<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Excuse me for asking
about something that is probably obvious for most of you, but do
you setting aside capital cities here?</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Marita</font><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/7/2018 12:25 PM, farzaneh badii
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAN1qJvCQhcVsHpUSF2fY0Pfeke_DkskmGuuUHd1wierJuZ=Rzg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I agree. </div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I think the joke which
was taken seriously by ICANN was to give privileges to some
entities over generic names, under dubious, arbitrary
measures. </div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><font face="verdana, sans-serif">Farzaneh </font></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 12:14 PM Paul Rosenzweig
<<a href="mailto:paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US">
<div class="m_5752158546544862074WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">I join Greg and Robin in thinking
that these ideas are not “jokes.” They may or may not
be suitable for adoption in the long run, but they are
certainly worthy of extended consideration.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Paul</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Paul Rosenzweig</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a
href="mailto:paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><span
style="color:#0563c1">paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">O: +1 (202) 547-0660</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">M: +1 (202) 329-9650</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a
href="http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><span
style="color:#0563c1">www.redbranchconsulting.com</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">My PGP Key: <a
href="https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><span
style="color:#0563c1">https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 <<a
href="mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces@icann.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces@icann.org</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Greg Shatan<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, September 5, 2018 5:58 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a
href="mailto:lists@christopherwilkinson.eu"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">lists@christopherwilkinson.eu</a>
Wilkinson <<a
href="mailto:lists@christopherwilkinson.eu"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">lists@christopherwilkinson.eu</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Icann Gnso Newgtld Wg Wt5 <<a
href="mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Motion to
include a notion of “Elimination of the 'non-geo use
provision' for sizeable cities” in the report</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Christopher,</p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Not joking at all. These are all
valid and rational proposals, many of which have come
up before in our discussions.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Perhaps you mistakenly thought that
this group was charged only with giving more
preferences and privileges to “geos.” Not the case at
all. The dial can move in both directions. More to
the point, consensus comes from compromise — give to
get, and all that. While these proposals are valid in
their own right, they will also be useful in examining
possible compromises.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">In any case, if I’m joking, we’re
all joking....</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best regards,</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Greg</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 4:33 PM
<a href="mailto:lists@christopherwilkinson.eu"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">lists@christopherwilkinson.eu</a>
Wilkinson <<a
href="mailto:lists@christopherwilkinson.eu"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">lists@christopherwilkinson.eu</a>>
wrote:</p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid
#cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in
6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p>Greg: You are joking, of course.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p> </p>
<p>CW</p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<blockquote
style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Sep 4, 2018, at
7:42 PM, Greg Shatan <<a
href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:</p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">[…]</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">While
we don't really work by
"motions," since we seem to be
looking for "notions" to include
in the report, here are some
that are at least as viable as
the one suggested by Alexander:</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">extending
the "non-geo use" provision to
other existing geo categories</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">replacing
the "letter of
consent/non-objection" with a
"notice and opportunity to
object" in some or all cases.
While this concept needs
further development, that is
just more reason to put it in
the report (and to develop it
further in the meantime).</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Eliminating
the sub-national category
(since it is full of
obscurities), or subjecting it
to the "non-geo use"
provision.</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Once
a geo-use gTLD is registered,
all other variations and
translations are
unconditionally available for
registration</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">A
"bright-line" rule that any
geographic term that is not
explicitly and expressly
protected is unprotected
(i.e., no objection or
non-consent can be used to
stop its registration).
Arguably, this rule was in
place in the prior round, but
it didn't seem to work out
that way. Hence, the need for
a bright-line rule.</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">A
heightened awareness program
for governments and others
regarding the gTLD program so
that they will be more likely
to seek (or to back) a
registration for the relevant
geo-name. This could be
accompanied by structured
supports and advice to
maximize the opportunities for
future geo-applicants. (To be
clear, I am all in favor of
geo-use applications, and we
should be spending more time
facilitating them, and less
time creating veto rights.
More doors, and less walls!)</span></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">There
may be others, but that's a
start.</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Best
regards,</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif">Greg</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Sep 4,
2018 at 6:23 PM Alexander Schubert
<<a
href="mailto:alexander@schubert.berlin"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">alexander@schubert.berlin</a>>
wrote:</p>
</div>
<blockquote
style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">Hi
Emily,</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">TNX.
