[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Scheduling Call for 29 February: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG

[Steve Chan]

Dear WG Members,

Thank you for your continued participation in the Doodle poll regarding the
recurring meeting schedule post ICANN55.

Separately, regarding the upcoming WG call that is currently scheduled for
29 February at 22:00 UTC, unfortunately, staff missed a conflict with a
Special GNSO Council meeting (which I would note Paul McGrady, at least,
raised as a concern during the first call). As a result, we have prepared a
Doodle poll to select an alternative time, which I am hoping to complete by
Wednesday, 23:39 UTC to allow for some advanced notice to WG members. Please
note your availability in the poll here and apologies for the confusion:
http://doodle.com/poll/gc6k935c9qqzxdm2.

Best,
Steve



From:  <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund via
Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
Reply-To:  Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Date:  Monday, February 22, 2016 at 5:16 PM
To:  Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele at blacknight.com>, Rafik Dammak
<rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
Cc:  "gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Scheduling Call for 29 February: New gTLD
Subsequent Procedures WG

Hi Michele,

Indeed, there is a poll that Steve Chan has just sent about the rotation of
call times post-ICANN 55.  It seemed to staff that the sense of today¹s call
was that since time is so short prior to Marrakech (and people are traveling
next week) we should schedule the call for next Monday the 29th at the same
time as today¹s call ‹ recognizing that the time may not work for some
people.

Kind regards,
Julie 

From: Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele at blacknight.com>
Date: Monday, February 22, 2016 at 8:05 PM
To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>, Julie Hedlund
<julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Cc: "gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Scheduling Call for 29 February: New gTLD
Subsequent Procedures WG

+1

The call was re-scheduled so some people who might have attended on the
original time couldn¹t at the new time

If there is to be any kind of poll about call times it should be with the
entire group

Regards

Michele

--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
http://www.blacknight.host/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://ceo.hosting/
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

From: <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Rafik Dammak via
Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
Reply-To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday 23 February 2016 at 00:33
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Cc: "gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Scheduling Call for 29 February: New gTLD
Subsequent Procedures WG

> Hi,
> 
> Thanks Julie for sharing this. I would like to highlight that doesn't make
> sense to poll about next call time only  those who could  attend today in
> first place.
> I hope that we are planning some rotation of confcall times.
> 
> Best.
> 
> Rafik 
> 
> On Feb 23, 2016 9:13 AM, "Julie Hedlund via Gnso-newgtld-wg"
> <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org> wrote:
>> Dear New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group (WG) members,
>> 
>> Per the action item on today¹s call, staff have reviewed the GNSO schedule
>> and found that there are no conflicts to hold a call on 29 February at 2200
>> UTC.  Also, after reviewing the chat room transcript there seemed to be
>> support for holding the call at that day and time.  Thus, in the interest of
>> getting the call on everyone¹s schedule as quickly as possible, we will
>> proceed to have the GNSO Secretariat schedule the call.
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Julie 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
>> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20160223/be7c09c9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4534 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20160223/be7c09c9/smime-0001.p7s>