From nathalie.peregrine at icann.org Thu Aug 11 12:16:51 2016 From: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org (Nathalie Peregrine) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 12:16:51 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Survey on Newcomer Tools In-Reply-To: References: <7F9B662A-215F-42E2-BEA5-A1A12FB06BE8@icann.org> <11A5DC54-BCC5-47FA-AC8A-2C4DA4D2CA91@icann.org> Message-ID: Dear ICANN Community member, We need your input to improve GNSO newcomer and training tools. GNSO Council has directed staff to develop a survey to assess the familiarity that the community has with the different newcomer and training tools as well as their perceived usefulness. Staff would kindly request that you complete the attached survey available here. Please provide your response by 11 September 2016. Should you have any further comments please do not hesitate to contact us. Kind regards, David Tait David A. Tait Policy Specialist (Solicitor qualified in Scotland) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Mobile: + 44-7864-793776 Email: david.tait at icann.org www.icann.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From julie.hedlund at icann.org Mon Aug 15 14:09:39 2016 From: julie.hedlund at icann.org (Julie Hedlund) Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 14:09:39 +0000 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Update re: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures Message-ID: Dear Amr and SCI members, Further to the message below, the Public Comment period ended on 14 August.? There were two comments ? one from the Registries Stakeholder Group and the other from the Business Constituency.? Both were in support of the proposed revisions.?? See the comments at: https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-op-procedures-05jul16/.? As both comments were positive, they do not necessitate any changes to the proposed revisions. ??Thus, staff will proceed as noted below and prepare the motion for approval of the revisions for the liaison to submit to the Council list not later than 22 August (the motion and document deadline for the GNSO Council?s meeting on 01 September). Staff also will post the public comment report on the public forum page and incorporate the revisions into the GNSO Operating Procedures so that they may be posted following the GNSO Council?s approval on 01 September, or as soon as possible thereafter. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: on behalf of Julie Hedlund Date: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 at 10:01 AM To: Amr Elsadr Cc: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" , "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: COMPLETED: Notification re: Consensus Call: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures Hi Amr, Here is the schedule: 1. Upon close of the Public Comment period on 14 August Staff will prepare Public Comment Report ? regardless of whether or not there are comments. Staff will be tracking to see if there are comments at any time during the Public Comment period and will forward them, if any, to the SCI as well as incorporate them into the report for the SCI?s consideration. The SCI will decide whether and/or how to address comments (if any). I will note that we seldom receive substantive comments on changes to the GNSO Operating Procedures. 2. Staff will prepare a motion for the approval of the revisions to the GNSO Operating Procedures for you, as Liaison, to send to the GNSO Council for consideration not later than the document and motion deadline for the 01 September GNSO Council meeting ? that is, by 22 August. 3. The GNSO Council will consider the motion at its meeting on 01 September and is expected to adopt the revisions. 4. The motion will direct staff to produce the revised GNSO Operating Procedures. Staff will prepare these in advance so that they can be posted immediately following the GNSO Council meeting, but not later than 02 September, when they will take effect. Staff briefed the GNSO Council on this schedule during its meeting in Helsinki and made it clear that the procedures will be in place in time to be applied for the next Chair/Vice Chair elections. Kind regards, Julie From: Amr Elsadr Date: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 at 9:13 AM To: Julie Hedlund Cc: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" , "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" Subject: Re: COMPLETED: Notification re: Consensus Call: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures Hi, Thanks for this Julie. I wasn?t aware that the public comment period has opened, but did recall that the plan was always to have this begin shortly following the Helsinki meeting. Also, if we could have a review of the foreseeable schedule for the approval/adoption of the proposed election procedures, that would be helpful. I know we had this conversation before, however, Anne?s request for confirmation is fair. Assuming there are no delays in adopting the proposed revisions, what kind of timeline are we looking at? Will there be a new version of the operating procedures published, and in use, before the next Council chair/v. chair elections? Thanks again. Amr On Jul 13, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Julie Hedlund wrote: Dear Anne, The public comment period started on 05 July and will go for the required minimum time of 40 days, closing on 14 August. See: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-op-procedures-2016-07-05-en. My apologies for not announcing this to the list. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 at 6:22 PM To: Julie Hedlund , "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" Cc: "'Amr Elsadr' (aelsadr at egyptig.org)" Subject: RE: COMPLETED: Notification re: Consensus Call: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures Hi Julie and all members, Wanted to ask Amr whether we are in line with GNSO to get this out for public comment. Want to make sure we have time to get that in and amend procedures before the next GNSO Council Election. Thank you, Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman at lrrc.com _____________________________ Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 7:06 AM To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] COMPLETED: Notification re: Consensus Call: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures Dear SCI members, No objections were received to the change below and included in the attached Word and PDF documents as of the deadline of COB Monday, 20 June. Thus, the proposed revisions are deemed accepted by Full Consensus. As requested, staff