[Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Proposed Agenda for 4 April 2016

[Jeff Neuman]

Dear Kavouss,

We have noted all of those great suggestions from the previous call and have them as action items.  Many of them relate to Track 3 which we will address at a later point when we split up into different subteams to work on the different tracks.  I would also like to remind the Working Group to review the ICANN Final Implementation Report at https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/program-review-29jan16-en.pdf.  That may address some of the topics you reference below.

On our next call, the plan is to review the 2007 high level principles, make sure we think they are still relevant (or whether they need some changes) and see if there are any high level overall principles we should be coming up with to govern the introduction of subsequent TLDs.  Then, time permitting, we will go into the first one or two overall questions.

I hope that helps.

Best regards,

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Senior Vice President |Valideus USA | Com Laude USA
1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600
Mclean, VA 22102, United States
E: jeff.neuman at valideus.com<mailto:jeff.neuman at valideus.com> or jeff.neuman at comlaude.com<mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>
T: +1.703.635.7514
M: +1.202.549.5079
@Jintlaw


From: gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Kavouss Arasteh via Gnso-newgtld-wg
Sent: Saturday, April 2, 2016 3:21 AM
To: Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org>
Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Proposed Agenda for 4 April 2016

Dear Steve,
Thank you very much for the message
At the last meeting of the Group,I raised the need to receive a report from ICANN on difficuilties, shorthcoming, defficiencies and problems encountred in implementing the first gTLD rould.
I also implicitly suggested that SOs/ACs , in particular, GAC be formally asked to make a list of the above mentioned issues (difficuilties, shorthcoming, defficiencies and problems encountred in implementing the first gTLD rould) and any proposed remedial actions
Moreover, I did suggest that a list of identical strings, and singular, plural strings and issue of different meaning of a string in different lanuages  ,the issue of Autions, advantages and disadvantages be also addressed.
May you pls advise on these also
Tks
Kavouss .

2016-04-01 20:41 GMT+02:00 Steve Chan via Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>>:
Dear WG Members,

Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Monday 4 April 2016 at 22:00 UTC.

  1.  Review agenda
  2.  Roll Call/SoIs
  3.  Discussion on response to Dr. Crocker (Draft letter to be distributed by Steve Coates)
  4.  Discussion regarding principles from 2007 Final Report (excerpt attached)
  5.  Discussion on Subject 1: Should there in fact be new gTLDs?
  6.  Discussion on Subject 2 (Time Permitting): TLD Types/Differentiation
  7.  AOB
Best,
Steve


Steven Chan
Sr. Policy Manager

ICANN
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
steve.chan at icann.org
<mailto:steve.chan at icann.org>
direct: +1.310.301.3886<tel:%2B1.310.301.3886>
mobile: +1.310.339.4410<tel:%2B1.310.339.4410>
tel: +1.310.301.5800<tel:%2B1.310.301.5800>
fax: +1.310.823.8649<tel:%2B1.310.823.8649>

_______________________________________________
Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20160403/254fe88f/attachment.html>