[Gnso-newgtld-dg] - Reminder: Submit Issues & Nominations for Group Chair(s)

[Katim S. Touray]

Hi Steve,

I'd like to add my voice to the last point made by Tony, i.e. the matter of
support for needy applicants. In particular, I'd like the issue of the
participation of developing countries (including outreach to them)
addressed as a separate topic. And the dismal failure of the JAS program is
an embarassment that deserves a full-blown inquiry of its own, in my
opinion.

Katim

Katim
On Sep 5, 2014 7:22 PM, "Anthony Harris" <anthonyrharris at gmail.com> wrote:

> Steve,
>
> I have the following issues to raise:
>
> - The question of new gTLD strings that are unacceptable, e.g. for
> geographic
>   TLDs, would not appear to be adequately defined in the current AGB. With
>   regards to geographic regions and territories, the applicant is directed
> to
>   UN listings for determining whether or not the application is aceptable,
> yet
>   in the cases of Amazon and Patagonia, neither were on these listings, and
>   this has caused conflictive situations which are unfortunate. Other
> considerations
>   involving religion and generic terms are not clearly defined, and there
> is a
>   clause in the AGB that effectively gives the GAC right of veto over
> anything
>   one of their members might object to (this was added on the eve of the
>   Singapore announcement of opening of applications). Some work needs to
>   be done to improve this, providing clarity to applicants in a future
> round.
>
> - Concerns expressed by the IP community should be carefully considered.
>   The strong opposition to the new gTLD programme from that sector,
>   resulted in several years of delays and postponements to the opening
>   of the applicant window. Any outstanding issues that remain unsolved
>   in this respect, should be reviewed.
>
> - The instrument known as the COI (a letter of credit in favor of ICANN
>   for the sum of U$S 140.000 which, prior to signing the Registry
>   Agreement with ICANN, must be deployed, thus inmobilizing this
>   sum for several years), should be revised as it constitutes an
>   additional entry barrier to communities and non-profit organizations
>   who wish to apply for a new gTLD.
>
> - The mechanisms developed by the JAS working group, to support
>   applicants with financial constraints, need to be reviewed and
>   improved. The very limited takeup of this option during the
>   application phase, would appear to signal the need for change.
>
> Regards
>
> Tony Harris
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear DG Members,
>>
>> This is a friendly reminder to please contribute your list of issues to
>> the Wiki group workspace (
>> https://community.icann.org/display/DGNGSR/3.+DG+Workspace) or to the
>> email list. To provide a bit of additional clarification on what
>> information might prove useful, as Bret spoke to on the first call, the
>> issues can be big, can be small, specific to you or a group you represent,
>> or what may be considered a widely held observation about the New gTLD
>> Program. Issues should at a minimum include enough detail so that others
>> can properly understand the issue. If you would like to make the issue
>> description more detailed, you can consider the elements in the Request for
>> Issue Report template found in Annex 2 of the PDP Manual found here (
>> http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-2-pdp-manual-16may13-en.pdf).
>> Contributing a preliminary set of issues now would of course not preclude
>> the submission of additional, or revision of, existing issues at a later
>> date. Provided enough contributions are received, I would like to be able
>> to take a first cut at categorizing those issues to facilitate the
>> discussion at the next meeting, scheduled for Monday, 8 Sept 2014 at 14:00
>> UTC.
>>
>> Please also be aware that it was discussed on the August 11th call that
>> the group should aim to elect leaders at the subsequent meeting. If you
>> would like to nominate yourself or someone else, please do so over the
>> email list. From conversations over the list in early August, it seemed
>> that the group was leaning towards perhaps a pair of co-chairs.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Steven Chan*
>> Sr. Policy Manager
>>
>>
>> *ICANN*12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
>>
>> Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
>> steve.chan at icann.org
>>
>> direct: +1.310.301.3886
>> mobile: +1.310.339.4410
>>
>> tel: +1.310.301.5800
>>
>> fax: +1.310.823.8649
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-newgtld-dg mailing list
>> Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-dg
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-dg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-dg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-dg/attachments/20140908/c7719989/attachment.html>