[Gnso-newgtld-dg] - Proposed Agenda
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Wed Apr 29 18:54:58 UTC 2015
Hi,
The GNSO council did not really do typing because at that time it was a
bit more difficult to predict the types and especially to predict the
specific needs of each type. Or so I thought.
All types that we now have were added by the Staff and Board. The
council talked about a special status and protection for communities but
did not define it a type. The AGB did. It defined communities as
probables gamers of the system and created a set of fees, penalties and
hurdles for them.
The Council said there would be no geographical types, the Board decided
otherwise.
The Council said all RPM would be voluntary, the Staff and Board decided
otherwise
Certainly, given the amount of data we have now, not only about types,
but what is special about their application needs, focusing a good deal
of effort on types and the various application requirements for those
types would be a necessary thing before any other round were to be
comtemplated.
avri
On 29-Apr-15 03:56, BRG wrote:
> Jacob, indeed this is a telling graph.
> It also demonstrates the short-sighted of the GNSO Council (I was a
> member at the time) in characterising potential TLDs into just four types.
>
> Philip
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* gnso-newgtld-dg-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:gnso-newgtld-dg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Jacob
> Malthouse
> *Sent:* 28 April 2015 18:40
> *To:* Liz Williams
> *Cc:* gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-newgtld-dg] - Proposed Agenda
>
> Further to yesterday's discussion, here are some stats
> from: http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/statistics
>
> In terms of discussing whether to include a note the about low
> diversity of types of applications, this chart shows that it would
> be significantly _more unfair_ to remove the point than to include
> it. /(Note I excluded 17 community applications that were brands
> e.g. .bugatti, with apologies to Bugatti owners.)/
>
> Whether the low diversity is appropriate or not is something we
> should discuss remaining neutral on, but the fact remains there
> were four options in the AGB: Community, Geographic, IDN and
> Standard and almost 90% were of one type.
>
> In other words, this was unequivocally not a diverse application
> round in terms of types of applications.
>
> Inline images 1
>
> Jacob Malthouse
> Co-founder & Director, Big Room Inc.
> 778-960-6527
> www.bigroom.ca <http://www.bigroom.ca/>
>
> On 27 April 2015 at 08:11, Liz Williams
> <tldomainsolutions at gmail.com <mailto:tldomainsolutions at gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> And I am the same as I pointed out to Avri in a separate message.
>
> Liz
>
>> On 27 Apr 2015, at 15:56, Jeff Neuman
>> <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com <mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> And I thought I was the one that was left out J
>>
>> For the record, I and my employer, Valideus, do represent
>> several non-commercial, community applicants/registries, but
>> your point is well taken.
>>
>> We will try our best to do the document clean up, but of
>> course will run everything by the group to make sure that we
>> got it right (or not). We will also make sure that we turn
>> around redlines so that you can see the changes.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> *Jeffrey J. Neuman*
>> *Senior Vice President *|*Valideus USA** *| *Com Laude USA*
>> 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600
>> Mclean, VA 22102, United States
>> E: jeff.neuman at valideus.com
>> <mailto:jeff.neuman at valideus.com> or jeff.neuman at comlaude.com
>> <mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>
>> T: +1.703.635.7514 <tel:%2B1.703.635.7514>
>> M: +1.202.549.5079 <tel:%2B1.202.549.5079>
>> @Jintlaw
>>
>>
>> *From:* gnso-newgtld-dg-bounces at icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-newgtld-dg-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gnso-newgtld-dg-bounces at icann.org] *On
>> Behalf Of *Avri Doria
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 27, 2015 10:48 AM
>> *To:* gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org
>> <mailto:gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-newgtld-dg] - Proposed Agenda
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I should have said 3 people who i like and trust ...
>> but I keep forgetting about the third capo.
>>
>> avri
>>
>> On 27-Apr-15 10:32, Avri Doria wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was surprised that we did not actually
>>
>> Review Draft Exec Summary / Matrix / Charter
>>
>>
>> But since some of the comment I rushed to get in in time
>> for the meeting were not complete, I suppose I should be
>> grateful.
>>
>> I want to reiterate my discomfort with the increasing
>> tend, seen again in this group, of chairs taking control
>> of the content and taking the pen in a relative opaque
>> manner. In this case we have 2 people who I like and
>> trust as people (a purely subjective statement), but none
>> of whom have non-commercial, community applicant not user
>> points of view (possibly an objective statement).
>>
>> I guess I will have to wait to see how it all works out.
>> And hope.
>>
>> avri
>>
>> On 24-Apr-15 14:30, Steve Chan wrote:
>>
>> Dear DG Members,
>>
>> Please find the agenda for the upcoming DG call
>> below. Regarding agenda item two, I encourage you all
>> to review the documents that were circulated on
>> Wednesday, 22 April.
>>
>> *Proposed Agenda – New gTLD Subsequent Procedures –
>> Monday 27 April at 14:00 UTC*
>>
>> 1. Roll Call / Updates to SOIs
>> 2. Review Draft Exec Summary / Matrix / Charter
>> 3. Next Steps
>> 4. Confirm next meeting
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>>
>> *Steven Chan*
>> Sr. Policy Manager
>>
>> *ICANN
>> *12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
>> Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
>> steve.chan at icann.org
>> <mailto:steve.chan at icann.org>
>> direct: +1.310.301.3886 <tel:%2B1.310.301.3886>
>> mobile: +1.310.339.4410 <tel:%2B1.310.339.4410>
>> tel: +1.310.301.5800 <tel:%2B1.310.301.5800>
>> fax: +1.310.823.8649 <tel:%2B1.310.823.8649>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Gnso-newgtld-dg mailing list
>>
>> Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org>
>>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-dg
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Avast logo <http://www.avast.com/>
>>
>>
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast
>> antivirus software.
>> www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Gnso-newgtld-dg mailing list
>>
>> Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org>
>>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-dg
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Avast logo <http://www.avast.com/>
>>
>>
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>> software.
>> www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-newgtld-dg mailing list
>> Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-dg
>
> ...
>
> Liz Williams
> m: +44 7824 877757 <tel:%2B44%207824%20877757>
> s: lizwilliams1963
> w: www.lizwilliams.net <http://www.lizwilliams.net>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-dg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-dg
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-dg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-dg
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-dg/attachments/20150429/5ab01df7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 30410 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-dg/attachments/20150429/5ab01df7/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the Gnso-newgtld-dg
mailing list