[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3] Legal Rights Objection - Strawman for WT3

[Emily Barabas]

Hi Rubens,

Paul discussed his proposal with the Work Track on the 7 February 2017 call. You can find the notes and recording here: https://community.icann.org/x/uLPDAw . If you are looking for the recording from a different call, please let us know.

Kind regards,
Emily

From: Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br>
Date: Wednesday 17 January 2018 at 22:16
To: Karen Day <Karen.Day at sas.com>
Cc: Paul McGrady <policy at paulmcgrady.com>, "gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3] Legal Rights Objection - Strawman for WT3

Karen,

I believe that one call when Paul mentioned them had most of the explanations being requested at this point... if staff could recover that transcript, it would probably expedite the process.

That said, besides specific occurrences, I think threat scenarios are as good as reasoning to do changes to abuse controls such as LROs. For instance, I believe the translation/transliteration occurrences in 2012 were likely none, but since IDNs are getting some (limited) adoption, such an issue might happen within subsequent procedures.


Rubens




Em 17 de jan de 2018, à(s) 18:06:000, Karen Day <Karen.Day at sas.com<mailto:Karen.Day at sas.com>> escreveu:

Dear Paul

On our WT3 call this past week we again reviewed the strawman modifications to the Legal Rights Objection<https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2017-02-07+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Procedures+PDP+Work+Track+3?preview=/63157176/64067212/7.2.5%20Legal%20Rights%20Objection%20-%20Strawman%20Edits.pdf> sections of the AGB which you had presented to the group for our consideration.   Since you were not able to join us on the call, the members wanted to ask if you could please provide to the us, via the email list, a written explanation for the overall reasoning for making changes to the LRO, as well as rationale for each of your red lines.

As you will see from the notes and chat transcript, in almost every instance members wanted to know if there had been specific occurrences in the 2012 round which prompted your request for that particular change.  If so, they would like to know the details of what those incidents were.

The members felt that having a good understanding of the foundation for your recommendations was essential to the group being able to continue to refine our thoughts and positions on the LRO.

If I can be of any assistance or if you have any questions back while preparing your responses, please don’t hesitate to let me know.

Thanks,
Karen


____________________________
Karen L. Day, NCCP ACP
Brand Protection & Registry Operations Manager
Tel: + 1 919-531-6016 ▪ Mobile: + 1 919-599-4356 ▪ karen.day at sas.com<mailto:karen.day at sas.com>
SAS Institute Inc.▪ SAS Campus Drive ▪ Cary, NC 27513 USA
www.sas.com<http://www.sas.com/>

<image003.jpg>

_______________________________________________
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 mailing list
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3 at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt3/attachments/20180117/1a1f6bb6/attachment.html>