Just: we still haven’t solved
the “vulnerable, sizeable city”
problem. I am not much scared
about brands – more about bad
actors “abusing” the “non-geo
use” provision. If I look at
how we protect country names,
ISO 3166 3-letter codes, country
subdivisions (3166 Alpha-2) and
capital cities: I think sizeable
cities (e.g. Shanghai – 24
million people, larger than 75%
of all countries in the world)
deserve similar protections.
It’s a few hundred strings, none
of them generic, and if maybe
someone could run the cities
with more than 1 Million
inhabitants against a few
important TM databases: I don’t
think brands are really much
impacted either. Geo-name based
gTLD warehousers will only go
for BIG cities. If we require
these bad actors to loop in the
city government – they will walk
away. I think we owe it to these
city communities to make sure
they get to be able to use
“their names” in a way that they
exercise some control over it –
and not falling victim to
VC-money driven exploitation in
a “wild west” land grab style
(and potential “G7-lead” global
cyber colonialism). </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"><br>
Btw: Paul recently offered as
“solution” to apply as
“community priority application”
– so city applicants would win
“automatically”. Brilliant idea!
I happen to have (co-)founded
both: a city and a community
priority applicant. Even the
city applicant was already in
2005 planned (and set up –
including the support
acquisition, etc) to be like
what later would be called
“community applicant”. Let me
poke a few holes in that
otherwise brilliant idea:</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-m-2906189528103137873msolistparagraph"><span
style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span
style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">
</span>Only the next (or maximum
next two) application phases
will be “rounds”. In absence of
“rounds” there won’t be
contention – and no community
priority mechanism anymore! So
the “solution” is short-lived! </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-m-2906189528103137873msolistparagraph"><span
style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span
style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">
</span>It would force the
applicant to commit (even if it
later turns out they were the
ONLY applicant) to engage in
registrant authentication: a
requirement for community
priority applicants that can’t
be reversed later</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-m-2906189528103137873msolistparagraph"><span
style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span
style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">
</span>In the past 6 years I
learned literally EVERYTHING
about “how to shoot down a
community applicant” – and you
just won’t believe to what ends
people go to do it (I know, I
was at the receiving end)!
“.osaka” was LUCKY – if they had
a “real” contender (a straight
shooter) they would have NEVER
EVER gotten 15 points (and
frankly I ask myself how that
was even possible). CPE is a
cruel thing – prevailing with a
“city-based” community would be
sheer luck. And once your city
name is not unique: just forget
it.</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">Long
story short: Nope, “community
priority application” is NOT the
answer to the problem. In my
mind.<br>
<br>
<strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">So
my suggestion (yes, again!):</span></strong></p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-m-2906189528103137873msolistparagraph"><span
style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span
style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">
</span><strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Have
cities with populations over
X being treated like capital
cities. (Elimination of the
“non-geo” use provision)</span></strong></p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-m-2906189528103137873msolistparagraph"><span
style="font-family:Symbol">·</span><span
style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">
</span><strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">X
to be debated by either us
in WT5 or the ICANN
community – or both.</span></strong></p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">I
say at minimum a Million
inhabitants in the Metro Area.
Would be nice if we could have
this proposed solution in the
report – so we could see how
people react. Would obviously
require to explain the
underlying problem: the
potential “abuse” of the
“non-geo use” provision (not by
brands, but by evil-doers).
Anybody here who would like to
second my motion to have this
solution (“elimination of the
non-geo use provision for
sizeable cities”) in the report?