will proceed to initiate a Public Comment Forum following Helsinki. Staff also has conveyed to Amr the SCI?s request for him, as the GNSO Council Liaison, to provide a written update on the SCI?s activities to the GNSO Council. This is in lieu of a face-to-face update in Helsinki and does not affect the timing or ability of the SCI to initiate a public forum on the proposed revisions to the GNSO Operating Procedures. Staff will forward to the SCI any comments received in the Public Comment Forum as they come in and will prepare a summary of comments, if any. Staff also will prepare for the SCI?s review a draft motion adopting the proposed revisions for the GNSO Council to consider at its meeting on 01 September. Note: With respect to the Chair and Vice Chair election procedures, as discussed last week the SCI and staff have determined that if these revisions are adopted at the 01 September meeting they will be in place in time for the necessary steps to occur leading up to and including the election at the Annual General Meeting at ICANN 57, 3-9 November 2016. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: on behalf of Julie Hedlund Date: Monday, June 20, 2016 at 4:52 PM To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Notification re: Consensus Call: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures Dear SCI members, During last week?s meeting SCI members agreed with the minor grammatical change suggested by Amr and that this change should be notified to the SCI list. The change is included in the attached document, for clarity updated with today?s date, as follows: Change the final sentence in #3 to "Should a House fail to designate an interim Vice-Chair, the Designated Interim Vice-Chair from the other House will serve as an Interim Vice-Chair alone until a new Chair is conclusively elected." Change ?the House? to ?a House? and strikeout ?with the vacant Vice-Chair position?. If there are no objections received by TODAY COB Monday, 20 June, this change will be considered to be accepted. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: on behalf of Julie Hedlund Date: Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 3:59 PM To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Notification re: Consensus Call: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures Dear SCI members, During today?s meeting SCI members agreed with the minor grammatical change suggested by Amr and that this change should be notified to the SCI list. The change is included in the attached document, for clarity updated with today?s date, as follows: Change the final sentence in #3 to "Should a House fail to designate an interim Vice-Chair, the Designated Interim Vice-Chair from the other House will serve as an Interim Vice-Chair alone until a new Chair is conclusively elected." Change ?the House? to ?a House? and strikeout ?with the vacant Vice-Chair position?. If there are no objections received by COB Monday, 20 June, this change will be considered to be accepted. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: on behalf of Julie Hedlund Date: Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 1:20 PM To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Consensus Call Revised: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures Dear SCI members, As there were no objections to Amr?s suggested text, it has been included in the attached documents. In the redline version the previous text is shown as stricken and the new text is in brackets. In the clean document the suggested text replaces the previous text. I hope this is clear, but please let us know if you have any questions. The documents are attached in Word and PDF. Unless otherwise requested, the deadline will continue to be Thursday, 16 June for the close of the Consensus Call. Note that we also have a meeting at our usual time on that Thursday at 1800 UTC. If you have not received a calendar invite or notice, please alert the GNSO Secretariat at gnso-secs at icann.org. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Director, SSAC Support From: on behalf of Julie Hedlund Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 11:44 AM To: Amr Elsadr Cc: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org" Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Consensus Call: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures Many thanks Amr for this very helpful and constructive suggestion. Kind regards, Julie Sent from my iPhone On Jun 7, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote: Hi, I know this in not exactly standard practice, but I would like to offer what I believe to be a friendly amendment (can?t think of a better term right now) to the language we are asking our SGs/Cs to consider. Specifically, the last sentence in section 2.2.1 #3 reads: Should the House with the vacant Vice-Chair position fail to designate an interim Vice-Chair, the Designated Interim Vice-Chair from the other House will serve as an Interim Vice-Chair alone until a new Chair is conclusively elected. This sentence seems applicable to me in 2.2.1 #2, but not #3. If we?re dealing with scenario 3, then there are already no vice chairs available to serve on an interim basis from either House. I believe this sentence may better serve the purpose we intended if it were something more like this: ?Should one of the Houses fail to designate an interim Vice-Chair, the designated interim Vice-Chair from the other House will serve as an interim Vice-Chair alone until a new Chair is conclusively elected.? I hope this makes sense to folks. If there is agreement on this, perhaps we can ask for an amended document to circulate to our groups? Thanks, and apologies for not catching this sooner. Amr On Jun 2, 2016, at 11:21 PM, Julie Hedlund wrote: Dear SCI members, As agreed on the SCI call on 02 June, the attached document, CONSENSUS CALL-GNSO Operating Procedures Proposed Revision Chair-Vice-Chair Elections 02 June 2016, is being circulated for a formal Consensus Call. The document is the proposed revision to the GNSO Operating Procedures to include the new text relating to Chair and Vice Chair elections. The text includes the following suggested changes from today?s SCI call: 1. In Section 2.2 (2) delete the phrase "within the allotted time period" in the sentence ?Should the House with the vacant Vice-Chair position fail to appoint an interim Vice-Chair within the allotted time period, the continuing Vice-Chair from the other House will serve as an Interim Vice-Chair alone until a new Chair is conclusively elected.? Show the deletion in strikeout. 