[Gnso-newgtld-dg] - Issues / Recommendations Matrix and Executive Summary

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I agree one aspect of the Global Public Interest (GPI0 in one way of
understanding GPI was indeed served as you describe below.
The issue is that the GPI is broader than that and is something that
needs specific work and specific focus.

Both in understanding it in respect to gTLDs  and knowing how to take it
into account in subsequent 'rounds'.

I believe it is a top level issue that needs to dealt with in many respects.

avri

On 18-Mar-15 13:17, Bret Fausett wrote:
> Avri, 
> I’m not sure I understand this completely, so I am hoping you can
> provide more details. My first reaction is that the global public
> interest was served by expanding the choices available when
> registering a domain name, bringing competition to the registry
> services space, and allowing people and companies to name themselves
> online with a label that provides greater semantic meaning. I also
> have statistics that show me that a meaningful number of registrations
> in Uniregistry TLDs come from countries identified as “developing
> countries” under either the UN or IMF definitions. To me, that’s a
> global public interest that was served.
>
> Now, I don’t propose to have that debate here, but is what I wrote
> above addressed to your issue, or were you raising something else? I
> think we already have identified issues around making sure that future
> registries come from developing economies. 
>
>          Bret
>
>
>
>> On Mar 18, 2015, at 9:20 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
>> <mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I think one whole group of issues is missing  from we need to have
>> dealt with in the review.
>>
>> Did the gTLD server the pubic interest?  It what ways could it have
>> done this better?  In terms of the future how do we design the policy
>> to make sure that the global public interests, such as inclusion of
>> developing economies and poor communities is supported?  This is one
>> area where many consider the gTLD to have bee na complete failure and
>> to not have that represented as a section of our work seems a deficit.
>>
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>> On 16-Mar-15 12:50, Steve Chan wrote:
>>> Dear DG Members,
>>>
>>> As discussed on today’s group call, staff is circulating the updated
>>> Issues / Recommendations matrix that was last edited by Jeff Neuman,
>>> along with his short explanation regarding the proposed groupings he
>>> included in the document (see below). I have also included his
>>> updated Executive Summary. As noted by Jeff on the call, the
>>> co-chairs request feedback by *30 Mar 2015* and preferably before,
>>> so as to be able to include for discussion during the DG call on 30
>>> Mar 2015 at 14:00 UTC.
>>>
>>> Note, I have incorporated Philip Shepard’s proposed changes into tab
>>> 2 of the attached Excel sheet.
>>>
>>>
>>> "I refer to the Matrix that has Policies A-G, 1-20 and IG A through
>>> IG-R.  With respect to the Potential New topics I refer to Excel row
>>> number in that 2^nd  tab)
>>>  
>>> _Group 1:  Overall Process __/ Support / Outreach __:_  A, C, 1, 9,
>>> 10 (concept), 12 (Concept), 13, IG A, IG B, IG C, IG D, IG E, IG I,
>>> IG M, IG N, IG O, IG Q, New Row 3)
>>>  
>>> _Group 2:  Legal__ __/__ __Regulatory_: 5, 10 (substance), 14, 15,
>>> 16, 17, 19, IG J, IG K, IG L, New Row 2, New Row 4, New Row 5, New Row 6
>>>  
>>> _Group 3:  Contentions / Objections & Disputes__:_  G, 2, 3, 6, 12,
>>> 20, IG F, IG H, IG P, IG R
>>>  
>>> _Group 4:  Internationalized Domain Names_:  B, 18
>>>  
>>> _Group 5:  Technical and Operations_:  D, E, F, 4, 7, 8, New Row 7
>>> (Name Collision)"
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Steven Chan*
>>> Sr. Policy Manager
>>>
>>> *ICANN
>>> *12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
>>> Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
>>> steve.chan at icann.org
>>> <mailto:steve.chan at icann.org>
>>> direct: +1.310.301.3886
>>> mobile: +1.310.339.4410
>>> tel: +1.310.301.5800
>>> fax: +1.310.823.8649
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gnso-newgtld-dg mailing list
>>> Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-dg
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> <http://www.avast.com/> 	
>>
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-newgtld-dg mailing list
>> Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-dg
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> *Bret Fausett, Esq.*
> General Counsel, Uniregistry, Corp.
>
> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 200
> Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
> mobile +1 310 985 1351
> office +1 949 706 2300 x4201
> UTC -8 hours  • http://uniregistry.link
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-dg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-dg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-dg



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-dg/attachments/20150318/db514e6d/attachment-0001.html>