How to do that? Create another
silo right behind the “capital
city” silo? Or include it in the
“non-capital city” silo; and
just say that the “non-geo use
provision” is only available for
cities smaller “X”?<br>
<br>
Thanks for hearing my out,</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"
style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Alexander.berlin<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<div>
<div
style="border:none;border-top:solid
#e1e1e1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt
0in 0in 0in">
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"><strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></strong>
Emily Barabas [mailto:<a
href="mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">emily.barabas@icann.org</a>]
<br>
<strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Sent:</span></strong>
Tuesday, September 04, 2018
11:07 PM<br>
<strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">To:</span></strong>
<a
href="mailto:alexander@schubert.berlin"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">alexander@schubert.berlin</a>;
<a
href="mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org</a><br>
<strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Subject:</span></strong>
Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5]
Proposed Agenda: Work Track
5 meeting - Wednesday 5
September at 5:00 UTC</p>
</div>
</div>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">Hi
Alexander, </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">Thanks
for your question. As discussed
on the last call, based on
feedback from the WT, the
leadership team has decided not
to conduct consensus calls prior
to publishing the Initial
Report. This provides the group
more time for discussion and
does not require the WT to feel
“locked into” a position prior
to public comment. For more
information on the details, you
can review the call recording <a
href="https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2018-08-22+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Procedures+PDP+Work+Track+5"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">here</a>
and transcript <a
href="https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/transcript-rpm-review-22aug18-en.pdf"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">here</a>.
</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">An
updated work plan taking into
account this change will be
discussed tomorrow under agenda
item 3.</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">Kind
regards,</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">Emily</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<div
style="border:none;border-top:solid
#b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in
0in 0in">
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"><strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From: </span></strong>Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5
<<a
href="mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces@icann.org"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces@icann.org</a>>
on behalf of Alexander
Schubert <<a
href="mailto:alexander@schubert.berlin"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">alexander@schubert.berlin</a>><br>
<strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Reply-To:
</span></strong>"<a
href="mailto:alexander@schubert.berlin"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">alexander@schubert.berlin</a>"
<<a
href="mailto:alexander@schubert.berlin"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">alexander@schubert.berlin</a>><br>
<strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Date:
</span></strong>Tuesday, 4
September 2018 at 15:50<br>
<strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">To:
</span></strong>"<a
href="mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org</a>"
<<a
href="mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org</a>><br>
<strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Subject:
</span></strong>Re:
[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Proposed
Agenda: Work Track 5 meeting -
Wednesday 5 September at 5:00
UTC</p>
</div>
<div>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
</div>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">Hi,</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">Question:
The initially planned “consensus
call” on non-capital cities will
be subject to the next call
then? I am asking as it was
originally planned for Sep 5<sup>th</sup>
– but obviously no “consensus”
has been reached (not even
close).<br>
<br>
Thanks,</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">Alexander</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<div>
<div
style="border:none;border-top:solid
#e1e1e1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt
0in 0in 0in">
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"><strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></strong>
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 [mailto:<a
href="mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">On
Behalf Of </span></strong>Emily
Barabas<br>
<strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Sent:</span></strong>
Monday, September 03, 2018
10:20 PM<br>
<strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">To:</span></strong>
<a
href="mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org</a><br>
<strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Subject:</span></strong>
[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5]
Proposed Agenda: Work Track
5 meeting - Wednesday 5
September at 5:00 UTC</p>
</div>
</div>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">Dear
Work Track 5 members,</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">Please
find below the proposed agenda
for the Work Track 5 call
scheduled for Wednesday 5
September at 5:00 UTC for 90
minutes. </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-m-2906189528103137873p1">1.
Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI
updates (5 mins)</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-m-2906189528103137873p1">2.
Non-AGB Terms (65 mins)</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-m-2906189528103137873p1">3.
Work Plan and Initial Report (15
mins)</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-m-2906189528103137873p1">4.
AOB (5 mins)</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">If
you need a dial out or would
like an apology to be noted for
this call, please send an email
as far in advance as possible to
<a
href="mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">gnso-secs@icann.org</a>.
</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">Kind
regards,</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">Emily</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"><strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Emily Barabas </span></strong>| Policy
Manager</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"><strong><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">ICANN</span></strong>
| Internet Corporation for
Assigned Names and Numbers</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal">Email:
<a
href="mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">emily.barabas@icann.org</a>
| Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976</p>
<p
class="m_5752158546544862074m6078343542596316299ox-7b7d7803eb-msonormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list<br>
<a
href="mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org</a><br>
<a
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5"
target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5</a></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list<br>
<a
href="mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org</a><br>
<a
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5</a></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote
style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org</a><br>
<a
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5</a></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org</a><br>
<a
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5</a></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org</a><br>
<a
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5</a></blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org">Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>