<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name=Title content=""><meta name=Keywords content=""><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:Calibri;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:Calibri;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:Calibri;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:Calibri;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:Calibri;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle23
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:Calibri;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle24
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:Calibri;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle25
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:Calibri;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle26
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Calibri;
color:windowtext;}
span.msoIns
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-style-name:"";
text-decoration:underline;
color:teal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Dear Sub Team Members,</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Please see below the action items and discussion notes captured by staff from the meeting on 06 March. <i>These high-level notes are designed to help Work Track Sub Team members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording.</i> Please also see the recording on the meetings page at: <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/Work+Track+4+Meetings">https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/Work+Track+4+Meetings</a>. </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Note also that the referenced slides for today’s meeting are attached and excerpts from the chat room are included.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Best regards,</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Julie</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-autospace:none'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Julie Hedlund, Policy Director</span><o:p></o:p></p><div style='border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Action Items/Discussion Notes 06 March</span></b><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><i><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>1. Full WG Update<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>-- short update -- Call later today at 20:00 UTC to finish going over the first reading of the CC2 questions. Also a full group call tomorrow at 20:00 UTC.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>-- Public comment will go through the month of April.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>-- Also Work Track 3 call tomorrow at 1500 UTC.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><i><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>2. Name Collisions in Legacy gTLDs<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>-- Not related to collisions in future TLDs, but in already delegated TLDs (Slide 6)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><u><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Situation 1: use of a previously unregistered domain and Situation 2: use of DNS suffix list<o:p></o:p></span></u></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Work Track discussion: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>-- One option: Contracted Parties should be forced or could be allowed to take collision domains away from users. Or could provide a contractual option for how to deal with a collision.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>-- Second option: Agree or disagree with this statement? "Possible threats do not warrant policy changes."<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>-- When we say no policy changes, we currently have no policy -- correct? So we accept the policy NGPC? Yes, the status quo.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>-- Agree that there is no policy, but allow expedited requests at registrar's discretion.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>-- So we specifically say that we do not bring forward the NGPC policy from the previous round.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>From the chat:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Jeff Neuman: By policy changes, are we saying the policy as promulgated by the NGPC<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) 2: status quo <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Jeff Neuman: the burden right now to take down a site because of a collission is pretty high. To anyone's knowledge has any name actually been taken down.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Dietmar Lenden - Valideus Ltd: not aware of any names being taken down (at least not publically mentioned).<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><u><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Situation 3: Previously registered domain (slide 7)<o:p></o:p></span></u></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Work Track Discussion:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>-- Expired Domain Deletion and Expired Registration Recovery policies should be revised - or - possible threats do not warrant policy changes.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>From the chat:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Jeff Neuman: Should we cover the final recommendations of the JAS report? I think we have had several decades of living with expired domain deletions and expired registrations without much data on name collision causing any significant issues.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) 2: indeed Jeff.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Jeff Neuman: So given that, I agree that no policy changes at this time from us are warranted.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Dietmar Lenden - Valideus Ltd: +1 Jeff.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Edmon: i feel perhaps we should say this is not a new gTLD specific issue, rather than we have no view.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Trang Nguyen: I don't.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) 2: Edmon, recommendation that we do not see the current need for Policy Development, but rather to continue with the status quo, is not "no opinion" IMO, but yes we could note that this is not specifically a *New* gTLD issue.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) 2: sorry "no view" (different situation from the 2012 round -- and discussion below).<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Edmon: thanks for the clarification cheryl<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><i><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>3. Name collisions in 2012 Round gTLDs <o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>-- Name collision framework in 2012 round (slide 9)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>-- Required to pass a controlled interruption period and be able to respond within two hours for life-threatening collision reports, for the first two years of delegation.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>-- Current number of collision reports is XXX occurrences report to ICANN, of which 0 were life-threatening.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>Work Track Discussion:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>-- 2012 round registries should extend such support beyond the 2-year period - or - occurrence experience does not warrant creation of policy to override what is in the agreements.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>[Three WT members agreeing with the second option -- no new policy.]<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>-- Continue discussion on the mailing list.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><i><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>4. Currently ongoing consensus calls and discussion themes (slides 10-16)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'>-- Review and continue discussion in Copenhagen.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>