<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19328"></HEAD>
<BODY
style="FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif; WORD-WRAP: break-word; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 14px">
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=588120315-13122012><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>All,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=588120315-13122012><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=588120315-13122012><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>from the list I did not understand a clear objection against
sending the draft motion to the council with the option of withdrawing it if
there can't be found SCI consensus. So I took this responsibility and did it to
preserve this chance.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=588120315-13122012><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=588120315-13122012><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>I'd like to encourage all of us to continue working at a
solution re the footnote. 2 suggestions are at the table:</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<OL dir=ltr>
<LI>
<DIV align=left><SPAN class=588120315-13122012>
<P style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt" class=MsoFootnoteText><SPAN lang=EN-US><FONT
face=Arial><FONT size=2><SPAN
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-bidi-font-style: italic">Suspension is
a STATED time interval during which there is a temporary cessation of the PDP,
i.e. all activities are halted upon a decision of the GNSO Council
</SPAN><S><SPAN style="mso-bidi-font-weight: bold">until further
notice</SPAN></S><SPAN
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-bidi-font-style: italic">. A mere
change in milestones or schedule of the PDP is not considered a
suspension.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></P></SPAN></DIV></LI>
<LI>
<DIV align=left><SPAN class=588120315-13122012><SPAN lang=EN-US><SPAN
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-bidi-font-style: italic"></SPAN><?xml:namespace
prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: Calibri, sans-serif; FONT-SIZE: 14px"><FONT
face=Arial><FONT size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Calibri; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: medium"
class=Apple-style-span>Suspension is a STATED </SPAN><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Calibri; FONT-SIZE: medium" class=Apple-style-span>time
interval during which there is a temporary cessation of the PDP, i.e. all
activities are halted upon a decision of the GNSO Council, <FONT
class=Apple-style-span color=#ff0000>subject to ICANN Board review in those
cases where the Board has requested GNSO input</FONT>. A mere change in
milestones or schedule of the PDP is not considered a
suspension.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV></o:p></SPAN></SPAN></DIV></LI></OL>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN class=588120315-13122012>Please
comment.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=588120315-13122012></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN class=588120315-13122012>I wonder what how to
proceed if there will be no consensus found at thew time being. On the one hand
I've got the impression that a majority would be satisfied with suggestion #1
but also open to find a solution which doesn't cause the need for another public
comment period.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN class=588120315-13122012>In case of no
consensus we could also - as we did with other items discussed at the SCI -
report to the council where we are, that there has been a public comment period
successfully finished, but there are still concerns which would prevent the SCI
from consensus. The council may then decide how to deal with the (publicly
commented) text.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=588120315-13122012></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN class=588120315-13122012>I would be thankful
hearing your assessment on and under which conditions consensus could still be
achieved.</SPAN></FONT></DIV><!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
<P><SPAN lang=de><FONT size=2 face="Courier New">Best regards</FONT></SPAN>
<BR><SPAN lang=de><FONT size=2 face="Courier New">Wolf-Ulrich
</FONT></SPAN></P><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=de class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT size=2 face=Tahoma><B>Von:</B> Aikman-Scalese, Anne
[mailto:AAikman@lrlaw.com] <BR><B>Gesendet:</B> Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2012
03:13<BR><B>An:</B> gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org; Knoben,
Wolf-Ulrich<BR><B>Betreff:</B> RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Suspending a
PDP--Proposed Revised Footnote<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 11pt">I
do not believe that this "negative response" mechanism is in accordance with
the full consensus process. I also believe I spoke against this at the last
reading. Anne<BR><BR>Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown
(www.nitrodesk.com)<BR><BR><SPAN style="COLOR: black">-----Original
Message----- <BR><B>From:</B> KnobenW@telekom.de
[KnobenW@telekom.de]<BR><B>Received:</B> Wednesday, 12 Dec 2012,
5:06am<BR><B>To:</B> gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org]<BR><B>Subject:</B> [gnso-improvem-impl-sc]
Suspending a PDP--Proposed Revised Footnote<BR><BR></SPAN></SPAN>
<DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=811415711-12122012>All,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT color=#0000ff size=2
face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left>
<DIV><SPAN class=164322211-12122012><FONT face=Arial><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=811415711-12122012>p</SPAN>er its charter, the SCI is expected to take
decisions using a 'full consensus' process ("when no one in the group speaks
against the recommendation in its last readings").</FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=164322211-12122012></SPAN><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=164322211-12122012>Obviously it would be ideal if all members support a
certain position.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=164322211-12122012></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><FONT size=2><SPAN class=164322211-12122012>It
would <SPAN class=811415711-12122012>also </SPAN>be ideal if we find
consensus today which is the deadline for motions before the next counciil
meeting. But in order to reduce time pressure I could imagine the option to
s</SPAN><SPAN class=164322211-12122012>ubmit the <SPAN
class=164322211-12122012>draft </SPAN>motion<SPAN class=164322211-12122012>
today</SPAN>, noting that there are some issues that are still being discussed
