<html>
<body>
One more small wording change. <br><br>
14 starts off with: <b>The WG recommends that, as an additional best
practice, ICANN accredited Registrars...<br><br>
</b>That should have been: <b>The WG recommends that, in addition, as a
best practice, ICANN accredited Registrars<br>
(See page 29 of the trascript -
<a href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/transcript-irtp-d-18aug14-en.pdf" eudora="autourl">
http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/transcript-irtp-d-18aug14-en.pdf</a> ot
at about minute 50 of the MP3).<br><br>
Alan <br><br>
</b>At 07/09/2014 10:12 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Sorry for the late comment.
<br><br>
Rec 13 now reads:<br><br>
<dl>
<dd><b>#13 The WG recommends that ICANN create and maintain a
user-friendly, one-stop website containing all relevant information
concerning disputed transfers and potential remedies to registrants. Such
a website should be clearly accessible from the ICANN Registrants'
Benefits and Responsibilities page (
<a href="https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/benefits-2013-09-16-en" eudora="autourl">
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/benefits-2013-09-16-en</a>).<br><br>
</b>
</dl>I would suggest that "should be clearly accessible from"
be changed to "should be clearly accessible from or integrated
into"<br><br>
That gives those implementing the recommendation free reign to do this in
the most logical and "user-friendly" manner.<br><br>
I will be on at the start of the call, but will need to leave within a
few minutes, so if there are any questions about this, I would hope that
they can be addressed at the start of the meeting.<br><br>
Thanks, Alan<br><br>
At 29/08/2014 10:36 AM, Lars Hoffmann wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Dear all,<br><br>
Apologies for the late distribution of this update but thanks to the
slight delay I was able to include comments from ICANN's GDD Team that
might be useful to the Group’s discussion. <br><br>
It would be great if you found some time to go through the Report –
especially the recommendations and observations in <b>Section 4</b> and
also consider the newly supplied comments from the GDD Team. <br><br>
Main edits from the last version are related to Charter Question F and
the additional recommendations 18 and 19. These can be found on pages 26,
27, 28, 29 and 30 – including the new Recommendation #19.<br><br>
Please also note the comments from ICANN’s GDD Team on:
<ul>
<li>page 14
<li>Page 16
<li>Page 18
<li>Page 22
<li>Page 24 (two comments)
<li>Page 26
<li>Page 28 (two comments)
<li>Page 30
<li>Page 42
</ul>Finally, please note that for ease of reading I have started the
latest changes from a clean copy, meaning that only the edits from the
last version are red-lined.<br><br>
Many thanks and have a good weekend and those lucky enough to have Monday
off – have a great Labour Day, too!<br><br>
Best,<br>
Lars<br><br>
</blockquote></blockquote></body>
</html>