2. In Section 2.2 (3) delete the phrase "within the allotted time period" in the sentence ?Should the House with the vacant Vice-Chair position fail to designate an interim Vice-Chair within the allotted time period, the Designated Interim Vice-Chair from the other House will serve as an Interim Vice-Chair alone until a new Chair is conclusively elected.? Show the deletion in strikeout. 3. In Section 2.2 (4) insert the phrase ?within the allotted time period? after ?on an interim basis? in the sentence ?If both Houses should fail to temporarily fill the role of Vice Chair on an interim basis, the non-voting NCA will be designated the Interim Chair to oversee the Chair election and conduct Council business until such time as a Chair is conclusively elected.? Show the addition in brackets. Background: In its motion approved on 19 November 2015 the GNSO Council requested the SCI: 1. To review Sections 2.2(b), (f) and (g) of the GNSO Operating Procedures with respect to clarifying: (i) the eligibility of incoming Council members to run for the position of GNSO Chair; (ii) the start and end dates and the duration of the Chair and Vice-Chair terms in accordance with the ICANN Bylaws; and (iii) the timing of publication of the election results; and 2. To recommend a general time table for election of the GNSO Council Chair to be approved by the GNSO Council and added to the GNSO Operating Procedures. In December 2015 the SCI created Subteam B to discuss and draft possible new procedures. The Subteam members were: Anne Aikman-Scalese, Angie Graves, Wolf-Ulrich Knoben, and Sara Bockey. The Subteam submitted its recommendations to the SCI to consider at its meeting during ICANN 55 in Marrakech, Morocco on 05 March 2016. On 02 June the SCI discussed the draft revisions and asked staff to submit them to the SCI for a Consensus Call. If there are no objections or changes received in two weeks by Thursday 16 June, the language will be presumed to be accepted by Full Consensus. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4630 bytes Desc: not available URL: From aelsadr at egyptig.org Mon Aug 15 14:43:37 2016 From: aelsadr at egyptig.org (Amr Elsadr) Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:43:37 +0200 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Update re: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <48398AD3-2F77-4C94-A62B-7C34D67A11FE@egyptig.org> Hi, Thanks for this, Julie. If I?m not mistaken, this was the last public comment period held as a result of an SCI project. We don?t usually get any comments on this committee?s work, and I always assumed (at the risk of being wrong) that this was because the SCI has always shown great diligence in its recommendations to amendments in the operating procedures. Still?, I?m glad that we did get a couple this time, and that they?ve supported the work we?ve done without reservation, and on a topic that has caused quite a bit of controversy last October in Dublin. Well done, gang. I also wanted to point out ,of course, that these comments were in response to both SCI projects including the one concerning Council motions, not just the Chair and VC election procedures. I?m looking forward to submitting the motion for the Council to adopt the changes the SCI has recommended. Thanks. Amr > On Aug 15, 2016, at 4:09 PM, Julie Hedlund wrote: > > Dear Amr and SCI members, > > Further to the message below, the Public Comment period ended on 14 August. There were two comments ? one from the Registries Stakeholder Group and the other from the Business Constituency. Both were in support of the proposed revisions. See the comments at: https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-op-procedures-05jul16/ . As both comments were positive, they do not necessitate any changes to the proposed revisions. Thus, staff will proceed as noted below and prepare the motion for approval of the revisions for the liaison to submit to the Council list not later than 22 August (the motion and document deadline for the GNSO Council?s meeting on 01 September). > > Staff also will post the public comment report on the public forum page and incorporate the revisions into the GNSO Operating Procedures so that they may be posted following the GNSO Council?s approval on 01 September, or as soon as possible thereafter. > > Kind regards, > Julie > > Julie Hedlund, Policy Director > > From: > on behalf of Julie Hedlund > > Date: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 at 10:01 AM > To: Amr Elsadr > > Cc: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" >, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org " > > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: COMPLETED: Notification re: Consensus Call: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures > > Hi Amr, > > Here is the schedule: > > 1. Upon close of the Public Comment period on 14 August Staff will prepare Public Comment Report ? regardless of whether or not there are comments. Staff will be tracking to see if there are comments at any time during the Public Comment period and will forward them, if any, to the SCI as well as incorporate them into the report for the SCI?s consideration. The SCI will decide whether and/or how to address comments (if any). I will note that we seldom receive substantive comments on changes to the GNSO Operating Procedures. > 2. Staff will prepare a motion for the approval of the revisions to the GNSO Operating Procedures for you, as Liaison, to send to the GNSO Council for consideration not later than the document and motion deadline for the 01 September GNSO Council meeting ? that is, by 22 August. > 3. The GNSO Council will consider the motion at its meeting on 01 September and is expected to adopt the revisions. > 4. The motion will direct staff to produce the revised GNSO Operating Procedures. Staff will prepare these in advance so that they can be posted immediately following the GNSO Council meeting, but not later than 02 September, when they will take effect. > > Staff briefed the GNSO Council on this schedule during its meeting in Helsinki and made it clear that the procedures will be in place in time to be applied for the next Chair/Vice Chair elections. > > Kind regards, > Julie > > From: Amr Elsadr > > Date: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 at 9:13 AM > To: Julie Hedlund > > Cc: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" >, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org " > > Subject: Re: COMPLETED: Notification re: Consensus Call: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures > > Hi, > > Thanks for this Julie. I wasn?t aware that the public comment period has opened, but did recall that the plan was always to have this begin