by the SCI which may result in withdrawal of the motion and agenda item if no
agreement can be found.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=164322211-12122012><FONT size=2
face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=164322211-12122012><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=811415711-12122012><STRONG>If there is no objection I'll do so
accordingly at the end of the day.</STRONG></SPAN></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=164322211-12122012><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=811415711-12122012></SPAN></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=164322211-12122012><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Thanks for this
valuable discussion and for your understanding.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=164322211-12122012><FONT size=2
face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=164322211-12122012><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Best
regards</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=164322211-12122012><FONT size=2
face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=164322211-12122012><FONT size=2
face=Arial>Wolf-Ulrich</FONT></SPAN></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr>
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif; FONT-SIZE: 14px"><STRONG><FONT
color=#999999 size=1 face=Arial></FONT></STRONG><BR></DIV><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif; FONT-SIZE: 14px"
id=OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION>
<DIV
style="BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; TEXT-ALIGN: left; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 11pt; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From: </SPAN>Julie Hedlund <<A
href="mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org">julie.hedlund@icann.org</A>><BR><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To: </SPAN>Alain Berranger <<A
href="mailto:alain.berranger@gmail.com">alain.berranger@gmail.com</A>>,
"<A href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</A>" <<A
href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</A>><BR><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Cc: </SPAN>"<A
href="mailto:AAikman@lrlaw.com">AAikman@lrlaw.com</A>" <<A
href="mailto:AAikman@lrlaw.com">AAikman@lrlaw.com</A>>, "<A
href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</A>" <<A
href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</A>>, "<A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>"
<<A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>><BR><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject: </SPAN>Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR
REVIEW: Suspending a PDP--Proposed Revised Footnote<BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif; WORD-WRAP: break-word; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 14px">
<DIV>Alain,</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>One consideration is that if we add that language it is a substantive
change from the original footnote text. The previous suggestion —
adding the word "stated" and deleting "until further notice" --- was
deemed by the SCI to be a minor clarification and thus didn't require us
to open a Public Comment Forum on new language. As discussed during
last Thursday's meeting, any substantive change to the text that was
presented in the public comment period that just ended on 03 December
would require that the revised text go out for public comment again at a
minimum of 21 days. Staff pointed out that with the holiday we would
probably need a longer period, perhaps 30 days.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>With best regards,</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Julie</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Julie Hedlund, Policy Director</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><SPAN id=OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION>
<DIV
style="BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; TEXT-ALIGN: left; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 11pt; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt"><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From: </SPAN>Alain Berranger <<A
href="mailto:alain.berranger@gmail.com">alain.berranger@gmail.com</A>><BR><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Date: </SPAN>Tuesday, December 11, 2012 3:41
PM<BR><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To: </SPAN>Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <<A
href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</A>><BR><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Cc: </SPAN>"<A
href="mailto:AAikman@lrlaw.com">AAikman@lrlaw.com</A>" <<A
href="mailto:AAikman@lrlaw.com">AAikman@lrlaw.com</A>>, "<A
href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</A>" <<A
href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</A>>, "<A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>"
<<A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>><BR><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject: </SPAN>Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR
REVIEW: Suspending a PDP--Proposed Revised Footnote<BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>Can we simply insert that: ... when judged necessary by the Council,
the GNSO Chair can clarify with the Board any required change
in scope, timing, and priority...
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Alain<BR><BR>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:27 PM, <SPAN
dir=ltr><<A href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de"
target=_blank>KnobenW@telekom.de</A>></SPAN> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex"
class=gmail_quote><BR>We all stick to find consensus. I didn't want to
suppress any discussion, just bring it to the point.<BR><BR>First the
wording must be accepted by all of us, then the procedure should be
agreed.<BR><BR>Anne, do you have a suggestion for the wording which
could incorporate the concern? Or do others have?<BR>
<DIV class=im><BR><BR>Best
regards<BR>Wolf-Ulrich<BR><BR><BR>-----Ursprüngliche
Nachricht-----<BR></DIV>Von: <A
href="mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>
[mailto:<A
href="mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>]
Im Auftrag von Aikman-Scalese, Anne<BR>Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Dezember
2012 17:45<BR>An: 'Avri Doria'; <A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A><BR>
<DIV class=HOEnZb>
<DIV class=h5>Betreff: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW:
Suspending a PDP--Proposed Revised Footnote<BR><BR><BR>Avri, thanks for
sticking up for the process of consensus. I don't think we are
unanimous.<BR>Anne<BR><BR><BR>Anne E. Aikman-Scalese<BR>Of
Counsel<BR>Lewis and Roca LLP . Suite 700<BR>One South Church Avenue .
