have personal stuff I need to sort out at that time. Sorry I won't be there. Rudi Vansnick:thanks Anne for chairing this meeting Mary Wong:Sorry we won't see you Julie Hedlund:@Anne: Mary and I are drafting some slides. Julie Hedlund:We will send them to you to review. Amr Elsadr:Thanks Anne and all. Bye. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Thanks Anne and bye to all Anne Aikman-Scalese - IPC member:Thank you. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 3765 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From julie.hedlund at icann.org Tue Jun 16 18:24:09 2015 From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:24:09 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 Message-ID: Hi Anne, We have some language that had been previously suggested by Mary and which also is the language Amr retrieved prior to our meeting. I'm just checking to see if we want to make any changes to it before we (or Amr) send it to the list. Thanks, Julie From: , Anne Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 2:14 PM To: Terri Agnew , "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 > Hi everyone. I had understood that Amr and staff would be working together to > put out a general e-mail asking whether there is a generally favorable view > toward the issue of giving resubmitted motions the benefit of the 10 day > waiver rule and that this general e-mail might include at least some old > language drafted previously by Mary to spark our discussion for this Saturday > morning?s meeting at 7:45 am in the GNSO Council meeting room. > > Could staff please advise as to status of this effort? > Thank you, > Anne > > Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel > Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | > One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 > (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 > AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com > > > > > From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org > [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Terri Agnew > Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:05 PM > To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org > Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June > 2015 > > Dear All, > > Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements > Implementation meeting held on Thursday, 04 June 2015: > http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-04jun15-en.mp3 > > On page:http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#jun > > (transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page) > > > Attendees: > > Anne Aikman Scalese ? IPC ? Primary - Chair > > Wolf-Ulrich Knoben ? ISPCP - Primary > > Rudi Vansnick ? NPOC - Primary > > Amr Elsadr ? NCUC - Primary > > Avri Doria ? NCSG ? Primary > > Lori Schulman ? IPC - Alternate > > > > Apologies: > > None > > > > ICANN Staff: > > Julie Hedlund > > Mary Wong > > Terri Agnew > > ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** > > Let me know if you have any questions. > > Thank you. > Kind regards, > > Terri Agnew > Adobe Chat Transcript 04 June 2015 > Terri Agnew:Dear all, welcome to the SCI call on the 4th June 2015 > Lori Schulman:Where is the mute symbol? > Terri Agnew:Lori your mic isn't active > Lori Schulman:good. I have a bad habit of not muting. > Amr Elsadr:I can hear you Anne. > Terri Agnew:Lost audio, one moment rejoining > Lori Schulman:Am I still disqualified? Are there ever exceptions? > Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:is it the wish of anybody (eg council) that the > resubmitted motion should benefit from the rule? > Rudi Vansnick:quid if motion content/context is changed ? > Amr Elsadr:http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg01201.html > Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:sorry Anne, I overread it. It's now clear, thanks > Amr Elsadr:This is the language Mary suggested adding to 3.3.2: "Resubmitted > motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating Procedures after the > Submission Deadline must meet these requirements in addition to those detailed > in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible for consideration by the GNSO Council > under this Section 3.3.2." > Rudi Vansnick:what's the feeling of the councils in this ? in favor ? > Avri Doria:i think clarity was the issue. and the fact that some SCI > members were unhappy with the way our last recommendation had left it. most > were ok with it. > Avri Doria:put after it haad been poked at enough and after the SCI asked the > council to please make this an issue we could work on, we did. > Mary Wong:Yes, per what Amr is saying - first question is whether 10-day > waiver rule can/should apply to resubmitted motions > Rudi Vansnick:if the 10-day waiver is applied, a resubmitted motion could > indefinitely be resubmitted ? > Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:@Mary, I thought that is the wish, so it should happen?? > Rudi Vansnick:thanks Mary > Mary Wong:@Anne, that works too - Chair's call :) > Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: I don't think the 10-day waiver rule affects how many > times a motion may be resubmitted. > Julie Hedlund:@Amr and Rudi: I think whether a motion can be resubmitted is > governed by the rules in 4.3.3. > Amr Elsadr:@Anne: Correct. > Amr Elsadr:Thanks Julie. > Mary Wong:Yes, a fresh start > Amr Elsadr:For some reason, I seem to be the only one who thinks we did > actually talk a great deal about this. :) > Avri Doria:Amr, you did talk about it a lot. But there weren't any great > discussions. > Rudi Vansnick:@Mary: +1 > Avri Doria:thee were one or two people who kept bringing it up , but the > discussion never stuck. > Amr Elsadr:Greg engaged in this discussion quite a bit. Discussions took > place both on-list and on calls, if I recall correctly. > Mary Wong:@Amr, that's right - there was discussion but people seemed to > have different ideas about what the agreed conclusion was. > Amr Elsadr:@Anne: I'm sorry, could you clarify your concern again. Not sure > I got it. > Rudi Vansnick:perhaps we are now in a state where we need to finalize the > direction > Avri Doria:i'm ambivalent on this issue. > Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:staff should draft > Avri Doria:i dont mind allowing them to draft, i am not sure about asking > them to draft. > Lori Schulman:There is no harm in starting drafting. We are not approving > anything. > Julie Hedlund:@Anne: That is correct. The next meeting is in Buenos Aires. > Lori Schulman:I agree with Mary's point that a draft would be a starting > point only and a good thing to react o. > Lori Schulman:yes. agree. > Julie Hedlund:@Anne: It is the 20th early in the morning. > Mary Wong:The usual "happy" hour :) > Rudi Vansnick:at 7am ? ;-) > Amr Elsadr:@Mary: Happy hour isn't supposed to be all about coffee!! > Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Saturday 7:45 > Julie Hedlund:@Wolf-Ulright I think that's correct. > Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:GNSO starts at 9:00 > Amr Elsadr:Am I not getting through? > Terri Agnew:@Amr your audio is cutting out > Amr Elsadr:The way I see it, both the request and the explanation should be > provided. > Mary Wong:@Amr, staff will send you something to review before sending to > the list > Amr Elsadr:@Mary: I'll dig up what I came up with and fwd it to you as well. > Mary Wong:Gerat, thanks! > Amr Elsadr:BTW..., I won't be in BA, but will participate in the SCI meeting > remotely. > Mary Wong:@Amr, so it's confirmed you can't come? :( > Amr Elsadr:Have personal stuff I need to sort out at that time. Sorry I > won't be there. > Rudi Vansnick:thanks Anne for chairing this meeting > Mary Wong:Sorry we won't see you > Julie Hedlund:@Anne: Mary and I are drafting some slides. > Julie Hedlund:We will send them to you to review. > Amr Elsadr:Thanks Anne and all. Bye. > Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Thanks Anne and bye to all > Anne Aikman-Scalese - IPC member:Thank you. > > > > > > > This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the > individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this > message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or > agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended > recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying > to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments > may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of > the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications > Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 3765 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5041 bytes Desc: not available URL: From julie.hedlund at icann.org Tue Jun 16 19:48:01 2015 From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 19:48:01 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Proposed Language Concerning 10-Day Waiver and Resubmitted Motions Message-ID: Dear Anne and SCI members, As discussed on our call on 04 June, Amr and staff considered draft language concerning the treatment of resubmitted motions with respect to the 10-day waiver rule. After reviewing the language that Amr had referenced at the meeting, and that had been suggested by Mary Wong last year when this issue was first discussed, we decided that language seemed to address the issue succinctly. Here is the language [in brackets/highlighted] following the last two sentences of Section 3.3.2 Submission of Reports and Motions. "If these requirements are not met, the motion shall not be considered submitted for the next Council meeting. For the avoidance of doubt, if the motion is proposed again for a subsequent Council meeting, it shall not be considered a resubmitted motion under the rules for Resubmission of a Motion in these Operating Procedures. [Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements in addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible for consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2.]" For your reference, I have included below the full text from Sections 3.3.2 and 4.3.3. The next SCI meeting will be held in Buenos Aires on Saturday, 20 June, from 0745 to 0845 local time (1045 UTC) during which the SCI can discuss the proposed language. Of course, you may also wish to send comments to the list prior to the meeting. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Excerpted from the GNSO Operating Procedures, v9 (13 November 2014) 3.3.2 Submission of Reports and Motions Reports and motions should be submitted to the GNSO Council for inclusion on the agenda as soon as possible, but no later than 23h59 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) on the day, 10 calendar days before the GNSO Council meeting. If a motion is submitted after the Submission Deadline, the GNSO Council shall consider the motion if the following requirements are met: a. The motion (including any report or other supporting documentation) is submitted to the GNSO Council at least 24 hours in advance of the GNSO Council meeting; b. The motion is accompanied by a request to consider the motion despite submission after the Submission Deadline (a ?Request for Consideration?); c. A vote on the Request for Consideration shall be called as the first order of business for the agenda item that deals with the motion. The vote on the Request for Consideration must be unanimous (i.e., all Councilors or their proxies must vote and all votes cast must be in favor of considering the motion at such GNSO Council meeting) for the motion to be considered at such GNSO Council meeting. If these requirements are not met, the motion shall not be considered submitted for the next Council meeting. For the avoidance of doubt, if the motion is proposed again for a subsequent Council meeting, it shall not be considered a resubmitted motion under the rules for Resubmission of a Motion in these Operating Procedures. 4.3.3 Resubmission of a Motion: If a motion has been voted on by the GNSO Council and not adopted, that motion may be resubmitted to the Council for consideration at a subsequent meeting of the Council, subject to the following criteria: 1. Explanation: The Councilor submitting the motion must also submit an explanation for the resubmission of the motion. The explanation need not accompany the motion when it is resubmitted; however, the explanation must be submitted no later than the deadline for submitting the motion (i.e., no later than 23h59 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) on the day 10 calendar days before the Council meeting at which the motion is to be reconsidered). The explanation does not need to meet any requirements other than being submitted in a timely manner. 2. Publication: The text and explanation of the resubmitted motion must be published (i.e., circulated to the Council mailing list) no later than the deadline for submitting the motion. 3. Second: Upon the second resubmission of a motion (i.e., the third time the same motion comes before the Council), the motion must be seconded by a Councilor from each house as a prerequisite for placing the resubmitted motion on the consent agenda. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5041 bytes Desc: not available URL: From AAikman at lrrlaw.com Tue Jun 16 20:20:47 2015 From: AAikman at lrrlaw.com (Aikman-Scalese, Anne) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 20:20:47 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Proposed Language Concerning 10-Day Waiver and Resubmitted Motions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B8496E1@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Dear all, It was agreed in our SCI conference call on Thursday June 4 that we would ask members for their general views on the applicability of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted motions prior to considering specific language. We took a straw poll and those on the call were in favor of pursuing this clarification to the Operating Procedures to confirm that a resubmitted motion may benefit from the 10 day waiver rule, provided it meets all the other requirements of that rule. Thus, a resubmitted motion could be considered under the waiver rule if submitted 24 hours prior to the Council meeting accompanied by a request for consideration on a waiver basis and an explanation as to why the motion should be reconsidered. The 10 day waiver only applies if no Councilor objects. At the top of our meeting in Buenos Aires, we will be discussing the proposed application of this rule generally. Will those who were not on the call June 4 please try to listen to the mp3 previously forwarded by Terri? Then please provide any comments you may want to make as to the general idea to the list prior to Saturday June 20 for our 7:45 am meeting BA time. I am looking forward to see all who are able to attend in Buenos Aires. Again, our meeting runs from 7:45 to 8:45 am Saturady in the same room as GNSO Council working sessions. Thank you and smooth travels to everyone, Anne [cid:image001.gif at 01D0A836.A09EB3C0] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 12:48 PM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Subject: Proposed Language Concerning 10-Day Waiver and Resubmitted Motions Importance: High Dear Anne and SCI members, As discussed on our call on 04 June, Amr and staff considered draft language concerning the treatment of resubmitted motions with respect to the 10-day waiver rule. After reviewing the language that Amr had referenced at the meeting, and that had been suggested by Mary Wong last year when this issue was first discussed, we decided that language seemed to address the issue succinctly. Here is the language [in brackets/highlighted] following the last two sentences of Section 3.3.2 Submission of Reports and Motions. "If these requirements are not met, the motion shall not be considered submitted for the next Council meeting. For the avoidance of doubt, if the motion is proposed again for a subsequent Council meeting, it shall not be considered a resubmitted motion under the rules for Resubmission of a Motion in these Operating Procedures. [Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements in addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible for consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2.]" For your reference, I have included below the full text from Sections 3.3.2 and 4.3.3. The next SCI meeting will be held in Buenos Aires on Saturday, 20 June, from 0745 to 0845 local time (1045 UTC) during which the SCI can discuss the proposed language. Of course, you may also wish to send comments to the list prior to the meeting. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Excerpted from the GNSO Operating Procedures, v9 (13 November 2014) 3.3.2 Submission of Reports and Motions Reports and motions should be submitted to the GNSO Council for inclusion on the agenda as soon as possible, but no later than 23h59 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) on the day, 10 calendar days before the GNSO Council meeting. If a motion is submitted after the Submission Deadline, the GNSO Council shall consider the motion if the following requirements are met: 1. The motion (including any report or other supporting documentation) is submitted to the GNSO Council at least 24 hours in advance of the GNSO Council meeting; 2. The motion is accompanied by a request to consider the motion despite submission after the Submission Deadline (a ?Request for Consideration?); 3. A vote on the Request for Consideration shall be called as the first order of business for the agenda item that deals with the motion. The vote on the Request for Consideration must be unanimous (i.e., all Councilors or their proxies must vote and all votes cast must be in favor of considering the motion at such GNSO Council meeting) for the motion to be considered at such GNSO Council meeting. If these requirements are not met, the motion shall not be considered submitted for the next Council meeting. For the avoidance of doubt, if the motion is proposed again for a subsequent Council meeting, it shall not be considered a resubmitted motion under the rules for Resubmission of a Motion in these Operating Procedures. 4.3.3 Resubmission of a Motion: If a motion has been voted on by the GNSO Council and not adopted, that motion may be resubmitted to the Council for consideration at a subsequent meeting of the Council, subject to the following criteria: Explanation: The Councilor submitting the motion must also submit an explanation for the resubmission of the motion. The explanation need not accompany the motion when it is resubmitted; however, the explanation must be submitted no later than the deadline for submitting the motion (i.e., no later than 23h59 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) on the day 10 calendar days before the Council meeting at which the motion is to be reconsidered). The explanation does not need to meet any requirements other than being submitted in a timely manner. Publication: The text and explanation of the resubmitted motion must be published (i.e., circulated to the Council mailing list) no later than the deadline for submitting the motion. Second: Upon the second resubmission of a motion (i.e., the third time the same motion comes before the Council), the motion must be seconded by a Councilor from each house as a prerequisite for placing the resubmitted motion on the consent agenda. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 3765 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From rudi.vansnick at isoc.be Wed Jun 17 05:25:57 2015 From: rudi.vansnick at isoc.be (Rudi Vansnick) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 07:25:57 +0200 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Anne, Dear all, I?m also in favor of integrating Mary?s (Amr?s) changes to the text before posting it to the list. I will be traveling from today 14:00 UTC till Thursday 9:00am AGT. Safe travels and see you in BA. Rudi Vansnick Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) www.npoc.org rudi.vansnick at npoc.org Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32 > Op 16-jun.-2015, om 20:24 heeft Julie Hedlund het volgende geschreven: > > Hi Anne, > > We have some language that had been previously suggested by Mary and which also is the language Amr retrieved prior to our meeting. I'm just checking to see if we want to make any changes to it before we (or Amr) send it to the list. > > Thanks, > Julie > > From: , Anne > > Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 2:14 PM > To: Terri Agnew >, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org " > > Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org " > > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 > >> Hi everyone. I had understood that Amr and staff would be working together to put out a general e-mail asking whether there is a generally favorable view toward the issue of giving resubmitted motions the benefit of the 10 day waiver rule and that this general e-mail might include at least some old language drafted previously by Mary to spark our discussion for this Saturday morning?s meeting at 7:45 am in the GNSO Council meeting room. >> >> Could staff please advise as to status of this effort? >> Thank you, >> Anne >> >> >> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel >> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | >> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 >> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 >> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com >> >> >> From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org ] On Behalf Of Terri Agnew >> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:05 PM >> To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org >> Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org >> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 >> >> Dear All, >> Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation meeting held on Thursday, 04 June 2015: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-04jun15-en.mp3 >> On page:http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#jun >> (transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page) >> >> Attendees: >> Anne Aikman Scalese ? IPC ? Primary - Chair >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben ? ISPCP - Primary >> Rudi Vansnick ? NPOC - Primary >> Amr Elsadr ? NCUC - Primary >> Avri Doria ? NCSG ? Primary >> Lori Schulman ? IPC - Alternate >> >> Apologies: >> None >> >> ICANN Staff: >> Julie Hedlund >> Mary Wong >> Terri Agnew >> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** >> Let me know if you have any questions. >> Thank you. >> Kind regards, >> Terri Agnew >> Adobe Chat Transcript 04 June 2015 >> Terri Agnew:Dear all, welcome to the SCI call on the 4th June 2015 >> Lori Schulman:Where is the mute symbol? >> Terri Agnew:Lori your mic isn't active >> Lori Schulman:good. I have a bad habit of not muting. >> Amr Elsadr:I can hear you Anne. >> Terri Agnew:Lost audio, one moment rejoining >> Lori Schulman:Am I still disqualified? Are there ever exceptions? >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:is it the wish of anybody (eg council) that the resubmitted motion should benefit from the rule? >> Rudi Vansnick:quid if motion content/context is changed ? >> Amr Elsadr:http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg01201.html >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:sorry Anne, I overread it. It's now clear, thanks >> Amr Elsadr:This is the language Mary suggested adding to 3.3.2: "Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements in addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible for consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2." >> Rudi Vansnick:what's the feeling of the councils in this ? in favor ? >> Avri Doria:i think clarity was the issue. and the fact that some SCI members were unhappy with the way our last recommendation had left it. most were ok with it. >> Avri Doria:put after it haad been poked at enough and after the SCI asked the council to please make this an issue we could work on, we did. >> Mary Wong:Yes, per what Amr is saying - first question is whether 10-day waiver rule can/should apply to resubmitted motions >> Rudi Vansnick:if the 10-day waiver is applied, a resubmitted motion could indefinitely be resubmitted ? >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:@Mary, I thought that is the wish, so it should happen?? >> Rudi Vansnick:thanks Mary >> Mary Wong:@Anne, that works too - Chair's call :) >> Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: I don't think the 10-day waiver rule affects how many times a motion may be resubmitted. >> Julie Hedlund:@Amr and Rudi: I think whether a motion can be resubmitted is governed by the rules in 4.3.3. >> Amr Elsadr:@Anne: Correct. >> Amr Elsadr:Thanks Julie. >> Mary Wong:Yes, a fresh start >> Amr Elsadr:For some reason, I seem to be the only one who thinks we did actually talk a great deal about this. :) >> Avri Doria:Amr, you did talk about it a lot. But there weren't any great discussions. >> Rudi Vansnick:@Mary: +1 >> Avri Doria:thee were one or two people who kept bringing it up , but the discussion never stuck. >> Amr Elsadr:Greg engaged in this discussion quite a bit. Discussions took place both on-list and on calls, if I recall correctly. >> Mary Wong:@Amr, that's right - there was discussion but people seemed to have different ideas about what the agreed conclusion was. >> Amr Elsadr:@Anne: I'm sorry, could you clarify your concern again. Not sure I got it. >> Rudi Vansnick:perhaps we are now in a state where we need to finalize the direction >> Avri Doria:i'm ambivalent on this issue. >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:staff should draft >> Avri Doria:i dont mind allowing them to draft, i am not sure about asking them to draft. >> Lori Schulman:There is no harm in starting drafting. We are not approving anything. >> Julie Hedlund:@Anne: That is correct. The next meeting is in Buenos Aires. >> Lori Schulman:I agree with Mary's point that a draft would be a starting point only and a good thing to react o. >> Lori Schulman:yes. agree. >> Julie Hedlund:@Anne: It is the 20th early in the morning. >> Mary Wong:The usual "happy" hour :) >> Rudi Vansnick:at 7am ? ;-) >> Amr Elsadr:@Mary: Happy hour isn't supposed to be all about coffee!! >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Saturday 7:45 >> Julie Hedlund:@Wolf-Ulright I think that's correct. >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:GNSO starts at 9:00 >> Amr Elsadr:Am I not getting through? >> Terri Agnew:@Amr your audio is cutting out >> Amr Elsadr:The way I see it, both the request and the explanation should be provided. >> Mary Wong:@Amr, staff will send you something to review before sending to the list >> Amr Elsadr:@Mary: I'll dig up what I came up with and fwd it to you as well. >> Mary Wong:Gerat, thanks! >> Amr Elsadr:BTW..., I won't be in BA, but will participate in the SCI meeting remotely. >> Mary Wong:@Amr, so it's confirmed you can't come? :( >> Amr Elsadr:Have personal stuff I need to sort out at that time. Sorry I won't be there. >> Rudi Vansnick:thanks Anne for chairing this meeting >> Mary Wong:Sorry we won't see you >> Julie Hedlund:@Anne: Mary and I are drafting some slides. >> Julie Hedlund:We will send them to you to review. >> Amr Elsadr:Thanks Anne and all. Bye. >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Thanks Anne and bye to all >> Anne Aikman-Scalese - IPC member:Thank you. >> >> >> >> >> >> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 496 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From avri at acm.org Thu Jun 18 00:02:53 2015 From: avri at acm.org (Avri Doria) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 20:02:53 -0400 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Proposed Language Concerning 10-Day Waiver and Resubmitted Motions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <55820AAD.3060709@acm.org> Hi, (without liaison hat on) I have a question: does it seem like we are complicating the rules to the point that it will take lawyers to read and interpret them. I read the language below and found I had to read it multiple times to get a clear view of what it was saying. Is there are chance we might consider readability when making changes? And perhaps doing a readability pass though the operating procedures at some point? avri On 16-Jun-15 15:48, Julie Hedlund wrote: > Dear Anne and SCI members, > > As discussed on our call on 04 June, Amr and staff considered draft > language concerning the treatment of resubmitted motions with respect > to the 10-day waiver rule. After reviewing the language that Amr had > referenced at the meeting, and that had been suggested by Mary Wong > last year when this issue was first discussed, we decided that > language seemed to address the issue succinctly. Here is the language > [in brackets/highlighted] following the last two sentences of Section > 3.3.2 Submission of Reports and Motions. > > "If these requirements are not met, the motion shall not be > considered submitted for the next Council meeting. For the avoidance > of doubt, if the motion is proposed again for a subsequent Council > meeting, it shall not be considered a resubmitted motion under the > rules for Resubmission of a Motion in these Operating Procedures. > [Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating > Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements > in addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible > for consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2.]" > > For your reference, I have included below the full text from Sections > 3.3.2 and 4.3.3. > > The next SCI meeting will be held in Buenos Aires on Saturday, 20 > June, from 0745 to 0845 local time (1045 UTC) during which the SCI can > discuss the proposed language. Of course, you may also wish to send > comments to the list prior to the meeting. > > Best regards, > Julie > > Julie Hedlund, Policy Director > * > * > *Excerpted from the GNSO Operating Procedures, v9 (13 November 2014)* > > > 3.3.2 Submission of Reports and Motions > > Reports and motions should be submitted to the GNSO Council for > inclusion on the agenda as soon as possible, but no later than *23h59 > Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) on the day, 10 calendar*/**//days > /before the GNSO Council meeting. > > > > If a motion is submitted after the Submission Deadline, the GNSO > Council shall consider the motion if the following requirements are met: > > a. The motion (including any report or other supporting > documentation) is submitted to the GNSO Council at least 24 hours in > advance of the GNSO Council meeting; > > b. The motion is accompanied by a request to consider the motion > despite submission after the Submission Deadline (a ?Request for > Consideration?); > > c. A vote on the Request for Consideration shall be called as the > first order of business for the agenda item that deals with the > motion. The vote on the Request for Consideration must be unanimous > (i.e., all Councilors or their proxies must vote and all votes cast > must be in favor of considering the motion at such GNSO Council > meeting) for the motion to be considered at such GNSO Council meeting. > > If these requirements are not met, the motion shall not be considered > submitted for the next Council meeting. For the avoidance of doubt, if > the motion is proposed again for a subsequent Council meeting, it > shall not be considered a resubmitted motion under the rules for > Resubmission of a Motion in these Operating Procedures. > > > 4.3.3 _Resubmission of a Motion_: If a motion has been > voted on by the GNSO Council and not adopted, that motion may > be resubmitted to the Council for consideration at a > subsequent meeting of the Council, subject to the following > criteria: > > > 1. _Explanation_: The Councilor submitting the motion > must also submit an explanation for the resubmission of the > motion. The explanation need not accompany the motion when it > is resubmitted; however, the explanation must be submitted no > later than the deadline for submitting the motion (_i.e._, no > later than 23h59 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) on the day > 10 calendar days before the Council meeting at which the > motion is to be reconsidered). The explanation does not need > to meet any requirements other than being submitted in a > timely manner. > > > 2. _Publication_: The text and explanation of the > resubmitted motion must be published (_i.e._, circulated to > the Council mailing list) no later than the deadline for > submitting the motion. > > > 3. _Second_: Upon the second resubmission of a motion > (_i.e._, the third time the same motion comes before the > Council), the motion must be seconded by a Councilor from each > house as a prerequisite for placing the resubmitted motion on > the consent agenda. > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus From aelsadr at egyptig.org Thu Jun 18 11:09:46 2015 From: aelsadr at egyptig.org (Amr Elsadr) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:09:46 +0200 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Proposed Language Concerning 10-Day Waiver and Resubmitted Motions In-Reply-To: <55820AAD.3060709@acm.org> References: <55820AAD.3060709@acm.org> Message-ID: <25E6A481-961B-4065-911A-0EAE051DA65F@egyptig.org> Hi, I don?t see why we can?t (or shouldn?t) consider readability. Note that the language being suggested is only meant to be a starting point, not a final draft. Having said that, I don?t personally find this language to be overly complex, but that may very well be because I?ve been paying far more attention to this topic than a typical community member who is not aware of SCI projects and discussions. On Jun 18, 2015, at 2:02 AM, Avri Doria wrote: > > Hi, > > (without liaison hat on) > > I have a question: does it seem like we are complicating the rules to > the point that it will take lawyers to read and interpret them. I read > the language below and found I had to read it multiple times to get a > clear view of what it was saying. > > Is there are chance we might consider readability when making changes? > And perhaps doing a readability pass though the operating procedures at > some point? > > avri > > On 16-Jun-15 15:48, Julie Hedlund wrote: >> Dear Anne and SCI members, >> >> As discussed on our call on 04 June, Amr and staff considered draft >> language concerning the treatment of resubmitted motions with respect >> to the 10-day waiver rule. After reviewing the language that Amr had >> referenced at the meeting, and that had been suggested by Mary Wong >> last year when this issue was first discussed, we decided that >> language seemed to address the issue succinctly. Here is the language >> [in brackets/highlighted] following the last two sentences of Section >> 3.3.2 Submission of Reports and Motions. >> >> "If these requirements are not met, the motion shall not be >> considered submitted for the next Council meeting. For the avoidance >> of doubt, if the motion is proposed again for a subsequent Council >> meeting, it shall not be considered a resubmitted motion under the >> rules for Resubmission of a Motion in these Operating Procedures. >> [Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating >> Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements >> in addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible >> for consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2.]" >> >> For your reference, I have included below the full text from Sections >> 3.3.2 and 4.3.3. >> >> The next SCI meeting will be held in Buenos Aires on Saturday, 20 >> June, from 0745 to 0845 local time (1045 UTC) during which the SCI can >> discuss the proposed language. Of course, you may also wish to send >> comments to the list prior to the meeting. >> >> Best regards, >> Julie >> >> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director >> * >> * >> *Excerpted from the GNSO Operating Procedures, v9 (13 November 2014)* >> >> >> 3.3.2 Submission of Reports and Motions >> >> Reports and motions should be submitted to the GNSO Council for >> inclusion on the agenda as soon as possible, but no later than *23h59 >> Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) on the day, 10 calendar*/**//days >> /before the GNSO Council meeting. >> >> >> >> If a motion is submitted after the Submission Deadline, the GNSO >> Council shall consider the motion if the following requirements are met: >> >> a. The motion (including any report or other supporting >> documentation) is submitted to the GNSO Council at least 24 hours in >> advance of the GNSO Council meeting; >> >> b. The motion is accompanied by a request to consider the motion >> despite submission after the Submission Deadline (a ?Request for >> Consideration?); >> >> c. A vote on the Request for Consideration shall be called as the >> first order of business for the agenda item that deals with the >> motion. The vote on the Request for Consideration must be unanimous >> (i.e., all Councilors or their proxies must vote and all votes cast >> must be in favor of considering the motion at such GNSO Council >> meeting) for the motion to be considered at such GNSO Council meeting. >> >> If these requirements are not met, the motion shall not be considered >> submitted for the next Council meeting. For the avoidance of doubt, if >> the motion is proposed again for a subsequent Council meeting, it >> shall not be considered a resubmitted motion under the rules for >> Resubmission of a Motion in these Operating Procedures. >> >> >> 4.3.3 _Resubmission of a Motion_: If a motion has been >> voted on by the GNSO Council and not adopted, that motion may >> be resubmitted to the Council for consideration at a >> subsequent meeting of the Council, subject to the following >> criteria: >> >> >> 1. _Explanation_: The Councilor submitting the motion >> must also submit an explanation for the resubmission of the >> motion. The explanation need not accompany the motion when it >> is resubmitted; however, the explanation must be submitted no >> later than the deadline for submitting the motion (_i.e._, no >> later than 23h59 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) on the day >> 10 calendar days before the Council meeting at which the >> motion is to be reconsidered). The explanation does not need >> to meet any requirements other than being submitted in a >> timely manner. >> >> >> 2. _Publication_: The text and explanation of the >> resubmitted motion must be published (_i.e._, circulated to >> the Council mailing list) no later than the deadline for >> submitting the motion. >> >> >> 3. _Second_: Upon the second resubmission of a motion >> (_i.e._, the third time the same motion comes before the >> Council), the motion must be seconded by a Councilor from each >> house as a prerequisite for placing the resubmitted motion on >> the consent agenda. >> > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > From rudi.vansnick at isoc.be Thu Jun 18 14:59:08 2015 From: rudi.vansnick at isoc.be (Rudi Vansnick) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:59:08 -0300 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6829B586-D525-45AE-8F04-669E88B172A5@isoc.be> Dear Anne, Dear all, As I did not see anyone volunteering for the vice-chair seat, I?m willing to jump in. Having finished a PDP WG, and ending my ISOC Board mandate, I?m having some more free time to make available for this task. See you all in BA. Best regards, Rudi Vansnick Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) www.npoc.org rudi.vansnick at npoc.org Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32 > Op 16-jun.