[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] WT5 Agenda, Work Plan & Consensus Call on Country & Territory Names - Please review before our call.

Carlos Raul Gutierrez carlosraul at gutierrez.se
Fri Aug 10 21:57:27 UTC 2018


Rosalía 

I submitted my position on 3 letter codes delegation in written form well before San Juan.

My position goes back to the CWG on the same issue years ago, also on record.

I can always live with a minority position here. 



On August 10, 2018 10:27:56 AM CST, "Rosalía Morales" <rosalia.morales at nic.cr> wrote:
>Dear All,
>
>We discussed the issue on 3 letter codes for months and had come to a
>consensus in our face to face meeting in San Juan. I strongly believe
>we should stick to our previous agreements and move on.
>
>Best,
>Rosalía
>[cid:B190111C-4AAD-456E-809F-8934B6CA8935]
>
>On Aug 9, 2018, at 5:52 PM, Javier Rua
><javrua at gmail.com<mailto:javrua at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>Carlos,
>
>I see you support keeping the current status of two letter-letter
>country/territory codes.  I think that’s in line with general WT
>thinking and I feel has broad support.
>
>On the other hand, like some other WT members you mention preference
>for a future policy that’s a bit more liberal or “pro delegation” in
>regards 3 letter codes that are geonames, limiting the possible
>applicants to -governmental authorities, ccTLD managers and “public
>interest entities”.
>
>Could you expand on these “public interest entities”? Could you suggest
>language in the pertinent “Recommendation” for WT consideration?
>
>Thx
>
>Javier Rúa-Jovet
>
>+1-787-396-6511
>twitter: @javrua
>skype: javier.rua1
>https://www.linkedin.com/in/javrua
>
>
>On Aug 8, 2018, at 8:50 PM, Carlos Raul Gutierrez
><carlosraul at gutierrez.se<mailto:carlosraul at gutierrez.se>> wrote:
>
>
>Dear Annebeth
>
>
>I fully support Recommendation #1 AS IS
>
>no changes there
>
>
>I don't support the recommendation on ISO 3 letter (forgot the number).
>ISO 3 letter codes should be delegated to Govs, ccTLD managers or any
>other interested PUBLIC INTEREST entities
>
>
>Don't know if this answers your question
>
>---
>Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>carlosraul at gutierrez.se<mailto:carlosraul at gutierrez.se>
>+506 8837 7176
>Aparatado 1571-1000
>COSTA RICA
>
>
>
>
>El 2018-08-08 14:48, Annebeth Lange escribió:
>
>Hi Carlos
>
>Could I ask you for one clarification? If we open up for some
>2-letter/letter combinations in the GNSO process, they will
>automatically be gTLDs. You don't think that will disturb the
>distinction we have had from the beginning that 2-characters are ccTLDs
>and 3 or more gTLDs?
>
>Kind regards,
>Annebeth
>
>
>Annebeth B Lange
>Special Adviser International Policy
>UNINETT Norid AS
>Phone: +47 959 11 559
>Mail: annebeth.lange at norid.no<mailto:annebeth.lange at norid.no>
>
>
>
>8. aug. 2018 kl. 22:43 skrev Carlos Raul Gutierrez
><carlosraul at gutierrez.se<mailto:carlosraul at gutierrez.se>>:
>
>My comments to today's call:
>
>1. "The ICANN Community may want to consider whether a future process
>should be established or determine if, when, and how specific
>interested parties, such as relevant government authorities, may apply
>for country and territory names" This paragraph is the only sensible
>part of a forward-looking recommendation and should/could be redrafted.
>I wonder if it could be enhanced, or if the only way to go is deletion
>as CW suggested.   A shorter more concise version? A more "liberal"
>version? How about: "ICANN may consider applications by specific
>interested parties, such as relevant authorities, of strings that are
>not current or future countries or territories."  Ps: The text in
>Recommendation 1 "reserving ALL two character letter letter"
>combinations-  can be enhanced.  I wonder if it's truly ALL, or if the
>potential for future countries and potential combinations is really
>much less broad? Could that be qualified somehow? I can't think of a
>future .xx or .ññ country or territory and maybe we could tweak the
>language to open this a bit and garner broad community support to move
>forward.
>
>2. Other than recommendation #1, I object strongly the text to "keep
>geo names from the delegation" in any other recommedation, unless a
>clear rationale is added to the recommendation
>
>
>3. I hope no draft goes out before a substantial non-AGB names
>discussion has taken place, including to geographic related, cultural,
>linguistic and other social  elements, ,like Apache Nation
>
>
>Best regards
>
>
>
