<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><div>All,</div><div><br></div><div>Here are the actions and notes from today's SCI call. Our next meeting will be in two weeks on 15 November 2012. A meeting notice will ben sent in advance of the meeting.</div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div>Julie</div><div><br></div><div>Julie Hedlund, Policy Director</div><div><br></div><div><b>Actions:</b></div><div>Julie Hedlund: 1) send around the options on Raising an Issue for a last call for comments — provide a 1-week response</div><div>James Bladel and Jennifer Standiford: Review the draft survey and provide comments by the end of the week.</div><div><br></div><div><b>Agenda/Notes:</b></div><div><br></div><div><div>1. Roll call</div><div><br></div><div>2. Statement of Interests — None</div><div><br></div><div>3. Approval of the agenda -- Approved</div><div><br></div><div>4. Chair and Vice Chair election -- Wolf-Ulrich: Re chair and VC election I suggest the following process in accordance with what we've done last time:</div><div>1. Nomination of candidates from the membership</div><div>2. In case of more than 1 nominee for each position election should be held by balloting.</div><div>Also, we are facing new membership on the SCI because we have new Council members. Asked the new NCAs asking about representation. Jennifer volunteered. I am waiting for responses from others. Also, asked Mary re: the NSUC on the SCI. James: Is there a deadline for selecting the Chair and Vice Chair? Wolf-Ulrich: There is nothing in the charter about new Chairs/Vice Chairs.</div><div><br></div><div>5. Deferral of Motions — updated response circulated by J. Scott — This item is deferred to the next meeting since there were only 4 SCI members on the call.</div><div><br></div><div>6. Update on Public Comments on Changes to the PDP Manual for Suspension of a PDP -- Julie Hedlund: Opened 22 Oct/Close 12 Nov. If comments reply period 13 Nov/Close 03 Dec.</div><div><br></div><div>7. Raising an issue — Seems to be support for option nr 1: maintain status quo — Wolf-Ulrich: Send again to the SCI members as a last call. Responses in two weeks.</div><div><br></div><div>8. Status update on Working Group survey -- Wolf-Ulrich: Number 4 and 5 -- question about scaling -- will we have other categories in the scale? Julie: These could be easily standardized. Wolf-Ulrich — there shouldn't be too many categories in the scale. Ray — Registry SG thought the survey was good in general (not a consensus position). James: Jennifer and I can review by the end of the week. Julie: Staff can create a Zoomerang survey as a trial and the ITRP Part C WG could try it out. James: Registrars and IRTP Part C group could try the survey and they could do it in a week. </div><div><br></div><div>9. AOB — None</div><div><br></div></div><div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></body></html>