<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name=Title content=""><meta name=Keywords content=""><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"MS Mincho";
panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.msoIns
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-style-name:"";
text-decoration:underline;
color:teal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Dear Work Track members,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Please find below the action items and discussion notes from the call on 14 September. <i>These high-level notes are designed to help Work Track members navigate through the content of the call and are not a substitute for the chat transcript or the recording.</i> The meeting recording and chat transcript are available at:<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_DBLfAw&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=adDIs0WEx_lLwFfrsdovxTYY8GkRHo5ibc8SR3Npdh8&m=sr_NgHpSHZnz8vTCC2xqgKzviH1KvrbGpgboyxExR6g&s=oujzcPfKQkPbY9ddfOQLo5EpuGLgmUiKhIlV6HzVTZM&e="> https://community.icann.org/x/9hkhB</a>.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Best,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Steve<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>--------------------------------------------------------------------------<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Action Items and Discussion Notes: 14 September 2017</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>2. SOI Updates<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- None<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Next plenary call on the 25 September. Note sent by Jeff re: replacement for Avri as she moves to the ICANN Board. Nominations needed by end of the next call. Description and suggested qualifications for co-chair versus vice-chair provided.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>3. CC2 Comments: Closed Generics<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Slide 2 (Intro)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Will discuss closed generics on 21 Sept meeting as well.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Slide 4 (Recap)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Recap of where we are now<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Requested to be discussed by NGPC. Unless consensus received to change, status quo remains.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Support: business model innovation, consumer choice, free expression, avoids ICANN regulating business models, competition, word classification<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Against: harms competition, favors industry players, hunders free expression for potentional registrants<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- There is no clear definition of who we are trying to protect (end-users, registrants, registrars, etc.)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- If path forward for some closed generics, circumstances will need to be defined while addressing public interest concerns<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Slide 5<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Text of question<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Slide 6 (CC2 2.4.1)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Hard to define generic. Change policy should prevent switching to open later (Jannik Skou)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Too hard to define generics and ICANN should not be deciding what is a generic string (INTA)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Slide 7 (CC2 2.4.1)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Should not be blanket rule preventing, partly b/c difficult to define. Certain closed "generics" could be problematic and could be guarded against by objections measures (BC)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Should be lifted to allow innovation (Afilias)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Slide 8 (CC2 2.4.1)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Unrestricted process migh allow for more utility. A more structured model could enhance security (Google)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Objection measures provide adequate protections. Not a security or stability concern. Solidying the classic use case of selling domain names (RySG)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Jim: Lots of cases of GAC concentrating on content and use (referencing Afilias comment). Maybe difficult to adhere to. Jeff: At least reducing focus on content and use could be helpful.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Justine Chew: </span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Do we know if Jannik Skou represents any stakeholder group? Is his (potentially) the only comment from a non-commercial group? Jeff: Some in the non-commercial support lifting (e.g., Milton Mueller) Avri: NC community split on issue.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Emily Barabas: </span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Jannik Skou SOI: <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_display_gnsosoi_Jannik-2BSkou-2BSOI&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=UAy6fqdE7uFkRCc7uzN4yui8bwTtqofadZHiQEIO1vw&m=hcARSR5rg4EHzBinhGpBvxKFxSySEXgT0qd-TvPCMAs&s=WuShLi9_tHosrllC37BywXLfPn0AtjdrppapcHCkpCo&e=" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Jannik+Skou+SOI[community.icann.org]</a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Slide 9 (CC2 2.4.1) Support restricting closed generics<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Exclusive use should serve a public interest (GAC). Jeff: could be construed as allowing exclusive use if there is a public interest goal. Direct outreach to GAC might be needed.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- "True" generics should not be restricted for exclusive use. These words would not be accepted as a brand and received TM protection. Jeff: generic words can be trademarked if not used in their generic sense (e.g., apple). <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Heather Forrest: </span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>International law requires that jurisdictions protect signs 9including generic terms) that have acquired distinctiveness. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Looking for triangular relationship. Connect term to a trader and to a good or service. Applicable to words that have more than one meeting. International law requires that this be recognized. Jeff: in TM law, context matters.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Justine Chew: </span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Yes, TM protection also based on classes of goods/service.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Trang Nguyen: </span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Implementation of GAC Category 2 Advice (exclusive access) can be viewed at: <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__newgtlds.icann.org_en_applicants_advisories_gac-2Dcat2-2Dadvice-2D19mar14-2Den&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=UAy6fqdE7uFkRCc7uzN4yui8bwTtqofadZHiQEIO1vw&m=hcARSR5rg4EHzBinhGpBvxKFxSySEXgT0qd-TvPCMAs&s=C18d-rdvNeO-RPU7iq9lA7xQmUP6vjGnEVqKOHC1Yrk&e=" target="_blank">https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/advisories/gac-cat2-advice-19mar14-en[newgtlds.icann.org]</a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Trang Nguyen: </span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>There were 12 applicants that stated that it was their intent to operate exclusive access registries. ICANN asked those applicants to provide a response for how the proposed exclusive registry access serves a public interest goal.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Jeff: applicants were allowed to provide response. Were any accepted? <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>ACTION ITEM (Trang): will research to determine how many decided to stay exclusive and how many were allowed.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Slide 10<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Process was messy and open to improvement. Ban on closed generics should be maintained (Jim). Question of fairness of process for last round and going forward. There were those in 2012 round that had to withdraw or change their business plans. Need this backward looking component as future applicants could be advantaged. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'> -- Jeff: Fairness argument is strong. If that could be addressed, is there an argument against closed generics otherwise? <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'> -- Avri: Not in scope to make decisions made in the past. If it's determined that rules should be changed, there is history of those changes being applied to the old. Focus should be on fair decisions going forward. Jeff: policy based on lessons learned. if, say starting from scratch, the WG would do it a certain way, but could acknowledge problems of fairness or other challenges.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'> -- Impacts consumer choice and consumer confusion (ALAC)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>ACTION ITEM: get context of ALAC comment.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Supports ban on closed generics for the foreseeable future (Nominet)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Slide 11 (2.4.2) <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Text of question<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Michael: Is the current standard to restrict? Jeff: NGPC stated that exclusion was for the 2012 round, but did not specify about the future. There might not be a status quo in this case. Best case would be to get to a recommendation, but in absence of that, status quo could include policy and the way things were implemented.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>ACTION ITEM: Keep as an discussion topic if consensus recommendations are unachievable.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Slide 12<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- If closed generics are retained, definition makes sense (NORID, RySG, ALAC)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Slide 13<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Not necessary to define if restriction lifted. (BC, Afilias, RySG)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Slide 14<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Restriction against closed generics should be maintained but exception to rule against closed generics.Some may qualify for Spec 9, but not Spec 13. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Collisions, UA, TMs, service marks (John Poole)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Slide 15<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Brands are not "generic terms" or geo names. "True" generics should not be allowed to be closed (NORID)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Trang Nguyen: </span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Of the 12 that initially indicated they will operate as exclusive registries, 7 withdrew, 1 obtained a Spec 13 (FOOD), the remaining 4 signed the RA, which includes Spec 11. Spec 11 has a provision that says: "Registry Operator of a “Generic String” TLD may not impose eligibility criteria for registering names in the TLD that limit registrations exclusively to a single person or entity and/or that person’s or entity’s “Affiliates” (as defined in Section 2.9(c) of the Registry Agreement). “Generic String” means a string consisting of a word or term that denominates or describes a general class of goods, services, groups, organizations or things, as opposed to distinguishing a specific brand of goods, services, groups, organizations or things from those of others."<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Trang Nguyen: </span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>The 4 are .GROCERY, .DVR, .DATA, .PHONE<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>ACTION ITEM: Examine how these 4 TLDs are being used.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Slide 16<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Questions for discussion on next call.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>-- Re: question 2. Spec 13 requires adherence to element of Spec 11. Is there a contradiction? Will review Spec 13 and 11 on the next call.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>From the chat:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Michelle DeSmyter: Welcome to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Team – Track 2 Legal/Regulatory Issues call on Thursday, 14 September 2017 at 03:00 UTC for 60 minutes.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Michelle DeSmyter: Agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/9hkhB[community.icann.org]<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Jeff Neuman: Will we get to 15 participants?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Michael Flemming: I'm only logged in on my phone so that must be an imposter me<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>clo: sorry I am on my mobile phone we have lost landline phone lines it seems<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Michael Flemming: closed generics<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Michael Flemming: not registrant protection <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Justine Chew: Do we know if Jannik Skou represents any stakeholder group? Is his (potentially) the only comment from a non-commercial group?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry): https://www.linkedin.com/in/jannikskou[linkedin.com]/<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Emily Barabas: Jannik Skou SOI: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Jannik+Skou+SOI[community.icann.org]<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Justine Chew: Right, thanks. Then his is not a "community" comment. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Justine Chew: @Jeff, yes that's what I wanted to get at. Thanks.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Justine Chew: @Avri, thanks for the clarification.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Heather Forrest: Norway<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Jim Prendergast: I agree we need to ask the GAC to clarify. I don't think anyone wants to try and interpret what the GAC says<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Heather Forrest: International law requires that jurisdictions protect signs 9including generic terms) that have acquired distinctiveness.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Justine Chew: Yes, TM protection also based on classes of goods/service.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Michael Flemming: yes distinctiveness<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Trang Nguyen: Implementation of GAC Category 2 Advice (exclusive access) can be viewed at: https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/advisories/gac-cat2-advice-19mar14-en[newgtlds.icann.org]<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Heather Forrest: Yes - context is a significant part of consumer recognition<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Trang Nguyen: There were 12 applicants that stated that it was their intent to operate exclusive access registries. ICANN asked those applicants to provide a response for how the proposed exclusive registry access serves a public interest goal.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Trang Nguyen: I can't recall how many of the 12 ultimately decided to stay exclusive access. Let me do some checking.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Justine Chew: Fine balance between "changing goal-posts" and "moving forward with the times".<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry): did everyone else just lose audio or just me?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Michelle DeSmyter: Jeff, we are not able to hear you<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Justine Chew: Lost audio<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Jim Prendergast: hung up instead of unmuting <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Jim Prendergast: dialing back <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Jeff Neuman: Thanks Jim. Let us know when you are back in<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Michael Flemming 2: Our decisions can allow for paths that back track to 2012 applicants <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): no audio in<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): sorry Aug winds playing havock.... <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO): Hard to hear<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Michael Flemming 2: Thanks Jeff, gotta drop<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Trang Nguyen: Of the 12 that initially indicated they will operate as exclusive registries, 7 withdrew, 1 obtained a Spec 13 (FOOD), the remaining 5 signed the RA, which includes Spec 11. Spec 11 has a provision that says: "Registry Operator of a “Generic String” TLD may not impose eligibility criteria for registering names in the TLD that limit registrations exclusively to a single person or entity and/or that person’s or entity’s “Affiliates” (as defined in Section 2.9(c) of the Registry Agreement). “Generic String” means a string consisting of a word or term that denominates or describes a general class of goods, services, groups, organizations or things, as opposed to distinguishing a specific brand of goods, services, groups, organizations or things from those of others."<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Trang Nguyen: sorry about that copy/paste<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Trang Nguyen: Of the 12 that initially indicated they will operate as exclusive registries, 7 withdrew, 1 obtained a Spec 13 (FOOD), the remaining 5 signed the RA, which includes Spec 11. Spec 11 has a provision that says: "Registry Operator of a “Generic String” TLD may not impose eligibility criteria for registering names in the TLD that limit registrations exclusively to a single person or entity and/or that person’s or entity’s “Affiliates” (as defined in Section 2.9(c) of the Registry Agreement). “Generic String” means a string consisting of a word or term that denominates or describes a general class of goods, services, groups, organizations or things, as opposed to distinguishing a specific brand of goods, services, groups, organizations or things from those of others."<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Trang Nguyen: Sorry, that should say remaining "4"<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Trang Nguyen: The 4 are .GROCERY, .DVR, .DATA, .PHONE<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Justine Chew: @Trang, thanks, useful info.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Emily Barabas: Full comment from NORID is available here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tcWZt1bdoYH7vJl2Yi9G0jah7QzyhqU99tXnl3qV0rc/edit#gid=1963024039[docs.google.com]<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Trang Nguyen: Safeway's GROCERY was withdrawn. The one that was delegated is from Wal-Mart.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Heather Forrest: None, thank you Jeff<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry): Good night.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Justine Chew: Thanks!<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>avri doria: bye<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Steven Chan</span></b><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"MS Mincho",serif'>
</span></b><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Policy Director, GNSO Support<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'> <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>ICANN<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536</span><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"MS Mincho",serif'>
</span><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><a href="mailto:steve.chan@icann.org"><span style='color:#0563C1'>steve.chan@icann.org</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>mobile: +1.310.339.4410<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>office tel: +1.310.301.5800<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>office fax: +1.310.823.8649<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Find out more about the GNSO by taking our i<a href="applewebdata://310CAD3E-E244-4690-A938-C2655DD44BDE/learn.icann.org/courses/gnso"><span style='color:#0563C1'>nteractive courses</span></a> and visiting the <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers"><span style='color:#0563C1'>GNSO Newcomer pages</span></a>.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Follow @GNSO on Twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO"><span style='color:#0563C1'>https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'>Follow the GNSO on Facebook: <a href="https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/"><span style='color:#0563C1'>https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt'><a href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/"><span style='color:#0563C1'>http://gnso.icann.org/en/</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>