[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4] Fwd: ICANN Compliance x Name Collisions

[Steve Chan]

Dear Rubens,

Certainly. We will submit a request to Contractual Compliance to seek this information.

Best,
Steve



On 9/14/17, 10:53 AM, "gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Rubens Kuhl" <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4-bounces at icann.org on behalf of rubensk at nic.br> wrote:

    
    
    Steve, Emily, Julie;
    (sent via WT4 list)
    
    
    Can we ask compliance to drill down the 45 TLDs where they found controlled interruption wildcards still in place per registry service provider ? Not mentioning names of RSPs or ROs, just something like
    RSP 1 - 32 TLDs
    RSP 2 - 10 TLDs
    RSP 3 - 3 TLDs
    
    
    Thanks,
    Rubens
    
    
    
    > 
    >> Início da mensagem encaminhada:
    >> 
    >> De: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br>
    >> Assunto: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4] ICANN Compliance x Name Collisions
    >> Data: 12 de setembro de 2017 21:07:21 BRT
    >> Para: gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4 at icann.org
    >> 
    >> 
    >> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/compliance-update-jun17-en.pdf
    >> 
    >> At the end of page 3:
    >> "This quarter, the ICANN Contractual Compliance team also processed referrals from ICANN Technical Services regarding controlled interruption wildcard record violations. Approximately 45 TLDs were found to have activated names (other than nic.tld) in the DNS, while controlled interruption wildcard records continued to exist in their zone file."
    >> 
    >> It seems a high number of TLDs are still having issues with the 2012-round Name Collision Framework, long after delegation. This specific data point suggests that one of the suggested modifications, having ICANN or an ICANN contractor run the process before the TLD is delegated to the approved applicant, would not only address the time-to-market problem seen by registries but also improve compliance with the framework as designed. 
    >> 
    >> We should note though that this report doesn't mention distribution by registry service provider; all 45 TLDs could share a single back-end for all we know. 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> Rubens
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4 mailing list
    >> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4 at icann.org
    >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4
    > 
    
    _______________________________________________
    Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4 mailing list
    Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4 at icann.org
    https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2018 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4/attachments/20170914/6913ad5e/smime.p7s>