>---
>Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>carlosraul at gutierrez.se<mailto:carlosraul at gutierrez.se>
>+506 8837 7176
>Aparatado 1571-1000
>COSTA RICA
>
>
>
>El 2018-08-08 05:09, Emily Barabas escribió:
>Dear Work Track members,
>
>Please find attached suggested revisions to the draft recommendations
>shared yesterday. Please note that this revised text includes
>clarifications and typo corrections only. Feedback on some of the more
>substantive issues will be discussed further on today's call.
>
>Kind regards,
>Emily
>
>From: Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5
><gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces at icann.org>>
>on behalf of Martin Sutton
><martin at brandregistrygroup.org<mailto:martin at brandregistrygroup.org>>
>Date: Monday, 6 August 2018 at 14:45
>To:
>"gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>"
><gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>>
>Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] WT5 Agenda, Work Plan & Consensus Call
>on Country & Territory Names - Please review before our call.
>
>Dear Work Track members,
>
>Please find below the proposed agenda for the WT5 call on Wednesday 8
>August at 13:00 UTC:
>
>1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates
>2. Review of Consensus Call Process and Work Plan
>3. Consensus Call on Country and Territory Names
>4. Wrap Up - Non-AGB Terms
>5. AOB
>
>On our upcoming call, the leadership team will introduce a work plan
>aimed at wrapping up WT5's work and delivering an Initial Report by the
>end of September. In maintaining this timeline, the leadership is
>seeking to ensure that Work Track 5 inputs can be effectively
>integrated into the work of the broader New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
>PDP Working Group in time for delivery of the PDP's Final Report. A
>copy of the work plan is attached.
>
>As outlined in the work plan, the leadership team will be holding a
>series of consensus calls on potential recommendations to include in
>WT5's Initial Report. These will be introduced in clusters, with the
>first set of recommendations focusing on country and territory names.
>The draft recommendations, which will be discussed on Wednesday, are
>attached. Work Track members are encouraged to review and provide
>feedback on these draft recommendations prior to the call on Wednesday.
>The leadership team will officially open the consensus call on this
>topic following Wednesday's call. For more information on the consensus
>call process that will be followed, please see the GNSO Working Group
>Guidelines, Section
>3.6:https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-18jun18-en.pdf
>[gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_default_files_file_field-2Dfile-2Dattach_annex-2D1-2Dgnso-2Dwg-2Dguidelines-2D18jun18-2Den.pdf&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=NVtIpaem-VqCNPYPOoZhv9ofczsIO-e3-mM3UoaoTMA&s=g15pYjxotpxtjftphXYKDMOR0bso7mS5i2CXTIVfcww&e=>.
>
>If you need a dial out for the upcoming call or would like to send an
>apology, please email gnso-secs at icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org>.
>
>Kind regards,
>
>WT5 Co-Leads
>Annebeth Lange
>Javier Rua
>Olga Cavalli
>Martin Sutton
>
>
>
>
>
>The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended
>solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or
>privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If
>you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or
>if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately
>alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any
>attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
>notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this
>message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
>Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5
><Draft Recommendations - country and territory names - v4.pdf>
><Draft Recommendations - country and territory names - v4.docx>
>_______________________________________________
>Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
>Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5
>_______________________________________________
>Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
>Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5
>_______________________________________________
>Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
>Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20180810/3c0d6785/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list