shortly following the Helsinki meeting. > > Also, if we could have a review of the foreseeable schedule for the approval/adoption of the proposed election procedures, that would be helpful. I know we had this conversation before, however, Anne?s request for confirmation is fair. Assuming there are no delays in adopting the proposed revisions, what kind of timeline are we looking at? Will there be a new version of the operating procedures published, and in use, before the next Council chair/v. chair elections? > > Thanks again. > > Amr > >> On Jul 13, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Julie Hedlund > wrote: >> >> Dear Anne, >> >> The public comment period started on 05 July and will go for the required minimum time of 40 days, closing on 14 August. See: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-op-procedures-2016-07-05-en . >> >> My apologies for not announcing this to the list. >> >> Kind regards, >> Julie >> >> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director >> >> From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" > >> Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 at 6:22 PM >> To: Julie Hedlund >, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org " > >> Cc: "'Amr Elsadr' (aelsadr at egyptig.org )" > >> Subject: RE: COMPLETED: Notification re: Consensus Call: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures >> >> Hi Julie and all members, >> Wanted to ask Amr whether we are in line with GNSO to get this out for public comment. Want to make sure we have time to get that in and amend procedures before the next GNSO Council Election. >> Thank you, >> Anne >> >> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese >> Of Counsel >> 520.629.4428 office >> 520.879.4725 fax >> AAikman at lrrc.com >> _____________________________ >> >> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP >> One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 >> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 >> lrrc.com >> >> From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org ] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund >> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 7:06 AM >> To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org >> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] COMPLETED: Notification re: Consensus Call: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures >> >> Dear SCI members, >> >> No objections were received to the change below and included in the attached Word and PDF documents as of the deadline of COB Monday, 20 June. Thus, the proposed revisions are deemed accepted by Full Consensus. >> >> As requested, staff will proceed to initiate a Public Comment Forum following Helsinki. Staff also has conveyed to Amr the SCI?s request for him, as the GNSO Council Liaison, to provide a written update on the SCI?s activities to the GNSO Council. This is in lieu of a face-to-face update in Helsinki and does not affect the timing or ability of the SCI to initiate a public forum on the proposed revisions to the GNSO Operating Procedures. >> >> Staff will forward to the SCI any comments received in the Public Comment Forum as they come in and will prepare a summary of comments, if any. Staff also will prepare for the SCI?s review a draft motion adopting the proposed revisions for the GNSO Council to consider at its meeting on 01 September. Note: With respect to the Chair and Vice Chair election procedures, as discussed last week the SCI and staff have determined that if these revisions are adopted at the 01 September meeting they will be in place in time for the necessary steps to occur leading up to and including the election at the Annual General Meeting at ICANN 57, 3-9 November 2016. >> >> Kind regards, >> Julie >> >> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director >> >> From: > on behalf of Julie Hedlund > >> Date: Monday, June 20, 2016 at 4:52 PM >> To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org " > >> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER Notification re: Consensus Call: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures >> >> Dear SCI members, >> >> During last week?s meeting SCI members agreed with the minor grammatical change suggested by Amr and that this change should be notified to the SCI list. The change is included in the attached document, for clarity updated with today?s date, as follows: >> >> Change the final sentence in #3 to "Should a House fail to designate an interim Vice-Chair, the Designated Interim Vice-Chair from the other House will serve as an Interim Vice-Chair alone until a new Chair is conclusively elected." Change ?the House? to ?a House? and strikeout ?with the vacant Vice-Chair position?. >> >> If there are no objections received by TODAY COB Monday, 20 June, this change will be considered to be accepted. >> >> Kind regards, >> Julie >> >> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director >> >> >> From: > on behalf of Julie Hedlund > >> Date: Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 3:59 PM >> To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org " > >> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Notification re: Consensus Call: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures >> >> Dear SCI members, >> >> During today?s meeting SCI members agreed with the minor grammatical change suggested by Amr and that this change should be notified to the SCI list. The change is included in the attached document, for clarity updated with today?s date, as follows: >> >> Change the final sentence in #3 to "Should a House fail to designate an interim Vice-Chair, the Designated Interim Vice-Chair from the other House will serve as an Interim Vice-Chair alone until a new Chair is conclusively elected." Change ?the House? to ?a House? and strikeout ?with the vacant Vice-Chair position?. >> >> If there are no objections received by COB Monday, 20 June, this change will be considered to be accepted. >> >> Kind regards, >> Julie >> >> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director >> >> From: > on behalf of Julie Hedlund > >> Date: Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 1:20 PM >> To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org " > >> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Consensus Call Revised: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures >> >> Dear SCI members, >> >> As there were no objections to Amr?s suggested text, it has been included in the attached documents. In the redline version the previous text is shown as stricken and the new text is in brackets. In the clean document the suggested text