[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] [Ext] AW: Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Fri Nov 30 11:45:19 UTC 2018
I agree with the first ( para. 12) but I have difficulty with paragraph 42not due to the addition on some proposed by Jorge but on the very awkward structure of the sentence
It needs to be redrafted including suggestion made by Jorge
In fact U gave difficulties to grasp “ negative experience”as experience usually is not associated with adjective such as positive or negative due to the fact that the use of such adjective is purely subjective .
Sent from my iPhone
> On 30 Nov 2018, at 08:52, Annebeth Lange <annebeth.lange at norid.no> wrote:
> Hi all
> I have no strong objections to this. Actually, it is important to highlight it when it is only «some», so it does not seem like it is a view the whole group shares.
> Best regards,
> Annebeth B Lange
> Special Adviser International Policy
> UNINETT Norid AS
> Phone: +47 959 11 559
> Mail: annebeth.lange at norid.no
> 29. nov. 2018 kl. 22:00 skrev Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>:
>> Dear all,
>> It appears that we neglected to walk through these new comments from Jorge on the call yesterday. If there are any strong objections to the following, please respond on list by 21:00 UTC tomorrow, 30 November:
>> On page 12, remove sentence “Treatment of these strings was inconsistent.”
>> On page 42, add the word “some” to the sentence referenced below.
>> Kind regards,
>> From: "Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch" <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>
>> Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 at 11:42
>> To: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>, "gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>
>> Subject: [Ext] AW: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC
>> Dear Emily
>> Please include the following comments in the consideration:
>> Page 12: “Treatment of these strings was inconsistent.” à this is just the opinion expressed (as far as I know) by one member. “inconsistent” is a value call. We could say that there were different treatments – whether that differentiation was inconsistent or not has not been agreed.
>> Page 42: the following heading/intro seems to reflect an agreed view, when it is only the view of “some”, hence it should read “Some of the issues problems and negative experiences that some Work Track members identified from the 2012 round include the following.”
>> Best regards
>> Von: Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces at icann.org> Im Auftrag von Emily Barabas
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. November 2018 20:52
>> An: gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
>> Betreff: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC
>> Dear all,
>> Please find below the proposed agenda for the Work Track 5 call taking place tomorrow 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC for 90 mins.
>> Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates
>> Initial Report – Outstanding Items
>> Additional information request – Geographic Names Panel
>> Please find attached the latest version of the draft Initial Report. This version incorporates new feedback received in the last week. New comments are highlighted in either blue or yellow. For those highlighted in blue, the resolution was relatively straightforward and staff has proposed edits. Comments in yellow require additional input and will be discussed on the call tomorrow.
>> Kind regards,
>> Emily Barabas | Policy Manager
>> ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
>> Email: emily.barabas at icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
>> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
>> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5