<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=us-ascii" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19222"></HEAD>
<BODY
style="FONT-FAMILY: Calibri, sans-serif; WORD-WRAP: break-word; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 14px; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space">
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=011315415-19062012><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>Personally my first reaction would be: we should handle it
practically and with flexibility. Don't start amending the rules unless it
is imperative.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=011315415-19062012><FONT color=#0000ff size=2
face=Arial>Flexibility could mean that the SCI</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=011315415-19062012><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial>- for
a certain period of time (eg 1 year) monitors how many issues are raised by
individuals/groups not covered by the charter. In case it exceeds a certain
volume of requests (depending on the workload) the SCI may strictly return to
the rules as written and not accept further requests from
outside</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=011315415-19062012><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial>- for
the a.m. period of time the SCI may discuss all issues raised and make
recommendations/suggestions re the issues in scope</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=011315415-19062012><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial>- re
Evan's SOI related issue I recall - if I'm right - that he was questioning the
sense of some of the points asked for in the SOI. I think we should first find
out whether his issue was more ALAC specific than relevant to the
GNSO</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=011315415-19062012><FONT color=#0000ff size=2
face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=011315415-19062012><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial>What
do others mean?</FONT></SPAN></DIV><!-- Converted from text/rtf format --><BR>
<P><SPAN lang=de><FONT size=2 face="Courier New">Best regards</FONT></SPAN>
<BR><SPAN lang=de><FONT size=2 face="Courier New">Wolf-Ulrich</FONT></SPAN> </P>
<DIV> </DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=de class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT size=2 face=Tahoma><B>Von:</B> Marika Konings
[mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] <BR><B>Gesendet:</B> Montag, 18. Juni 2012
14:47<BR><B>An:</B> Avri Doria; Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich<BR><B>Betreff:</B> FW:
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting agenda<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Hi Wolf, Avri,</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Under AOB, you might also want to cover the update to the GNSO Council
which is scheduled for Prague. In addition to getting clarification on who
should be responsible for putting out SCI recommendations for public comments
(also of relevance in relation to the item on consensus items), there is also
this issue with regard to who may raise issues with the SCI. As you may
recall, Evan Leibovitch raised a suggestion with regard to the SOI. There may
be other questions / suggestions that individuals may make in the future
relating to GNSO Improvements topics. However, the SCI charter says 'requests
can be made by either the GNSO Council or a group chartered by the GNSO
Council'. Should individual requests be directed to the GNSO Council for
referral, or should there be another mechanism? It might be good to get
clarification on this as well so it can be made clear to those that have
proposals / questions.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>With best regards,</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Marika</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><SPAN id=OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION>
<DIV
style="BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; TEXT-ALIGN: left; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 11pt; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From: </SPAN>"<A
href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</A>" <<A
href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</A>><BR><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To: </SPAN>"<A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>"
<<A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>><BR><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject: </SPAN>[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting
agenda<BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<META name=Generator content="Microsoft Exchange Server"><!-- converted from rtf -->
<STYLE><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></STYLE>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial,sans-serif>
<DIV>All:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>this is the suggested agenda for the <B>SCI call on Monday June 18, 13:00
UTC</B>:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>- Roll call</DIV>
<DIV>- Statement of Interests</DIV>
<DIV>- Approval of the agenda</DIV>
<DIV>- Background information (and suggested solutions) on</DIV>
<DIV> - <FONT size=3
face="Times New Roman,serif">Deferral of Motions</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3
face="Times New Roman,serif"> <FONT
size=2 face=Arial,sans-serif>- </FONT>Proxy Voting Procedure</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3
face="Times New Roman,serif"> <FONT
size=2 face=Arial,sans-serif>- </FONT>Voting Thresholds for Delaying a
PDP</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3 face="Times New Roman,serif">- Consensus items: <FONT size=2
face=Arial,sans-serif>GNSO Council Voting Results Table, Consent
Agenda</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>- AOB: next meeting, F2F in Prague?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Courier New,monospace">Best regards</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Courier New,monospace">Wolf-Ulrich </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Courier New,monospace"></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></FONT></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></SPAN></BODY></HTML>