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611<BR>Tel <A href="tel:%28520%29%20629-4428"
value="+15206294428">(520) 629-4428</A> . Fax <A
href="tel:%28520%29%20879-4725" value="+15208794725">(520)
879-4725</A><BR><A href="mailto:AAikman@LRLaw.com">AAikman@LRLaw.com</A>
. <A href="http://www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman"
target=_blank>www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman</A><BR>P Please consider the
environment before printing this e-mail.<BR>This e-mail contains legally
privileged and confidential information<BR>intended only for the
individual or entity named within the message.<BR>If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, or the<BR>agent responsible to
deliver it to the intended recipient, you are<BR>hereby notified that
any review, dissemination, distribution or<BR>copying of this
communication is prohibited. If this communication<BR>was received
in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original
message.<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: <A
href="mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>
[mailto:<A
href="mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria<BR>Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 9:39
AM<BR>To: <A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A><BR>Subject:
Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Suspending a PDP--Proposed
Revised Footnote<BR><BR><BR>Hi,<BR><BR>Are we unanimous on this issue?
I had the impression Anne was still
concerned.<BR><BR>avri<BR><BR>On 11 Dec 2012, at 14:28, <<A
href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</A>> <<A
href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</A>>
wrote:<BR><BR>> Thanks Marika for clarification.<BR>><BR>> I'll
forward the motion (clear) attached with the revised footnote (redline)
to the council list by tomorrows deadline for the 20 Dec council
meeting.<BR>><BR>><BR>> Best regards<BR>>
Wolf-Ulrich<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> -----Ursprüngliche
Nachricht-----<BR>> Von: Marika Konings [mailto:<A
href="mailto:marika.konings@icann.org">marika.konings@icann.org</A>]<BR>>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2012 10:52<BR>> An: Aikman-Scalese,
Anne; Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; <A
href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</A>;<BR>> <A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A><BR>>
Betreff: Re: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Suspending
a<BR>> PDP--Proposed Revised Footnote<BR>><BR>> Anne, Staff
typically provides the Board with status updates on issues<BR>> that
are of significant interest to the Board, but there are also<BR>>
examples of direct communication between the GNSO Council and
the<BR>> Board after the GNSO Council decided to terminate a PDP that
had been<BR>> initiated to provide input to the ICANN Board (see for
example the Vertical Integration PDP:<BR>> <A
href="http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg09754.html"
target=_blank>http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg09754.html</A>).<BR>>
It is then up to the Board to decide how to proceed. For example,
in<BR>> the case of vertical integration, the Board made the
following<BR>> decision, absent GNSO Council recommendations:<BR>>
<A
href="http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-09nov10-en.htm"
target=_blank>http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-09nov10-en.htm</A>.<BR>><BR>>
With best regards,<BR>><BR>> Marika<BR>><BR>> On 10/12/12
19:19, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <<A
href="mailto:AAikman@lrlaw.com">AAikman@lrlaw.com</A>>
wrote:<BR>><BR>>> Many thanks, Marika - very helpful.
Whether or not the Board calls<BR>>> its questions a
"Request for an Issue Report" that then results in<BR>>>
initiation of a PDP seems less important substantively than
the<BR>>> reference to continuing consultation with the Board as
to "scope,<BR>>> timing, and priority". This discussion
illustrates why I think there<BR>>> has to be some provision for
communication with or involvement of the<BR>>> Board in connection
with a GNSO vote to suspend a PDP which is<BR>>> commenced as a
result of a Board request for "answers" or for an<BR>>> Issue
Report. A unilateral suspension by GNSO of a PDP (even on<BR>>>
Supermajority vote) where the PDP was initiated as a result of such
a<BR>>> Board request, is problematic if the Board needs to act.