replaces the previous text. I hope this is clear, but please let us know if you have any questions. The documents are attached in Word and PDF. >> >> Unless otherwise requested, the deadline will continue to be Thursday, 16 June for the close of the Consensus Call. Note that we also have a meeting at our usual time on that Thursday at 1800 UTC. If you have not received a calendar invite or notice, please alert the GNSO Secretariat at gnso-secs at icann.org . >> >> Kind regards, >> Julie >> >> Julie Hedlund, Director, SSAC Support >> >> From: > on behalf of Julie Hedlund > >> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 11:44 AM >> To: Amr Elsadr > >> Cc: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org " > >> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Consensus Call: Chair & Vice Chair Election Procedures >> >> Many thanks Amr for this very helpful and constructive suggestion. >> >> Kind regards, >> Julie >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jun 7, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Amr Elsadr > wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I know this in not exactly standard practice, but I would like to offer what I believe to be a friendly amendment (can?t think of a better term right now) to the language we are asking our SGs/Cs to consider. >>> >>> Specifically, the last sentence in section 2.2.1 #3 reads: >>> >>>> Should the House with the vacant Vice-Chair position fail to designate an interim Vice-Chair, the Designated Interim Vice-Chair from the other House will serve as an Interim Vice-Chair alone until a new Chair is conclusively elected. >>> >>> This sentence seems applicable to me in 2.2.1 #2, but not #3. If we?re dealing with scenario 3, then there are already no vice chairs available to serve on an interim basis from either House. I believe this sentence may better serve the purpose we intended if it were something more like this: >>> >>> ?Should one of the Houses fail to designate an interim Vice-Chair, the designated interim Vice-Chair from the other House will serve as an interim Vice-Chair alone until a new Chair is conclusively elected.? >>> >>> I hope this makes sense to folks. If there is agreement on this, perhaps we can ask for an amended document to circulate to our groups? >>> >>> Thanks, and apologies for not catching this sooner. >>> >>> Amr >>> >>>> On Jun 2, 2016, at 11:21 PM, Julie Hedlund > wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear SCI members, >>>> >>>> As agreed on the SCI call on 02 June, the attached document, CONSENSUS CALL-GNSO Operating Procedures Proposed Revision Chair-Vice-Chair Elections 02 June 2016, is being circulated for a formal Consensus Call. The document is the proposed revision to the GNSO Operating Procedures to include the new text relating to Chair and Vice Chair elections. The text includes the following suggested changes from today?s SCI call: >>>> >>>> 1. In Section 2.2 (2) delete the phrase "within the allotted time period" in the sentence ?Should the House with the vacant Vice-Chair position fail to appoint an interim Vice-Chair within the allotted time period, the continuing Vice-Chair from the other House will serve as an Interim Vice-Chair alone until a new Chair is conclusively elected.? Show the deletion in strikeout. >>>> 2. In Section 2.2 (3) delete the phrase "within the allotted time period" in the sentence ?Should the House with the vacant Vice-Chair position fail to designate an interim Vice-Chair within the allotted time period, the Designated Interim Vice-Chair from the other House will serve as an Interim Vice-Chair alone until a new Chair is conclusively elected.? Show the deletion in strikeout. >>>> 3. In Section 2.2 (4) insert the phrase ?within the allotted time period? after ?on an interim basis? in the sentence ?If both Houses should fail to temporarily fill the role of Vice Chair on an interim basis, the non-voting NCA will be designated the Interim Chair to oversee the Chair election and conduct Council business until such time as a Chair is conclusively elected.? Show the addition in brackets. >>>> >>>> Background: >>>> In its motion approved on 19 November 2015 the GNSO Council requested the SCI: >>>> 1. To review Sections 2.2(b), (f) and (g) of the GNSO Operating Procedures with respect to clarifying: (i) the eligibility of incoming Council members to run for the position of GNSO Chair; (ii) the start and end dates and the duration of the Chair and Vice-Chair terms in accordance with the ICANN Bylaws; and (iii) the timing of publication of the election results; and >>>> 2. To recommend a general time table for election of the GNSO Council Chair to be approved by the GNSO Council and added to the GNSO Operating Procedures. >>>> In December 2015 the SCI created Subteam B to discuss and draft possible new procedures. The Subteam members were: Anne Aikman-Scalese, Angie Graves, Wolf-Ulrich Knoben, and Sara Bockey. >>>> The Subteam submitted its recommendations to the SCI to consider at its meeting during ICANN 55 in Marrakech, Morocco on 05 March 2016. >>>> On 02 June the SCI discussed the draft revisions and asked staff to submit them to the SCI for a Consensus Call. >>>> If there are no objections or changes received in two weeks by Thursday 16 June, the language will be presumed to be accepted by Full Consensus. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Julie >>>> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From aelsadr at egyptig.org Mon Aug 22 21:40:41 2016 From: aelsadr at egyptig.org (Amr Elsadr) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 23:40:41 +0200 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Fwd: [council] Motion for SCI Proposed Modifications Relating to Elections and Motions References: Message-ID: Hi, In my capacity as the Council liaison to the SCI, I sent this to the Council list a few days ago, and neglected to send a copy here. Thought you should all know. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks. Amr > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Amr Elsadr > Subject: Re: [council] Motion for SCI Proposed Modifications Relating to Elections and Motions > Date: August 16, 2016 at 3:43:40 PM GMT+2 > To: "GNSO Council List (council at gnso.icann.org)" > > Hi again, > > I?ve attached a revised motion to this email. Apart from making the changes recommended by Rubens. > > I?ve also taken the opportunity to follow up on a motion from the Council?s July 16th meeting disbanding the SCI following the completion of the two tasks addressed in this motion. So if the Council does vote in favour of this motion, I thought it?d make sense to officially disband the SCI in the process. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks. > > Amr > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Motion for Proposed Modifications to GNSO Operating Procedures Relating to Elections and Motions 16-08-16.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 18541 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- > >> On Aug 15, 2016, at 9:27 PM, Amr Elsadr wrote: >> >> >> Hi Rubens, >> >> I certainly consider this a friendly amendment to the motion, and not too clich? for my taste. :) >> >> Thanks. >> >> Amr >> >>> On Aug 15, 2016, at 9:09 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Em 15 de ago de 2016, ?(s) 16:11:000, Amr Elsadr escreveu: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> In my capacity as the Council liaison to the Standing Committee on Improvements, I am submitting this motion to adopt modifications to the GNSO Operating Procedures proposed by the SCI. These modifications involve both the process for GNSO Councillors to submit motions, in addition to the process to elect a GNSO Council Chair/Vice-Chair(s). >>>> >>>> As all SCI recommendations go, the SCI has achieved full consensus on these recommendations, and a public comment period on the proposed modifications was opened on July 2nd 2016, and closed on August 14th 2016 (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-op-procedures-2016-07-05-en). >>>> >>>> With the creation of the GNSO Review WG, these should be the final two projects the SCI will have worked on before it is standing-no-more, and I just wanted to say that working on this committee has been a pleasure. The SCI?s done some really solid work for the GNSO over the years, and its members have worked very well to give the GNSO Council recommendations that have been very diligently thought out. Both present and past members of the SCI have my gratitude. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> Amr >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Amr, >>> >>> Perhaps adding that gratitude to the motion would be in order ? I know it's a bit clich?, but in this case we mean it, I believe. >>> >>> >>> >>> Rubens >>> >>> >>> >> >> > From angie at webgroup.com Mon Aug 22 23:43:33 2016 From: angie at webgroup.com (Angie Graves) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 19:43:33 -0400 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Fwd: [council] Motion for SCI Proposed Modifications Relating to Elections and Motions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Amr, Will you please clarify the meaning of "officially disband the SCI"? Thank you, Angie On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Amr Elsadr wrote: > Hi, > > In my capacity as the Council liaison to the SCI, I sent this to the > Council list a few days ago, and neglected to send a copy here. Thought you > should all know. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. > > Thanks. > > Amr > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > From: Amr Elsadr > > Subject: Re: [council] Motion for SCI Proposed Modifications Relating to > Elections and Motions > > Date: August 16, 2016 at 3:43:40 PM GMT+2 > > To: "GNSO Council List (council at gnso.icann.org)" > > > > > Hi again, > > > > I?ve attached a revised motion to this email. Apart from making the > changes recommended by Rubens. > > > > I?ve also taken the opportunity to follow up on a motion from the > Council?s July 16th meeting disbanding the SCI following the completion of > the two tasks addressed in this motion. So if the Council does vote in > favour of this motion, I thought it?d make sense to officially disband the > SCI in the process. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Amr > > > > > > >> On Aug 15, 2016, at 9:27 PM, Amr Elsadr wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi Rubens, > >> > >> I certainly consider this a friendly amendment to the motion, and not > too clich? for my taste. :) > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Amr > >> > >>> On Aug 15, 2016, at 9:09 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Em 15 de ago de 2016, ?(s) 16:11:000, Amr Elsadr > escreveu: > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> In my capacity as the Council liaison to the Standing Committee on > Improvements, I am submitting this motion to adopt modifications to the > GNSO Operating Procedures proposed by the SCI. These modifications involve > both the process for GNSO Councillors to submit motions, in addition to the > process to elect a GNSO Council Chair/Vice-Chair(s). > >>>> > >>>> As all SCI recommendations go, the SCI has achieved full consensus on > these recommendations, and a public comment period on the proposed > modifications was opened on July 2nd 2016, and closed on August 14th 2016 ( > https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-op-procedures-2016-07-05-en). > >>>> > >>>> With the creation of the GNSO Review WG, these should be the final > two projects the SCI will have worked on before it is standing-no-more, and > I just wanted to say that working on this committee has been a pleasure. > The SCI?s done some really solid work for the GNSO over the years, and its > members have worked very well to give the GNSO Council recommendations that > have been very diligently thought out. Both present and past members of the > SCI have my gratitude. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks. > >>>> > >>>> Amr > >>>> > >>>> Relating to Elections and Motions 15-08-16.docx> > >>> > >>> Amr, > >>> > >>> Perhaps adding that gratitude to the motion would be in order ? I know > it's a bit clich?, but in this case we mean it, I believe. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Rubens > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From aelsadr at egyptig.org Tue Aug 23 14:49:58 2016 From: aelsadr at egyptig.org (Amr Elsadr) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:49:58 +0200 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] [council] Motion for SCI Proposed Modifications Relating to Elections and Motions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Angie, It means exactly what it appears to. If the GNSO Council adopts this motion on its September 1st meeting, then the SCI will officially cease to exist. Please note that the decision to disband the SCI will not actually take place on September 1st. The GNSO Council has already made this decision on its July 21st meeting, and will only effectively confirm that decision, or perhaps just activate the next steps. This action is also directly associated with the GNSO Council?s consideration of the motion to adopt the SCI?s recommendation on its latest (and last) two projects, which are now complete. For reference, please check the second resolved clause under the second motion here: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+21+July+2016. The only scenario I can think of, where the SCI continues to operate for a while is if the Council disagrees with something in the SCI?s recommendations, votes against the motion, and sends us some more work to do. However, I find this to be extremely unlikely. So this is really just follow-up to last month?s decision. Please let me know if you still have more questions. Thanks. Amr > On Aug 23, 2016, at 1:43 AM, Angie Graves wrote: > > Dear Amr, > > Will you please clarify the meaning of "officially disband the SCI"? > > Thank you, > > Angie > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Amr Elsadr > wrote: > Hi, > > In my capacity as the Council liaison to the SCI, I sent this to the Council list a few days ago, and neglected to send a copy here. Thought you should all know. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. > > Thanks. > > Amr > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > From: Amr Elsadr > > > Subject: Re: [council] Motion for SCI Proposed Modifications Relating to Elections and Motions > > Date: August 16, 2016 at 3:43:40 PM GMT+2 > > To: "GNSO Council List (council at gnso.icann.org )" > > > > > Hi again, > > > > I?ve attached a revised motion to this email. Apart from making the changes recommended by Rubens. > > > > I?ve also taken the opportunity to follow up on a motion from the Council?s July 16th meeting disbanding the SCI following the completion of the two tasks addressed in this motion. So if the Council does vote in favour of this motion, I thought it?d make sense to officially disband the SCI in the process. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Amr > > > > > > >> On Aug 15, 2016, at 9:27 PM, Amr Elsadr > wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi Rubens, > >> > >> I certainly consider this a friendly amendment to the motion, and not too clich? for my taste. :) > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Amr > >> > >>> On Aug 15, 2016, at 9:09 PM, Rubens Kuhl > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Em 15 de ago de 2016, ?(s) 16:11:000, Amr Elsadr > escreveu: > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> In my capacity as the Council liaison to the Standing Committee on Improvements, I am submitting this motion to adopt modifications to the GNSO Operating Procedures proposed by the SCI. These modifications involve both the process for GNSO Councillors to submit motions, in addition to the process to elect a GNSO Council Chair/Vice-Chair(s). > >>>> > >>>> As all SCI recommendations go, the SCI has achieved full consensus on these recommendations, and a public comment period on the proposed modifications was opened on July 2nd 2016, and closed on August 14th 2016 (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-op-procedures-2016-07-05-en ). > >>>> > >>>> With the creation of the GNSO Review WG, these should be the final two projects the SCI will have worked on before it is standing-no-more, and I just wanted to say that working on this committee has been a pleasure. The SCI?s done some really solid work for the GNSO over the years, and its members have worked very well to give the GNSO Council recommendations that have been very diligently thought out. Both present and past members of the SCI have my gratitude. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks. > >>>> > >>>> Amr > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> Amr, > >>> > >>> Perhaps adding that gratitude to the motion would be in order ? I know it's a bit clich?, but in this case we mean it, I believe. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Rubens > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From aelsadr at egyptig.org Tue Aug 30 20:57:29 2016 From: aelsadr at egyptig.org (Amr Elsadr) Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:57:29 +0200 Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] [council] Motion for SCI Proposed Modifications Relating to Elections and Motions In-Reply-To: <9A9B4207E6315F4080868F440D9CFC7A7310EEAC@ODCMBX01-1.firm.lrrlaw.com> References: <9A9B4207E6315F4080868F440D9CFC7A7310EEAC@ODCMBX01-1.firm.lrrlaw.com> Message-ID: <79D93F67-0BCD-412C-856C-5209BD0378AA@egyptig.org> Hi Anne, On its meeting of July 21 2016, the GNSO Council voted on a motion to adopt the charter of the GNSO Review Working Group. My understanding is that a Council discussion was held in Helsinki in preparation for the creation of this working group, and the adoption of its charter. This discussion included that the working group, which would work on implementing a number of recommendations made by Westlake (the independent examiner) following their review of the GNSO, would also assume the role that the SCI performs. This discussion resulted in this motion being adopted on July 21, where the decision was made by the GNSO Council to disband the SCI following the completion of its last two remaining tasks (procedures on submission of motions and Chair/V. Chair elections): please see resolved clause 2 of the 2nd motion here: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+21+July+2016. On July 27 2016, I sent an email to the SCI list informing the committee that this motion had passed (https://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg01801.html). I had also assumed that the Councillors of each of the stakeholder groups and constituencies of the GNSO discussed this with their respective groups prior to voting. I also forwarded a call for volunteers for the GNSO Review Working Group to the SCI list in hope that as many of the SCI members as possible would join the working group (https://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg01802.html). The format for this working group is slightly different to that which we are used to in the GNSO, in that it has voting members who are appointed by the GNSO SGs/Cs, as well as non-voting participants and observers similar to how they function in cross-community working groups. The NCSG hasn?t appointed its members to this WG yet, but we are actively working on it. Several of our members, however, have signed up as participants in the WG, including myself. There was an online sign-up sheet for those interested in becoming involved with this working group, and the announcement calling for volunteers for this WG indicated that the sign-up sheet would be online and open until August 19. If this has gone by unnoticed by enough members of this committee, and there is interest from SCI members who have