-2015, om 15:24 heeft Julie Hedlund het volgende geschreven: > > Hi Anne, > > We have some language that had been previously suggested by Mary and which also is the language Amr retrieved prior to our meeting. I'm just checking to see if we want to make any changes to it before we (or Amr) send it to the list. > > Thanks, > Julie > > From: , Anne > > Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 2:14 PM > To: Terri Agnew >, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org " > > Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org " > > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 > >> Hi everyone. I had understood that Amr and staff would be working together to put out a general e-mail asking whether there is a generally favorable view toward the issue of giving resubmitted motions the benefit of the 10 day waiver rule and that this general e-mail might include at least some old language drafted previously by Mary to spark our discussion for this Saturday morning?s meeting at 7:45 am in the GNSO Council meeting room. >> >> Could staff please advise as to status of this effort? >> Thank you, >> Anne >> >> >> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel >> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | >> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 >> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 >> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com >> >> >> From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org ] On Behalf Of Terri Agnew >> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:05 PM >> To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org >> Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org >> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 >> >> Dear All, >> Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation meeting held on Thursday, 04 June 2015: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-04jun15-en.mp3 >> On page:http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#jun >> (transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page) >> >> Attendees: >> Anne Aikman Scalese ? IPC ? Primary - Chair >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben ? ISPCP - Primary >> Rudi Vansnick ? NPOC - Primary >> Amr Elsadr ? NCUC - Primary >> Avri Doria ? NCSG ? Primary >> Lori Schulman ? IPC - Alternate >> >> Apologies: >> None >> >> ICANN Staff: >> Julie Hedlund >> Mary Wong >> Terri Agnew >> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** >> Let me know if you have any questions. >> Thank you. >> Kind regards, >> Terri Agnew >> Adobe Chat Transcript 04 June 2015 >> Terri Agnew:Dear all, welcome to the SCI call on the 4th June 2015 >> Lori Schulman:Where is the mute symbol? >> Terri Agnew:Lori your mic isn't active >> Lori Schulman:good. I have a bad habit of not muting. >> Amr Elsadr:I can hear you Anne. >> Terri Agnew:Lost audio, one moment rejoining >> Lori Schulman:Am I still disqualified? Are there ever exceptions? >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:is it the wish of anybody (eg council) that the resubmitted motion should benefit from the rule? >> Rudi Vansnick:quid if motion content/context is changed ? >> Amr Elsadr:http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg01201.html >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:sorry Anne, I overread it. It's now clear, thanks >> Amr Elsadr:This is the language Mary suggested adding to 3.3.2: "Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements in addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible for consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2." >> Rudi Vansnick:what's the feeling of the councils in this ? in favor ? >> Avri Doria:i think clarity was the issue. and the fact that some SCI members were unhappy with the way our last recommendation had left it. most were ok with it. >> Avri Doria:put after it haad been poked at enough and after the SCI asked the council to please make this an issue we could work on, we did. >> Mary Wong:Yes, per what Amr is saying - first question is whether 10-day waiver rule can/should apply to resubmitted motions >> Rudi Vansnick:if the 10-day waiver is applied, a resubmitted motion could indefinitely be resubmitted ? >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:@Mary, I thought that is the wish, so it should happen?? >> Rudi Vansnick:thanks Mary >> Mary Wong:@Anne, that works too - Chair's call :) >> Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: I don't think the 10-day waiver rule affects how many times a motion may be resubmitted. >> Julie Hedlund:@Amr and Rudi: I think whether a motion can be resubmitted is governed by the rules in 4.3.3. >> Amr Elsadr:@Anne: Correct. >> Amr Elsadr:Thanks Julie. >> Mary Wong:Yes, a fresh start >> Amr Elsadr:For some reason, I seem to be the only one who thinks we did actually talk a great deal about this. :) >> Avri Doria:Amr, you did talk about it a lot. But there weren't any great discussions. >> Rudi Vansnick:@Mary: +1 >> Avri Doria:thee were one or two people who kept bringing it up , but the discussion never stuck. >> Amr Elsadr:Greg engaged in this discussion quite a bit. Discussions took place both on-list and on calls, if I recall correctly. >> Mary Wong:@Amr, that's right - there was discussion but people seemed to have different ideas about what the agreed conclusion was. >> Amr Elsadr:@Anne: I'm sorry, could you clarify your concern again. Not sure I got it. >> Rudi Vansnick:perhaps we are now in a state where we need to finalize the direction >> Avri Doria:i'm ambivalent on this issue. >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:staff should draft >> Avri Doria:i dont mind allowing them to draft, i am not sure about asking them to draft. >> Lori Schulman:There is no harm in starting drafting. We are not approving anything. >> Julie Hedlund:@Anne: That is correct. The next meeting is in Buenos Aires. >> Lori Schulman:I agree with Mary's point that a draft would be a starting point only and a good thing to react o. >> Lori Schulman:yes. agree. >> Julie Hedlund:@Anne: It is the 20th early in the morning. >> Mary Wong:The usual "happy" hour :) >> Rudi Vansnick:at 7am ? ;-) >> Amr Elsadr:@Mary: Happy hour isn't supposed to be all about coffee!! >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Saturday 7:45 >> Julie Hedlund:@Wolf-Ulright I think that's correct. >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:GNSO starts at 9:00 >> Amr Elsadr:Am I not getting through? >> Terri Agnew:@Amr your audio is cutting out >> Amr Elsadr:The way I see it, both the request and the explanation should be provided. >> Mary Wong:@Amr, staff will send you something to review before sending to the list >> Amr Elsadr:@Mary: I'll dig up what I came up with and fwd it to you as well. >> Mary Wong:Gerat, thanks! >> Amr Elsadr:BTW..., I won't be in BA, but will participate in the SCI meeting remotely. >> Mary Wong:@Amr, so it's confirmed you can't come? :( >> Amr Elsadr:Have personal stuff I need to sort out at that time. Sorry I won't be there. >> Rudi Vansnick:thanks Anne for chairing this meeting >> Mary Wong:Sorry we won't see you >> Julie Hedlund:@Anne: Mary and I are drafting some slides. >> Julie Hedlund:We will send them to you to review. >> Amr Elsadr:Thanks Anne and all. Bye. >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Thanks Anne and bye to all >> Anne Aikman-Scalese - IPC member:Thank you. >> >> >> >> >> >> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 496 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de Thu Jun 18 16:45:46 2015 From: wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de (WUKnoben) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:45:46 -0300 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 In-Reply-To: <6829B586-D525-45AE-8F04-669E88B172A5@isoc.be> References: <6829B586-D525-45AE-8F04-669E88B172A5@isoc.be> Message-ID: <441EDB146D884DD0843C16879A5A5ECD@WUKPC> I really welcome your fearlessness, Rudi! You?ll have my support. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich From: Rudi Vansnick Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 11:59 AM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Cc: Terri Agnew ; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org ; gnso-secs at icann.org ; Julie Hedlund Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 Dear Anne, Dear all, As I did not see anyone volunteering for the vice-chair seat, I?m willing to jump in. Having finished a PDP WG, and ending my ISOC Board mandate, I?m having some more free time to make available for this task. See you all in BA. Best regards, Rudi Vansnick Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) www.npoc.org rudi.vansnick at npoc.org Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32 Op 16-jun.-2015, om 15:24 heeft Julie Hedlund het volgende geschreven: Hi Anne, We have some language that had been previously suggested by Mary and which also is the language Amr retrieved prior to our meeting. I'm just checking to see if we want to make any changes to it before we (or Amr) send it to the list. Thanks, Julie From: , Anne Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 2:14 PM To: Terri Agnew , "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 Hi everyone. I had understood that Amr and staff would be working together to put out a general e-mail asking whether there is a generally favorable view toward the issue of giving resubmitted motions the benefit of the 10 day waiver rule and that this general e-mail might include at least some old language drafted previously by Mary to spark our discussion for this Saturday morning?s meeting at 7:45 am in the GNSO Council meeting room. Could staff please advise as to status of this effort? Thank you, Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Terri Agnew Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:05 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 Dear All, Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation meeting held on Thursday, 04 June 2015: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-04jun15-en.mp3 On page:http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#jun (transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page) Attendees: Anne Aikman Scalese ? IPC ? Primary - Chair Wolf-Ulrich Knoben ? ISPCP - Primary Rudi Vansnick ? NPOC - Primary Amr Elsadr ? NCUC - Primary Avri Doria ? NCSG ? Primary Lori Schulman ? IPC - Alternate Apologies: None ICANN Staff: Julie Hedlund Mary Wong Terri Agnew ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew Adobe Chat Transcript 04 June 2015 Terri Agnew:Dear all, welcome to the SCI call on the 4th June 2015 Lori Schulman:Where is the mute symbol? Terri Agnew:Lori your mic isn't active Lori Schulman:good. I have a bad habit of not muting. Amr Elsadr:I can hear you Anne. Terri Agnew:Lost audio, one moment rejoining Lori Schulman:Am I still disqualified? Are there ever exceptions? Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:is it the wish of anybody (eg council) that the resubmitted motion should benefit from the rule? Rudi Vansnick:quid if motion content/context is changed ? Amr Elsadr:http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg01201.html Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:sorry Anne, I overread it. It's now clear, thanks Amr Elsadr:This is the language Mary suggested adding to 3.3.2: "Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements in addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible for consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2." Rudi Vansnick:what's the feeling of the councils in this ? in favor ? Avri Doria:i think clarity was the issue. and the fact that some SCI members were unhappy with the way our last recommendation had left it. most were ok with it. Avri Doria:put after it haad been poked at enough and after the SCI asked the council to please make this an issue we could work on, we did. Mary Wong:Yes, per what Amr is saying - first question is whether 10-day waiver rule can/should apply to resubmitted motions Rudi Vansnick:if the 10-day waiver is applied, a resubmitted motion could indefinitely be resubmitted ? Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:@Mary, I thought that is the wish, so it should happen?? Rudi Vansnick:thanks Mary Mary Wong:@Anne, that works too - Chair's call :) Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: I don't think the 10-day waiver rule affects how many times a motion may be resubmitted. Julie Hedlund:@Amr and Rudi: I think whether a motion can be resubmitted is governed by the rules in 4.3.3. Amr Elsadr:@Anne: Correct. Amr Elsadr:Thanks Julie. Mary Wong:Yes, a fresh start Amr Elsadr:For some reason, I seem to be the only one who thinks we did actually talk a great deal about this. :) Avri Doria:Amr, you did talk about it a lot. But there weren't any great discussions. Rudi Vansnick:@Mary: +1 Avri Doria:thee were one or two people who kept bringing it up , but the discussion never stuck. Amr Elsadr:Greg engaged in this discussion quite a bit. Discussions took place both on-list and on calls, if I recall correctly. Mary Wong:@Amr, that's right - there was discussion but people seemed to have different ideas about what the agreed conclusion was. Amr Elsadr:@Anne: I'm sorry, could you clarify your concern again. Not sure I got it. Rudi Vansnick:perhaps we are now in a state where we need to finalize the direction Avri Doria:i'm ambivalent on this issue. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:staff should draft Avri Doria:i dont mind allowing them to draft, i am not sure about asking them to draft. Lori Schulman:There is no harm in starting drafting. We are not approving anything. Julie Hedlund:@Anne: That is correct. The next meeting is in Buenos Aires. Lori Schulman:I agree with Mary's point that a draft would be a starting point only and a good thing to react o. Lori Schulman:yes. agree. Julie Hedlund:@Anne: It is the 20th early in the morning. Mary Wong:The usual "happy" hour :) Rudi Vansnick:at 7am ? ;-) Amr Elsadr:@Mary: Happy hour isn't supposed to be all about coffee!! Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Saturday 7:45 Julie Hedlund:@Wolf-Ulright I think that's correct. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:GNSO starts at 9:00 Amr Elsadr:Am I not getting through? Terri Agnew:@Amr your audio is cutting out Amr Elsadr:The way I see it, both the request and the explanation should be provided. Mary Wong:@Amr, staff will send you something to review before sending to the list Amr Elsadr:@Mary: I'll dig up what I came up with and fwd it to you as well. Mary Wong:Gerat, thanks! Amr Elsadr:BTW..., I won't be in BA, but will participate in the SCI meeting remotely. Mary Wong:@Amr, so it's confirmed you can't come? :( Amr Elsadr:Have personal stuff I need to sort out at that time. Sorry I won't be there. Rudi Vansnick:thanks Anne for chairing this meeting Mary Wong:Sorry we won't see you Julie Hedlund:@Anne: Mary and I are drafting some slides. Julie Hedlund:We will send them to you to review. Amr Elsadr:Thanks Anne and all. Bye. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Thanks Anne and bye to all Anne Aikman-Scalese - IPC member:Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: wlEmoticon-smile[1].png Type: image/png Size: 1046 bytes Desc: not available URL: From AAikman at lrrlaw.com Fri Jun 19 20:04:55 2015 From: AAikman at lrrlaw.com (Aikman-Scalese, Anne) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 20:04:55 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Proposed Language Concerning 10-Day Waiver and Resubmitted Motions In-Reply-To: <55820AAD.3060709@acm.org> References: <55820AAD.3060709@acm.org> Message-ID: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B84D9A4@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Avri - I agree with your instincts on this one. Although I am a lawyer and appreciate that this language is in fact succinct from a legal drafting standpoint, I am also interested to see whether we could craft something a bit easier to read. Let's discuss in our meeting tomorrow morning. Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com -----Original Message----- From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri at acm.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 5:03 PM To: Julie Hedlund; Aikman-Scalese, Anne; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Proposed Language Concerning 10-Day Waiver and Resubmitted Motions Hi, (without liaison hat on) I have a question: does it seem like we are complicating the rules to the point that it will take lawyers to read and interpret them. I read the language below and found I had to read it multiple times to get a clear view of what it was saying. Is there are chance we might consider readability when making changes? And perhaps doing a readability pass though the operating procedures at some point? avri On 16-Jun-15 15:48, Julie Hedlund wrote: > Dear Anne and SCI members, > > As discussed on our call on 04 June, Amr and staff considered draft > language concerning the treatment of resubmitted motions with respect > to the 10-day waiver rule. After reviewing the language that Amr had > referenced at the meeting, and that had been suggested by Mary Wong > last year when this issue was first discussed, we decided that > language seemed to address the issue succinctly. Here is the language > [in brackets/highlighted] following the last two sentences of Section > 3.3.2 Submission of Reports and Motions. > > "If these requirements are not met, the motion shall not be considered > submitted for the next Council meeting. For the avoidance of doubt, if > the motion is proposed again for a subsequent Council meeting, it > shall not be considered a resubmitted motion under the rules for > Resubmission of a Motion in these Operating Procedures. > [Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating > Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements > in addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible > for consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2.]" > > For your reference, I have included below the full text from Sections > 3.3.2 and 4.3.3. > > The next SCI meeting will be held in Buenos Aires on Saturday, 20 > June, from 0745 to 0845 local time (1045 UTC) during which the SCI can > discuss the proposed language. Of course, you may also wish to send > comments to the list prior to the meeting. > > Best regards, > Julie > > Julie Hedlund, Policy Director > * > * > *Excerpted from the GNSO Operating Procedures, v9 (13 November 2014)* > > > 3.3.2 Submission of Reports and Motions > > Reports and motions should be submitted to the GNSO Council for > inclusion on the agenda as soon as possible, but no later than *23h59 > Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) on the day, 10 calendar*/**//days > /before the GNSO Council meeting. > > > > If a motion is submitted after the Submission Deadline, the GNSO > Council shall consider the motion if the following requirements are met: > > a. The motion (including any report or other supporting > documentation) is submitted to the GNSO Council at least 24 hours in > advance of the GNSO Council meeting; > > b. The motion is accompanied by a request to consider the motion > despite submission after the Submission Deadline (a "Request for > Consideration"); > > c. A vote on the Request for Consideration shall be called as the > first order of business for the agenda item that deals with the > motion. The vote on the Request for Consideration must be unanimous > (i.e., all Councilors or their proxies must vote and all votes cast > must be in favor of considering the motion at such GNSO Council > meeting) for the motion to be considered at such GNSO Council meeting. > > If these requirements are not met, the motion shall not be considered > submitted for the next Council meeting. For the avoidance of doubt, if > the motion is proposed again for a subsequent Council meeting, it > shall not be considered a resubmitted motion under the rules for > Resubmission of a Motion in these Operating Procedures. > > > 4.3.3 _Resubmission of a Motion_: If a motion has been > voted on by the GNSO Council and not adopted, that motion may > be resubmitted to the Council for consideration at a > subsequent meeting of the Council, subject to the following > criteria: > > > 1. _Explanation_: The Councilor submitting the motion > must also submit an explanation for the resubmission of the > motion. The explanation need not accompany the motion when it > is resubmitted; however, the explanation must be submitted no > later than the deadline for submitting the motion (_i.e._, no > later than 23h59 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) on the day > 10 calendar days before the Council meeting at which the > motion is to be reconsidered). The explanation does not need > to meet any requirements other than being submitted in a > timely manner. > > > 2. _Publication_: The text and explanation of the > resubmitted motion must be published (_i.e._, circulated to > the Council mailing list) no later than the deadline for > submitting the motion. > > > 3. _Second_: Upon the second resubmission of a motion > (_i.e._, the third time the same motion comes before the > Council), the motion must be seconded by a Councilor from each > house as a prerequisite for placing the resubmitted motion on > the consent agenda. > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. From AAikman at lrrlaw.com Fri Jun 19 20:07:58 2015 From: AAikman at lrrlaw.com (Aikman-Scalese, Anne) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 20:07:58 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 In-Reply-To: <6829B586-D525-45AE-8F04-669E88B172A5@isoc.be> References: <6829B586-D525-45AE-8F04-669E88B172A5@isoc.be> Message-ID: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B84D9AF@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Fantastic news Rudi - very helpful. Yesterday my plane had to make an emergency landing and for a few hours I thought I would not be able to make it before Saturday morning. Very good to know there will now be a Vice Chair in place. Will staff please advise the procedure for making this official - assuming there are no other volunteers? Anne [cid:image001.gif at 01D0AA90.F62A3C40] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com From: Rudi Vansnick [mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be] Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 7:59 AM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Cc: Terri Agnew; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org; gnso-secs at icann.org; Julie Hedlund Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 Importance: High Dear Anne, Dear all, As I did not see anyone volunteering for the vice-chair seat, I'm willing to jump in. Having finished a PDP WG, and ending my ISOC Board mandate, I'm having some more free time to make available for this task. See you all in BA. Best regards, Rudi Vansnick Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) www.npoc.org rudi.vansnick at npoc.org Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32 Op 16-jun.-2015, om 15:24 heeft Julie Hedlund > het volgende geschreven: Hi Anne, We have some language that had been previously suggested by Mary and which also is the language Amr retrieved prior to our meeting. I'm just checking to see if we want to make any changes to it before we (or Amr) send it to the list. Thanks, Julie From: , Anne > Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 2:14 PM To: Terri Agnew >, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" > Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 Hi everyone. I had understood that Amr and staff would be working together to put out a general e-mail asking whether there is a generally favorable view toward the issue of giving resubmitted motions the benefit of the 10 day waiver rule and that this general e-mail might include at least some old language drafted previously by Mary to spark our discussion for this Saturday morning's meeting at 7:45 am in the GNSO Council meeting room. Could staff please advise as to status of this effort? Thank you, Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Terri Agnew Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:05 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 Dear All, Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation meeting held on Thursday, 04 June 2015: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-04jun15-en.mp3 On page:http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#jun (transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page) Attendees: Anne Aikman Scalese - IPC - Primary - Chair Wolf-Ulrich Knoben - ISPCP - Primary Rudi Vansnick - NPOC - Primary Amr Elsadr - NCUC - Primary Avri Doria - NCSG - Primary Lori Schulman - IPC - Alternate Apologies: None ICANN Staff: Julie Hedlund Mary Wong Terri Agnew ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew Adobe Chat Transcript 04 June 2015 Terri Agnew:Dear all, welcome to the SCI call on the 4th June 2015 Lori Schulman:Where is the mute symbol? Terri Agnew:Lori your mic isn't active Lori Schulman:good. I have a bad habit of not muting. Amr Elsadr:I can hear you Anne. Terri Agnew:Lost audio, one moment rejoining Lori Schulman:Am I still disqualified? Are there ever exceptions? Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:is it the wish of anybody (eg council) that the resubmitted motion should benefit from the rule? Rudi Vansnick:quid if motion content/context is changed ? Amr Elsadr:http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg01201.html Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:sorry Anne, I overread it. It's now clear, thanks Amr Elsadr:This is the language Mary suggested adding to 3.3.2: "Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements in addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible for consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2." Rudi Vansnick:what's the feeling of the councils in this ? in favor ? Avri Doria:i think clarity was the issue. and the fact that some SCI members were unhappy with the way our last recommendation had left it. most were ok with it. Avri Doria:put after it haad been poked at enough and after the SCI asked the council to please make this an issue we could work on, we did. Mary Wong:Yes, per what Amr is saying - first question is whether 10-day waiver rule can/should apply to resubmitted motions Rudi Vansnick:if the 10-day waiver is applied, a resubmitted motion could indefinitely be resubmitted ? Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:@Mary, I thought that is the wish, so it should happen?? Rudi Vansnick:thanks Mary Mary Wong:@Anne, that works too - Chair's call :) Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: I don't think the 10-day waiver rule affects how many times a motion may be resubmitted. Julie Hedlund:@Amr and Rudi: I think whether a motion can be resubmitted is governed by the rules in 4.3.3. Amr Elsadr:@Anne: Correct. Amr Elsadr:Thanks Julie. Mary Wong:Yes, a fresh start Amr Elsadr:For some reason, I seem to be the only one who thinks we did actually talk a great deal about this. :) Avri Doria:Amr, you did talk about it a lot. But there weren't any great discussions. Rudi Vansnick:@Mary: +1 Avri Doria:thee were one or two people who kept bringing it up , but the discussion never stuck. Amr Elsadr:Greg engaged in this discussion quite a bit. Discussions took place both on-list and on calls, if I recall correctly. Mary Wong:@Amr, that's right - there was discussion but people seemed to have different ideas about what the agreed conclusion was. Amr Elsadr:@Anne: I'm sorry, could you clarify your concern again. Not sure I got it. Rudi Vansnick:perhaps we are now in a state where we need to finalize the direction Avri Doria:i'm ambivalent on this issue. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:staff should draft Avri Doria:i dont mind allowing them to draft, i am not sure about asking them to draft. Lori Schulman:There is no harm in starting drafting. We are not approving anything. Julie Hedlund:@Anne: That is correct. The next meeting is in Buenos Aires. Lori Schulman:I agree with Mary's point that a draft would be a starting point only and a good thing to react o. Lori Schulman:yes. agree. Julie Hedlund:@Anne: It is the 20th early in the morning. Mary Wong:The usual "happy" hour :) Rudi Vansnick:at 7am ? ;-) Amr Elsadr:@Mary: Happy hour isn't supposed to be all about coffee!! Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Saturday 7:45 Julie Hedlund:@Wolf-Ulright I think that's correct. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:GNSO starts at 9:00 Amr Elsadr:Am I not getting through? Terri Agnew:@Amr your audio is cutting out Amr Elsadr:The way I see it, both the request and the explanation should be provided. Mary Wong:@Amr, staff will send you something to review before sending to the list Amr Elsadr:@Mary: I'll dig up what I came up with and fwd it to you as well. Mary Wong:Gerat, thanks! Amr Elsadr:BTW..., I won't be in BA, but will participate in the SCI meeting remotely. Mary Wong:@Amr, so it's confirmed you can't come? :( Amr Elsadr:Have personal stuff I need to sort out at that time. Sorry I won't be there. Rudi Vansnick:thanks Anne for chairing this meeting Mary Wong:Sorry we won't see you Julie Hedlund:@Anne: Mary and I are drafting some slides. Julie Hedlund:We will send them to you to review. Amr Elsadr:Thanks Anne and all. Bye. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Thanks Anne and bye to all Anne Aikman-Scalese - IPC member:Thank you. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 3765 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From julie.hedlund at icann.org Fri Jun 19 21:21:43 2015 From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 21:21:43 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 In-Reply-To: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B84D9AF@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> References: <6829B586-D525-45AE-8F04-669E88B172A5@isoc.be> <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B84D9AF@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Message-ID: Anne, In the past we have discussed and confirmed Chair/Vice Chair nominations/volunteers during a meeting. So, we could put the position of the Vice Chair and Rudi's offer first on the agenda for Saturday's meeting, if you agree. Kind regards, Julie From: , Anne Date: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:07 PM To: 'Rudi Vansnick' Cc: Terri Agnew , "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" , "gnso-secs at icann.org" , Julie Hedlund Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 > Fantastic news Rudi ? very helpful. Yesterday my plane had to make an > emergency landing and for a few hours I thought I would not be able to make it > before Saturday morning. Very good to know there will now be a Vice Chair in > place. > > Will staff please advise the procedure for making this official ? assuming > there are no other volunteers? > > Anne > > Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel > Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | > One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 > (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 > AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com > > > > > From: Rudi Vansnick [mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be] > Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 7:59 AM > To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne > Cc: Terri Agnew; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org; gnso-secs at icann.org; Julie > Hedlund > Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 > June 2015 > Importance: High > > Dear Anne, > > Dear all, > > > > As I did not see anyone volunteering for the vice-chair seat, I?m willing to > jump in. Having finished a PDP WG, and ending my ISOC Board mandate, I?m > having some more free time to make available for this task. > > > > See you all in BA. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Rudi Vansnick > > Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) > > www.npoc.org > > > > rudi.vansnick at npoc.org > > Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 > > Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32 > > > > >> >> Op 16-jun.-2015, om 15:24 heeft Julie Hedlund het >> volgende geschreven: >> >> >> Hi Anne, >> >> >> >> We have some language that had been previously suggested by Mary and which >> also is the language Amr retrieved prior to our meeting. I'm just checking >> to see if we want to make any changes to it before we (or Amr) send it to the >> list. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Julie >> >> >> >> From: , Anne >> Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 2:14 PM >> To: Terri Agnew , "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" >> >> Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" >> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 >> June 2015 >> >> >>> >>> Hi everyone. I had understood that Amr and staff would be working together >>> to put out a general e-mail asking whether there is a generally favorable >>> view toward the issue of giving resubmitted motions the benefit of the 10 >>> day waiver rule and that this general e-mail might include at least some old >>> language drafted previously by Mary to spark our discussion for this >>> Saturday morning?s meeting at 7:45 am in the GNSO Council meeting room. >>> >>> >>> >>> Could staff please advise as to status of this effort? >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Anne >>> >>> >>> >>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel >>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | >>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 >>> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 >>> AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org >>> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Terri Agnew >>> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:05 PM >>> To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org >>> Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org >>> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June >>> 2015 >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements >>> Implementation meeting held on Thursday, 04 June 2015: >>> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-04jun15-en.mp3 >>> >>> On page:http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#jun >>> >>> (transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page) >>> >>> >>> >>> Attendees: >>> >>> Anne Aikman Scalese ? IPC ? Primary - Chair >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben ? ISPCP - Primary >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick ? NPOC - Primary >>> >>> Amr Elsadr ? NCUC - Primary >>> >>> Avri Doria ? NCSG ? Primary >>> >>> Lori Schulman ? IPC - Alternate >>> >>> >>> >>> Apologies: >>> >>> None >>> >>> >>> >>> ICANN Staff: >>> >>> Julie Hedlund >>> >>> Mary Wong >>> >>> Terri Agnew >>> >>> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** >>> >>> Let me know if you have any questions. >>> >>> Thank you. >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Terri Agnew >>> Adobe Chat Transcript 04 June 2015 >>> >>> Terri Agnew:Dear all, welcome to the SCI call on the 4th June 2015 >>> >>> Lori Schulman:Where is the mute symbol? >>> >>> Terri Agnew:Lori your mic isn't active >>> >>> Lori Schulman:good. I have a bad habit of not muting. >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:I can hear you Anne. >>> >>> Terri Agnew:Lost audio, one moment rejoining >>> >>> Lori Schulman:Am I still disqualified? Are there ever exceptions? >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:is it the wish of anybody (eg council) that the >>> resubmitted motion should benefit from the rule? >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick:quid if motion content/context is changed ? >>> >>> Amr >>> Elsadr:http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg01201.html >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:sorry Anne, I overread it. It's now clear, thanks >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:This is the language Mary suggested adding to 3.3.2: >>> "Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating >>> Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements in >>> addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible for >>> consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2." >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick:what's the feeling of the councils in this ? in favor ? >>> >>> Avri Doria:i think clarity was the issue. and the fact that some SCI >>> members were unhappy with the way our last recommendation had left it. most >>> were ok with it. >>> >>> Avri Doria:put after it haad been poked at enough and after the SCI asked >>> the council to please make this an issue we could work on, we did. >>> >>> Mary Wong:Yes, per what Amr is saying - first question is whether 10-day >>> waiver rule can/should apply to resubmitted motions >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick:if the 10-day waiver is applied, a resubmitted motion could >>> indefinitely be resubmitted ? >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:@Mary, I thought that is the wish, so it should >>> happen?? >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick:thanks Mary >>> >>> Mary Wong:@Anne, that works too - Chair's call :) >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: I don't think the 10-day waiver rule affects how many >>> times a motion may be resubmitted. >>> >>> Julie Hedlund:@Amr and Rudi: I think whether a motion can be resubmitted >>> is governed by the rules in 4.3.3. >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:@Anne: Correct. >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:Thanks Julie. >>> >>> Mary Wong:Yes, a fresh start >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:For some reason, I seem to be the only one who thinks we did >>> actually talk a great deal about this. :) >>> >>> Avri Doria:Amr, you did talk about it a lot. But there weren't any great >>> discussions. >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick:@Mary: +1 >>> >>> Avri Doria:thee were one or two people who kept bringing it up , but the >>> discussion never stuck. >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:Greg engaged in this discussion quite a bit. Discussions took >>> place both on-list and on calls, if I recall correctly. >>> >>> Mary Wong:@Amr, that's right - there was discussion but people seemed to >>> have different ideas about what the agreed conclusion was. >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:@Anne: I'm sorry, could you clarify your concern again. Not >>> sure I got it. >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick:perhaps we are now in a state where we need to finalize the >>> direction >>> >>> Avri Doria:i'm ambivalent on this issue. >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:staff should draft >>> >>> Avri Doria:i dont mind allowing them to draft, i am not sure about asking >>> them to draft. >>> >>> Lori Schulman:There is no harm in starting drafting. We are not approving >>> anything. >>> >>> Julie Hedlund:@Anne: That is correct. The next meeting is in Buenos >>> Aires. >>> >>> Lori Schulman:I agree with Mary's point that a draft would be a starting >>> point only and a good thing to react o. >>> >>> Lori Schulman:yes. agree. >>> >>> Julie Hedlund:@Anne: It is the 20th early in the morning. >>> >>> Mary Wong:The usual "happy" hour :) >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick:at 7am ? ;-) >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:@Mary: Happy hour isn't supposed to be all about coffee!! >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Saturday 7:45 >>> >>> Julie Hedlund:@Wolf-Ulright I think that's correct. >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:GNSO starts at 9:00 >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:Am I not getting through? >>> >>> Terri Agnew:@Amr your audio is cutting out >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:The way I see it, both the request and the explanation should >>> be provided. >>> >>> Mary Wong:@Amr, staff will send you something to review before sending to >>> the list >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:@Mary: I'll dig up what I came up with and fwd it to you as >>> well. >>> >>> Mary Wong:Gerat, thanks! >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:BTW..., I won't be in BA, but will participate in the SCI >>> meeting remotely. >>> >>> Mary Wong:@Amr, so it's confirmed you can't come? :( >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:Have personal stuff I need to sort out at that time. Sorry I >>> won't be there. >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick:thanks Anne for chairing this meeting >>> >>> Mary Wong:Sorry we won't see you >>> >>> Julie Hedlund:@Anne: Mary and I are drafting some slides. >>> >>> Julie Hedlund:We will send them to you to review. >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:Thanks Anne and all. Bye. >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Thanks Anne and bye to all >>> >>> Anne Aikman-Scalese - IPC member:Thank you. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the >>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this >>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or >>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended >>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or >>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you >>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by >>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any >>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and >>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the >>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the >>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this >>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or >>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended >>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or >>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you >>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by >>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any >>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and >>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the >>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 3765 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5041 bytes Desc: not available URL: From AAikman at lrrlaw.com Sat Jun 20 09:32:25 2015 From: AAikman at lrrlaw.com (Aikman-Scalese, Anne) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 09:32:25 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 In-Reply-To: References: <6829B586-D525-45AE-8F04-669E88B172A5@isoc.be> <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B84D9AF@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Message-ID: <3291ED54A36D36449ED57ED8CA77CFD9015B84E16F@lrodcmbx2.lrlaw.com> Absolutely - let's address this first. Anne [cid:image001.gif at 01D0AB01.57B0DCB0] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org] Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 2:22 PM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Rudi Vansnick' Cc: Terri Agnew; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org; gnso-secs at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 Anne, In the past we have discussed and confirmed Chair/Vice Chair nominations/volunteers during a meeting. So, we could put the position of the Vice Chair and Rudi's offer first on the agenda for Saturday's meeting, if you agree. Kind regards, Julie From: , Anne > Date: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:07 PM To: 'Rudi Vansnick' > Cc: Terri Agnew >, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" >, "gnso-secs at icann.org" >, Julie Hedlund > Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 Fantastic news Rudi - very helpful. Yesterday my plane had to make an emergency landing and for a few hours I thought I would not be able to make it before Saturday morning. Very good to know there will now be a Vice Chair in place. Will staff please advise the procedure for making this official - assuming there are no other volunteers? Anne [cid:image001.gif at 01D0AB01.57B0DCB0] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com From: Rudi Vansnick [mailto:rudi.vansnick at isoc.be] Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 7:59 AM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Cc: Terri Agnew; gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org; gnso-secs at icann.org; Julie Hedlund Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 Importance: High Dear Anne, Dear all, As I did not see anyone volunteering for the vice-chair seat, I'm willing to jump in. Having finished a PDP WG, and ending my ISOC Board mandate, I'm having some more free time to make available for this task. See you all in BA. Best regards, Rudi Vansnick Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) www.npoc.org rudi.vansnick at npoc.org Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32 Op 16-jun.-2015, om 15:24 heeft Julie Hedlund > het volgende geschreven: Hi Anne, We have some language that had been previously suggested by Mary and which also is the language Amr retrieved prior to our meeting. I'm just checking to see if we want to make any changes to it before we (or Amr) send it to the list. Thanks, Julie From: , Anne > Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 2:14 PM To: Terri Agnew >, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" > Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 Hi everyone. I had understood that Amr and staff would be working together to put out a general e-mail asking whether there is a generally favorable view toward the issue of giving resubmitted motions the benefit of the 10 day waiver rule and that this general e-mail might include at least some old language drafted previously by Mary to spark our discussion for this Saturday morning's meeting at 7:45 am in the GNSO Council meeting room. Could staff please advise as to status of this effort? Thank you, Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman at LRRLaw.com | www.LRRLaw.com From:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Terri Agnew Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:05 PM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Cc: gnso-secs at icann.org Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 Dear All, Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation meeting held on Thursday, 04 June 2015: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-04jun15-en.mp3 On page:http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#jun (transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page) Attendees: Anne Aikman Scalese - IPC - Primary - Chair Wolf-Ulrich Knoben - ISPCP - Primary Rudi Vansnick - NPOC - Primary Amr Elsadr - NCUC - Primary Avri Doria - NCSG - Primary Lori Schulman - IPC - Alternate Apologies: None ICANN Staff: Julie Hedlund Mary Wong Terri Agnew ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew Adobe Chat Transcript 04 June 2015 Terri Agnew:Dear all, welcome to the SCI call on the 4th June 2015 Lori Schulman:Where is the mute symbol? Terri Agnew:Lori your mic isn't active Lori Schulman:good. I have a bad habit of not muting. Amr Elsadr:I can hear you Anne. Terri Agnew:Lost audio, one moment rejoining Lori Schulman:Am I still disqualified? Are there ever exceptions? Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:is it the wish of anybody (eg council) that the resubmitted motion should benefit from the rule? Rudi Vansnick:quid if motion content/context is changed ? Amr Elsadr:http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg01201.html Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:sorry Anne, I overread it. It's now clear, thanks Amr Elsadr:This is the language Mary suggested adding to 3.3.2: "Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements in addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible for consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2." Rudi Vansnick:what's the feeling of the councils in this ? in favor ? Avri Doria:i think clarity was the issue. and the fact that some SCI members were unhappy with the way our last recommendation had left it. most were ok with it. Avri Doria:put after it haad been poked at enough and after the SCI asked the council to please make this an issue we could work on, we did. Mary Wong:Yes, per what Amr is saying - first question is whether 10-day waiver rule can/should apply to resubmitted motions Rudi Vansnick:if the 10-day waiver is applied, a resubmitted motion could indefinitely be resubmitted ? Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:@Mary, I thought that is the wish, so it should happen?? Rudi Vansnick:thanks Mary Mary Wong:@Anne, that works too - Chair's call :) Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: I don't think the 10-day waiver rule affects how many times a motion may be resubmitted. Julie Hedlund:@Amr and Rudi: I think whether a motion can be resubmitted is governed by the rules in 4.3.3. Amr Elsadr:@Anne: Correct. Amr Elsadr:Thanks Julie. Mary Wong:Yes, a fresh start Amr Elsadr:For some reason, I seem to be the only one who thinks we did actually talk a great deal about this. :) Avri Doria:Amr, you did talk about it a lot. But there weren't any great discussions. Rudi Vansnick:@Mary: +1 Avri Doria:thee were one or two people who kept bringing it up , but the discussion never stuck. Amr Elsadr:Greg engaged in this discussion quite a bit. Discussions took place both on-list and on calls, if I recall correctly. Mary Wong:@Amr, that's right - there was discussion but people seemed to have different ideas about what the agreed conclusion was. Amr Elsadr:@Anne: I'm sorry, could you clarify your concern again. Not sure I got it. Rudi Vansnick:perhaps we are now in a state where we need to finalize the direction Avri Doria:i'm ambivalent on this issue. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:staff should draft Avri Doria:i dont mind allowing them to draft, i am not sure about asking them to draft. Lori Schulman:There is no harm in starting drafting. We are not approving anything. Julie Hedlund:@Anne: That is correct. The next meeting is in Buenos Aires. Lori Schulman:I agree with Mary's point that a draft would be a starting point only and a good thing to react o. Lori Schulman:yes. agree. Julie Hedlund:@Anne: It is the 20th early in the morning. Mary Wong:The usual "happy" hour :) Rudi Vansnick:at 7am ? ;-) Amr Elsadr:@Mary: Happy hour isn't supposed to be all about coffee!! Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Saturday 7:45 Julie Hedlund:@Wolf-Ulright I think that's correct. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:GNSO starts at 9:00 Amr Elsadr:Am I not getting through? Terri Agnew:@Amr your audio is cutting out Amr Elsadr:The way I see it, both the request and the explanation should be provided. Mary Wong:@Amr, staff will send you something to review before sending to the list Amr Elsadr:@Mary: I'll dig up what I came up with and fwd it to you as well. Mary Wong:Gerat, thanks! Amr Elsadr:BTW..., I won't be in BA, but will participate in the SCI meeting remotely. Mary Wong:@Amr, so it's confirmed you can't come? :( Amr Elsadr:Have personal stuff I need to sort out at that time. Sorry I won't be there. Rudi Vansnick:thanks Anne for chairing this meeting Mary Wong:Sorry we won't see you Julie Hedlund:@Anne: Mary and I are drafting some slides. Julie Hedlund:We will send them to you to review. Amr Elsadr:Thanks Anne and all. Bye. Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Thanks Anne and bye to all Anne Aikman-Scalese - IPC member:Thank you. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 3765 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: From aelsadr at egyptig.org Sat Jun 20 11:10:02 2015 From: aelsadr at egyptig.org (Amr Elsadr) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 13:10:02 +0200 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: [ntfy-gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Dial in details for remote participation for the SCI meetings ICANN Meeting Buenos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Was wondering if there is a problem with the AC room for this meeting. There doesn?t seem to be a host for it, or the meeting hasn?t started. I don?t believe I have my timezone conversion mixed up. Thanks. Amr On Jun 18, 2015, at 10:12 PM, Glen de Saint G?ry wrote: > > > > Dear All > > Please find below the dial in details for the Standing Committee on Improvement Implementation Working Group meetings during the ICANN meeting in Buenos Aires > The meetings will be audio streamed, recorded and there will be a transcript available. For audio streaming please click on the link tothe AdobeConnect on the meeting node below. > > Saturday 20 June - Standing Committee on Improvement Implementation Working Group (Closed) > Room: Retiro B > 7:45 ? 8:45 > (10:45 ? 11:45UTC) > Audio Passcode: SCI AC room: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/standcommdraft/ > > Saturday 20 June? Update to the GNSO Council > http://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/sat-gnso-working > Room: Retiro B > 09:00 ? 09:15 > (12:00 ? 12:15 UTC) > Audio Passcode: UPDATE 1 > > > > Dial in numbers: > Country > > Toll Numbers > Freephone/ > Toll Free Number > ARGENTINA > > > > > > 0800-777-0519 > > AUSTRALIA > > ADELAIDE: > > 61-8-8121-4842 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > BRISBANE: > > 61-7-3102-0944 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > CANBERRA: > > 61-2-6100-1944 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > MELBOURNE: > > 61-3-9010-7713 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > PERTH: > > 61-8-9467-5223 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > SYDNEY: > > 61-2-8205-8129 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRIA > > > > 43-1-92-81-113 > > 0800-005-259 > > BELGIUM > > > > 32-2-400-9861 > > 0800-3-8795 > > BRAZIL > > > > 55-11-3958-0779 > > 0800-7610651 > > CHILE > > > > > > 1230-020-2863 > > CHINA > > CHINA A: > > 86-400-810-4789 > > 10800-712-1670 > > CHINA > > CHINA B: > > 86-400-810-4789 > > 10800-120-1670 > > COLOMBIA > > > > > > 01800-9-156474 > > CROATIA > > > > > > 080-08-06-309 > > CZECH REPUBLIC > > > > 420-2-25-98-56-64 > > 800-700-177 > > DENMARK > > > > 45-7014-0284 > > 8088-8324 > > ESTONIA > > > > > > 800-011-1093 > > FINLAND > > > > 358-9-5424-7162 > > 0-800-9-14610 > > FRANCE > > LYON: > > 33-4-26-69-12-85 > > 080-511-1496 > > FRANCE > > MARSEILLE: > > 33-4-86-06-00-85 > > 080-511-1496 > > FRANCE > > PARIS: > > 33-1-70-70-60-72 > > 080-511-1496 > > GERMANY > > > > 49-69-2222-20362 > > 0800-664-4247 > > GREECE > > > > 30-80-1-100-0687 > > 00800-12-7312 > > HONG KONG > > > > 852-3001-3863 > > 800-962-856 > > HUNGARY > > > > 36-1-700-8856 > > 06-800-12755 > > INDIA > > BANGALORE: > > 91-80-61275204 > > INDIA > > MUMBAI: > > 91-22-61501629 > > INDIA > > INDIA A: > > > > 000-800-852-1268 > > INDIA > > INDIA B: > > > > 000-800-001-6305 > > INDIA > > INDIA C: > > > > 1800-300-00491 > > INDONESIA > > > > > > 001-803-011-3982 > > IRELAND > > > > 353-1-246-7646 > > 1800-992-368 > > ISRAEL > > > > > > 1-80-9216162 > > ITALY > > MILAN: > > 39-02-3600-6007 > > 800-986-383 > > ITALY > > ROME: > > 39-06-8751-6018 > > 800-986-383 > > ITALY > > TORINO: > > 39-011-510-0118 > > 800-986-383 > > JAPAN > > OSAKA: > > 81-6-7878-2631 > > 0066-33-132439 > > JAPAN > > TOKYO: > > 81-3-6868-2631 > > 0066-33-132439 > > LATVIA > > > > > > 8000-3185 > > LUXEMBOURG > > > > 352-27-000-1364 > > 8002-9246 > > MALAYSIA > > > > > > 1-800-81-3065 > > MEXICO > > GUADALAJARA (JAL): > > 52-33-3208-7310 > > 001-866-376-9696 > > MEXICO > > MEXICO CITY: > > 52-55-5062-9110 > > 001-866-376-9696 > > MEXICO > > MONTERREY: > > 52-81-2482-0610 > > 001-866-376-9696 > > NETHERLANDS > > > > 31-20-718-8588 > > 0800-023-4378 > > NEW ZEALAND > > > > 64-9-970-4771 > > 0800-447-722 > > NORWAY > > > > 47-21-590-062 > > 800-15157 > > PANAMA > > > > > > 011-001-800-5072065 > > PERU > > > > > > 0800-53713 > > PHILIPPINES > > > > 63-2-858-3716 > > 1800-111-42453 > > POLAND > > > > > > 00-800-1212572 > > PORTUGAL > > > > > > 8008-14052 > > ROMANIA > > > > 40-31-630-01-79 > > RUSSIA > > > > > > 8-10-8002-0144011 > > SAUDI ARABIA > > > > > > 800-8-110087 > > SINGAPORE > > > > 65-6883-9230 > > 800-120-4663 > > SLOVAK REPUBLIC > > > > 421-2-322-422-25 > > 0800-002066 > > SOUTH AFRICA > > > > > > 080-09-80414 > > SOUTH KOREA > > > > 82-2-6744-1083 > > 00798-14800-7352 > > SPAIN > > > > 34-91-414-25-33 > > 800-300-053 > > SWEDEN > > > > 46-8-566-19-348 > > 0200-884-622 > > SWITZERLAND > > > > 41-44-580-6398 > > 0800-120-032 > > TAIWAN > > > > 886-2-2795-7379 > > 00801-137-797 > > THAILAND > > > > > > 001-800-1206-66056 > > TURKEY > > > > > > 00-800-151-0516 > > UNITED ARAB EMIRATES > > > > > > 8000-35702370 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > BIRMINGHAM: > > 44-121-210-9025 > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > GLASGOW: > > 44-141-202-3225 > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > LEEDS: > > 44-113-301-2125 > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > LONDON: > > 44-20-7108-6370 > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > MANCHESTER: > > 44-161-601-1425 > > 0808-238-6029 > > URUGUAY > > > > > > 000-413-598-3421 > > USA > > > > 1-517-345-9004 > > 866-692-5726 > > VENEZUELA > > > > > > 0800-1-00-3702 > From julie.hedlund at icann.org Sat Jun 20 11:06:47 2015 From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 11:06:47 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: [ntfy-gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Dial in details for remote participation for the SCI meetings ICANN Meeting Buenos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Amr, There is a different Adobe Connect room. It is the one from the SCI meeting page on the ICANN 53 meetings page. It is at: http://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/sat-sci. Thanks, Julie On 6/20/15 8:10 AM, "Amr Elsadr" wrote: > >Hi, > >Was wondering if there is a problem with the AC room for this meeting. >There doesn?t seem to be a host for it, or the meeting hasn?t started. I >don?t believe I have my timezone conversion mixed up. > >Thanks. > >Amr > >On Jun 18, 2015, at 10:12 PM, Glen de Saint G?ry wrote: > >> >> >> >> Dear All >> >> Please find below the dial in details for the Standing Committee on >>Improvement Implementation Working Group meetings during the ICANN >>meeting in Buenos Aires >> The meetings will be audio streamed, recorded and there will be a >>transcript available. For audio streaming please click on the link tothe >>AdobeConnect on the meeting node below. >> >> Saturday 20 June - Standing Committee on Improvement Implementation >>Working Group (Closed) >> Room: Retiro B >> 7:45 ? 8:45 >> (10:45 ? 11:45UTC) >> Audio Passcode: SCI AC room: >>http://icann.adobeconnect.com/standcommdraft/ >> >> Saturday 20 June? Update to the GNSO Council >> http://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/sat-gnso-working >> Room: Retiro B >> 09:00 ? 09:15 >> (12:00 ? 12:15 UTC) >> Audio Passcode: UPDATE 1 >> >> >> >> Dial in numbers: >> Country >> >> Toll Numbers >> Freephone/ >> Toll Free Number >> ARGENTINA >> >> >> >> >> >> 0800-777-0519 >> >> AUSTRALIA >> >> ADELAIDE: >> >> 61-8-8121-4842 >> >> 1-800-657-260 >> >> AUSTRALIA >> >> BRISBANE: >> >> 61-7-3102-0944 >> >> 1-800-657-260 >> >> AUSTRALIA >> >> CANBERRA: >> >> 61-2-6100-1944 >> >> 1-800-657-260 >> >> AUSTRALIA >> >> MELBOURNE: >> >> 61-3-9010-7713 >> >> 1-800-657-260 >> >> AUSTRALIA >> >> PERTH: >> >> 61-8-9467-5223 >> >> 1-800-657-260 >> >> AUSTRALIA >> >> SYDNEY: >> >> 61-2-8205-8129 >> >> 1-800-657-260 >> >> AUSTRIA >> >> >> >> 43-1-92-81-113 >> >> 0800-005-259 >> >> BELGIUM >> >> >> >> 32-2-400-9861 >> >> 0800-3-8795 >> >> BRAZIL >> >> >> >> 55-11-3958-0779 >> >> 0800-7610651 >> >> CHILE >> >> >> >> >> >> 1230-020-2863 >> >> CHINA >> >> CHINA A: >> >> 86-400-810-4789 >> >> 10800-712-1670 >> >> CHINA >> >> CHINA B: >> >> 86-400-810-4789 >> >> 10800-120-1670 >> >> COLOMBIA >> >> >> >> >> >> 01800-9-156474 >> >> CROATIA >> >> >> >> >> >> 080-08-06-309 >> >> CZECH REPUBLIC >> >> >> >> 420-2-25-98-56-64 >> >> 800-700-177 >> >> DENMARK >> >> >> >> 45-7014-0284 >> >> 8088-8324 >> >> ESTONIA >> >> >> >> >> >> 800-011-1093 >> >> FINLAND >> >> >> >> 358-9-5424-7162 >> >> 0-800-9-14610 >> >> FRANCE >> >> LYON: >> >> 33-4-26-69-12-85 >> >> 080-511-1496 >> >> FRANCE >> >> MARSEILLE: >> >> 33-4-86-06-00-85 >> >> 080-511-1496 >> >> FRANCE >> >> PARIS: >> >> 33-1-70-70-60-72 >> >> 080-511-1496 >> >> GERMANY >> >> >> >> 49-69-2222-20362 >> >> 0800-664-4247 >> >> GREECE >> >> >> >> 30-80-1-100-0687 >> >> 00800-12-7312 >> >> HONG KONG >> >> >> >> 852-3001-3863 >> >> 800-962-856 >> >> HUNGARY >> >> >> >> 36-1-700-8856 >> >> 06-800-12755 >> >> INDIA >> >> BANGALORE: >> >> 91-80-61275204 >> >> INDIA >> >> MUMBAI: >> >> 91-22-61501629 >> >> INDIA >> >> INDIA A: >> >> >> >> 000-800-852-1268 >> >> INDIA >> >> INDIA B: >> >> >> >> 000-800-001-6305 >> >> INDIA >> >> INDIA C: >> >> >> >> 1800-300-00491 >> >> INDONESIA >> >> >> >> >> >> 001-803-011-3982 >> >> IRELAND >> >> >> >> 353-1-246-7646 >> >> 1800-992-368 >> >> ISRAEL >> >> >> >> >> >> 1-80-9216162 >> >> ITALY >> >> MILAN: >> >> 39-02-3600-6007 >> >> 800-986-383 >> >> ITALY >> >> ROME: >> >> 39-06-8751-6018 >> >> 800-986-383 >> >> ITALY >> >> TORINO: >> >> 39-011-510-0118 >> >> 800-986-383 >> >> JAPAN >> >> OSAKA: >> >> 81-6-7878-2631 >> >> 0066-33-132439 >> >> JAPAN >> >> TOKYO: >> >> 81-3-6868-2631 >> >> 0066-33-132439 >> >> LATVIA >> >> >> >> >> >> 8000-3185 >> >> LUXEMBOURG >> >> >> >> 352-27-000-1364 >> >> 8002-9246 >> >> MALAYSIA >> >> >> >> >> >> 1-800-81-3065 >> >> MEXICO >> >> GUADALAJARA (JAL): >> >> 52-33-3208-7310 >> >> 001-866-376-9696 >> >> MEXICO >> >> MEXICO CITY: >> >> 52-55-5062-9110 >> >> 001-866-376-9696 >> >> MEXICO >> >> MONTERREY: >> >> 52-81-2482-0610 >> >> 001-866-376-9696 >> >> NETHERLANDS >> >> >> >> 31-20-718-8588 >> >> 0800-023-4378 >> >> NEW ZEALAND >> >> >> >> 64-9-970-4771 >> >> 0800-447-722 >> >> NORWAY >> >> >> >> 47-21-590-062 >> >> 800-15157 >> >> PANAMA >> >> >> >> >> >> 011-001-800-5072065 >> >> PERU >> >> >> >> >> >> 0800-53713 >> >> PHILIPPINES >> >> >> >> 63-2-858-3716 >> >> 1800-111-42453 >> >> POLAND >> >> >> >> >> >> 00-800-1212572 >> >> PORTUGAL >> >> >> >> >> >> 8008-14052 >> >> ROMANIA >> >> >> >> 40-31-630-01-79 >> >> RUSSIA >> >> >> >> >> >> 8-10-8002-0144011 >> >> SAUDI ARABIA >> >> >> >> >> >> 800-8-110087 >> >> SINGAPORE >> >> >> >> 65-6883-9230 >> >> 800-120-4663 >> >> SLOVAK REPUBLIC >> >> >> >> 421-2-322-422-25 >> >> 0800-002066 >> >> SOUTH AFRICA >> >> >> >> >> >> 080-09-80414 >> >> SOUTH KOREA >> >> >> >> 82-2-6744-1083 >> >> 00798-14800-7352 >> >> SPAIN >> >> >> >> 34-91-414-25-33 >> >> 800-300-053 >> >> SWEDEN >> >> >> >> 46-8-566-19-348 >> >> 0200-884-622 >> >> SWITZERLAND >> >> >> >> 41-44-580-6398 >> >> 0800-120-032 >> >> TAIWAN >> >> >> >> 886-2-2795-7379 >> >> 00801-137-797 >> >> THAILAND >> >> >> >> >> >> 001-800-1206-66056 >> >> TURKEY >> >> >> >> >> >> 00-800-151-0516 >> >> UNITED ARAB EMIRATES >> >> >> >> >> >> 8000-35702370 >> >> UNITED KINGDOM >> >> BIRMINGHAM: >> >> 44-121-210-9025 >> >> 0808-238-6029 >> >> UNITED KINGDOM >> >> GLASGOW: >> >> 44-141-202-3225 >> >> 0808-238-6029 >> >> UNITED KINGDOM >> >> LEEDS: >> >> 44-113-301-2125 >> >> 0808-238-6029 >> >> UNITED KINGDOM >> >> LONDON: >> >> 44-20-7108-6370 >> >> 0808-238-6029 >> >> UNITED KINGDOM >> >> MANCHESTER: >> >> 44-161-601-1425 >> >> 0808-238-6029 >> >> URUGUAY >> >> >> >> >> >> 000-413-598-3421 >> >> USA >> >> >> >> 1-517-345-9004 >> >> 866-692-5726 >> >> VENEZUELA >> >> >> >> >> >> 0800-1-00-3702 >> > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5041 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nathalie.peregrine at icann.org Sat Jun 20 11:08:36 2015 From: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org (Nathalie Peregrine) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 11:08:36 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: [gnso-secs] Re: [ntfy-gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Dial in details for remote participation for the SCI meetings ICANN Meeting Buenos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Amr, Please join here; https://icann.adobeconnect.com/eze53-retirob Thanks! On 6/20/15, 1:10 PM, "Amr Elsadr" wrote: > >Hi, > >Was wondering if there is a problem with the AC room for this meeting. >There doesn?t seem to be a host for it, or the meeting hasn?t started. I >don?t believe I have my timezone conversion mixed up. > >Thanks. > >Amr > >On Jun 18, 2015, at 10:12 PM, Glen de Saint G?ry wrote: > >> >> >> >> Dear All >> >> Please find below the dial in details for the Standing Committee on >>Improvement Implementation Working Group meetings during the ICANN >>meeting in Buenos Aires >> The meetings will be audio streamed, recorded and there will be a >>transcript available. For audio streaming please click on the link tothe >>AdobeConnect on the meeting node below. >> >> Saturday 20 June - Standing Committee on Improvement Implementation >>Working Group (Closed) >> Room: Retiro B >> 7:45 ? 8:45 >> (10:45 ? 11:45UTC) >> Audio Passcode: SCI AC room: >>http://icann.adobeconnect.com/standcommdraft/ >> >> Saturday 20 June? Update to the GNSO Council >> http://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/sat-gnso-working >> Room: Retiro B >> 09:00 ? 09:15 >> (12:00 ? 12:15 UTC) >> Audio Passcode: UPDATE 1 >> >> >> >> Dial in numbers: >> Country >> >> Toll Numbers >> Freephone/ >> Toll Free Number >> ARGENTINA >> >> >> >> >> >> 0800-777-0519 >> >> AUSTRALIA >> >> ADELAIDE: >> >> 61-8-8121-4842 >> >> 1-800-657-260 >> >> AUSTRALIA >> >> BRISBANE: >> >> 61-7-3102-0944 >> >> 1-800-657-260 >> >> AUSTRALIA >> >> CANBERRA: >> >> 61-2-6100-1944 >> >> 1-800-657-260 >> >> AUSTRALIA >> >> MELBOURNE: >> >> 61-3-9010-7713 >> >> 1-800-657-260 >> >> AUSTRALIA >> >> PERTH: >> >> 61-8-9467-5223 >> >> 1-800-657-260 >> >> AUSTRALIA >> >> SYDNEY: >> >> 61-2-8205-8129 >> >> 1-800-657-260 >> >> AUSTRIA >> >> >> >> 43-1-92-81-113 >> >> 0800-005-259 >> >> BELGIUM >> >> >> >> 32-2-400-9861 >> >> 0800-3-8795 >> >> BRAZIL >> >> >> >> 55-11-3958-0779 >> >> 0800-7610651 >> >> CHILE >> >> >> >> >> >> 1230-020-2863 >> >> CHINA >> >> CHINA A: >> >> 86-400-810-4789 >> >> 10800-712-1670 >> >> CHINA >> >> CHINA B: >> >> 86-400-810-4789 >> >> 10800-120-1670 >> >> COLOMBIA >> >> >> >> >> >> 01800-9-156474 >> >> CROATIA >> >> >> >> >> >> 080-08-06-309 >> >> CZECH REPUBLIC >> >> >> >> 420-2-25-98-56-64 >> >> 800-700-177 >> >> DENMARK >> >> >> >> 45-7014-0284 >> >> 8088-8324 >> >> ESTONIA >> >> >> >> >> >> 800-011-1093 >> >> FINLAND >> >> >> >> 358-9-5424-7162 >> >> 0-800-9-14610 >> >> FRANCE >> >> LYON: >> >> 33-4-26-69-12-85 >> >> 080-511-1496 >> >> FRANCE >> >> MARSEILLE: >> >> 33-4-86-06-00-85 >> >> 080-511-1496 >> >> FRANCE >> >> PARIS: >> >> 33-1-70-70-60-72 >> >> 080-511-1496 >> >> GERMANY >> >> >> >> 49-69-2222-20362 >> >> 0800-664-4247 >> >> GREECE >> >> >> >> 30-80-1-100-0687 >> >> 00800-12-7312 >> >> HONG KONG >> >> >> >> 852-3001-3863 >> >> 800-962-856 >> >> HUNGARY >> >> >> >> 36-1-700-8856 >> >> 06-800-12755 >> >> INDIA >> >> BANGALORE: >> >> 91-80-61275204 >> >> INDIA >> >> MUMBAI: >> >> 91-22-61501629 >> >> INDIA >> >> INDIA A: >> >> >> >> 000-800-852-1268 >> >> INDIA >> >> INDIA B: >> >> >> >> 000-800-001-6305 >> >> INDIA >> >> INDIA C: >> >> >> >> 1800-300-00491 >> >> INDONESIA >> >> >> >> >> >> 001-803-011-3982 >> >> IRELAND >> >> >> >> 353-1-246-7646 >> >> 1800-992-368 >> >> ISRAEL >> >> >> >> >> >> 1-80-9216162 >> >> ITALY >> >> MILAN: >> >> 39-02-3600-6007 >> >> 800-986-383 >> >> ITALY >> >> ROME: >> >> 39-06-8751-6018 >> >> 800-986-383 >> >> ITALY >> >> TORINO: >> >> 39-011-510-0118 >> >> 800-986-383 >> >> JAPAN >> >> OSAKA: >> >> 81-6-7878-2631 >> >> 0066-33-132439 >> >> JAPAN >> >> TOKYO: >> >> 81-3-6868-2631 >> >> 0066-33-132439 >> >> LATVIA >> >> >> >> >> >> 8000-3185 >> >> LUXEMBOURG >> >> >> >> 352-27-000-1364 >> >> 8002-9246 >> >> MALAYSIA >> >> >> >> >> >> 1-800-81-3065 >> >> MEXICO >> >> GUADALAJARA (JAL): >> >> 52-33-3208-7310 >> >> 001-866-376-9696 >> >> MEXICO >> >> MEXICO CITY: >> >> 52-55-5062-9110 >> >> 001-866-376-9696 >> >> MEXICO >> >> MONTERREY: >> >> 52-81-2482-0610 >> >> 001-866-376-9696 >> >> NETHERLANDS >> >> >> >> 31-20-718-8588 >> >> 0800-023-4378 >> >> NEW ZEALAND >> >> >> >> 64-9-970-4771 >> >> 0800-447-722 >> >> NORWAY >> >> >> >> 47-21-590-062 >> >> 800-15157 >> >> PANAMA >> >> >> >> >> >> 011-001-800-5072065 >> >> PERU >> >> >> >> >> >> 0800-53713 >> >> PHILIPPINES >> >> >> >> 63-2-858-3716 >> >> 1800-111-42453 >> >> POLAND >> >> >> >> >> >> 00-800-1212572 >> >> PORTUGAL >> >> >> >> >> >> 8008-14052 >> >> ROMANIA >> >> >> >> 40-31-630-01-79 >> >> RUSSIA >> >> >> >> >> >> 8-10-8002-0144011 >> >> SAUDI ARABIA >> >> >> >> >> >> 800-8-110087 >> >> SINGAPORE >> >> >> >> 65-6883-9230 >> >> 800-120-4663 >> >> SLOVAK REPUBLIC >> >> >> >> 421-2-322-422-25 >> >> 0800-002066 >> >> SOUTH AFRICA >> >> >> >> >> >> 080-09-80414 >> >> SOUTH KOREA >> >> >> >> 82-2-6744-1083 >> >> 00798-14800-7352 >> >> SPAIN >> >> >> >> 34-91-414-25-33 >> >> 800-300-053 >> >> SWEDEN >> >> >> >> 46-8-566-19-348 >> >> 0200-884-622 >> >> SWITZERLAND >> >> >> >> 41-44-580-6398 >> >> 0800-120-032 >> >> TAIWAN >> >> >> >> 886-2-2795-7379 >> >> 00801-137-797 >> >> THAILAND >> >> >> >> >> >> 001-800-1206-66056 >> >> TURKEY >> >> >> >> >> >> 00-800-151-0516 >> >> UNITED ARAB EMIRATES >> >> >> >> >> >> 8000-35702370 >> >> UNITED KINGDOM >> >> BIRMINGHAM: >> >> 44-121-210-9025 >> >> 0808-238-6029 >> >> UNITED KINGDOM >> >> GLASGOW: >> >> 44-141-202-3225 >> >> 0808-238-6029 >> >> UNITED KINGDOM >> >> LEEDS: >> >> 44-113-301-2125 >> >> 0808-238-6029 >> >> UNITED KINGDOM >> >> LONDON: >> >> 44-20-7108-6370 >> >> 0808-238-6029 >> >> UNITED KINGDOM >> >> MANCHESTER: >> >> 44-161-601-1425 >> >> 0808-238-6029 >> >> URUGUAY >> >> >> >> >> >> 000-413-598-3421 >> >> USA >> >> >> >> 1-517-345-9004 >> >> 866-692-5726 >> >> VENEZUELA >> >> >> >> >> >> 0800-1-00-3702 >> > >