Is there a<BR>>> provision for providing the Board with a full
report as to the status<BR>>> of the PDP and maybe summarizing the
differing opinions expressed<BR>>> where no consensus was reached
in the event of termination or<BR>>> suspension? We should
not leave the Board in the position where it<BR>>> has to say, "We
cannot act because the GNSO has not acted and has not<BR>>>
answered our questions." This is particularly unsatisfactory where
the GAC has asked the Board to address an issue.<BR>>>
Anne<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> Anne E.
Aikman-Scalese<BR>>> Of Counsel<BR>>> Lewis and Roca LLP .
Suite 700<BR>>> One South Church Avenue . Tucson, Arizona
85701-1611 Tel (520)<BR>>> 629-4428 . Fax <A
href="tel:%28520%29%20879-4725" value="+15208794725">(520)
879-4725</A><A href="mailto:AAikman@LRLaw.com">AAikman@LRLaw.com</A>
.<BR>>> <A href="http://www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman"
target=_blank>www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman</A> P Please consider the
environment before<BR>>> printing this e-mail.<BR>>> This
e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential
information<BR>>> intended only for the individual or entity named
within the message.<BR>>> If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, or the<BR>>> agent responsible to deliver it
to the intended recipient, you are<BR>>> hereby notified that any
review, dissemination, distribution or<BR>>> copying of this
communication is prohibited. If this communication<BR>>> was
received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and
delete<BR>>> the original message.<BR>>><BR>>>
-----Original Message-----<BR>>> From: <A
href="mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A><BR>>>
[mailto:<A
href="mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>]
On Behalf Of Marika<BR>>> Konings<BR>>> Sent: Sunday,
December 09, 2012 4:05 AM<BR>>> To: <A
href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</A>; <A
href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</A>; <A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A><BR>>>
Subject: Re: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Suspending
a<BR>>> PDP--Proposed Revised Footnote<BR>>><BR>>> To
clarify, there are currently two Board requested PDPs, one on
the<BR>>> RAA ('Resolved (2011.10.28.33), the Board also requests
the creation<BR>>> of an Issue Report to undertake a GNSO policy
development process<BR>>> (PDP) as quickly as possible to address
remaining items suited for a<BR>>> PDP) and the recently requested
Issue Report on the purpose of Whois<BR>>> ('hereby directs
preparation of an Issue Report on the purpose of<BR>>> collecting
and maintaining gTLD registration data, and on solutions<BR>>> to
improve accuracy and access to gTLD registration data, as part
of<BR>>> a Board-initiated GNSO policy development process'). As
pointed out<BR>>> by Avri, for PDPs initiated by the ICANN Board,
there is no<BR>>> intermediate vote by the GNSO Council, the PDP
automatically<BR>>> proceeds. However, the ICANN Bylaws foresee
that in the case of a<BR>>> Board initiated PDP, 'the Board should
provide a mechanism by which<BR>>> the GNSO Council can
consult with the Board to provide information<BR>>> on the scope,
timing, and priority of the request for an Issue<BR>>> Report'. In
addition to this mechanism, the ICANN Board and GNSO<BR>>> Council
meet at every ICANN meeting where there is another<BR>>>
opportunity to discuss and/or express concerns with regard to
Board<BR>>> requested PDPs. For example, in relation to the RAA
PDP, as a result<BR>>> of dialogue between the ICANN Board and
GNSO Council it was agreed to<BR>>> 'suspend' the PDP until the
RAA negotiations were near completion so that it would be clear which
topics would need to be included in the PDP.<BR>>><BR>>>
With best regards,<BR>>><BR>>>
Marika<BR>>><BR>>> On 09/12/12 08:12, "<A
href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</A>" <<A
href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</A>>
wrote:<BR>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> Thanks Avri, very
helpful for
understanding.<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> Best
regards<BR>>>>
Wolf-Ulrich<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>>
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----<BR>>>> Von: <A
href="mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A><BR>>>>
[mailto:<A
href="mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>]
Im Auftrag von Avri<BR>>>> Doria<BR>>>> Gesendet:
Sonntag, 9. Dezember 2012 05:39<BR>>>> An: <A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A><BR>>>>
Betreff: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Suspending
a<BR>>>> PDP--Proposed Revised
Footnote<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>>
Hi,<BR>>>><BR>>>> As I understand it, they have asked
g-council for answers, but they<BR>>>> have not actually used
the by-laws mechanism of requesting a PDP.<BR>>>> The g-council
has used the PDP as a method of deciding on answers.<BR>>>>
These are still g-council initiated PDPs. Had the Board asked
for<BR>>>> the PDP, there never would have been a vote in
g-council to initiate the PDP.<BR>>>>
Specifically:<BR>>>><BR>>>> "<BR>>>> March
212 20120314-1<BR>>>> Motion on the Initiation of a Policy
Development Process (PDP) on 'thick'<BR>>>>
Whois<BR>>>><BR>>>> Whereas the GNSO Council requested
an Issue Report on 'thick' Whois<BR>>>> at its meeting on 22
September 2011<BR>>>> (seehttp://<A
href="http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#201109"
target=_blank>gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#201109</A>);<BR>>>><BR>>>>
....<BR>>>> "<BR>>>><BR>>>> "<BR>>>>
November 2012 20121017-2<BR>>>> Motion on the Initiation of a
Policy Development Process on the<BR>>>> Protection of Certain
International Organization Names in all
GTLDs.<BR>>>><BR>>>> Whereas the GNSO Council
requested an Issue Report on the topic of<BR>>>> whether ICANN
should approve additional protections for the names of<BR>>>>
international organizations at the first and second levels in
the<BR>>>> New gTLD Program.<BR>>>><BR>>>>
....<BR>>>> "<BR>>>><BR>>>> Under the
by-laws, ANNEX A: GNSO POLICY DEVELOPMENT
PROCESS<BR>>>><BR>>>> "<BR>>>> Section 3.