not signed up to do so, then perhaps a request could be made to reopen the sign-up process for a while. I suggest that folks who would like to do so go back to your representatives on Council to get this done. This seems to be the most logical approach to me. You do bring up an interesting point though, Anne. The GNSO Review WG is not chartered to perform periodic reviews of the GNSO, which is the case for the SCI as you pointed out. That may be a bit of an oversight on the Council?s part, including myself in my capacity of Council liaison to the SCI. Still?, I don?t recall the SCI actually conducting a review of the GNSO during my time on this committee, but I was appointed to the SCI in 2013, and the committee was around for a couple of years before I joined it. Still?, I think it is pertinent to point this issue out to the GNSO Council during it meeting the day after tomorrow, and I will do that. Thanks for pointing it out to me, Anne. I am happy to continue the discussion on this list as well. Thanks again, Anne. Amr > On Aug 30, 2016, at 9:00 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote: > > Amr, > It doesn?t make sense to me that the SCI would be ?disbanded? and ?cease to exist? as you put it because this work was completed. The SCI Charter includes a periodic review of GNSO procedures and any other matter that the GSNO Council elects to refer to the SCI. > > On what basis have you concluded that GNSO Council intends to eliminate the SCI? > Anne > > Anne E. Aikman-Scalese > Of Counsel > 520.629.4428 office > 520.879.4725 fax > AAikman at lrrc.com > _____________________________ > > Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP > One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 > Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 > lrrc.com > > From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc at icann.org ] On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr > Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 7:50 AM > To: Angie Graves > Cc: > > Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] [council] Motion for SCI Proposed Modifications Relating to Elections and Motions > > Hi Angie, > > It means exactly what it appears to. If the GNSO Council adopts this motion on its September 1st meeting, then the SCI will officially cease to exist. > > Please note that the decision to disband the SCI will not actually take place on September 1st. The GNSO Council has already made this decision on its July 21st meeting, and will only effectively confirm that decision, or perhaps just activate the next steps. This action is also directly associated with the GNSO Council?s consideration of the motion to adopt the SCI?s recommendation on its latest (and last) two projects, which are now complete. For reference, please check the second resolved clause under the second motion here: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+21+July+2016 . > > The only scenario I can think of, where the SCI continues to operate for a while is if the Council disagrees with something in the SCI?s recommendations, votes against the motion, and sends us some more work to do. However, I find this to be extremely unlikely. > > So this is really just follow-up to last month?s decision. Please let me know if you still have more questions. > > Thanks. > > Amr > > On Aug 23, 2016, at 1:43 AM, Angie Graves > wrote: > > Dear Amr, > > Will you please clarify the meaning of "officially disband the SCI"? > > Thank you, > > Angie > > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Amr Elsadr > wrote: > Hi, > > In my capacity as the Council liaison to the SCI, I sent this to the Council list a few days ago, and neglected to send a copy here. Thought you should all know. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. > > Thanks. > > Amr > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > From: Amr Elsadr > > > Subject: Re: [council] Motion for SCI Proposed Modifications Relating to Elections and Motions > > Date: August 16, 2016 at 3:43:40 PM GMT+2 > > To: "GNSO Council List (council at gnso.icann.org )" > > > > > Hi again, > > > > I?ve attached a revised motion to this email. Apart from making the changes recommended by Rubens. > > > > I?ve also taken the opportunity to follow up on a motion from the Council?s July 16th meeting disbanding the SCI following the completion of the two tasks addressed in this motion. So if the Council does vote in favour of this motion, I thought it?d make sense to officially disband the SCI in the process. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Amr > > > > > > >> On Aug 15, 2016, at 9:27 PM, Amr Elsadr > wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi Rubens, > >> > >> I certainly consider this a friendly amendment to the motion, and not too clich? for my taste. :) > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Amr > >> > >>> On Aug 15, 2016, at 9:09 PM, Rubens Kuhl > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Em 15 de ago de 2016, ?(s) 16:11:000, Amr Elsadr > escreveu: > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> In my capacity as the Council liaison to the Standing Committee on Improvements, I am submitting this motion to adopt modifications to the GNSO Operating Procedures proposed by the SCI. These modifications involve both the process for GNSO Councillors to submit motions, in addition to the process to elect a GNSO Council Chair/Vice-Chair(s). > >>>> > >>>> As all SCI recommendations go, the SCI has achieved full consensus on these recommendations, and a public comment period on the proposed modifications was opened on July 2nd 2016, and closed on August 14th 2016 (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-op-procedures-2016-07-05-en ). > >>>> > >>>> With the creation of the GNSO Review WG, these should be the final two projects the SCI will have worked on before it is standing-no-more, and I just wanted to say that working on this committee has been a pleasure. The SCI?s done some really solid work for the GNSO over the years, and its members have worked very well to give the GNSO Council recommendations that have been very diligently thought out. Both present and past members of the SCI have my gratitude. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks. > >>>> > >>>> Amr > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> Amr, > >>> > >>> Perhaps adding that gratitude to the motion would be in order ? I know it's a bit clich?, but in this case we mean it, I believe. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Rubens > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ?2510-2521. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: