[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Notes & Action Items - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Work Track 5 - 30 April 2019

[Julie Hedlund]

Dear Work Track 5 members,



Please see below the action items and notes from the Work Track 5 meeting today, 30 April 2019.  These high-level notes are designed to help WT5 members navigate through the content of the call and are not a substitute for the recording, transcript, or the chat, which will be posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2019-04-30+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Procedures+PDP+Work+Track+5.



Kind regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director



Notes and Action Items:

Actions:

ACTION ITEM: Check with the Portuguese Government -- comment stating only “non support”.

Brief Notes:

1. Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs): Paul McGrady has an update and has moved to a new law firm: Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP.

2. Options/Proposals: Public comment review:

a. general measures proposed to improve the New gTLD Program (see deliberations section f.1.2.5 for context) -- start on line 24

Proposal 1:
Line 24, INTA, Divergence
Line 25, Group of Registries, Divergence

Proposal 2:
Lines 27-40, Multiple commenters agree, some with qualifications
Lines 41-42, Concerns -- United States and INTA

Proposal 3:
Lines 44-48, Multiple commenters agree
Lines 49-50, RrSG and United States -- Agreement, Concerns
Line 51, BRG -- New Idea and Divergence
Line 52, ALAC -- Concerns (although seems close to divergence)
Line 53, BC -- Concerns
Line 54, RySG -- Agreement, Divergence
Lines 55-62, Multiple commenters diverge

Proposal 4:
Lines 64-75, Multiple commenters agree (some with qualifications)
Line 76-77, RrSG and NCSG -- concerns (RrSG not in support of ICANN facilitating)
Line 78, BRG -- New Idea
Line 79-80, INTA and Portuguese Government -- Divergence

Proposal 5:
Lines 82-92, Multiple commenters agree (some qualified) -- ALAC also is New Idea (line 91)
Lines 93-94, RrSG and INTA -- Agreement, New Idea
Line 95, United States -- Concerns
Line 96, RySG -- Agreement, Divergence
Line 97, CITC -- Concerns
Line 98-100, DotBerlin, Dotzon, Singapore -- Divergence

Proposal 6:
Lines 102-107, Multiple commenters agree (some qualified)
Line 108, RySG, Agreement (with qualifications), Divergence
Lines 109-118, Multiple commenters diverge

Proposal 7:
Line 120, BC -- Agreement (qualified), Concerns
Line 121, ALAC -- Agreement (qualified, limited), Concerns
Line 122-123, INTA, United States -- Concerns, Divergence
Lines 124-138, Multiple commenters Diverge

Proposal 8:
Lines 140-149, Multiple commenters agree
Line 150, RySG -- Agreement, Divergence
Line 151, United States -- Concerns, Divergence
Lines 152-158, Multiple commenters diverge

Proposal 9:
Lines 160-162, Governments of Argentina, Chile, Colombia -- Agreement
Lines 163-176, Multiple commenters diverge, United States also has concerns
Line 177, Government of Spain et al., no position

Proposal 10:
Lines 179-183, Multiple commenters agree
Line 184, RySG -- Agreement, Divergence
Line 185, United States -- Concerns, Divergence
Lines 186-194, Multiple commenters diverge, although Portuguese Government has no position
Line 195, Governments of Spain et al. -- no position

b. Options/Proposals: country and territory names (see deliberations section f.2.2.2 for context)

Proposal 11:
Line 6, Dotzon GmbH -- Agreement [however, given the wording for support in other areas, this may be do *not* support]
Line 7, ALAC -- Agreement (qualified) New Idea

Next Meeting, 06 May at 1500 UTC -- start at line 8


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20190430/3ce1d44e/attachment.html>