Requesting an Issue Report<BR>>>><BR>>>> Board
Request. The Board may request an Issue Report by
instructing<BR>>>> the GNSO Council ("Council") to begin the
process outlined the PDP Manual.<BR>>>> In the event the Board
makes a request for an Issue Report, the<BR>>>> Board should
provide a mechanism by which the GNSO Council can<BR>>>>
consult with the Board to provide information on the scope,
timing,<BR>>>> and priority of the request for an Issue
Report.<BR>>>><BR>>>>
....<BR>>>><BR>>>> Section 5. Initiation of the
PDP<BR>>>><BR>>>> The Council may initiate the PDP as
follows:<BR>>>><BR>>>> Board Request: If the Board
requested an Issue Report, the Council,<BR>>>> within the
timeframe set forth in thePDP Manual, shall initiate a
PDP.<BR>>>> No vote is required for such
action.<BR>>>> "<BR>>>><BR>>>>
avri<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>> On 9 Dec 2012, at
03:20, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote:<BR>>>><BR>>>>>
Must be my misunderstanding... I thought both the current whois
PDP<BR>>>>> and IOC RC NGO PDP were requested by the ICANN
Board. Anne<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> Sent from my Android
phone using TouchDown (<A href="http://www.nitrodesk.com"
target=_blank>www.nitrodesk.com</A>)<BR>>>>><BR>>>>>
-----Original Message-----<BR>>>>> From: Ron Andruff [<A
href="mailto:randruff@rnapartners.com">randruff@rnapartners.com</A>]<BR>>>>>
Received: Saturday, 08 Dec 2012, 3:06pm<BR>>>>> To: 'Avri
Doria' [<A href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</A>]; <A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A><BR>>>>>
[<A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>]<BR>>>>>
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Suspending
a<BR>>>>> PDP--Proposed Revised
Footnote<BR>>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>>> I
support Avri's comments as well. The Board's role is to
commit<BR>>>>> policy that has been developed through
the bottom up process into<BR>>>>> rule by way of
resolution. Although the history of the
Board's<BR>>>>> actions to date might prove otherwise,
in an ever-maturing ICANN<BR>>>>> environment we should
expect the Board to conform to ICANN's basic<BR>>>>>
principles.<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> I support the
footnote amendment as proposed.<BR>>>>><BR>>>>>
Kind regards,<BR>>>>><BR>>>>>
RA<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> Ronald N.
