[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Motion to include a notion of “Elimination of the 'non-geo use provision' for sizeable cities” in the report

[Marita Moll]

Thank you Rosalia. Nicely said.

Marita


On 9/7/2018 1:42 PM, Rosalía Morales wrote:
> Dear Mike,
>
> Stating that "The compromise of 2012 went too far kowtowing to 
> government demands, holding the entire program hostage” does not seem 
> accurate. As far as I’m concerned, the program went by pretty well for 
> some few exceptions. Taking into account the opinions of other 
> stakeholder groups is not holding the program hostage, is actually how 
> the multistakeholder model works and how this group is supposed to 
> work.  All opinions (not “demands”) are welcomed in this process and 
> are the key elements of ICANN.
>
> Best,
> Rosal'ia
>
>> On Sep 7, 2018, at 11:14 AM, Mike Rodenbaugh <mike at rodenbaugh.com 
>> <mailto:mike at rodenbaugh.com>> wrote:
>>
>> went way too far kowtowing to government demands, holding the entire 
>> program hostage
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20180907/87569541/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Rosalia-Morales.png
Type: image/png
Size: 9809 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20180907/87569541/Rosalia-Morales-0001.png>