[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Topic Follow-Up - Non-Capital City Names

[Justine Chew]

I too support Proposal 2 with suggested amendments though I think the
square brackets in limb (b)(ii) ought to be deleted.

Justine
-----


On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 18:55, <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch> wrote:

> As said, I would favor Proposal 2.
> kindly
> Jorge
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Von: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>
> Datum: 30. August 2019 um 10:47:56 MESZ
> An: gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>
> Betreff: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Topic Follow-Up - Non-Capital City Names
>
>  Sent on behalf of the Work Track 5 Co-Leaders
>
> Dear Work Track 5 members,
>
> This email follows up on agenda item 4 covered on this week’s WT5 call:
> Closure of Discussion on Non-Capital City Names (agenda, notes, recording
> and slides available here: https://community.icann.org/x/f6ujBg). This is
> a topic that has been discussed extensively over the last two years with
> many areas in which members have divergent opinions. This week, the Work
> Track considered updated versions of two final proposals that have been
> discussed on the mailing list. Both proposals offer what the Co-Leaders
> view as modest adjustments to the existing Applicant Guidebook text. Note
> that for proposal 2, the proposer has confirmed that the correct connector
> between sub-sections (a) and (b) is “AND.” See attached for reference.
>
> If they have not already done so, WT members are encouraged to respond
> on-list about whether or not they believe they can support or accept the
> attached proposals. At this point, wordsmithing/redlining is strongly
> discouraged, especially if suggested edits fundamentally change the nature
> of the proposal. If the group comes to general agreement on one of the
> proposals, minor adjustments can be made to the text before finalizing
> recommendations if the group agrees.
>
> Our discussion of non-capital city names at this stage are narrowly
> focused. Please do not re-open broad debates, re-state arguments already
> discussed, bring forward new proposals, or request new data/research. There
> has been ample opportunity over the last two years for the Work Track to
> discuss these issues and the Work Track is concluding its work. The task
> now is to see if the Work Track can reach agreement on these final
> proposals before closing discussion. As a reminder, if the Work Track
> cannot come to an agreement on a change to the 2012 Applicant Guidebook
> provisions, the status quo will remain.
>
> We look forward to discussing your input on next week’s call and closing
> this discussion.
>
> Kind regards,
> WT5 Co-Leaders
> Olga Cavalli, Annebeth Lange, Javier Rúa-Jovet, Martin Sutton
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20190830/374f4a5a/attachment.html>