Andruff<BR>>>>> RNA Partners,
Inc.<BR>>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>>>
-----Original Message-----<BR>>>>> From: <A
href="mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A><BR>>>>>
[mailto:<A
href="mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>]
On Behalf Of Avri<BR>>>>> Doria<BR>>>>> Sent:
Saturday, December 08, 2012 9:47 AM<BR>>>>> To: <A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A><BR>>>>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Suspending
a<BR>>>>> PDP--Proposed Revised
Footnote<BR>>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>>>
Hi,<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> I think the question of what
the Board would do if g-council ever<BR>>>>> suspended
a PDP that they mandated is an open question. I
expect<BR>>>>> they would either wait, question the
postponement, or make one<BR>>>>> their preemptory
decisions.<BR>>>>> Since the Board has never yet, to my
knowledge, mandated a PDP -<BR>>>>> though they can -
I do not think it is a critical issue at this<BR>>>>> point,
and in any case think it is a separate issue from
the<BR>>>>> suspension mechanism. All other PDPs
are g-council decsions, even<BR>>>>> if the issues
report is requested by one of the
ACs.<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> I am fine with the
footnote. thanks.<BR>>>>><BR>>>>>
avri<BR>>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>>>
On 8 Dec 2012, at 18:26, <<A
href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</A>> <<A
href="mailto:KnobenW@telekom.de">KnobenW@telekom.de</A>><BR>>>>>
wrote:<BR>>>>><BR>>>>>> Anne and
all,<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> this touches the
question whether the board may overrule a council<BR>>>>>
decision on suspension because you're expressing an
expectation<BR>>>>> that the council should follow a
related board request. I think<BR>>>>> this could be the
case depending on a council debate following
the<BR>>>>> board request but there is no obligation
to do so.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> With this
understanding, an you agree to the footnote provided
by<BR>>>>>
Julie?<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Best
regards<BR>>>>>>
Wolf-Ulrich<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
Von: <A
href="mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A><BR>>>>>
[mailto:<A
href="mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>]
Im Auftrag von<BR>>>>> Aikman-Scalese,
Anne<BR>>>>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Dezember 2012
18:43<BR>>>>>> An: 'J. Scott Evans'; Julie
Hedlund;<BR>>>>>> <A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A><BR>>>>>>
Betreff: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Suspending
a<BR>>>>> PDP--Proposed Revised
Footnote<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> This makes
sense. Is it clear to everyone that if the ICANN
Board<BR>>>>> says,<BR>>>>> "Sorry, GNSO, we
don't want you to suspend because we need an<BR>>>>>
answer<BR>>>>> - go back to the drawing board,"
then that is what will
happen?<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Deadlock is
deadly for ICANN. If GNSO can't work effectively
and<BR>>>>>> the<BR>>>>> Board has to act
(pursuant to GAC Advice or otherwise), then Fadi's<BR>>>>>
"oasis"<BR>>>>> announced in Dubai becomes more of a
"quagmire" and pressure<BR>>>>> increases to take
control away from ICANN.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
I only raise this because it seems to me the question will come
up<BR>>>>>> at<BR>>>>>
the<BR>>>>> GNSO
level.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
Anne<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
<image001.gif>Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel Lewis and Roca
LLP<BR>>>>>> . Suite 700 One South Church Avenue .
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611<BR>>>>>> Tel <A
href="tel:%28520%29%20629-4428" value="+15206294428">(520) 629-4428</A>
. Fax <A href="tel:%28520%29%20879-4725" value="+15208794725">(520)
879-4725</A> <A href="mailto:AAikman@LRLaw.com">AAikman@LRLaw.com</A>
.<BR>>>>>> <A href="http://www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman"
target=_blank>www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman</A><BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
P Please consider the environment before printing this
e-mail.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> This e-mail
contains legally privileged and confidential<BR>>>>>>
information intended only for the individual or entity
named<BR>>>>>> within<BR>>>>> the
message.<BR>>>>>> If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, or<BR>>>>>> the agent responsible
to deliver it to the intended recipient, you<BR>>>>>> are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution<BR>>>>>> or copying of this communication is
prohibited. If this<BR>>>>>> communication was
received in error, please notify us by reply<BR>>>>>>
e-mail and delete the<BR>>>>> original
message.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
From: J. Scott Evans [mailto:<A
href="mailto:jscottevans@yahoo.com">jscottevans@yahoo.com</A>]<BR>>>>>>
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 10:20 AM<BR>>>>>> To:
Julie Hedlund; Aikman-Scalese, Anne;<BR>>>>> <A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A><BR>>>>>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Suspending
a<BR>>>>> PDP--Proposed Revised
Footnote<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> I can live with
that and I don't think this require further public<BR>>>>>
comment<BR>>>>> since it merely clarifies the
suspension.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
jse<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> j. scott evans -
head of global brand, domains & copyright -
Yahoo!<BR>>>>> Inc.<BR>>>>> - <A
href="tel:408.349.1385" value="+14083491385">408.349.1385</A> - <A
href="mailto:jscottevans@yahoo.com">jscottevans@yahoo.com</A><BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
From: Julie Hedlund <<A
href="mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org">julie.hedlund@icann.org</A>><BR>>>>>>
To: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <<A
href="mailto:AAikman@lrlaw.com">AAikman@lrlaw.com</A>>;<BR>>>>>
"<A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>"
<<A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>><BR>>>>>>
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 8:40 AM<BR>>>>>> Subject:
Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Suspending a<BR>>>>>
PDP--Proposed Revised
Footnote<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Thanks Anne.
