[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Comment on Paragraph 1 of the Scope of Terms of Reference

Statton Hammock Statton.Hammock at markmonitor.com
Thu Nov 30 14:55:57 UTC 2017


I support this language in the first paragraph as well.

Statton

Statton Hammock
V.P. Global Policy & Industry Development
MarkMonitor / Part of Clarivate Analytics
Ph.:  415.971.3561
statton.hammock at markmonitor.com

From: Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Kris Seeburn
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 6:53 AM
To: Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>
Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Comment on Paragraph 1 of the Scope of Terms of Reference

+ 1

It is to the point and less ambiguous


On Nov 30, 2017, at 18:50, Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com<mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>> wrote:


With respect to the Scope of the Terms of Reference, please keep in mind that this section refers only to what will be discussed.  It is intended to make sure the right questions are being asked and the right topics are being covered.  It should also be neutral in nature to allow all sides of an issue to be discussed.

Therefore, may I suggest a slight rewording of that first paragraph to the following:

Work Track 5 will focus on developing proposed recommendations regarding the treatment of geographic names at the top level (both in ASCII and IDN form), including whether such names require consent or non-objection from applicable governmental authorities, evaluation criteria and potential grounds for objection.

This shorter rewording moves the consent or non-objection part up in the paragraph from where it is now.  The new wording does not preclude any discussions on “approvals” nor does it implicitly endorse an approval-based model.  It (hopefully) is neutral and by virtue of having the word “consent” in the paragraph will naturally lead to discussions on how one obtains consent or non-objection if required.

In addition, the term consent is already in the Applicant Guidebook, so it is a term that we are all familiar with.  And finally, according to http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/consent, the term “Consent” is synonymous with, “approval, assent, authorization, permission, allowance, acquiescence”, etc.

This is being provided as a suggestion only to move forward the conversation.  It is not being provided in any official capacity.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Senior Vice President |Valideus USA | Com Laude USA
1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600
Mclean, VA 22102, United States
E: jeff.neuman at valideus.com<mailto:jeff.neuman at valideus.com> or jeff.neuman at comlaude.com<mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>
T: +1.703.635.7514
M: +1.202.549.5079
@Jintlaw

_______________________________________________
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5



Kris Seeburn
seeburn.k at gmail.com<mailto:seeburn.k at gmail.com>

  *   www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/<http://www.linkedin.com/in/kseeburn/>

[cid:image001.gif at 01D369A8.44960160]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20171130/fb6eda26/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 51490 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20171130/fb6eda26/image001-0001.gif>


More information about the Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list