Then, would you want "until further notice" to
be<BR>>>>> deleted?<BR>>>>> If so, here's an
amended text for all to
review.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Best
regards,<BR>>>>>>
Julie<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> "Suspension is a
STATED time interval during which there is a<BR>>>>>
temporary<BR>>>>> cessation of the PDP, i.e. all activities
are halted upon a<BR>>>>> decision of the GNSO
Council. A mere change in milestones or<BR>>>>> schedule of
the PDP is not considered a
suspension."<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> From:
<Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <<A
href="mailto:AAikman@LRLaw.com">AAikman@LRLaw.com</A>><BR>>>>>>
Date: Thursday, December 6, 2012 4:32 PM<BR>>>>>> To: "<A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>"<BR>>>>>
<<A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>>,<BR>>>>>
Julie Hedlund <<A
href="mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org">julie.hedlund@icann.org</A>><BR>>>>>>
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Suspending
a<BR>>>>> PDP--Proposed Revised
Footnote<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> What is the
relationship between "stated" and "until further
notice"?<BR>>>>> If<BR>>>>> "stated" applies,
then it seems that "until further notice" would<BR>>>>> not
apply.<BR>>>>>
Anne<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Sent from my
Android phone using TouchDown (<A href="http://www.nitrodesk.com"
target=_blank>www.nitrodesk.com</A>)<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
-----Original Message-----<BR>>>>>> From: Julie Hedlund
[<A
href="mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org">julie.hedlund@icann.org</A>]<BR>>>>>>
Received: Thursday, 06 Dec 2012, 2:15pm<BR>>>>>> To: <A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A><BR>>>>>>
[<A
href="mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org">gnso-improvem-impl-sc@icann.org</A>]<BR>>>>>>
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] FOR REVIEW: Suspending
a<BR>>>>> PDP--Proposed<BR>>>>> Revised
Footnote<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Dear SCI
members,<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> As we discussed
on today's call, J. Scott has proposed a<BR>>>>>
clarification to<BR>>>>> the footnote text for the PDP
Manual, Section 15, on Suspending a PDP.<BR>>>>> Please
review the revised following text with the change in
bold<BR>>>>> all<BR>>>>>
caps:<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> "Suspension is a
STATED time interval during which there is a<BR>>>>>
temporary<BR>>>>> cessation of the PDP, i.e. all activities
are halted upon a<BR>>>>> decision of the GNSO Council
until further notice. A mere change<BR>>>>> in milestones or
schedule of the PDP is not considered a
suspension."<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> For
reference, I have included the entire section below so
that<BR>>>>>> the<BR>>>>> footnote may be
viewed in context.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> It
was suggested on the call that if this clarification
is<BR>>>>>> accepted<BR>>>>> by
the<BR>>>>> SCI members it will not require a new public
comment period.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> **Please
send any comments by COB Monday, 10 December so that
if<BR>>>>>> the<BR>>>>>
SCI<BR>>>>> decides to submit a motion it may do so by the
deadline of<BR>>>>> Wednesday,<BR>>>>>
12<BR>>>>>
December.**<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> With best
regards,<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>>
Julie<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Julie Hedlund,
Policy Director<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> 15.
Termination of PDP prior to Final
Report<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> The GNSO Council
may terminate or suspend[1] a PDP prior to the<BR>>>>>
publication of a Final Report only for significant cause, upon
a<BR>>>>> motion that passes with a Supermajority Vote
in favour of<BR>>>>> termination
orsuspension.<BR>>>>> The<BR>>>>> following are
illustrative examples of possible reasons for a<BR>>>>>
premature termination or suspension of a
PDP:<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> 1.
Deadlock. The PDP Team is hopelessly deadlocked and unable
to<BR>>>>> identify recommendations or statements that have
either the strong<BR>>>>> support or a consensus of
its members despite significant time and<BR>>>>> resources
being dedicated to the PDP;<BR>>>>>> 2.
Changing Circumstances. Events have occurred since
the<BR>>>>> initiation<BR>>>>> of the PDP that
have rendered the PDP moot, or no longer necessary;<BR>>>>>
or warranting a suspension; or<BR>>>>>> 3.
Lack of Community Volunteers. Despite several calls
for<BR>>>>> participation, the work of the PDP Team
issignificantly impaired<BR>>>>> and unable to
effectively conclude its deliberations due to lack<BR>>>>>
of volunteer
participation.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> If
there is no recommendation from the PDP Team for
its<BR>>>>>> termination,<BR>>>>>
the<BR>>>>> Council is required to conduct a public comment
forum first prior<BR>>>>> to conducting a vote on the
termination of the PDP (as described
above).<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> [1] Suspension
is a STATED time interval during which there is a<BR>>>>>
temporary<BR>>>>> cessation of the PDP, i.e. all activities
are halted upon a<BR>>>>> decision of the GNSO Council
until furthernotice. A mere change in<BR>>>>> milestones or
schedule of the PDP is not considered a
suspension.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> For more
information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to<BR>>>>>
<A href="http://www.lewisandroca.com"
target=_blank>www.lewisandroca.com</A>.<BR>>>>>> Phoenix
<A href="tel:%28602%29262-5311" value="+16022625311">(602)262-5311</A>
Reno <A href="tel:%28775%29823-2900"
value="+17758232900">(775)823-2900</A><BR>>>>>> Tucson <A
href="tel:%28520%29622-2090" value="+15206222090">(520)622-2090</A>
Albuquerque<A
href="tel:%28505%29764-5400"
value="+15057645400">(505)764-5400</A><BR>>>>>> Las Vegas
<A href="tel:%28702%29949-8200" value="+17029498200">(702)949-8200</A>
Silicon Valley
<A href="tel:%28650%29391-1380"
value="+16503911380">(650)391-1380</A><BR>>>>>>
This message is intended only for the use of the individual
or<BR>>>>> entity to<BR>>>>> which it is
addressed. If the reader of this message is not the<BR>>>>>
intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible
for<BR>>>>> delivering the message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby<BR>>>>> notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this<BR>>>>>
message is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this<BR>>>>> communication in error, please notify us
immediately by replying<BR>>>>> to the sender of this
E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.<BR>>>>>>
In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230,
we<BR>>>>>> advise<BR>>>>>
you<BR>>>>> that if this email contains any tax advice, such
tax advice was not<BR>>>>> intended or written to be
used, and it cannot be used, by any<BR>>>>> taxpayer for the
purpose of avoiding penalties that may be
imposed<BR>>>>> on the
taxpayer.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>>><BR>>
<Excerpt of PDP Manual Modified to Address Suspension of a<BR>>
PDP.docx><Motion to Adopt Revised PDP Manual to Include the
Suspension of a
PDP.docx><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><BR
clear=all>
<DIV><BR></DIV>-- <BR>Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
<DIV>Member, Board of Directors, CECI, <A
href="http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/"
target=_blank>http://www.ceci.ca</A><BR>
<DIV>Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, <A
href="http://www.schulich.yorku.ca"
target=_blank>www.schulich.yorku.ca</A></DIV>
<DIV>Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, <A
href="http://www.gkpfoundation.org"
target=_blank>www.gkpfoundation.org</A></DIV>
<DIV>NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, <FONT color=#0a246a
face="Times New Roman,Times,serif"><A href="http://www.chasquinet.org"
target=_blank>www.chasquinet.org</A></FONT><BR>Chair, NPOC, NCSG,
ICANN, <A href="http://npoc.org/"
target=_blank>http://npoc.org/</A><BR>O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704
7824<BR>Skype: alain.berranger<BR></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ</DIV>
<DIV>Ce courriel est confidentiel et est à l’usage exclusif du
destinataire ci-dessus. Toute personne qui lit le présent message sans en
être le destinataire, ou l’employé(e) ou la personne responsable de le
remettre au destinataire, est par les présentes avisée qu’il lui est
strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer, de le modifier ou
de le reproduire, en tout ou en partie . Si le destinataire ne peut être
joint ou si ce document vous a été communiqué par erreur, veuillez nous en
informer sur le champ et détruire ce courriel et toute copie de
celui-ci. Merci de votre coopération.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>CONFIDENTIALITY MESSAGE</DIV>
<DIV>This e-mail message is confidential and is intended for the exclusive
use of the addressee. Please note that, should this message be read by
anyone other than the addressee, his or her employee or the person
responsible for forwarding it to the addressee, it is strictly prohibited
to disclose, distribute, modify or reproduce the contents of this message,
in whole or in part. If the addressee cannot be reached or if you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete
this e-mail and destroy all copies. Thank you for your
cooperation.</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><BR></DIV></DIV></DIV></SPAN></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></SPAN></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>